South Dakota pro-life legal team celebrates appellate win; slams PP intimidation
Normally, we would end our public comments with the statement above. However, we feel that, in this instance, given the fact that South Dakota’s Informed Consent Statute, passed to protect the interests of pregnant mothers in South Dakota, was the subject of false claims and protracted litigation that took seven years to conclude, and required the Intervenors to win four different appeals in the Eighth Circuit, requires further comment.
Throughout the legislative processes, over the past eight years, and all during the pending of this litigation, as well as that of the new case now pending in the District Court (in which Alpha Center and Care Net are party Intervenors), Planned Parenthood has threatened expensive litigation and counsel fees. Planned Parenthood has argued that they should be free to perform their radical abortion practices the way its New York City office prefers and that the people of the State of South Dakota should not impose regulations that reflect the values of the people of the State; and the people should not protect the interests of their pregnant mothers.
Planned Parenthood has been proven completely wrong on every issue in the case. The
State Statute is a constitutionally valid method to protect pregnant mothers. Harold Cassidy stated:
“The people of the State of South Dakota have stood up to the threats, false accusations and litigation tactics of Planned Parenthood. In the process, the people of South Dakota have shown that they will not be intimidated by threats of litigation, threats of payment of attorneys’ fees, and will hold fast to their conviction that a handful of people in New York, with a radical philosophy, will not dictate to the people of South Dakota, when, if, and how they will protect their women from harm, pressure, coercion and false and incomplete information when making the most important decision of their lives.”
It is worth noting that Planned Parenthood gets federal money - your taxes - to operate and carry on this kind of partisan intimidation.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- Capitalism and Community
- Adoption: Recipe for Virtually Automatic Audit
- States Have a Right to Protect Residents from Illegal Immigration
- Gang Immigration Bill (S.744) is Comprehensively Flawed
- The Obama Scandals Aren’t About Bad Government, but Big Government
- Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up
- And the Hits (to the First Amendment) Just Keep On Coming
Are you reading this?
Advertising on Stand Firm works!
Click here for details.