[Bumped from 2007] TLC: Central New York Defends Its Defiance of Court Order
Saturday, February 6, 2010 • 4:22 pm
[Bumped from 2007
for rather obvious reasons. Here's what Matt Kennedy had to say earlier in summary about this case: "The Diocese of Central New York had more pressing concerns than the status of Good Shepherd. The wheels were starting to come off of the diocese's contrived, trumped up, and ultimately failed case against Fr. Bollinger, former Rector of St. Paul's, Owego who had openly questioned the dioceses' failure to pursue accusations of sexual abuse against one of his predecessors." Ah yes . . . what
a rich and typical example of a TEC bishop.]
Central New York Defends Its Defiance of Court Order
...In an interview with The Living Church, Canon Lewis described the case as complex with numerous rulings and motions prior to the start. She said it was regrettable that during the trial the court refused to consider any of the more than 1,000 pages of documentary evidence against Fr. Bollinger that the church attorney had prepared. She defended the diocese’s decision to withhold what became known as the Shafer Report from the court, describing it as a “privileged piece of attorney-client work product.”
The Shafer Report is identified with the last name of a previous church attorney retained by the diocese after Fr. Bollinger accused the former financial controller for the diocese of improperly gaining access to his personal financial records. In a letter to clergy after completion of the investigation, the diocese quoted a paragraph from the report, but the report itself has not been made public and there are no plans to do so, Canon Lewis said.
...more
Comments:
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see
this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.
They dig themselves further into a hole.
They go after a fellow re-appraiser for turning in a suspected child abuser who preceded him,it backfires on them and bites them in the bewtox(sorry Forrest),they continue to obfuscate(nice,shiny new word I learned on SF).
DioCNewYork,repeat after me;Bennison,Bennison,Bennison…...