May 24, 2013

June 19, 2012


Somehow This Does Not Add Up ...

  A resigned (retired) Episcopal Bishop was arrested and tried on charges of trespass in New York City. His offense? He joined (actually led) a group of protesters in their attempt to take over and occupy a vacant plot of ground that was owned by Trinity Church on Wall Street—ECUSA’s wealthiest parish.

How does he react to his conviction and sentence to five days of community service?

Trinity did not have to pursue the charges, but it opted to “protect fiduciary interests,” Packard told ENS. “It’s pretty sad. I mean, this is what our church has come to. You don’t have enough pledging units to sustain many places. So we depend on the cash flow of corporate investment. It’s a caricature of what the gospel is… It’s bewildering to me that Trinity has gone ahead with prosecuting these arrests. I fully thought they would just drop the charges,” Packard said. “I don’t put ‘trespass’ and ‘church property’ in the same sentence, somehow. Maybe I’m just naïve. I have a long history with Trinity Church.”

Now, just imagine that the shoe was on the other foot, and that Trinity Wall Street had voted to withdraw from the Episcopal Church (USA), but remain in and continue to occupy their building, which they have paid for and maintained for over 200 years.

Whom do you think that Bishop Packard would be calling “trespassers” then?


Share this story:


Recent Related Posts

Comments

Facebook comments are closed.

5 comments

Counselor, That is truely rich and I ain’t talking endowment!

[1] Posted by Carpe DCN on 6-19-2012 at 02:41 PM · [top]

Add razor wire.  It’s hell to get over razor wire in a cassock.

[2] Posted by midwestnorwegian on 6-19-2012 at 05:59 PM · [top]

It’s hell to get over razor wire in a cassock.

You too, huh?

[3] Posted by James Manley on 6-19-2012 at 06:55 PM · [top]

Ouch.  That’s gonna leave a mark.

[4] Posted by Jeffersonian on 6-19-2012 at 07:39 PM · [top]

I just read the ENS article.  If what they say is accurate, Packard is a liar.  He claims to be a go-between for OWS with Trinity, yet says he believed in good faith that it was okay for his mob to invade the latter’s property.  But if he was in discussions with the Rector of Trinity, he knew for sure that was not the case, a fact reinforced by the presence of locks on the gates of the fences they scaled.

[5] Posted by Jeffersonian on 6-19-2012 at 08:58 PM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.