June 17, 2013

August 26, 2012


Southerners and Gs

I think most readers know how much I love exploring and toying with accents and dialects—this is a fun article on the development and changes in American and British dialects over on NRO:

That faithful pronunciation is not limited to the letter G. At the time of the Revolutionary War, American and British accents were somewhat similar, though informed by the usual geographical variations. Contrary to popular belief, colonial Americans did not speak with British accents of which the passage of time slowly has deprived them. Instead, the two accents diverged, with most of the changes being made on the British side — and somewhat deliberately, to boot.

But why is the Southern accent different? Simplistically: From 1717 up to the eve of the War of Independence, Scots-Irish from the northern and western parts of Britain moved to America, helping to populate the South. Ultimately, most of these immigrants followed the rivers, setting up home along their paths. As the University of Pennsylvania’s John Fought has argued, the consequence of this was that the inland South was filled by immigrants who extended their manner of speaking “beyond the Mississippi to Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Missouri and beyond . . . taking Inland Southern down the major rivers.” As they moved away from the coasts, the accents and modes of speech that these immigrants brought with them were incubated and preserved in the new country.

Meanwhile, across the Atlantic in Britain, Rs were going out of fashion, softening almost to the vanishing point in words like “Lord” and, for that matter, “word,” and Gs were coming in, especially among the upper classes and those who aspired to their ways. During the 19th century, British English changed dramatically, leading eventually to the quasi-codification of the Received Pronunciation that is still the calling card of the elites. Slowly but surely, the new way of speaking spread through the old country, and then to a lesser extent across the Atlantic. To varying degrees, in the cities of New York, Boston, and Philadelphia, and in a few other parts of the upper East Coast — plus a few snobbish Southern outliers such as Richmond, Charleston, and Savannah — American accents were influenced by these British changes. But outside of these areas, distance inured most from being affected, and they kept their older pronunciations, including the silent G.

With growing Southern and Western populations, Southern and Western accents are on the rise. In 1900, 61 percent of the American people lived in the Northeast and upper Midwest; in 2000, that was down to just 38 percent. One potential consequence of this trend is that you’ll hear fewer Gs. That being so, the political class had better get practicin’.


Share this story:


Recent Related Posts

Comments

Facebook comments are closed.

6 comments

Lord Peter Wimsey never says “-ing,”  but drops those final g’s consistently. 

One of the most interesting things I’ve seen is how much a full-time Maine resident, who grew up w/ pure Maine pronunciation in and around him, sounds Southern, genteel variety.

Changes to the Brit pronunciation would have happened on the England side of the ocean - when a language moves to new turf, it freezes in development.  Thus, until the income of incessant television broadcasting, etc, the islands of the Chesapeake and Carolinas had many residents who spoke English w/  an older pronunciation long gone elsewhere. 

Same thing happened with folk tales, ballads, etc - when they moved over here, the story tellers, ballad singers, etc, kept the stories as they were.  Child’s ballads were studied intensely over here to keep the earlier forms intact.


Didn’t Dory sing “Just keep swimmin’, just keep swimmin’ “? 

As for playing w/ accents, hon, youze jes gotta go Bawlmer fer slosses o’ peetsa.  An’ go dowyne ayshun, butcha ken’ drown.

[1] Posted by maineiac on 8-26-2012 at 01:34 PM · [top]

Lord Peter used what was know as “huntin’ slang,” favored by the fox hunting squires and young bloods of the Regency era.  Deliberate use of “aint” and such phrases as “It don’t signify.” are examples of the this mode of speaking.  Alistair Cooke once commented that Wimsey’s use of it was a bit unbelievable, as it had more or less gone out of fashion a good generation or so earlier.

[2] Posted by evan miller on 8-27-2012 at 10:17 AM · [top]

Ya’ll all talk funny.  All ya’ll.

From the great state of Texas.

[3] Posted by B. Hunter on 8-27-2012 at 11:24 AM · [top]

I’m just re-reading some short stories of Sayers—right before I fall asleep I fill my mind with Wimsey-sayings.

Bliss.

[4] Posted by Sarah on 8-27-2012 at 11:32 AM · [top]

Then there is the little matter of what happens when one vowel is swapped out for another. 

There is a scene from Gods and Generals where a captured Confederate soldier is explaining to a Union officer that he was only fighting to defend his rats as a Southerner.

The officer was momentarily confused, just as I was when I first read the line about “a giant protest rat in front of the building” in the article on the maintenance workers who got stiffed by GTS.

Context can be so important, and it’s always helpful to look at any pictures that have been provided.  LOL

[5] Posted by episcopalienated on 8-27-2012 at 12:12 PM · [top]

As those ‘enuine rats chant in the walls of 815, perhaps in the food areas and basement:

(high squeak)  pht-pht-pht-pht-pht-pht  

Looks like the 815ers mi’ht reply:

(non vocal, just empty air)  pthpthpthpthpthpth, perhaps thumbin’ their noses?


bye, bye,  g’s.

[6] Posted by maineiac on 8-27-2012 at 01:42 PM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.