Occupy Movement: As Low As It Can Go
Chris Johnson of MCJ brings to our attention what has got to be the sickest piece of twaddle to come out of the Occupy movement yet. Seems Oakland was the site last week of the 2012 National Human Exploitation and Trafficking (H.E.A.T.) Watch Conference. As described by conference organizers, the reason for it was this:
The conference is designed to provide those professionals who intersect with children put into the commercial sex trade with the opportunity to identify the complex problems and strategic solutions for responding to CSEC victims, investigations and cases.
The response of Occupy Oakland? To protest this clear infringement on the rights of child sex workers:
The H.E.A.T. conference is a conference of pigs and their nonprofit lackeys to increase the harassment, imprisonment, marginalization and criminalization of sex workers. Fronting as a conference against “child trafficking,” this conference brings pigs and nonprofits together to develop policing strategies that line their pockets while leaving sex workers exploited and disempowered. Pigs and nonprofits hide behind lies about “safety” and “protection” while they profit off the incarceration and “reformation” of sex workers.
These pigs and nonprofits neurotically plug their ears to the fact they themselves are exactly the reason sex work can exist. Sex work, like all forms of work, can only exist within a society based on hierarchical economic systems like capitalism, which are protected by the police and patronizing reformist organizations that keep exploited people from revolting. The pigs are the enemies of sex workers, and of all workers.
Photojournalist extraordinaire Zombie described the attendance at the conference that drew so much extreme left ire:
If there’s one issue that unites Americans of all political stripes, it’s the sexual enslavement of children. Whatever our opinions on other issues, we all agree that sex trafficking and the prostituting of children is an outrage and a tragedy. Thus, conference attendees included liberal, moderate and conservative politicians; progressive nonprofit organizations; law enforcement groups; religious leaders; and (according to the conference Web site) “social services, medical providers, mental health, education, probation, and community-based organizations.” In short: Everybody.
Everybody, that is, but the moral midgets of the Occupy movement, whose souls have apparently been so warped by ideology that they are incapable of opposing the sexual exploitation of children. Zombie has much more about the “thinking” behind this, but two photos she snapped really tell you all you need to know:
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the Occupy movement: child trafficking enablers.
Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
13 comments
July 28, we have a demonstration and fund raiser against human trafficking here in Sioux Falls. Fortunately, there’s no significant “Occupy Sioux Falls” to anticipate.
Women are brought into South Dakota from out of state during hunting seasons. Trailer camps spring up in out of the way places.
A friend who lives in Minneapolis reports that there is active recruiting of strippers at clubs there for this South Dakota seasonal sex business.
This stuff goes on right under our noses in all kinds of seemingly “nice” places.
Thanks for helping to out this Occupy idiocy.
[1] Posted by Timothy Fountain on 6-18-2012 at 09:01 PM · [top]
I am outraged, but not surprised, that in their outrage over what they perceive as their own mythical exploitation by the forces of capitalism, that the Occupiers are perfectly willing to allow real people (minors who cannot defend themselves) to be exploited by reprobates who would truly feast upon our children with impunity.
Then again, is it not just a deeper shade of grey coming out of the intellectual infanticide movement? We do have, after all, a growing culture not only willing to cheer women who have had abortions and treat them as heroes, but lots of people who talk about having children as a punishment or even a disease. I have a small pro-life video blog, and you should see some of the comments I get.
[2] Posted by All-Is-True on 6-18-2012 at 11:27 PM · [top]
Episcopal Liberals declare war on episcopal liberals over property in the occupy movement; rector of Trinity Wall Street has Bishop Packard arrested, charged, found guilty and sentenced.
http://episcopaldigitalnetwork.com/ens/2012/06/18/bishop-priest-convicted-of-trespassing-in-occupy-demonstration/
[3] Posted by Brad Drell on 6-18-2012 at 11:48 PM · [top]
You truly can’t make this stuff up.
[4] Posted by Brad Drell on 6-18-2012 at 11:49 PM · [top]
Imagine that.
[5] Posted by Timothy Fountain on 6-19-2012 at 06:19 AM · [top]
“all forms of work, can only exist within a society based on hierarchical economic systems like capitalism, which are protected by the police and patronizing reformist organizations that keep exploited people from revolting”
I know, I left out the sex stuff. But at the base economic level, whoever issued this statement is insane. Without work, there is no food, no shelter, no clothing. There certainly are no news reporters to document what Occupy or anyone else has to say, no streets or roads for them to use to get to demonstrations, no city for their demonstration.
Granted, without food, shelter, roads, boats, airplanes, trains, there would be no sex trade, at least nothing on a global scale. But then, if this Occupy group is successful in overthrowing the hierarchy, there would be no more work, and anyone who had hoarded enough food to last 2 weeks would die of the plague caused by all the unburied bodies of those who starved to death. So, in that sense, they are correct, they have a solution to all the human problems on the planet. It is just a solution that humanity has been WORKING to avoid for its entire existence.
[6] Posted by tjmcmahon on 6-19-2012 at 06:44 AM · [top]
Thanks for pointing that out, TJ. In focusing on the sex traffic aspect of this, I’d completely overlooked it. These people really do exist in some kind of parallel dimension.
[7] Posted by David Fischler on 6-19-2012 at 07:33 AM · [top]
I’m at a loss for words. I knew the Occupy crowd were . . . low-lifes, but, wow, incredible.
[8] Posted by Newbie Anglican on 6-19-2012 at 09:12 AM · [top]
Oh, and Occupy can go lower. Don’t over(under)estimate them.
[9] Posted by Newbie Anglican on 6-19-2012 at 10:04 AM · [top]
Sanity does not seem to be the strong suit within Occupy.
[10] Posted by Jeffersonian on 6-19-2012 at 12:28 PM · [top]
Wow, I didn’t know that capitalists had police who made people do certain jobs. Here I thought capitalism was the free exchange of goods and services without compulsion or coercion. I thought that socialism determined who could do what, when, and forced them. Silly me.
I suppose the occupiers would want the state to run the sex trade in a non-hierarchal, non-coercive way. But since that state makes people do things, and people are kept in line through fear and intimidation, that makes everyone a slave. Huh. Who could guess a non-hierarchal, egalitarian total state could turn out that way?
[11] Posted by Theron Walker✙ on 6-19-2012 at 07:24 PM · [top]
The left-hand photo above makes all clear. What kind of person could stand there with a sign defending “minor sex workers”?
[12] Posted by Katherine on 6-20-2012 at 06:47 AM · [top]
Katherine: Exactly my thought. To these people, the villains are not the traffickers who enslave children in sex work, but the police and others who seek to rescue them. Yes, there are evil cops who take advantage of those they are sworn to protect, but the mindset of the Occupy people, where all cops are tyrannous oppressors and those who impress children into sex slavery are blameless is symptomatic of ideologically-based mental illness.
[13] Posted by David Fischler on 6-20-2012 at 09:01 AM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.