
Oral Arguments Tomorrow in Texas and Virginia
On October 16, beginning at 9 a.m. Central (Daylight) Time, the Texas Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in two Episcopal church property cases: first (starting at 9:00) will be The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, et al. v. The Episcopal Church, et al., Case No. 11-0265. You can find downloadable versions of all the briefs (including amici briefs) at this link. The Court’s official summary of what is at stake in the case is as follows:
The principal issue in this case is essentially the same ownership question as that in 11-0332, Robert Masterson, et al. v. Diocese of Northwest Texas, et al., set to be argued the same day: whether in Texas the a diocese seeking to leave the U.S. Episcopal Church or the larger Episcopal governing entity owns the church property in the diocese and whether ownership should be decided by “neutral principles” using established trust and property law and taking account of deeds, the governing language employed by a local church and the larger denomination, or by “compulsory deference”, determining where church members place ultimate authority over property use.
The other case, referred to in the summary of the Fort Worth case just given, is Robert Masterson, et al. v. Diocese of Northwest Texas, et al., Case No. 11-0332 (briefs may be downloaded here). Arguments in Masterson will immediately follow the Ft. Worth arguments, beginning at 9:50 a.m. Here is the Court’s summary of that case:
The principal issues in this property dispute between the diocese and a breakaway congregation are (1) whether in Texas the dispute should be decided by “neutral principles” – using established trust and property law and taking account of deeds, the governing language employed by a local church and the larger denomination – or by “compulsory deference” – determining where church members place ultimate authority over property use and (2) whether the trial court erred by deciding the diocese owns the property.
To watch the oral arguments tomorrow, go to this page and click on the respective case names when they are highlighted in blue.
As described earlier in this post, the Virginia Supreme Court will also hear oral argument tomorrow from just the attorneys for The Falls Church on why it should agree to review the decision of Judge Randy Bellows. There is no online video for court sessions, but the public is welcome to attend and listen to the brief (ten-minute) argument (The Falls Church case is No. 32 on the list of cases to be heard tomorrow), which is scheduled for 1:00 p.m.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- TEC Minnesota gives local option for same sex marriage
- DioDallas: Bishop Stanton Announces Retirement
- Gay Marriage is to Govt. as is Study Hall to Academics
- Don’t Sign the Letter
- Hey Anglicans, hearing the Benghazi testimony, how ‘bout that IX Commandment?
- GAFCON 2013 - Official Announcement
- Ruling in St. James Case Clouds the Title of Former Episcopal Parish Properties in California

Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
4 comments
God be with his faithful servants.
[1] Posted by All-Is-True on 10-15-2012 at 01:50 PM · [top]
Interesting that this is happening on the feast of Cranmer, Latimer and Ridley. May the Lord grant the Diocese of Fort Worth and Falls Church Anglican favor with the court.
[2] Posted by deanlhh on 10-15-2012 at 05:01 PM · [top]
http://texassupremecourt.mediasite.com/mediasite/Play/943cacab93aa4a548374bdeea2e263bd1d
Here is the recorded version of the oral arguments. Having witnessed it first hand, I think the justices were very well prepared and our legal counsel did an excellent job. Now we pray and await the court’s decision.
[3] Posted by cbates on 10-16-2012 at 05:25 PM · [top]
The video recording of the arguments is also on the site. Both sets of attorneys did a good job, I thought. The court has seven member for this. One Justice, Justice Wainwright, recently left the court to return to private practice, and another, Justice Lerhmann, appears to have recused herself. She was a state district judge hearing family law matters in Fort Worth before she was appointed and subsequently elected to the supreme court.
[4] Posted by Dallasite on 10-16-2012 at 08:13 PM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.