
[Just A Little Flashback] Yes, Many Republicans Supported Obamacare All Along
From Red State, where there is more:
Many of us have taken it for granted that all Republicans would work for full repeal of Obamacare. After all, not a single Republican voted for it. However, it is always important to understand the reasons why politicians support or oppose a piece of legislation.
When you listen to many prominent Republicans voicing their disdain for Obamacare, you generally hear the following complaints: it raises taxes, it cuts Medicare, it contains death panels, it is 2,700 pages long – and most notably – the individual mandate.
The problem is that these are all ancillary to the crux of what is so offensive about Obamacare. The overarching concern about Obamacare is that it harnesses the factors that have already driven up the cost of healthcare and health insurance, most prominently, the mandates and subsidies, and multiplies them to the nth degree. The tax increases, Medicare cuts, and individual mandate are merely tools to fund those interventions. Many Republicans never had a problem with them. This is why they were never repulsed by Romneycare, which doesn’t contain tax hikes and Medicare cuts. As for the individual mandate of MassCare, they contend that there is nothing wrong with a state mandate.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- They lived not only in ages past (South Sudan news)
- When Will Republicans Understand Free Market Healthcare?
- Exposing Works of Darkness II: 72 Members of Congress Confront MSM
- Exposing Works of Darkness: There’s New Cover for Pedophiles
- The New Biology: Gay Infertility
- The Media’s “Republicans Have No Obamacare Replacement” Myth
- Unlike ObamaCare, the Republican Plan Will Work

Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
4 comments
I believe a cornerstone of Ryan’s medicare plan is the ability of seniors to buy insurance policies from state run insurance exchanges. Why do we need the states running insurance exchanges? How about letting the seniors buy health insurance from any company they want to, in any state of the union, and only purchase those options which fit their specific needs?
[1] Posted by Capt. Father Warren on 8-20-2012 at 02:31 PM · [top]
Amen Capt.
[2] Posted by B. Hunter on 8-20-2012 at 02:45 PM · [top]
In fact, does it make sense for the government, paid for by YOU AND ME, in any case to be running businesses that compete against private enterprise???
[3] Posted by B. Hunter on 8-20-2012 at 02:46 PM · [top]
It makes no sense to me. And while I will agree that Paul Ryan has a decent conservative streak in him, I do not think he is anywhere close to being a Constitutional Conservative. I mean, his “radical”, “extreme” plan to balance the federal budget is going to take 30 years. Don’t get me wrong, I am glad he is on the ticket, it does give Tea Party and other conservative folks something to be enthusiastic about.
[4] Posted by Capt. Father Warren on 8-20-2012 at 06:22 PM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.