
Secular and Religious Leftists Gang Up on Hobby Lobby
Faithful America, a creation of the National Council of Churches, has joined forces with a far left feminist organization called UltraViolet (led by former MoveOn.org activist Nita Chaudhary) to pressure Christian-led business Hobby Lobby to give up its quest to maintain its ethical standards. CharismaNews offers the details:
Christian activists are demanding Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. drop its lawsuit opposing the Health and Human Services “preventive services” mandate.
The Rev. Lance Schmitz, pastor of the Capitol Hill Church of the Nazarene in Oklahoma City, Okla., was turned away from Hobby Lobby’s headquarters Thursday when he attempted to deliver a petition.
The pastor said more than 80,000 people had signed copies of a petition circulated nationwide by the online Christian group Faithful America, and women’s rights group UltraViolet.
Hobby Lobby’s lawsuit, filed earlier this month in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, seeks protection from Obamacare’s “preventive services” mandate, which forces businesses to provide the “morning-after” and “week-after” pills—without co-pay—in their health insurance plans. If Hobby Lobby failed to comply with this mandate, it would face fines up to $1.3 million per day.
So, to summarize: Hobby Lobby is run by Christians who don’t believe in paying for abortifacient-type contraception. Faithful America and UltraViolet believe that Christians have no right to dissent from the reigning sexual and contraceptive orthodoxy which they represent, think that delivering petitions from their fellow orthodox will persuade Hobby Lobby to give up its rights.
Here’s Hobby Lobby’s side:
“By being required to make a choice between sacrificing our faith or paying millions of dollars in fines, we essentially must choose which poison pill to swallow,” explained David Green, founder and CEO of the arts and craft store company. “We simply cannot abandon our religious beliefs to comply with this mandate.”
Kyle Duncan, chief counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty—the nonprofit, public-interest law firm representing the company—was reported by the Associated Press as saying the Green family respects the religious convictions of others, “including those who do not agree with them.”
“All they are asking is for the government to give them the same respect by not forcing them to violate their religious beliefs,” he said.
In a press statement earlier this month, Duncan said the Green family is not against contraceptives—and will continue to cover birth control for their employees—but they are against abortion-inducing drugs.
The petitioners, on the other hand, take the usual hysterical approach, which is that Hobby Lobby wants to return women to the Middle Ages:
“It’s a woman’s personal decision on what kind of birth control to use,” said Cat Barr, campaign director for UltraViolet. “Hobby Lobby is out of touch with mainstream Americans. It’s not their role to be dictating medical decisions.”
Because if Hobby Lobby doesn’t pay for contraception, women won’t be able to get it, because it isn’t available without a prescription and costs thousands of dollars a month to…oh, wait.
Faithful America’s spokesman, Michael Sharrard, said a large part of the group’s efforts “is to try to counter extremists” and that it represents the “mainstream majority,” AP reports.
Because it is the mainstream position that all women should have free access to any and all types of contraception…oh, wait.
The petitions accuse the Green family of using their faith as an excuse to obstruct the reform of health care and deny women access to birth control. The signatories have vowed not to stop at the craft store until it dismisses the lawsuit.
Because women are such children that they are incapable of buying inexpensive contraception for themselves despite its universal accessibility. For Hobby Lobby to “deny women access to birth control” would essentially mean they would have to arrange for the closure of every pharmacy in America. This kind of talk, which seeks to make every employer in America serve the culture of contraception and death, is utterly contrary to any notion of freedom. That an allegedly Christian organization such as Faithful America would seek to have fellow believers violate their consciences in the service of that culture says much about how in thrall to the world so much of the religious left has become.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- The Obama Scandals Aren’t About Bad Government, but Big Government
- Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up
- And the Hits (to the First Amendment) Just Keep On Coming
- IRS Asks For “Content of Prayers”
- They lived not only in ages past (South Sudan news)
- Gay Marriage is to Govt. as is Study Hall to Academics
- Hey Anglicans, hearing the Benghazi testimony, how ‘bout that IX Commandment?

Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
17 comments
I thought the Church of the Nazarene was a rather conservative denomination. Is there some linkage between entire sanctification and free birth control that I am missing?
[1] Posted by Daniel on 9-29-2012 at 10:26 AM · [top]
I think it’s time I bought something from Hobby Lobby.
[2] Posted by Jacobsladder on 9-29-2012 at 10:46 AM · [top]
The Church of the Nazarene is a conservative denomination. Schmitz is definitely out of the mainstream among the Nazarenes.
[3] Posted by David Fischler on 9-29-2012 at 11:54 AM · [top]
If it’s a woman’s personal decision, why is she then demanding someone else pay for it? After all, it’s my personal decision as to whether to grill ribeyes for dinner tonight, but I’m not telling someone else they have to provide them to me.
And please, let’s dispense with the idea that there is the slighest difference between a secular and religious leftist. They both have the same deity: The State.
[4] Posted by Jeffersonian on 9-29-2012 at 07:29 PM · [top]
The stores are full of holiday decorations. Surely your home could use a new wreath on the door this season.
[5] Posted by midwestnorwegian on 9-30-2012 at 08:20 AM · [top]
It’s about 40 miles to the closest Hobby Lobby. Think I’ll go this afternoon and spend some money.
[6] Posted by marney on 9-30-2012 at 03:38 PM · [top]
#6 I applaud your support of Hobby Lobby. But go tomorrow, Monday, when they are open, since they, like Chick-Fil-A, are closed Sundays. Hate to see you waste 80 miles worth of gasoline!
[7] Posted by Milton on 9-30-2012 at 05:01 PM · [top]
Submission to Obamacare, and a host of other things, is becoming the modern day equivalent to saying “Caesar is Lord” and offering a pinch of incense before his image, and then being free to worship whomever else you might desire. The Left cannot stand that we are not all statists.
[8] Posted by AnglicanXn on 9-30-2012 at 06:45 PM · [top]
Obviously these children don’t understand commerce and free trade. A petition, even one with 80,000 signatures is irrelevant to a business. I’ll gladly wager that most of the signatories have never set foot inside a Hobby Lobby. That said, I was going to buy some Halloween decorations from another shop. I’ll now go the extra mile for HL.
[9] Posted by Nikolaus on 9-30-2012 at 08:03 PM · [top]
How about that! The nearest Hobby Lobby to me is about 40 miles. I think the trip will be quite delightful. I will use the time to think of all the lovely things I can buy at Hobby Lobby knowing my money is being used to enhance the coffers of a Christian organization. Possibly I can use my cell phone during the trip (hands free, of course) to entice my friends and family to do the same. As an added bonus, we will stop at Chick-Fil-A.
[10] Posted by Jackie on 9-30-2012 at 09:25 PM · [top]
“It’s a woman’s personal decision on what kind of birth control to use,”
Exactly, so why is it NOT a personal decision for Hobby Lobby that they don’t want to pay for it? Further, if it’s a woman’s person decision, shouldn’t she also take responsibility for paying for it herself?
BTW, there’s a Hobby Lobby in my city. Think, I’ll go shop there soon.
[11] Posted by flaanglican on 10-1-2012 at 08:51 AM · [top]
Love me some Hobby Lobby. I appreciate them standing up for what’s right.
[12] Posted by B. Hunter on 10-1-2012 at 01:24 PM · [top]
#7 Milton you saved me a wasted trip! Jackie, maybe I’ll see you at Chick-Fil-A on the way home.
[13] Posted by marney on 10-1-2012 at 02:34 PM · [top]
Hmmm. Me thinks a trip to Hobby Lobby is in order. There is one here in town. No doubt they have the Christmas stuff up already. A new wreath? or ?...............
[14] Posted by SC blu cat lady on 10-1-2012 at 04:57 PM · [top]
We have a Hobby Lobby here, I’ll have to give them another look.
[15] Posted by Paula Loughlin on 10-1-2012 at 05:15 PM · [top]
What thugs these people are…bullying a private business that is minding its own business. Brownshirts in America.
[16] Posted by All-Is-True on 10-2-2012 at 10:32 AM · [top]
These so called “Religious” Professional Activists define “Women’s Health Care” as no more than: Abortion surgery, birth control and abortion pills. They show no concern for other Women’s health care services and they show little or no concern for the cost of treating the sexually contacted diseases these activities produce.
If I have read this correctly this means that taxpayers and people on medicare will be stuck with paying for “Women’s Preventive Care” while “Real Women’s Health Care” will probably suffer because the new “Preventive care” services will require such a huge portion of the money budgeted for Woman’s Health Care and our Insurance premiums, Medicare premiums and Taxes will have to be increased to cover the costs.
Please correct me if I am wrong but as I understand this article it seems to say that “PREVENTIVE CARE medicines” are Co-Pay free but Co-Pays will still apply to “EXISTING ILLNESS medicines”.
[17] Posted by Betty See on 10-4-2012 at 12:42 PM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.