Thursday, September 2, 2010

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

Leaving Home Part III

Tuesday, February 23, 2010 • 10:29 pm

Our move had been so quick, both from church and home, that we really didn't have time to sort stuff. I was afraid, and later my fears proved founded, that people were not really understanding the implications of the court order. We'd lost our building, our rectory, and all of the assets, but it was the surrender, willing though it was, of the memorials that caused, I think, the most visceral outrage and sorrow in the congregation.
From Anne
The sense of adventure and excitement carried through the rest of Sunday afternoon and evening and then Matt began to worry again. Worry became a drumbeat for him--and it was frustrating because there was nothing I could do or say to comfort him. He could intellectually affirm that God is sovereign and in control and loves us, but emotionally he seemed not to see any other possibility than the slow dissolution of the congregation.

"God loves people who get run over by trains too" he would say, or some variation on that theme, in response to my every encouragement. At some point, I just gave up and started quoting scripture at him, 'you are commanded in Scripture not to worry' I would say, which I am sure was very helpful.

Monday was the day Matt was supposed to speak with Fr. Meaghar about renting St. Andrew's. He fretted about it until mid-morning, preparing at the same time for services the second week at Conklin Ave. Baptist church...

From Matt
The rectory garage fronts the church parking-lot, so if you're backing your car out from the garage (a feat that is only possible if you can actually park your car in the garage which, filled with furniture and boxes as it was, we had yet to perform) you don't pull out into the street, you back into a parking lot.

A view of the rectory taken from the church parking lot



There is also a door to the left of the double garage doors with a doorbell--that has the same sound as the doorbell at the front door...which is some distance away. So, every time the door-bell rings there is a scramble to figure out which door to open.

The Rectory front yard



The doorbell rang at about 11:30am on Monday the 19th of January--I'd been procrastinating all morning. I had a lot more to do that day besides call Msgr Meaghar.

Our move had been so quick, both from church and home, that we really didn't have time to sort stuff. I was afraid, and later my fears proved founded, that people were not really understanding the implications of the court order. I'd written a letter describing what we could and could not remove from the church--personal items, items lent but not given, items that were bought privately but not by the church, could all be removed by owners. But items that had been bought by Good Shepherd or belonging to Good Shepherd, no longer, according to the court order, belonged to us.

The most difficult items to explain were those that people bought in memory of deceased relatives. It was incomprehensible to many of my parishioners, that a chalice, to cite one example, bought exclusively through monies donated by one of our parishioners in memory of his departed grandmother, would have to be given to the Diocese of Central New York. We'd lost our building, our rectory, and all of the assets, but it was the surrender, willing though it was, of the memorials that caused, I think, the most visceral outrage and sorrow in the congregation.

Nevertheless, the court demanded a full accounting of all assets and personal property of the parish and so we had to get together as full a list as possible.

That was my biggest task beginning Monday. I believed, due to the misunderstandings above, that in the rush to leave there may have been things taken that should have stayed. My plan was to write a second, more detailed letter describing what could and what could not be taken, and then to go back to the old church, we still had the keys, and list all the things present.

Empty hallway inside the old Good Shepherd--taken the day we returned for the final accounting



We hoped to have a full and complete accounting done by midweek when we hoped to turn over the key to the church to the Diocese of Central New York.

When the door bell rang I opened the front door only to find myself staring at a vacant porch, then ran back to the garage door and opened it to find Msgr. Meaghar.

I greeted him, a bit embarrassed by the garage packed full of boxes and furniture and asked him to come in.

We sat in the living room.

After pleasantries and more expressions of gratitude, I dove right in. We needed, I said, a place to worship and were willing to pay the full rental value not only for the rectory but also for the use of the church building from 7am to 2pm on Sunday mornings plus utilities, bills, and snow removal costs.

We were also, I told him, interested in discussing the possibilities of purchasing the property.

He'd known this of course. As early as last year when we heard about the merger of St. Andrew's and St. John's, our wardens had broached the subject with him but things were still up in the air and the Catholic diocese was not in a position to negotiate.

Our purchase plans were now in disarray. The older plan drawn up by John Chaney (Jr. Warden) assumed a court victory. It would no longer work given the loss of our assets. At this point, the only thing we had going for us was the $100,000.00 parishioners had saved up autonomously during the legal battle. It was not much considering the $700,000.00 price tag for St. Andrew's.

There were several ideas floating around:

1. We spend the year in the gym with low overhead, raising an additional 50 to 100K and, in the meantime, negotiate some equity with the Catholic Diocese of Syracuse by seeing if they would lower their asking price. Then at the end of the year, seek a bank loan. We would then seek a renter for the school building which would help us pay off the mortgage.

The west side of the church building taken in early Spring 2009



The school building



2. Pay the full rent for St. Andrews which would make it more difficult to raise the necessary money for a loan, but we could offset that problem by seeking an agreement with the Catholic diocese whereby the money we would pay for the year in rent would go to the purchase of the property. Meanwhile we would save what money we could and approach a bank at the end of a year or possibly two. Having an actual church for a meeting place, also, it was supposed, would make for increased income and prevent a much larger loss of membership.

3. A very far fetched thought was that perhaps the Diocese of Syracuse would agree to hold the mortgage for us at lower interest. This would allow us to move in immediately and start paying a mortgage instead of rent, perhaps at a lower set interest rate.

4. Ask the Diocese of Syracuse whether they would be willing to split the property, allowing us to buy only the sanctuary, parking lot and rectory and leaving the school building, storage facility and field to be sold separately.

The storage facility stands on the west side of the property in back of the school.



In this photo taken in late January, you can see the school in the right foreground, church building standing to the right in the background, and the rectory to the left of the church building



This would allow us to rent St. Andrew's, raise money for the year, keep more parishioners, and go to the bank much sooner to seek a loan.

The vestry planned to meet in the next week to discuss purchase strategies but there were strong proponents of each strategy and it promised to be a difficult meeting.

Of course, I did not share our plans with Msgr. Meaghar, I only indicated our hope to negotiate for a purchase.

Msgr. Michael Meaghar

Msgr Meaghar is in his 70's, balding, thin, with kind face. He's soft-spoken and gentle in conversation, choosing his words slowly.

I tend to speak very fast and bowl people over when I'm excited about something or have a lot of information to pass on. So I'm constantly telling myself to shut up and listen when I'm with him. This conversation was no exception.

After laying out all of our hopes, offers, and dreams, Msgr Meaghar reached into his pocket and pulled out three keys. One, he said, was an extra key for the rectory. The second was a key to the church and the third was a key for the school building.

"We'd like to offer you use of the entire property rent free for as long as it is on the market. We only ask that you pay for utilities."

He'd managed to leave me speechless again, for a moment. He smiled. Regaining myself I asked, "What can we do? There has to be something we can do? I mean this is incredibly gracious, please tell us what we can do to help you if anything?"

"There's really nothing at this point that we need," he said, "I do think we should set up a meeting at some point soon to discuss your purchase proposals. What does your calendar look like?"

We ended up setting a date for our first meeting on Friday March 13th, 2009 which would give us the time to sort through our finances and come up with a feasible proposal

As soon as Msgr Meaghar had gone, I sat down and dashed off this quick email to the entire parish:
Dear Good Shepherd,

Great news. It is confirmed that we will worship at St. Andrew's this Sunday...thanks be to God and many thanks to Msgr Meaghar of Sts John and Andrew Catholic Church.

In Christ
Matt
I made a point throughout the year to communicate bad news clearly, quickly, and without mincing words. But I also was sure to broadcast every bit of good news, however slight to the hilt with bells and whistles, using every bit of media possible. This provided a great deal of encouragement to the congregation during the dark days to come (and there were many). And, I later discovered, it evoked all kinds of exasperation, perplexity and bitterness on the part of those Episcopalians in town who were waiting expectantly for our demise and dissolution.

Only eight days after losing our building and home, God had set us down, at least for the moment, in a very good place. On Sunday we would worship in relatively recently built, much better maintained worship space four times larger than our old one, with exactly ten times the parking capacity. My family went from a split level home with one bathroom, three bedrooms, and one car garage to a two story home with finished basement and laundry, four bedrooms, three bathrooms and a two car garage. And we had the keys to the school building should we, somehow, ever need space.

Interlude: The Trauma of the Cat (by Anne)

Bander is a young, black, silky ridiculous animal we had aquired in a fit of tragedy for my mother, whose own cat in Kenya met a difficult and unhappy end. She, my mother, was here in Binghamton, awaiting the birth of Rowan and helping me cope (it was another moment in our lives when Matt had to go to General Convention and I was hoping to have a baby any day). Before Rowan was born she received news of her cat and so the obvious first response was to rush out and buy her a kitten she could take back to Kenya.

But on the eve of her flight, a young gentlemen in London attempted to ignite a bomb made from various liquids. Suddenly, at 1 in the morning before her flight, she was trying to shove all her carry on luggage into clear plastic bags and remove all gells and liquids. There was no way she was going to be able to take a cat.

So, Bander became a permanent part of our household, the only cat who would sit on a lap, and one deeply in love with all babies, but essentially shy.

Bander before the move



Rewind to Thursday afternoon the 15th of January 2008 our last day living in the old rectory, the week before the first worship service in the gym. Matt and the men from church were toward the end of the great task of moving the the bigger items out of the rectory. All the animals (we had three cats at the time including Bander, and an elderly dog named Maggie) were spooked. We'd shut some of them up in a bedroom but we could not find Bander. Had I had my wits about me, which clearly I did not, I would have packed him up in his box Thursday morning, before anything was moved anywhere. The great numbers of people packing and move all week had already made him extremely nervous and I should have been paying better attention.

I'm pretty sure it was the moving of the washer and dryer that terrified him. That was where he was last seen, hiding behind the washer. When the men lifted it, he shot out accros the floor in a flash of black fur and nobody saw where he went. To my horror, the back door had been left open. During the summer it would have been far less worrying, but temperatures that week hovered around 0 Fahrenheit. Cats generally have good sense so I persuaded myself that he would not have sought refuge outside but at the same time, there was literally nowhere to go in the house to get away from people...people were everywhere.

I had no idea that Matt, at 6pm that very evening would say, "Why don't we go sleep in the new house. Let's just get out of here. It will be better in the long run."

I couldn't think of any reason why not. With so much of our furniture gone, walls bare, and pets hiding, the old house was empty and sorrowful. It just seemed like the good thing to do.

My cat and Emma's cat obediently and angrily allowed themselves to be shoved into the carrier and then we all went searching for Bander. We couldn't find him at all but as we had to come back in the morning anyway, we decided to go without him.

By 9:30pm the car was packed with children and animals. It was snowing and frigid as we pulled away from the curb and that was that. We never spent the night in that house again as a family.

Besides putting the children in the wrong rooms (we accidentally switched the boys and girls, you'd have to be here to see how wrong it was) causing much much much wailing and weeping, we basically got through that first night in the St. Andrew's rectory. In the morning, Matt went to Men's Bible Study and then back to the old house to keep loading while I stayed at the St. Andrew's Rectory and tried to unpack essentials.

Micah and two of the kids on the day after we moved in



Gwendolyn and Rowan during moving week



The cat was not anywhere to be found all day, although everyone kept watch, and the carrier stood ready for him.

And so began a long season of checking the house three or four times a day, every day, in hopes that he would come out and come home. Unlike the church building, we did not have to immediately hand over the keys to the rectory. We had access to the house until mid-February.

Throughout the month, I made frequent trips, walking up and down and around the block, asking neighbors whether they had seen our cat, asking them to keep watch. I set a safe racoon trap. Left bowls of food and drink laying about in the house. Some mornings it looked like food had been eaten and on others it was obvious that it had not. I prayed and prayed and prayed and prayed. And finally, the last night before we were required to turn in the keys, I slept in a thick sleeping bag, next to the back door just hoping and praying that he would come to me.

But he did not. When morning came I despaired of ever finding him. I locked up the house and cursed the day I was born.

The cat, for me, came to stand for the whole black week of the move. On the one hand, God had so over extended his grace and love for us. We were in a warm, comfortable well laid out house and we were all together. Church life was all around us. We had a place to worship on Sunday mornings, Morning Prayer met every morning in the basement, all five Bible Studies were up and running, the youth group was meeting again, and so many people were busy giving their all to serve and help in so many ways.

The rectory basement set up for Morning prayer and bible study



Men's bible study meeting in the finished rectory basement



And yet, all this time there was the black smear of this cat gone missing.


Threads of Anxiety (Matt)

Though the events of week two were overall encouraging, our arrangements with Msgr Meaghar were, at the moment, tentative and temporary. Our position, realistically, was incredibly tenuous.

Money: We needed it desperately and we had little of it. If membership and pledges decreased in keeping with our pre-departure projections, it would not be difficult to burn through a good chunk of the 100K in a year's time. We not only needed to save the money we already had, but we had to find a way of making at least $50,000.00 more if we hoped to have any chance at securing a bank loan to purchase St. Andrew's within the year. How could we possibly hope to do that?

Property: Meanwhile, we were sitting on some of the most valuable real estate in town. And it was for sale. On Friday the 23rd, the end of week two, a realtor showed up at the rectory front door with some prospective buyers. They looked very interested. Rumors were flying around town that an Orthodox congregation and a Pentecostal congregation were both looking seriously at the property. The Catholic Diocese of Syracuse had been incredibly gracious, but they too had fiduciary responsibilities. If another church or company made the right offer, Syracuse would, it seemed, be obligated in all fairness to accept it...and we would, once more, be without a home.

Identity. Even if, by some miracle, we were able to raise the money to make an offer and seek a loan, how on earth could we ever hope approach a bank or lending institution? We'd just been thrown out of our buildings by the court. We had no loan history, no equity, nothing at all to show ourselves trustworthy. Who were "we" anyway. Having lost the first three counts of the lawsuit, could we still claim to be "the Church of the Good Shepherd" or had we lost our corporate identity? Would we need to form a new incorporation? And if we did what would that mean for the ongoing legal fight?

Legal troubles: The next court date was Friday March 20th. The judge would hear arguments regarding the $600,000.00 bequest and review our accounting. Our legal standing before the court was already compromised. What would happen when we turned in our accounting? The diocese was expecting at least $150,000.00 in assets. That's about how much money was on the books when they filed the lawsuit in April of 2008--that's also when, knowing their financial contributions might end up enriching the Episcopal Diocese of Central New York, the vast bulk of parishioners (with the exception of two individuals) refused to give any more money to the Church of the Good Shepherd. In order to maintain contractual obligations, pay the bills, and maintain the property, the vestry was forced, throughout 2008, to spend close to $98,000.00 of the $150,000.00 in savings. Would the diocese object to our accounting and try to sue us again for the money we spent during the lawsuit? We were told it was a possibility. The vestry took care to spend money thriftily, half-expecting the diocese to seek some kind of injunction or freeze our assets after the one attempt to negotiate some kind of agreement fell through in May of 08. They didn't. When they received less money than expected from their court victory, would they come after us for more?

Broken Pipes: On Tuesday January 20th, the day before we turned the keys into the Diocese of Central New York, two longstanding members of Good Shepherd, a husband and wife, decided to give the church building one last walk through. While there, they noticed that the office area was extremely cold. This was not unusual. The furnace that served that section of the building was prone to frequent malfunction. The usual procedure had been to open the doors leading from the offices to the sanctuary which was always quite warm. This usually brought enough warm air into office area to keep pipes from bursting. So that's what they did. They also tried to call the Diocese of Central New York to warn them of the problem but nobody answered. The next day, the temperatures rose and they figured, as usual, that all was well. Unfortunately, the hard freeze the night before had been enough to cause the pipes in the office area to burst. We found out about it a week later through our attorney. Ultimately our insurance was able to pay for the damages, but to this day, many Episcopalians in town are persuaded that we deliberately trashed the place. That false impression would come back to hurt us later.

Shepherd's Bowl: At midday on Thursday January 22nd, the day after we'd turned in the keys and accounting to the Diocese of Central New York, a parishioner stopped at the old building in order to put up signs on the outside of the windows and on the door, directing people looking for their usual warm meal at our soup kitchen to Sts. Andrew and John Catholic Church just up the street. Msgr. Meaghar had, once more, stepped up and agreed to host the Shepherd's Bowl temporarily until we found a more permanent location. By 5pm, judging by the footprints in the snow, someone with a key had entered the old building. And all the signs pointing people to the soup kitchen had been taken down. Many of our soup kitchen regulars arrived that evening only to find a dark, cold, locked building. They went away hungry, having no idea that a warm meal was waiting just one block away. Before we lost our building, we'd been the only soup kitchen operating on the south-side of Binghamton on Thursday nights. A good number of people depended on us to make ends meet. What would happen to this program? Was there any way to keep it going long term?

Mission: Good Shepherd is a church. Our primary mission is not survival, but making disciples, baptizing, and teaching all that Jesus commands. Somehow we had to move from thinking about survival to thinking about mission. God had set us down in the perfect neigborhood for it. St. Andrew's stands only one block away from a public housing complex with a good number of Muslim residents. The neighborhood beyond the public housing center is largely lower middle class, and largely unchurched. There was and is a great deal of resentment and animosity between the two demographics. The neighborhood around us was not just a setting, it was a calling. If ever there was an opportunity for a church to bring the gospel of Jesus Christ to bear on a community, this was it. And here we were.

Things had gone very well so far, much better than anyone expected. But we were still in serious trouble. We had no equity, no property, an ongoing court battle, a full accounting to defend, uncertain corporate identity, no possibility of getting a bank loan, and no firm grasp for how many people we would have with us in two to three months time. I couldn't sleep at night and even though I prayed like crazy, I felt no peace, no sense that all would be well. I remember these as some of the most despairing days of my life.
Comments:

Incredible that someone with a key—apparently from the diocese—would have the malice to enter the building and remove those signs knowing it would cause poor hungry people to walk away hungry and dejected! It defies the imagination.

[1] Posted by Josiah on 02-24-2010 at 05:30 AM • top

I, like Josiah, am appalled.  That is just evil.

[2] Posted by Newbie Anglican on 02-24-2010 at 06:28 AM • top

To be clear, we do not know who exactly removed the signs. I think that they were posted on the outside, not the inside of the building…but it is clear that someone with a key was at the building between midday and the evening and someone during that time, took the signs down.

[3] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 02-24-2010 at 07:00 AM • top

Did you ever find the cat?  They do go off sometimes.

[4] Posted by Pageantmaster on 02-24-2010 at 07:02 AM • top

RE: “Incredible that someone with a key—apparently from the diocese—would have the malice to enter the building and remove those signs knowing it would cause poor hungry people to walk away hungry and dejected!”

No—just some very very angry Episcopalians.    Who now, in 2010, must be feeling rather deprived of their prey . . .  ; > )

Matt, thank you for going through each of the sordid aspects of this Grand Adventure.  It’s good to have it all recorded and archived.  I’m proud of you and Anne.

My favorite parts of this series, however, has been 1) the fact that a Roman Catholic priest has been so incredibly generous and kind to a Truly Reformed Anglican priest, with no expectation of anything.  It’s not as if Matt’s been conducting services along the lines of the Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament or indicating any other AngloCatholic tendencies such that the RC priest might think you were teetering on the edge of conversion.

And 2) the dawning realization that I and Matt are more similar than I had thought regarding the goodness of God—that is, not that conscious of it or faithful in believing it!!!

I read this line—“God loves people who get run over by trains too” he would say, or some variation on that theme, in response to my every encouragement”—and I thought “right on, Matt, preach it brother!”

; > )

[5] Posted by Sarah on 02-24-2010 at 07:22 AM • top

So how honked off was the Episcopal Diocese that the Romans Catholics were so darn nice?

[6] Posted by Nasty, Brutish & Short on 02-24-2010 at 08:07 AM • top

heh…good question. The Syracuse offices for the Catholic Diocese of Syracuse are right next door to the offices of the Episcopal Diocese of Central New York…

[7] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 02-24-2010 at 08:08 AM • top

Right next door…interesting.  Snowball fight, anyone?

At some point in this series it would be interesting to get a run down on how nice the other denominations in the area were (or how mean they were).  And, were there ANY Episcopalians in the area who were charitable to you all?  I would like to think there were at least some priests in the diocese who at least managed to say “we’re sorry.”

[8] Posted by Nasty, Brutish & Short on 02-24-2010 at 08:14 AM • top

Matt, I’ll be glad to take those two little munchkins in the box off your hands, if you ever get around to unpacking them.

[9] Posted by Greg Griffith on 02-24-2010 at 08:21 AM • top

Hi Nasty, Brutish & Short,

The list pastors and churches that helped us or in some way encouraged us is fairly exhaustive. Presbyterians, Baptists, Free Methodists, Methodists, Catholics, Orthodox, Pentecostal, non-denominational…the outpouring was incredible. We were and are fairly well hooked into the ecumenical gatherings of evangelical and conservative pastors around town since we had been very deeply involved in bringing Franklin Graham to town.

Of course our actions were not as well received by liberal pastors locally but none said or did anything unsupportive and some expressed dismay that the Episcopal Church would do what she did.

There was one act of kindness by an Episcopal priest which we will describe in another installment. But other than that, the response has been uniformly spiteful. The only Episcopalians in town from the five episcopal churches in this area who I have heard from either directly or through connections that still exist through parishioners, express a great deal of frustration that we did not fold and believe that the only reason we did not is that we did something dishonest. we have been accused of stealing, lying, cheating, trashing our buildings, etc… They are, I have heard, embittered that we are thriving and that the lawsuit has finally settled.

It is rather sad.

[10] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 02-24-2010 at 08:25 AM • top

RE: “It is rather sad.”

But so so unsurprising.  And just think, Matt . . . all around TEC there are revisionist activists who are embittered, spiteful, and frustrated that you are thriving.  ; > )

Hey Matt, on another note, what are the five other Episcopal parishes in the area?  Do they all reside in Binghamton?

[11] Posted by Sarah on 02-24-2010 at 08:36 AM • top

I suspected that was the case, Matt.  Presbyterians, Baptists, Free Methodists, Methodists, Catholics, Orthodox, Pentecostal, non-denominational…it sounds like you passed the rigorous parameters of “peer review.”

[12] Posted by Nasty, Brutish & Short on 02-24-2010 at 08:36 AM • top

sub

[13] Posted by Bo on 02-24-2010 at 08:44 AM • top

Hi Sarah, within a 15 minute radius of downtown Binghamton there are actually six Episcopal Churches:

1. Christ Church
2. Trinity
3. All Saints
4. St. Paul’s
5. Zion
6. Zion

The population here is shrinking and it is largely unchurched which is a fact many Episcopalians cite to excuse decreasing membership…but there are LOTS of people who do not know Jesus around here and there are lots of growing non-denominational and denominational churches…so i don’t buy it.

[14] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 02-24-2010 at 08:47 AM • top

sub

[15] Posted by AndrewA on 02-24-2010 at 08:51 AM • top

God loves people who get run over by trains too” he would say, or some variation on that theme, in response to my every encouragement.

Wow, sounds a lot like my attitude!  Maybe we should all join Pesimists Anonymous.

[16] Posted by AndrewA on 02-24-2010 at 08:53 AM • top

NBS (#12) Brilliant!
Nice installment Anne & Matt.  Thank you for recounting God’s faithfulness, but also your own struggles with doubt, fear, grief… it’s good to know you’re human wink but also, to see how God has worked in spite of and through your weaknesses, and how He has brought beauty out of the ashes of all you lost, suffered, grieved.

[17] Posted by Karen B. on 02-24-2010 at 08:57 AM • top

Matt+, I wonder if Sarah meant whether you received support or encouragement from ANY TEC priests in the dio of CNY, not just those in your town…

[18] Posted by Karen B. on 02-24-2010 at 08:59 AM • top

Hi KarenB. The Episcopal Priest who showed us kindness is a rector here in town.

[19] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 02-24-2010 at 09:00 AM • top

1. Christ Church—only slightly lower ASA then from 1998—around 125
2. Trinity—a pretty significant plunge—from around 150 to 110 or so
3. All Saints [Johnson City]—from 100 to 80 ASA
4. St. Paul’s [Endicott]—devastated—from around 180 to a touch over 100
5. Zion [Greene]—from 100 to 80
6. Zion [Windsor]—roughly from 40 to 30

So the total ASA for the Binghamton area—now that Good Shepherd is gone—is around 525.

Nice going, Bishop Gladstone Adams.

[20] Posted by Sarah on 02-24-2010 at 09:06 AM • top

I’m curious to know the ASA figures for Grace Church, Utica, where my wife and attended during our long ago residence in my home town.  How about it, Matt?

[21] Posted by Cennydd on 02-24-2010 at 09:23 AM • top

Of course, I’m talking about past, when Stan Gasek+ was rector for so many years, and the present.

[22] Posted by Cennydd on 02-24-2010 at 09:24 AM • top

I don’t know Cennydd, I’ll have to look. overall the diocese has lost close to 15 % ASA in the last 5 years.

[23] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 02-24-2010 at 09:25 AM • top

Grace Church, Utica has gone from an ASA in 1998 of around 200 to an ASA of around 130.

[24] Posted by Sarah on 02-24-2010 at 09:28 AM • top

Binghamton and its surrounding county has an overall population of 45,000, I believe? 

Yeah, the TEC evangelism in that city is just stunning.  hmmm

[25] Posted by Proud Bottom Feeder on 02-24-2010 at 09:32 AM • top

These instalment plan stories are as good as Dickens!

Pageantmaster (#4) and I will be waiting with bated breath to find out about the darn cat.

[26] Posted by robroy on 02-24-2010 at 09:33 AM • top

Just to put some flesh on what God has done here—our ASA has gone from 80-90 to around 115 (I have to crunch the numbers to be sure but that’s about where we are). We have gained around 40 new members. Our budget has gone from 110K per year to over 200K—a table before our enemies.

[27] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 02-24-2010 at 09:35 AM • top

I agree with the above posters.

I really appreciate Anne and Matt documenting their experience.  I think it is important for spiritual and historical purposes.

20 years from now, when people wonder how Anglicanism has evolved in North America, they will look to these narratives and understand what happened.

DoW

[28] Posted by DietofWorms on 02-24-2010 at 09:45 AM • top

Thank you, Matt and Anne, for this very personal window into your thoughts and lives during those dark days.

[29] Posted by Raised as an Atheist on 02-24-2010 at 09:49 AM • top

Thanks so very much for the 3rd installment of this page-turner!  I eagerly await “the rest of the story”.  In times like these I think all of us need to have such clear witness of God’s amazing provision; nothing else gives such encouragement!  Frances Scott

[30] Posted by Frances S Scott on 02-24-2010 at 10:31 AM • top

I’ll be watching my newstand for the next exciting issue of…

Good Shepherd is a church. Our primary mission is not survival, but making disciples, baptizing, and teaching all that Jesus commands.

I have no doubt that this is the reality behind the miracles.

[31] Posted by Positive Phototaxis on 02-24-2010 at 11:37 AM • top

Matt+ for memory jogging purposes, how about linking the SFIF posts and the Binghamton TV news pieces on the soup kitchen signs being taken down?

[32] Posted by Milton on 02-24-2010 at 01:36 PM • top

sub

[33] Posted by JustOneVoice on 02-24-2010 at 02:13 PM • top

Moving story. Saintly man, is Fr. Meagher.

I know of an Anglican parish in Colorado which left a really wonderful new Episcopal church for a store front, ended up in a large, new, unused community center in an upscale subdivision. A better place.

God will provide, and indeed set a table for us in front of our enemies. Just give him a little time to pull it off.

[34] Posted by teddy mak on 02-24-2010 at 04:28 PM • top

Yes, it is a griping read, and the stories of kindness, particularly from the Catholic church just wonderful.

I still want to know about the puddy-tat.

[this comment has been peer-reviewed.  I have been baptised]

[35] Posted by Pageantmaster on 02-24-2010 at 05:05 PM • top

The Episcopal Priest who showed us kindness is a rector here in town

Dear Episcopal Priest Who Showed Kindness,

Please be advised that your actions are hereby accepted as your renunciation of orders in This Church.  Effective immediately, you are inhibited from performing any priestly functions, deposed from the order of priests, forbidden to enter your former church, probibited from contacting any member of your former congregation, and being sued for malfeasance.

In Christ’s Love,
The Most Reverend Katharine Jefferts Schori

[36] Posted by Chazaq on 02-24-2010 at 06:34 PM • top

Chazaq—that is ridiculous!  That goes beyond the pale . . . . there is no way that Katharine Jefferts Schori would write such a thing.

She would have ended the letter with “Shalom” . . . not “In Christ’s Love.”

To the tower with you!!!!  [And do better next time.]

[37] Posted by Sarah on 02-24-2010 at 06:41 PM • top

Hahahahahahahaha….

[38] Posted by Greg Griffith on 02-24-2010 at 09:26 PM • top

What an edifying serial, thank you both. I realized how invested I’d become in it when I burst into tears at Msgr. Meagher’s kind, anticipative offer. The Lord goes before us, making a way, halleluia.

Pessimists Anonymous! Reminded me of my wonderful husband, married to Ms. Polyanna Prisms. A time or two in our 34 years I’ve even (helpfully, I think) verbally deployed Katie Luther’s ammunition; according to one (perhaps apocryphal) account, when her husband was in a slough of depression, she came in dressed in funeral garb moaning, “The Lord is dead,” and answered Martin’s protests by telling him, well, he was acting as if it were true. What wisdom of God, that complementary types do attract.

[39] Posted by wingshadow on 02-24-2010 at 11:32 PM • top

Sometimes God works in mysterious ways, but sometimes I think we miss what He is doing because He is so obvious about it. Good Shepard is not the only Anglican congregation out there which has been substantially rescued by the Roman Catholic Church.  I’ve only preached a few sermons myself (as a layman), but they have been preached, to an Anglican congregation, from the pulpit of a small Catholic Church.  No doubt there are Roman bishops and priests who would never be so generous, but it does indeed bring a tear to one’s eye when witness those who do take the directives to love the Lord our God, and to love our neighbors, seriously.  May our Lord bless them richly for it.

[40] Posted by tjmcmahon on 02-25-2010 at 08:04 AM • top

RE: “Reminded me of my wonderful husband, married to Ms. Polyanna Prisms.”

Yes—for years I had a business partner [and now a very good friend] who was Mr. Polyanna Prisms. 

I considered it my duty to remind him of all the times that things had gone disastrously wrong.  Though it might serve to dash his hopes temporarily—for a few golden half-hours or so—he soon forgot such minor episodes as he pondered the future’s rosy glow.

I’ve decided that optimists have poor—very poor—memories.  He could experience the most shocking defeat, but bounce back hours later while contemplating future prospects, and of course the present’s joys as well.

It is a gift to have a poor memory of life’s traumas. 

I am more like this elephant here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RANOMniA_kM

[41] Posted by Sarah on 02-25-2010 at 08:15 AM • top

I considered it my duty to remind him of all the times that things had gone disastrously wrong.

I think my husband views this as a ministry, too, for Facing Reality to inform Cheerful Oblivion. The apostle Thomas, it seems to me, was of the Facing Reality race, and once he came face to Face with the reality of the resurrection, he went off and, oh, just took the gospel to India. If only he’d had more faith and optimism… no, wait…

[42] Posted by wingshadow on 02-25-2010 at 10:19 AM • top

He could experience the most shocking defeat, but bounce back hours later while contemplating future prospects, and of course the present’s joys as well.

I am thankful for such people.

[43] Posted by oscewicee on 02-25-2010 at 11:03 AM • top

Just to put some flesh on what God has done here—our ASA has gone from 80-90 to around 115 (I have to crunch the numbers to be sure but that’s about where we are). We have gained around 40 new members. Our budget has gone from 110K per year to over 200K—a table before our enemies.

Matt, is this since you came to Good Shepherd, or just since the move?
Either way, a vast improvement over the record of the Episcopal churches in the area.
Keep up the good work.
Marie

[44] Posted by Marie Blocher on 02-25-2010 at 11:46 AM • top

Hi Marie, the figures above were for 2009 only.

When I arrived at Good Shepherd in 2002, there were 47 people in the pews on average. Thanks be to God.

[45] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 02-25-2010 at 12:02 PM • top

Me too, oscewicee.

[46] Posted by Sarah on 02-25-2010 at 12:04 PM • top

Ours is on the upswing, too….although I don’t have the exact numbers at my fingertips.

[47] Posted by Cennydd on 02-25-2010 at 12:13 PM • top

And thanks for the figures on Grace Church, Matt.+  The ASA used to be closer to 300 when we left there in 1968.  What a drop!

[48] Posted by Cennydd on 02-25-2010 at 12:29 PM • top

I give those numbers in the full recognition that the lack of growth or even losing members does not necessarily mean a church is doing anything wrong. Sometimes it can mean that a church is doing everything right. I think Carl reminded us somewhere yesterday that Jesus, in one day, went from thousands of followers to 12…. Numbers are not as important as faithfulness.

[49] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 02-25-2010 at 01:15 PM • top

Okay. okay but what about the cat!!!! I don’t even like cats .....

[50] Posted by martin5 on 02-25-2010 at 02:01 PM • top

#45
Wow! Matt, I’m impressed. God is surely doing a powerful thing in your church, to gain that may new members in an area that others have essentially given up on. May the feast
before your enemies continue unabated.
May Good Shepherd stand as a living rebuke to those that have tried to destroy it and a witness to the power
of God’s word to overcome evil efforts.

Marie

[51] Posted by Marie Blocher on 02-25-2010 at 02:33 PM • top

Okay. okay but what about the cat!!!! I don’t even like cats .....

Yeah, this human interest stuff is really fascinating but can Bander please have his own thread?

Does anyone around here have Mrs. Kennedy’s cell phone number?  I can’t take this much longer and I’m not a well man! tongue rolleye

[52] Posted by episcopalienated on 02-25-2010 at 03:05 PM • top

The cat story was told in much more detail on Anne Kennedy’s own blog, “an undercurrent of hostility” which is linked here. (click on the “blogs” tab.) Then search backwards by the date.

[53] Posted by Miss Sippi on 02-25-2010 at 03:14 PM • top

But Don’t go look! It will spoil the awesome surprise.

[54] Posted by Anne Kennedy on 02-25-2010 at 05:13 PM • top

Couldn’t help it.  I looked and I’m glad I did!

Thank you to both of you for continuing to tell your story of faith. It is uniquely your story of course, but it is representative of so many others. I also cried over the Msgr.‘s gracious love and kindness to you and how God used him to bless your church family and your own family.  I listened to two sermons on your web site, Anne, the one you posted by Matt and one by you—both outstanding.  I smile at realizing what good hands the ACNA is in with young, God-centered leadership like the two of you have.  Praise God for all that He has done through your faithfulness.  Your children are surely blessed to have parents with such steadfast faith in Jesus Christ. The people of Good Shepherd are blessed to have such Biblically faithful leadership.  Most importantly, God is glorified through both of you.
May He strengthen you and bless you every step of the way!

[55] Posted by BettyLee Payne on 02-25-2010 at 07:42 PM • top

Subscribe #55

[56] Posted by Just a Parishioner on 02-25-2010 at 08:32 PM • top

Okay, I won’t look… but you realize this all about the cat now ....

[57] Posted by martin5 on 02-25-2010 at 09:04 PM • top

I continue to be intrigued and uplifted by your story. In particular, I find Msgr.  Meaghar involvement to be a sign that we all can work together for Christ’s Kingdom.  No doubt an awfully dark time in your life but as we see in these installments, it is working out according to   God’s purposes. THAT is the real message here. Thanks for sharing this part of your lives.

[58] Posted by SC blu cat lady on 02-26-2010 at 11:25 AM • top

DID THE CAT COME BACK? This is driving me crazy! I looked at Anne’s bog but didn’t find the outcome. Our cat got spooked and escaped when we moved too - pretty much just the same way the Kennedys’ did. He did come back, when I spent the night, as Anne did, in a sleeping bag in the empty house. I have to find out if they got Bander back!

[59] Posted by Nellie on 02-26-2010 at 12:16 PM • top

[59] Nellie

The cat always comes back.  They typically have powerful allies who watch out for counter-feline insurgency operations in the household.

Go to Anne Kennedy’s weblog, search for ‘bander cat’ and the answer will be revealed.  The post is dated 27 February 2009.

carl

[60] Posted by carl on 02-26-2010 at 12:41 PM • top

Thank you Carl. I can get on with my life now .....

[61] Posted by martin5 on 02-26-2010 at 01:22 PM • top

That’s all I wanted to know, thanks Carl.  I will now await the story of the prodigal cat with interest.

[62] Posted by Pageantmaster on 02-26-2010 at 01:31 PM • top

With cats, it does always end up being about them.  Excuse me now, I have to go open the door to the porch.

[63] Posted by Miss Sippi on 02-26-2010 at 01:35 PM • top

carl:

The cat always comes back.

Oh, that video was cold!  Something Torquemada might have come up with, although I doubt that even he was that mean.

While faithful believers throughout Christendom eagerly await news of Bander’s fate, you’re screwing around with You Tube again.  And having a good time doing it.

Honestly, I just don’t know what’s wrong with you.

But I intend to find out. cool mad

[64] Posted by episcopalienated on 02-26-2010 at 02:25 PM • top

Episcopalienated, I think you may have misjudged Carl, who is clearly softening.

That video was a demonstration of The Judgement of God on that man for trying to rid himself of that cute kitten.  It serves as an object lesson—a didactic display—for all those persons who may be inclined to sin in that way.

Carl is becoming an Anglican.  For instance, he also caved on telling Nellie what happened to Bander.

A Truly Reformed Carl of a year ago would have accepted the suffering that Nellie was enduring as a sign that she needed more of it.  Instead, Carl’s heart was touched and he became empathetic to Nellie’s feelings of pain and loss, and he gave in and decided to offer practical “pastoral care” in response, rather than a reading from Job or Lamentations and a treatise on God’s sovereignty.

Of course, it’s two steps back, one step forward.  Expect Carl to do several things that are Truly Reformed in order to compensate—several treatises on babies and hell, double predestination, the importance of ugliness in worship, etc, etc.  It’s a form of thrashing—lashing out—like a dragon in death throes.

But all of us in the know recognize what this moment means.  It’s just another signpost on the long road through purgatory and into the nearer presence of Beatrice—let the reader understand!

[65] Posted by Sarah on 02-27-2010 at 07:51 AM • top

That video is most certainly not a depiction “of The Judgment of God on that man for trying to rid himself of that cute kitten.”  It is clear and forthright exposition on the treacherous, destructive, malicious Evil that is contained within the murderous heart of every cat.  This thread seemed an appropriate venue for such elucidation.  Concern for the fate of the cat must not overwhelm an understanding of its true nature.

And I most certainly did not ‘cave.’  I simply provided the necessary information so that Nellie could find the answer if she so chose.  The proper search string and the date of the post.  It’s like the little statement at the bottom of the crossword puzzle: “Answers found on page 72.”  That’s not ‘caving.’  That’s ‘providing options.’

carl

[66] Posted by carl on 02-27-2010 at 08:59 AM • top

See Episcopalienated?

Right on target—another lashing of the tail of the dying dragon.

[67] Posted by Sarah on 02-27-2010 at 11:07 AM • top

Only Carl has the courage to speak of the darkness in a cat’s heart, truly one of the strange mysteries of creation.


EXCERPTS FROM A CAT’S DIARY

DAY 752 - My captors continue to taunt me with bizarre little dangling objects. They dine lavishly on fresh meat, while I am forced to eat dry cereal. The only thing that keeps me going is the hope of escape, and the mild satisfaction I get from ruining the occasional piece of furniture. Tomorrow I may eat another houseplant.

DAY 761 - Today my attempt to kill my captors by weaving around their feet while they were walking almost succeeded, must try this at the top of the stairs. In an attempt to disgust and repulse these vile oppressors, I once again induced myself to vomit on their favorite chair ... must try this on their bed.

DAY 765 - Decapitated a mouse and brought them the headless body, in attempt to make them aware of what I am capable of, and to try to strike fear into their hearts. They only cooed and condescended about what a good little cat I was…Hmmm. Not working according to plan.

DAY 768 - I am finally aware of how sadistic they are. For no good reason I was chosen for the water torture. This time however it included a burning foamy chemical called “shampoo.” What sick minds could invent such a liquid. My only consolation is the piece of thumb still stuck between my teeth.

DAY 771 - There was some sort of gathering of their accomplices. I was placed in solitary throughout the event. However, I could hear the noise and smell the foul odor of the glass tubes they call “beer”. More importantly I overheard that my confinement was due to MY power of “allergies.” Must learn what this is and how to use it to my advantage.

DAY 774 - I am convinced the other captives are flunkies and maybe snitches. The dog is routinely released and seems more than happy to return. He is obviously a half-wit. The bird on the other hand has got to be an informant, and speaks with them regularly. I am certain he reports my every move. Due to his current placement in the metal room his safety is assured. But I can wait, it is only a matter of time…

[68] Posted by sandraoh on 02-27-2010 at 12:14 PM • top

Love the cat diary! Any cat owner knows how true a picture of the cat this is.

[69] Posted by Nellie on 02-28-2010 at 11:12 AM • top

carl:

And I most certainly did not ‘cave.’ I simply provided the necessary information so that Nellie could find the answer if she so chose. The proper search string and the date of the post. It’s like the little statement at the bottom of the crossword puzzle: “Answers found on page 72.” That’s not ‘caving.’ That’s ‘providing options.’

Perhaps I’ve been unfair.  It sounds to me like you might have the makings of a great Episcopalian after all.

Casuistry is one of the few things we’re still good at and the little snippet above is easily recognized as a masterpiece of the art.  My guess is, you could squirm with the best of us.  You’ve certainly done so in this case.

Can we at least put you on a mailing list?

This doesn’t mean we’re prepared to forgive you for your obvious pathological hatred of God’s little friends who happen to have fur, claws, beaks, tails, or horns.  (And pouches.  Some of them have pouches.)  We never forgive anybody.

Although, we do understand that pathology isn’t half as bad as some people make it sound, so we try to make allowances for it and meet you half way.  We are the “Via Media” Church after all.

But if you’re going to crank up with all that “Reform” stuff, you will want to try it in Sarah Hey’s parish, not mine.  She and her friends can sometimes be kind and gentle, or so I’m told.  Pity and tolerance, however, are unknown among me and my kind.

Unless you show up dressed like St. Francis of Assisi with birds nesting in your hair and a black cat under one arm.  As for how you’re going to keep the two separated . . . well, that’s your problem.  But then we might listen, even if not for long.

Remember, the Episcopal Church welcomes you.  Why ruin a good thing by pushing your luck?

[70] Posted by episcopalienated on 02-28-2010 at 02:20 PM • top

[70] episcopalienated

This doesn’t mean we’re prepared to forgive you for your obvious pathological hatred of God’s little friends who happen to have fur, claws, beaks, tails, or horns.

Naah.  I don’t even hate cats.  I just have a realistic view of their fundamentally murderous nature.  That’s how I have survived so long with a certified member of the Feline Cong in my house.  I never turn my back, and always make sure to watch my steps on dark stairs.  It’s not their fault, really.  Cats were created as the anti-canine so man would have a greater appreciation for dogs.

carl

[71] Posted by carl on 02-28-2010 at 07:42 PM • top

carl:

Naah. I don’t even hate cats. I just have a realistic view of their fundamentally murderous nature.

Sure thing, Chico.  They say that working your way through the denial is always the hardest part.

Fortunately for you, we have 12 step programs that are guaranteed to help with your recovery.

If you’re a hard case, there’s always primal scream therapy.  That’s what our crying rooms are for.  We don’t let kids in there.

And everyone knows that humans were created so that woofers, tweeters, and screechers alike could all ask God:  “What were you thinking?”

It’s in the Bible, Mr. “I’m Reformed and all that.” See for yourself.

http://www.lolcatbible.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

Or - let me guess - isn’t that the one you use? tongue laugh

[72] Posted by episcopalienated on 02-28-2010 at 09:50 PM • top

RE: “Casuistry is one of the few things we’re still good at and the little snippet above is easily recognized as a masterpiece of the art.  My guess is, you could squirm with the best of us.  You’ve certainly done so in this case.”

Word, Episcopalienated.

I see that you’ve figured this out.

All the signs are there, wouldn’t you say?  I mean . . . he sounded like Rowan Williams there.

[73] Posted by Sarah on 02-28-2010 at 09:59 PM • top

Ah that link you supplied, Episcopalienated, reminded me of my late cat Chloe.  She always misquoted Scripture—twisted all the stories and everything.

The stories about “The Fatted Cat” and “The Golden Cat” were favorites of hers.

And the sweet thing would turn and say, piously, when I forbad or denied her something: “Let not the hope of the poor be taken from them.”

She had the cleverest way about her with words.

. . . Always wanted to be an Episcopal bishop.  Loved the pomp and pageantry—I always had to remind her that she’d have to be around a lot of people if she went that route, and she’d subside. 

But the longing gleam of ambition never really left her eyes on that desire.

[74] Posted by Sarah on 02-28-2010 at 10:02 PM • top

Sarah:

Oh, they can make Carl the Archbishop of Canterbury tomorrow for all I care.  He has it down.

That “hellfire and brimstone” stuff he’s so fond of might shatter a few windows at Lambeth Palace at first.  But just keep him yammering on about “providing options” and they’ll get over it.

Anybody who’s still willing to go near the place, that is.

If the pope shows up for a visit, it’ll be: “What happened to the other guy?” followed by shock and awe.  Then, business as usual.

The Queen, I don’t know about.  But probably something along the lines of: “Lord, take me now!”  And hasn’t she suffered enough?

Word, indeed.  Word up!

With that, you’ve triggered the semi-automatic song dedication feature.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q-k-uN73Gk

Not to worry, Carl is actually fond of dogs, or so he says.

How they feel about him, of course, may be a bit more open-ended.

Just the way he likes it. wink

[75] Posted by episcopalienated on 02-28-2010 at 10:36 PM • top

I mean ... he sounded like Rowan Williams there.

Ouch! To be compared to Rowan Williams. Twas the most unkindest cut of all. 

carl
who had to look up the meaning of ‘casuistry’

[76] Posted by carl on 02-28-2010 at 10:42 PM • top

Thanks for sharing the journey, Matt.  Our hearts and prayers remain with you and your congregation.  Reading about the memorials is one of the things that tears my heart.  We are so glad to hear how you are growing and thriving, and maintaining a sense of humor!

Not a cat person either (though they love me - perhaps I emit the scent that entices them to conquer me), but can’t wait to read about the cat in due time!

[77] Posted by The Lakeland Two on 03-13-2010 at 10:10 AM • top

The recent photo of the former Good Shepherd building with its new doors and sign reminds me of that old song from my childhood, “What’s behind the Green Door?”

[78] Posted by Theodora on 03-23-2010 at 06:40 AM • top

I had wondered what the muslims would do about the cross in the front door. Their solution was to remove the arms leaving a long straight pane, before painting it green.

Maybe in a few years they’ll buy the cathedral, it is already a non-Christian edifice.

[79] Posted by Marie Blocher on 03-23-2010 at 07:37 AM • top

It seems to me that defacing a church should be as much a crime here as defacing a mosque is in Muslim countries.  But then, there IS a difference between our societies, isn’t there?  And thank God for that!

[80] Posted by Cennydd on 03-23-2010 at 07:48 AM • top

A few thoughts-
I am thinking that in the long run, this may be God at work after all, look at it this way (sorry if this is an overly Catholic understanding for some)...
Even if Skip Adams’ orders were valid in the first place, he abandoned the Church (and I don’t just mean “Episcopal”) when he began a campaign to eliminate orthodox Christians from the diocese.  He, therefore, does not have authority within the Church.  He therefore cannot decommission a church building that was consecrated to the worship of Jesus Christ.
So the Church of the Good Shepard (building) remains a Christian church regardless of what is written on the door. Let us pray that the Holy Spirit moves as powerfully within its new congregation as He does within the Anglican congregation which once worshiped within the walls.
And let’s be sure not to blame the Muslim community for making a shrewd business deal (I understand from Ed Tomlinson’s article on Anglican Mainstream that the diocese sold the building to the Islamic group for less than Fr. Matt’s congregation offered for the building). Let us instead pray that they see the light, and come to accept our Savior.
And let us pray for God’s mercy for Skip Adams.

[81] Posted by tjmcmahon on 03-23-2010 at 07:59 AM • top

From reading Fr Matt’s postings on the move, I understand that he and the people of Good Shepherd de-consecrated
the building before they left.

[82] Posted by Marie Blocher on 03-23-2010 at 08:09 AM • top

Thanks Marie,
You are of course quite correct.  For some reason, while composing my logical fallacy above I lost track of the order in which these events occurred.  Since at the time Matt and the congregation were evicted by TEC, they had been out from under TEC jurisdiction for a while.
  If Matt+ de-consecrated the building, I am sure it was done properly.
  Still, I will pray that the Lord moves the hearts of the current occupants.  And the heart of the TEC bishop.

[83] Posted by tjmcmahon on 03-23-2010 at 09:17 PM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.