March 23, 2017

June 22, 2016

UMC Withdraws from RCRC, Agency Heads Throw Tantrum

You may have heard that the United Methodist Church’s General Conference voted earlier this year to withdraw from the odious Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, a Moloch-worshipping organization that supports abortion at any time, for any reason no matter how trivial (it has stood firmly against any laws to prevent a repetition of Kermit Gosnell’s slaughterhouse, for example). The GC ordered the denomination’s General Board of Church and Society and Women’s Division to withdraw their support and affiliation. The heads of these two agencies, the Rev. Susan Henry-Crowe and Harriett Jane Olson, wrote to the RCRC to let them know, and to assure them that all non-Neanderthal Methodists were appalled with the decision and were sticking with them:

To the members and leaders of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice,

The General Conference of The United Methodist Church passed a resolution at its May 2016 session directing the General Board of Church and Society and United Methodist Women to withdraw from membership in the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice. By way of this letter we are officially communicating our withdrawal.

As founding members of the Coalition, we are well aware of the important ministries you provide in support of pastors who are counseling with women and families during the “tragic conflicts of life with life” when abortion may be considered according to the Discipline of The United Methodist Church. It is worth noting that the Conference added language to the Discipline directing the church to provide “nurturing ministries to those who terminate a pregnancy, to those in the midst of a crisis pregnancy and to those who give birth” during the same session that they voted against our continuing membership in this coalition that provides much needed resourcing in this area.

Further, The United Methodist Church continues to support the need for comprehensive education on matters of sexuality, yet we were directed to withdraw from this Coalition whose work supports just that. As you already know, during this debate and in prior years, RCRC was described as a political lobbying group. Of course, where legal rights and access are threatened, the Coalition has helped us as members reach out to advocate for women and their doctors. As our Judicial Council found, as long ago as 1992, this work does not contravene our United Methodist Book of Discipline, see Decision 683.

One of the misunderstandings that surfaced during the debate on the floor has to do with the nature of ecumenical and coalition-based work. We helped to found this coalition in 1973 in order to share perspectives, learn from each other and to advance work in areas of common interest. We have been enriched by the diverse theological perspectives around the table and this has deepened our own work. We did not come to the table to convert each other, but we were gratified by your interest in the United Methodist theological framework and our carefully nuanced position on abortion. We regret that we will no longer be there to share this with you.

Even though we will not be members of RCRC, we continue our commitment to the reproductive health of women and girls. We will continue our work to support United Methodists to grow their communities of faith to have the skills, resources and connections to help women and families in all the phases of their lives. We remain committed to meeting women in the midst of difficult circumstances with tenderness, theological groundedness and skill.

With many other members of the community of faith, we encourage the Religious Coalition on Reproductive Choice to continue its important work so that women have safe, legal and affordable access to the care they need.

I’m delighted that the Methodists decided to cut ties with the advocates for child sacrifice, but I have to wonder when they are going to get around to pulling the plug on those who stand with them and continue to sully the church’s witness.

(Hat tip: Chelsen Vicari, Juicy Ecumenism.)

Share this story:

Recent Related Posts



God bless all the unborn Methodists who have “benefitted” from the “ministry” of the RCRC and been terminated in earthly terms.  He Who formed them in the womb knows them all.  God have mercy on their souls. 

May He grant repentance and amendment of life to the RCRC members and supporters.  God have mercy on their souls, as well.

[1] Posted by dwstroudmd+ on 6-23-2016 at 08:22 AM · [top]

Or, “We will not repent.”

[2] Posted by Undergroundpewster on 6-23-2016 at 08:41 AM · [top]

Why do they think that the UMC has a “carefully nuanced position on abortion”?  Is it so, and how “nuanced” can it be?  You’re either for it or again’ it, right?

[3] Posted by GillianC on 6-23-2016 at 10:15 AM · [top]

At least they complied with the directive.  The tantrum is extra, to make them feel self-righteous about the awfulness of having to withdraw from a coalition of infanticide advocates.

[4] Posted by Katherine on 6-23-2016 at 02:22 PM · [top]

Yeah, the letter is disgusting.  It should say:

Dear RCRC -

The UMC is withdrawing from RCRC membership.

RCRC no longer represents the beliefs of the UMC, in that the Bible and Jesus Christ teaches that each life is precious, especially unborn children, and to terminate an unborn child is, in the eyes of the UMC, murder.



[5] Posted by B. Hunter on 6-24-2016 at 07:48 AM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.