May 24, 2013

July 27, 2012


Double Down on Stupid

Yesterday, one of the politicians who uses the Constitution for toilet paper decided that mere newspaper reporting that made him look like a Soviet apparatchik was not good enough. Proco “Joe” Moreno took to the pages of the Chicago Tribune to remove any doubt:

Home Depot in the 2500 block of North Elston Avenue wants to sell a piece of its land so that a Chick-fil-A restaurant can open in the 1st Ward, where I am alderman. It would be the fast-food chain’s first “stand-alone” Chicago restaurant. But to subdivide the land, the companies need my approval.

Initially, I had some traffic concerns with their plan. But then I heard the bigoted, homophobic comments by Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy, who recently came out against same-sex marriage.

There are consequences for one’s actions, statements and beliefs. Because of this man’s ignorance, I will deny Chick-fil-A a permit to open a restaurant in my ward.

Because his name is apparently an anagram for “petty tyrant.” If ignorance were a reason to deny someone something, Alderman Moreno would never be allowed to roam the streets without an ankle monitor and a nanny who could help him read hard words on traffic signs like “stop” and “yield.”

Obviously, Cathy has the right to believe, say and give money to whatever cause he wants. But my belief in equality is resolute, and if I were to take the easy way out and turn a blind eye to his remarks, I would be turning my back on the principles I stand for.

Those principles being government control and suppression of ungood thoughts and beliefs.

Chick-fil-A did put out a damage-control response, which was basically worthless lip service. If company officials read this commentary, they most likely will come back with the trite corporate accusation, which is rolled out every time a business has a problem with government: “Ald. Moreno doesn’t care about jobs.”

Actually, they will probably come out with the untrite response, “Ald. Moreno doesn’t care about freedom of religion, speech, or association,” followed by, “see you in court.”

Nothing could be further from the truth. I am proud of my track record on promoting and assisting businesses to open and grow in the 1st Ward. I would argue that a company with such overtly bigoted beliefs is bad for business and jobs in the 1st Ward, not the reverse.

“Bigoted beliefs.” I am getting truly sick of hearing this, especially from yobs like Moreno, whose bigotry toward those who don’t believe as he does is palpable. I think the word that applies here is “projection.” It’s obvious that Moreno (and lots of his like-minded liberals) genuinely hate those who disagree with them. They hate conservatives, they hate Republicans, they hate traditional Christians, they hate Second Amendment advocates, they hate those who support smaller (and less tyrannical) government, they hate pro-lifers, they hate pretty much anyone who doesn’t toe their ideological line. That being the case, they assume that those on the other side must hate anyone who doesn’t conform as well. It is beyond their comprehension, for instance, that those who oppose gay marriage don’t hate gays, so they must, by definition, be bigots. From now on, whenever we hear someone call those who oppose gay marriage bigots or hateful, we should all call back, “PROJECTION! PROJECTION!”

I represent a diverse, forward-thinking community, and I’m sure the majority of 1st Warders find Cathy’s comments and attitude repugnant. Even if I did give Chick-fil-A the go-ahead, I suspect many in my community wouldn’t spend their dollars there.

But since I’m the Big Cheese in this here district, and what I say goes, I’m not going to give those who disagree the opportunity to demonstrate that disagreement by allowing my constituents to vote with their dollars. No, sir, in this district, my word is law!

I know my decision may anger or annoy some people. It’s just a chicken place, they will say. But I believe Chick-fil-A should really reconsider its platform on gay issues. Equality for LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) people is the civil rights issue of our generation. This decision is me taking a stand.

No, it’s not just a “chicken place.” It’s freedom. Not that I’d expect a Soviet apparatchik to understand a concept like that.


Share this story:


Recent Related Posts

Comments

Facebook comments are closed.

11 comments

Assume for the sake of argument that he is right and that his hip and progressive constituents would never patronize a restaurant whose head was so terrible, the smartest thing he could do would be to encourage them to open a restaurant and gloat over the inevitable failure.  He won’t do that because he would have to eat a heaping helping of crow when he was proved wrong.  I’ve never eaten in a Chick-fil-A bu but I will now, first chance I get.

[1] Posted by DaveG on 7-27-2012 at 09:54 AM · [top]

Same here. We’ve never eaten at a Chick-fil-A but we located the nearest one online and plan to have dinner there next week.

[2] Posted by Doug A on 7-27-2012 at 10:19 AM · [top]

Even the ACLU agrees that this guy is reaching beyond his powers:

“The government can regulate discrimination in employment or against customers, but what the government cannot do is to punish someone for their words,” said Adam Schwartz, senior attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois. “When an alderman refuses to allow a business to open because its owner has expressed a viewpoint the government disagrees with, the government is practicing viewpoint discrimination.”

The ACLU “strongly supports” same-sex marriage, Schwartz said, but noted that if a government can exclude a business for being against same-sex marriage, it can also exclude a business for being in support of same-sex marriage.
“But we also support the First Amendment,” he said. “We don’ think the government should exclude Chick-fil-A because of the anti-LGBT message. We believe this is clear cut.”

[3] Posted by GillianC on 7-27-2012 at 10:45 AM · [top]

DaveG and DougA—dittos—our local radio station was talking approvingly of Chick-fil-A today and folks were calling in very impressed and happy.

I think Chick-fil-A’s sales will skyrocket—and a further demonstration of the *reality* of non-cultural approval of special rights for one particular sexual orientation minority will occur, just as it did in North Carolina recently.

[4] Posted by Sarah on 7-27-2012 at 10:57 AM · [top]

“But we also support the First Amendment,” he said. “We don’ think the government should exclude Chick-fil-A because of the anti-LGBT message

What anti-LGBTQXYZ message?  The man [Dan Cathy] has merely stated he runs his business by biblical principles and as someone who takes the bible seriously, he cannot be in favor of same-sex marriage or blessings.

I’ll bet he is against people robbing banks, no matter how great their attraction to the money in the banks.

Chick-fil-A’s stated customer service motto is to welcome everyone in their stores and to serve everyone [race, gender, gender preference, religion, background, etc] the same.

I would say that is a little “projection” on the part of the ACLU,,,,,,,,

[5] Posted by Capt. Father Warren on 7-27-2012 at 11:57 AM · [top]

My staff and I are heading to our local Chick-fil-A on Wednesday.  I’ve only eaten at one once, but it’ll be a regular stop from now on.

[6] Posted by evan miller on 7-27-2012 at 02:06 PM · [top]

Next thing you know, the Alderman will ban all Chinese manufactured clothing and toys because China has unfair labor practices (I have no idea about the Chinese government stance on gay marriage), and next Christmas he will have a cold, nearly naked populace and no Santa.

[7] Posted by tjmcmahon on 7-27-2012 at 03:35 PM · [top]

Au contraire, tjmcmahon. I’m sure Moreno loves China, and fantasizes about having the kind of power that the Chinese government has.

[8] Posted by David Fischler on 7-27-2012 at 04:29 PM · [top]

Mark Steyn takes his rapier wit to Menino and Moreno:

Meanwhile, fellow mayor Tom Menino announced that Chick-fil-A would not be opening in his burg anytime soon. “If they need licenses in the city, it will be very difficult,” said His Honor. If you’ve just wandered in in the middle of the column, this guy Menino isn’t the mayor of Soviet Novosibirsk or Kampong Cham under the Khmer Rouge, but of Boston, Mass. Nevertheless, he shares the commissars’ view that in order to operate even a modest and politically inconsequential business it is necessary to demonstrate that one is in full ideological compliance with party orthodoxy. “There is no place for discrimination on Boston’s Freedom Trail,” Mayor Menino thundered in his letter to Mr. Cathy, “and no place for your company alongside it.” No, sir. On Boston’s Freedom Trail, you’re free to march in ideological lockstep with the city authorities – or else. Hard as it is to believe, there was a time when Massachusetts was a beacon of liberty: the shot heard round the world, and all that. Now it fires Bureau of Compliance permit-rejection letters round the world.

Mayor Menino subsequently backed down and claimed the severed rooster’s head left in Mr. Cathy’s bed was all just a misunderstanding. Yet, when it comes to fighting homophobia on Boston’s Freedom Trail, His Honor is highly selective. As the Boston Herald’s Michael Graham pointed out, Menino is happy to hand out municipal licenses to groups whose most prominent figures call for gays to be put to death. The mayor couldn’t have been more accommodating (including giving them $1.8 million of municipal land) of the new mosque of the Islamic Society of Boston, whose IRS returns listed as one of their seven trustees Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Like President Obama, Imam Qaradawi’s position on gays is in a state of “evolution”: He can’t decide whether to burn them or toss ‘em off a cliff. “Some say we should throw them from a high place,” he told Al-Jazeera. “Some say we should burn them, and so on. There is disagreement ... . The important thing is to treat this act as a crime.” Unlike the deplorable Mr. Cathy, Imam Qaradawi is admirably open-minded: There are so many ways to kill homosexuals, why restrict yourself to just one? In Mayor Menino’s Boston, if you take the same view of marriage as President Obama did from 2009 to 2012, he’ll run your homophobic ass out of town. But, if you want to toss those godless sodomites off the John Hancock Tower, he’ll officiate at your ribbon-cutting ceremony.

[9] Posted by Jeffersonian on 7-28-2012 at 12:34 PM · [top]

this guy Menino isn’t the mayor of Soviet Novosibirsk or Kampong Cham under the Khmer Rouge

I think that Democratic Kampuchea’s few remaining chickens may have been protected by an Endangered Species Act.

Anyway, the Khmer Rouge did something to make sure their former owners couldn’t possibly eat them.

[10] Posted by episcopalienated on 7-28-2012 at 04:55 PM · [top]

Apparently what we have here is a pretty severe mis-understanding of what the city’s role is in government.  By socialists who are taking themselves a bit too seriously.

[11] Posted by B. Hunter on 7-30-2012 at 09:19 AM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.