May 25, 2013

July 4, 2012


PCUSA to Vote on Changing Marriage Definition

The Presbyterian Church (USA) General Assembly will soon consider the following amendments to its Book of Order, passed last night by the Committee on Civil Union and Marriage Issues, which will change the definition of marriage:

1. Amend W-4.9001 as follows: [Text to be deleted is shown with a strike-through; text to be added or inserted is shown as italic.]

“Marriage is a gift God has given to all humankind for the well-being of the entire human family. Marriage is a civil contract covenant between a woman and a man two people, and according to the laws of the state also constitutes a civil contract. For Christians marriage is a covenant through which a man and a woman two people are called to live out together before God their lives of discipleship. In a service of Christian marriage, two people make a lifelong commitment is made by a woman and a man to each other, publicly witnessed and acknowledged by the community of faith.”

2. Amend W-4.9002 as follows: [Text to be deleted is shown with a strike-through; text to be added or inserted is shown as italic.]

“a. In preparation for the marriage service, the teaching elder shall provide for a discussion with the man and the woman two people to be married concerning” [The remainder of this section remains the same.]

3. Amend W-4.9004 as follows: [Text to be deleted is shown with a strike-through; text to be added or inserted is shown as italic.]

“The service begins with scriptural sentences and a brief statement of purpose. The man and the woman two people to be married shall declare their intention to enter into Christian marriage and shall exchange vows of love and faithfulness. The service includes appropriate passages of Scripture, which may be interpreted in various forms of proclamation. Prayers shall be offered for the couple, for the communities which support them in this new dimension of discipleship, and for all who seek to live in faithfulness. In the name of the triune God the teaching elder shall declare publicly that the woman and the man they are now joined in marriage.” [The remainder of this paragraph remains the same.]

4. Amend W-4.9006 as follows: [Text to be deleted is shown with a strike-through; text to be added or inserted is shown as italic.]

“A service of worship recognizing a civil marriage and confirming it in the community of faith may be appropriate when requested by the couple. The service will be similar to the marriage service except that the opening statement, the declaration of intention, the exchange of vows by the husband and wife two people,and the public declaration by the teaching elder† reflect the fact that the woman and man they are already married to one another according to the laws of the state.”

Translation: The PCUSA will, if this amendment is passed by the General Assembly and approved by the presbyteries, will no longer hold to a Christian definition of marriage, and will instead adopt that of a minority of state governments. Way to speak truth to power, folks.


Share this story:


Recent Related Posts

Comments

Facebook comments are closed.

5 comments

David,
Prayers ascending that the the Presbyies will not join the Piskies on their leap from the cliff.

[1] Posted by Jackie on 7-4-2012 at 09:48 AM · [top]

This looks like the work of human desires. Let us pray that the Lord’s will be done.

[2] Posted by Undergroundpewster on 7-4-2012 at 12:25 PM · [top]

I will give the Presbyterians credit for at least trying to get their Book of Order changed to new wording to reflect their new understanding instead doing the wink,wink, nod,nod approach of TEC.  They are ahead of TEC in this regard.  What they are speaking….... i am not sure what it is called…. Whatever it is, it is not Christian!

[3] Posted by SC blu cat lady on 7-4-2012 at 01:06 PM · [top]

#3, I agree that this approach has more integrity, but it is several years too late. PCUSA has been playing nudge, nudge, wink, wink with people who do conduct SSM for years now, and just this week elected a vice-moderator of General Assembly shortly after she did one!

[4] Posted by David Fischler on 7-4-2012 at 02:14 PM · [top]

I’m concerned that this approach clearly discriminates against people who’s love is too great to limit to just 2 people.

We need full inclusion for the polyamorous, not to mention the animals. This is a narrow-minded, hate filled policy change which will leave untold numbers of baptised Presbyterians to suffer the ongoing shame and guilt of not being fully accepted by their Christian family.

A fully inclusive gospel understanding would not draw such arbitrary lines.

(sarcasm off)

[5] Posted by Capn Jack Sparrow on 7-4-2012 at 03:18 PM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.