
Our Allies: No Farm Bill in Lame Duck
Since 2010, when Republicans overwhelmingly won the majority in the House I could have posted something like this twice a week and more. Which is why electing Republicans has no effect in lessening the central planning efforts of our bloated and ever-expanding Federal government.
From RedState, where there is more:
Yesterday, Majority Leader Eric Cantor told a crowd in Boise, “I’m committed to bring the issue to the floor and then to see a way forward so we can get the votes to pass (a Farm Bill).”
I’d like to give him the benefit of doubt and assume that he is referring to a totally new bill – one which would sever the pernicious tie between farm subsidies and food stamp spending, while block granting the food welfare and phasing out the farm subsidies. Unfortunately, he is likely referring to the House Agriculture Committee bill (H.R. 6083). This bill should never come to the floor in a Republican Congress, let alone a lame duck session.
The House bill authorizes $957 billion in spending over 10 years, 80% of which will go towards food stamps. Despite erroneous claims in the media regarding severe cuts to food stamps, this bill actually consummates the Obama-era baseline into our entitlement empire forever. Furthermore, this bill adds an additional 3 crop insurance and price support programs that distort the market, encourage risky behavior, protect parochial interests, and are tendentious towards large farms. This bill also continues the egregious coddling of rich sugar farmers and the dairy supply regulations that you so aptly referred to as “Soviet style.”
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- Capitalism and Community
- Adoption: Recipe for Virtually Automatic Audit
- States Have a Right to Protect Residents from Illegal Immigration
- Gang Immigration Bill (S.744) is Comprehensively Flawed
- 2013 Best & Worst States For Business
- The Obama Scandals Aren’t About Bad Government, but Big Government
- Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up

Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
2 comments
Embarassingly, South Dakota’s lone Representative, Kristi Noem (R) and her Democrat challenger, Matt Varilek, are posturing as to who is most supportive of the bill’s passage.
[1] Posted by Timothy Fountain on 10-29-2012 at 11:27 AM · [top]
So very frustrating. Make it STOP.
[2] Posted by Theron Walker✙ on 10-29-2012 at 11:44 PM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.