[CofE] General Synod Adjourns Women Bishops Vote Until Autumn
The gist of it is that they’ve sent the legislation back to the House of Bishops to have another think about whether they really want to put in safeguards for conservatives. The BBC has a summary report:
The Church of England is to delay a final vote on the consecration of women bishops to allow a late amendment to be reconsidered.
The General Synod voted by 288 votes to 144 to adjourn the debate, after protests from pro-women campaigners.
They object to an amendment to the draft law allowing parishes who do not accept women bishops to request a male bishop who shares their beliefs.
The new vote is likely to happen at a special Synod session in November.
The draft law was amended by the Synod’s House of Bishops in May.
It already contained a provision for parishes who object to women bishops to request that they be placed under the care of a male bishop.
But the amendment went further, specifying that the stand-in bishop should exercise their ministry in accordance with the parish’s opinions on the issue.
That caused uproar within the Church, as many who favour of women bishops said it embedded discrimination into the law.
‘Lower the temperature’
The debate has been taking place at the second meeting of the Church’s governing body this year, held at York University.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, warned that an adjournment would not be a “panacea” but would give a chance to “lower the temperature” within the Church of England over the dispute.
“When there is a reaction of real hurt and offence in the Church, Christians, and Christian pastors in particular, cannot afford to ignore it.
“If other bishops feel as I do, they will need to examine themselves and feel appropriate penitence that they did not recognise just how difficult that was going to be,” he added.
The bishops of the Church of England will reconsider the amendment - known as clause 5 (1) (c) - over the summer, with the legislation set to return for final approval in November.
It was feared that the legislation, if voted on in its current form, would not have gained the necessary two-thirds majority in all three Houses of the Synod, of Bishops, Clergy and Laity, and would have fallen.
Grace and generosity
Many of the supporters of women bishops who were dismayed by the amendment believe that in practice male bishops and priests would be appointed who were in sympathy with the views of the parishes they looked after. But they object to enshrining this in law.
One group of women clergy wrote last week that the amendment sought to “plant legislation where grace and generosity would have flourished”.
The Archdeacon of Hackney, the Venerable Rachel Treweek, told the General Synod it was with “deep sadness” that she was unable to vote for the Measure while it contained the clause.
She said: “It seems clause 5 (1) (c) exists because of fear and lack of trust. That is a sad reflection on a Church that proclaims the perfect love of God.”
Campaign group Women and the Church (WATCH) said in a statement it was relieved that the vote had been delayed.
The Rev Rachel Weir, Chair of WATCH, said: “We hope that there will be a thorough consultation process… so that whatever is presented to General Synod in November keeps faith with the dioceses that voted overwhelmingly for the unamended Measure”.
But a statement from Anglo-Catholic opposition group Forward in Faith expressed its disappointment at the vote suspension.
“We call upon the House of Bishops to stand firm in the face of this unwarranted pressure and to return the draft Measure to the Synod in a form which will provide for the future of traditional Catholics and conservative evangelicals,” it said.
The Rev Rod Thomas, leader of the conservative evangelical group Reform, said the House of Bishops had “a huge amount of work to do.”
“Unless it comes up with clear space for us to have a permanent space in the Church,” he said, the legislation would fail.
The Rt Rev Nigel McCulloch, Bishop of Manchester and chairman of the steering committee for the legislation, said before the vote it would be “nothing short of tragic and hugely damaging” to the Church’s reputation if the legislation were to be voted down.
“We need to get this legislation right, we need to get it passed. If to achieve that a little more time and reflection is required, then so be it,” he said.
The adjournment comes after more than 12 years of work on legislation to allow women bishops, and 20 years after the Church approved women clergy.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- A (Formerly Anglo-)Catholic on the Anglican Flaw
- Grafton Appointment Exposes Massive Differences in the Anglican Church in Australia
- Perth Same-Sex Marriage Vote - Provincial Council Says “No”
- Dan Savage is right
- Australia’s First Female Diocesan Bishop - we should ordain homosexuals and the Cross does not save
- U.S. designates more Religion-of-Peaceniks as terror groups
- CofE bishop Alan Wilson takes low road in same sex rite debate
Are you reading this?
Advertising on Stand Firm works!
Click here for details.