A Well-Aimed Blast at the Communion-Wreckers
Finally: someone with the ability—and credibility—to pinpoint what is wrong with the progressive elitists in ECUSA and other branches of the Anglican Communion speaks out, and speaks forcefully. I cannot do justice to the whole article here, so you will have to click on the link below and read the entire piece in Forward in Christ Magazine. I shall do my best to whet your appetite—but please believe me, isolated excerpts (as the copyright laws require) cannot provide the same impact as reading the article from start to finish. Use the summary here to get a grasp on the scope of the article, and then take your time to read it carefully at the original site.
First, by way of introduction, the author explains:
Recently a prelate asked me if I’d be willing to write something in article form. He had seen the as-yet unedited and unpublished autobiographical/topical book I had already written contextualizing this subject (at the time of this writing, I am still in prayer and discernment for a publisher). For five years that book project had gone from a seed idea to full fruition—and it wasn’t easy. It went at an ultra-careful, uphill, in the rain snail’s-pace…. The kindly prelate ..., one of my greatest supporters, wanted to see the book happen, suggesting it might be time to go ahead and take the leap with a smaller preliminary piece. This immediately made sense and felt right, as much as it scared me. Getting some of the general concepts into an article, aiming them to a current event, making it work forced me to become an amateur editor—not my strong suit. It is quite obvious I am not a professional writer. Incidentally, the book is much broader–not as pointed as this article….
Why did the book, the art exhibition, this article, and other projects require so much emotional energy and feet-dragging? Why was I so secretive and careful the whole time? Because–this is my life experience, distilled into words. I am a sexually continent and maritally celibate 37 year-old man, finally sharing publicly that I am attracted to men. This is essentially my “coming out article”, if you will. Once it’s out there, there is no going back…. But, don’t let the subject matter put you off. I want to bring a nuance to the conversation. I do understand that it cannot be helped if readers may unfairly project what they think this article is going to say and mean. We have been conditioned by a click-bait, sound-bite media to do this. I often have to be careful not to do that myself. And if you are Anglican like myself, you know what it is to see “homosexuality” in an article and think, “Oh good grief, what now?!”.
After a little more background, the author starts with what he calls “Anglican housekeeping”:
I’m infinitely grateful that I initially got to know Anglicanism in a traditional Anglican-Catholic diocese within The Episcopal Church (TEC). In the end I actually came into TEC through a neighboring diocese (another story) with what I thought were open eyes. I wanted to be a part of the orthodox wing of the Anglican Communion. I wanted to be a part of the active movement to reform the Communion away from the zeitgeist under which it had suffered for so long. Ironically, I was confirmed the year AFTER the infamous TEC General Convention in 2003, when many were already leaving. But it only took about three years of intensive observation to learn how things actually worked. I can honestly say that TEC gave me the best intensive education in how progressivism (actually regressive) and identity politics work. The leadership and establishment in TEC ended up giving me a crash course in just how hypocritical the “generous, inclusive, open, affirming, welcoming, equality” movement of change-agents really is. From the time I first heard the words “conversation” and “listening process” in 2005-2006, I quickly discerned them to be tools of delay, shaming, isolation, and wearing down of conservatives and traditionalists….
From there on, the gloves really come off, and I cannot quote more without detracting from the unity of the whole piece, which is what gives it its force. So please do click on over and read the whole thing.
And if you choose to comment on the article here, please keep in mind the official SF guidelines in matters of critiquing what is wrong with ECUSA: no urging that those who have stayed thus far should leave, no criticism of those who have stayed, or who have already left, no proselytizing for your own church or denomination by way of comparison, and no policing of the author’s tone, or that of other commenters (the elves here will see to it that no one gets out of line). I for one would far rather see SF’s readers address the questions of: Has the author got it right about the forces that have wrecked ECUSA and the Communion thus far, or is there more to be said? How could his article help those who are still fighting the fight from within? Can clarity such as the author’s help focus the rest of us on what is still important, or is it fated to be another shout that gets lost in the stultifying dreariness of progressive blarney?
By way of a footnote, since the author mentions the present litigation in which ECUSA and the local dissenting parishes have sued his own Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, be aware that ECUSA and the dissenters’ appeal from the judgment against them in Tarrant County District Court is being heard Tuesday morning, April 19 in the 2nd Court of Appeals in Fort Worth. Please keep Bishop Iker, his Diocese, their attorneys and the Court of Appeals in your prayers.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
Are you reading this?
Advertising on Stand Firm works!
Click here for details.