
PCUSA Vice-Moderator Resigns (UPDATED)
The Layman Online is reporting that the just elected vice-moderator of the General Assembly, Tara Spuhler McCabe, has resigned. There are no details available yet, but I’ll bring them to you as soon as they are.
UPDATE: McCabe jumped the gun, recently performing a same-sex marriage even before her denomination could vote on approving them. That’s what’s behind her resignation, according to the Presbyterian News Service:
Surrounded by controversy since it was learned she had recently signed a same-gender wedding license in Washington, D.C., 220th General Assembly vice moderator Tara Spuhler McCabe stood down from that office today (July 4). The news was greeted with a chorus of “no!” and a standing ovation from most of the commissioners as she concluded her statement.
McCabe told the Assembly that “the amount of conversation in person and comments online indicate that my confirmation (Sunday) touched a nerve. During the question-and-answer session during the moderatorial election Saturday night, the Rev. Neal D. Presa, 220th GA moderator, acknowledged that he and McCabe disagreed on the issue of same-gender marriage but their friendship outweighed their disagreement.
When Presa placed McCabe’s name in nomination as vice moderator Sunday, questions were raised on the floor and her confirmation was approved by a 55-44 percent vote.
“It was with deep sadness that the stated clerk and I received this news,” Presa told the Assembly. “But as I listened to her, I was struck by her pastoral heart and her deep love for this church and General Assembly.“
He continued, “It is clear that there are parties within the church who would not let her split confirmation vote rest, who questioned her integrity and even the authenticity and veracity of our eleven-and-a-half year friendship. I absorbed those attacks and still stand by her while this pernicious poison reared its ugly head.”
I don’t know what he’s referring to, but I think legitimate questions can be asked about a person who deliberately ignores the denomination’s Book of Order when it gets in the way of her ideological commitments. What would have actually been an act of integrity would have been to refuse nomination and election, combined with a statement that she couldn’t lead a denomination that was still practicing an injustice. But I suspect she wanted the office so she could use it to lobby the church as a whole to change its definition of marriage.
“And I have an even more steely determination to seek unity in the bonds of peace. I will deeply miss what could have been but am even more determined to seek the peace and unity of our Presbyterian family,” he concluded.
“I am a pastor. That’s who God has called me to be,” McCabe told the stunned Assembly. “I think I embody the reality of a growing number of pastors who find themselves caught … between being pastors … and having a polity that restricts us from living out our pastoral calling.”
There’s always the UCC, Pastor.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- Indoctrination Through Hymnody in the Pluralistic Church
- PCUSA Apes Mafia
- Church of Scotland (Presbyterian) “to Seize Back” Evangelical Church Building and Assets
- Talk, Talk, Talk
- Make Up Your Minds!
- PCUSA General Assembly Wrap-Up: At the Edge of the Cliff
- Gay Marriage Debate Begins at PCUSA GA (UPDATED)

Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
3 comments
Who is to argue with a pastoral calling?
[1] Posted by Undergroundpewster on 7-4-2012 at 02:54 PM · [top]
For some, having a “pastoral calling” is license to tell God what to do.
[2] Posted by David Fischler on 7-4-2012 at 02:56 PM · [top]
Two possibilities: She discovered a conscience or she’ll play the martyr card next time the Moderator slot comes open.
[3] Posted by Bill2 on 7-4-2012 at 10:14 PM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.