Thursday, September 9, 2010

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

Wife Distributes Talking Points In Advance of Custody Hearing After Caught With Score of Hunky Men

Thursday, February 4, 2010 • 9:29 am


"It is important to note that I have a very fine job."

"The wife in question is of a Southern lineage, and has also been a member of the Junior League and chaired the annual Rose Bowl."

"It is an inaccurate and misleading image to claim that I have had affairs with "scores" of hunky men.

"I enjoy running at least five times a week, with two full-body gym workouts."

"Sarah welcomes and affirms any spouse who desires to have a wholesome, inclusive relationship."

"The wife believes in The Sacred Bonds of Marriage, children, family values, covenantal partnering, commitment, unity, faithfulness, love, joy, peace, dialogue, telling one's story, Holy Scripture, and many other fine concepts."

"Those who have remained in this Loving Marriage -- particularly those children for which the wife is Giving Voice -- are deeply hurt. I personally guarantee that even the grown-up children about whom it is rumored may have other ideas about how I have conducted this Faithful, Wholesome Marriage, are Deeply Hurt by the actions of the husband."

"It is important to note that Sarah's spouse has never in fact made more than $65,000 in salary in any particular year of this marriage."

Comments:

Ba Da Bing

[1] Posted by Looking for Leaders on 02-04-2010 at 09:59 AM • top

Who is this…VGR?
I do not believe in California that any of these are valid points for child custody.
Intercessor

[2] Posted by Intercessor on 02-04-2010 at 10:21 AM • top

...and then the judge yawns, stretches and says “So what?  Irrelevant…”.

[3] Posted by B. Hunter on 02-04-2010 at 10:40 AM • top

Oh wait…I believe here in California many of the judges really wish that they had affairs with scores of
“Hunky Men”.
Intercessor

[4] Posted by Intercessor on 02-04-2010 at 10:44 AM • top

Where did this come from?

[5] Posted by heart on 02-04-2010 at 11:01 AM • top

heart,

From the darkest recesses of Sarah’s mind…

[6] Posted by Greg Griffith on 02-04-2010 at 11:03 AM • top

Well, you must admit it follows the same logic as the Tec Talking Points. 

[7] Posted by Jackie on 02-04-2010 at 11:32 AM • top

Was she “caught with a score of hunky men” or was she scoring with hunky men?

Er, does it matter?

[8] Posted by Paul B on 02-04-2010 at 01:01 PM • top

“Well, you must admit it follows the same logic as the Tec Talking Points.”
I take it Jackie that you are using the definition of the word “logic” from the revisionist dictionary, as I can find no definition of the word in the OED that can be applied to the TEC talking points.

[9] Posted by tjmcmahon on 02-04-2010 at 02:08 PM • top

Why wasn’t this labelled as a palette refresher?  It’s delightful.

David Handy+

[10] Posted by New Reformation Advocate on 02-04-2010 at 02:11 PM • top

So… women of fine southern heritage who belong to the Junior League AND preside over the local rose festival are immediately absolved from any wrong doing or behavior? WOW! I was married to such a woman for 20+ years and didn’t know these facts.

[11] Posted by bdino on 02-04-2010 at 04:33 PM • top

The Junior League remark brought back memories of “A Southern Belle Primer, Or why Princess Margaret Will Never Be a Kappa Kappa Gamma.”

I bought that book after getting married, and I placed it on a prominent bookshelf. It has kept the Junior Leaguers away better than any other product I have tested.

[12] Posted by Undergroundpewster on 02-04-2010 at 06:38 PM • top

Sarah is straining bonds of affection.

[13] Posted by Dr. N. on 02-05-2010 at 08:25 AM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.