May 18, 2013

October 29, 2012


The Ideology Problem in Timbuktu Is Not al-Qaeda’s Making — It Is Classical Islam

Yup.

More over at NRO:

Andrew’s post describing the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Mali is essential, if excruciating, reading. Beyond the monstrously cruel but all too usual punishments being imposed, I’m struck by two things, which really show how willful blindness leads inexorably to spring fever: The Guardian attributes the atrocious penalties to the “menace of al-Qaida”; it also notes, however, that the “ban [on music] comes in the context of a horrifically literal and gratuitous application of Sharia law in all aspects of daily life.”

Much as I hate to be the bearer of bad news, al Qaeda did not make up sharia law. Islam did. And in the West, it is a key tenet of due process that law is imposed literally — ambiguous laws violate the principle that people of ordinary intelligence must be on fair notice of what is prohibited. There’s nothing “gratuitous” about applying as it is written.

We can keep our heads tucked snug in the sand, or we can recognize the source of the problem. As I detail in Spring Fever: The Illusion of Islamic Democracy, the literalist construction of sharia that al Qaeda’s local franchise is enforcing in Mali is “literal” because it comes from Islamic scripture, not from some purportedly “extremist” fabrication of Islam. Moreover, while it seems only militant jihadists proudly urge this construction in practice, it is enthusiastically endorsed in principle by two of the most influential institutions in the Islamic Middle East: al Azhar University and the Muslim Brotherhood.

 


Share this story:


Recent Related Posts

Comments

Facebook comments are closed.

5 comments

My wife grew up in Mali, in a small village in the south made up of Muslims, Christians and animists. Everyone got along fine. The north, then, was (as is true today) more dominated by Muslims…but there was never any threat or fear of violence. Tourists visited Timbuktu and toureg tribal areas freely. So, no, I don’t completely agree with this article. Yes Sharia and Islam go hand in hand theologically. But culturally it was not so until Al Quaida began to infiltrate.

[1] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 10-29-2012 at 01:41 PM · [top]

Matt,  that was most likely before the Wahhabist brand of Islam became dominant, reinforced and supercharged with Saudi petrodollars.  The Saudis keep the scimitars off their chubby necks by funding the lunatic Wahhabi clerics, who in turn establish the mosques that preach this form of Islam.

[2] Posted by Jeffersonian on 10-29-2012 at 02:01 PM · [top]

Our administrations war on US energy causes us to have to depend on Arab oil and pumps money into the middle east to fund more and more evil in this world.  We need to cut off the supply of western and US money to those regimes, IMHO

[3] Posted by PROPHET MICAIAH on 10-29-2012 at 05:04 PM · [top]

Matt+, good point. 

Its also interesting to look at it from a long-term perspective - Islam as a whole is fearful, because it is losing ground to Christianity.  The islamic tide that swept down through Africa over the centuries is receding.  The front-line can be found in places like northern Nigeria, Sudan, Somalia and now Mali (draw a line through them on the map).  Desperate islamists seek to turn back the Christian tide by violence, which is terrible for the victims of it, but unlikely to work in the long term.

Pray for the African Union states as they are considering the despatch of a UN-backed peace-keeping force to Mali.  Most of the troops are likely to come from Nigeria. 

This has a good precedent - troops from Uganda, Burundi, and Kenya formed the backone of the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) starting in 2008, which has pushed back the islamist Al-Shabaab in Somalia.  The UN-backed AMISOM has enjoyed far more success than its predecessors in Somalia, including US and UN forces in the 1990s.

The religious background is never highlighted in the media, but difficult to ignore - the African troops that have pushed back islamist militias in recent years tend to be Christian, and also from countries that have strong Anglican churches.

[4] Posted by MichaelA on 10-29-2012 at 05:34 PM · [top]

About a decade ago at the annual Smithsonian Folklife Festival, I was in the audience for a performance of traditional Iranian music by a woman from Iran. After her performance she took questions from the audience. One person asked her if she faced any restrictions from the Iranian government. She said she was only permitted to perform for all-female audiences and to teach female students. Otherwise, she faced no restrictions on performing and teaching traditional music.

Compare that with what was happening in the neighboring country of Afghanistan under the Taliban: If any musical instrument was discovered it was destroyed and its owner was punished - most likely by being murdered.

There are obviously different interpretations of Shariah. The interpretation that bans all music is a radical interpretation, NOT a classical interpretation.

[5] Posted by Roland on 11-5-2012 at 03:42 PM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.