May 24, 2013

August 13, 2012


Louisiana’s bold bid to privatize schools

This is going to be a fascinating experiment for all of us to observe [the state has already run a pilot program]. The article makes much of the fact that some of the schools are below-par in instruction and curriculum—but when one compares that with the *actual outcomes* of the public-school educated kids in Louisiana, one realizes that those concerns are easily overcome if you’re a parent wanting your child to succeed and learn.

The issue I’m more concerned about with this system is that government dollars always deflate value; they do not increase it.  And government dollars also warp the free market, creating a price bubble that serves to maintain those businesses that should no longer exist and would not, in a free market. This inevitably increases prices [one can see the impact of government dollars on price most clearly in higher education and healthcare.] While it’s acknowledged by the Constitution that, despite that deflation in value, the State should manage some very limited duties, those duties do not include the State’s giving private schools tax dollars.

Of course, teachers are outraged by the plan, which gives parents the control to say where their children will attend school. Good.

From Reuters, where there is more:

Of the plans so far put forward, Louisiana’s plan is by far the broadest. This month, eligible families, including those with incomes nearing $60,000 a year, are submitting applications for vouchers to state-approved private schools.

That list includes some of the most prestigious schools in the state, which offer a rich menu of advanced placement courses, college-style seminars and lush grounds. The top schools, however, have just a handful of slots open. The Dunham School in Baton Rouge, for instance, has said it will accept just four voucher students, all kindergartners. As elsewhere, they will be picked in a lottery.

Far more openings are available at smaller, less prestigious religious schools, including some that are just a few years old and others that have struggled to attract tuition-paying students. ...

... The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that vouchers can be used for religious education so long as the state is not promoting any one faith but letting parents choose where to enroll their children.

In Louisiana, Superintendent of Education John White said state officials have at one time or another visited all 120 schools in the voucher program and approved their curricula, including specific texts. He said the state plans more “due diligence” over the summer, including additional site visits to assess capacity.

In general, White said he will leave it to principals to be sure their curriculum covers all subjects kids need and leave it to parents to judge the quality of each private school on the list.

That infuriates the teachers union, which is weighing a lawsuit accusing the state of improperly diverting funds from public schools to private programs of questionable value.

“Because it’s private, it’s considered to be inherently better,” said Steve Monaghan, president of the Louisiana Federation of Teachers. “From a consumer perspective, it’s buyer beware.”

To date, private schools have not had to give their students state standardized tests, so there’s no straightforward way for parents to judge their performance. Starting next year, any student on a voucher will have to take the tests; each private school must report individual results to parents and aggregate results to the state.


Share this story:


Recent Related Posts

Comments

Facebook comments are closed.

6 comments

In Louisiana the vouchers are available to any low- to middle-income student who now attends a public school where at least 25 percent of students test below grade level.

If I understand correctly, the plan is for those public school districts that are, for whatever reason, failing to deliver.  Currently, it is not fair for poor families trapped in such districts because they can’t afford other options. 
Good for the state of Louisiana.  Something needs to be done to break the gridlock in such communities.

[1] Posted by Jill Woodliff on 8-13-2012 at 06:44 AM · [top]

I am in full favor of vouchers for all and letting the students go wherever the parents prefer.  However, I have to say that I would not like my tax dollars to pay for militant Islamist schools where the students learn to be terrorists.  Beyond that, I am pretty much OK.  No income requirements up or down.

[2] Posted by old lady on 8-13-2012 at 07:37 AM · [top]

“To date, private schools have not had to give their students state standardized tests, so there’s no straightforward way for parents to judge their performance.”

Are ‘state standardized tests” a valid indicator of performance? As I recall, the private schools in New Orleans had high graduation rates and high percentages of college bound graduates, less violence, and other things that parents might consider desirable.

[3] Posted by Undergroundpewster on 8-13-2012 at 08:25 AM · [top]

I think the ethical imperative here is giving the power of choice to parents.  This empowers them, and gives them ownership in their child’s education.  How can this be bad?

[4] Posted by Father Bob Hackendorf on 8-13-2012 at 12:55 PM · [top]

Pewster,
Your recollection is similar to what I remember from living in NO,LA decades ago. The public schools in Orleans Parish were never particularly wonderful and some were pretty awful.  I remember there being a lot of parochial schools not just RC but also Episcopal Schools in both Orleans (city proper) and Jefferson Parish (‘burbs of New Orleans). Many poor worked hard to send their kids to a parochial school with generous scholarships.

[5] Posted by SC blu cat lady on 8-13-2012 at 03:51 PM · [top]

Have not other states had similar voucher programs? How have those programs worked to better the schools?

[6] Posted by SC blu cat lady on 8-13-2012 at 03:52 PM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.