
Obama’s Third-Party History
Nothing new, obviously—just a reminder and confirmation is all—truck over to NRO to read the entire piece:
On the evening of January 11, 1996, while Mitt Romney was in the final years of his run as the head of Bain Capital, Barack Obama formally joined the New Party, which was deeply hostile to the mainstream of the Democratic party and even to American capitalism. In 2008, candidate Obama deceived the American public about his potentially damaging tie to this third party. The issue remains as fresh as today’s headlines, as Romney argues that Obama is trying to move the United States toward European-style social democracy, which was precisely the New Party’s goal.
In late October 2008, when I wrote here at National Review Online that Obama had been a member of the New Party, his campaign sharply denied it, calling my claim a “crackpot smear.” Fight the Smears, an official Obama-campaign website, staunchly maintained that “Barack has been a member of only one political party, the Democratic Party.” I rebutted this, but the debate was never taken up by the mainstream press.
Recently obtained evidence from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society now definitively establishes that Obama was a member of the New Party. He also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.
Minutes of the meeting on January 11, 1996, of the New Party’s Chicago chapter read as follows:
Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.
Consistent with this, a roster of the Chicago chapter of the New Party from early 1997 lists Obama as a member, with January 11, 1996, indicated as the date he joined.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- The Obama Scandals Aren’t About Bad Government, but Big Government
- Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up
- And the Hits (to the First Amendment) Just Keep On Coming
- Never Let a Tragedy Go to Waste
- IRS Asks For “Content of Prayers”
- More from the IX Commandment beat
- Gay Marriage is to Govt. as is Study Hall to Academics

Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
6 comments
And the Mainstream Snooze Media will continue to ignore this.
If McCain or Romney had been a member of an extreme right-wing party, the MSM would be all over this.
[1] Posted by Newbie Anglican on 6-26-2012 at 07:54 AM · [top]
Will it be too much to ask for Romney to have these documents in hand at the debates, along with Fast & Furious records or any other stuff that can be excavated to show that this POTUS frequently deceives the American people?
[2] Posted by Timothy Fountain on 6-26-2012 at 08:09 AM · [top]
I heard about this months ago on conservative talk radio. But a large segment of the population still relies on the main stream media, which has been conscripted by the liberals and progressives.
[3] Posted by old lady on 6-26-2012 at 10:16 AM · [top]
The mainstream media (with the exception of CBS) has just now barely started covering Fast and Furious…no way this gets any love.
[4] Posted by B. Hunter on 6-26-2012 at 10:29 AM · [top]
Well, the New Party means well and isn’t that what counts, not the serial prevarications of BHO and his minions?
[5] Posted by Jeffersonian on 6-26-2012 at 10:47 AM · [top]
Dear American people:
“For you bear it if someone makes slaves of you, or devours you, or takes advantage of you, or puts on airs, or strikes you in the face.” (2 Corinthians 11:20 ESV)
You know, maybe TEC remains the church of our national consensus after all. Voters and pew sitters seem very much alike when it comes to following falsehood and failure.
[6] Posted by Timothy Fountain on 6-26-2012 at 10:56 AM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.