© 2004-2010 Stand Firm, LLC.
All rights reserved.
[64 : 0.6964]
Welcome to Stand Firm!
Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info
|
Well, since I’m often called “NRA” for short because of my chosen moniker of New Reformation Advocate, let me take this opportunity of clarifying once again that I am NOT a card-carrying member or promoter of the National Rifle Association. If Greg wants to pack one of these niftly little collapsible machine guns, the FMG9, well, it might be wise in his case. And after all, he is a layman. Somehow, I don’t feel comfortable packing that kind of heat as a priest. Of course, there are more than a few clergy who do, and I’m not criticizing them. A notable example would the orthodox low church hero, the Rev. William Dickson of Ft. Worth, who is famous for his prowess with his beloved 9mm Glock. No one should mess with him. But I can’t help wondering: Greg, how in the world do you find this kind of stuff? David Handy+ |
|
You know, the reason why Kendall gets away with posting about the Death Ray is because it is all in the Service of Humanity and Higher Education and Ethical Considerations. Nobody thinks that really Kendall is secretly longing for his very own Ray Gun. And we know that you are not posting this article for the service of humanity or conversation about ethical considerations. Had you been smart enough to say “I wonder if this gun is really appropriate for use since it is based on deceit and camoflage” and then said at the very end of the article “My birthday is very soon” you would have gotten the message across and yet been able to claim the Ethical Thoughtfulness angle. But no—you have not listened to the 13 Episcopal Therapists that I assigned you some months ago. And therefore you continue to reveal the Underlying Non-Interest in Dialogue and Inclusion that marks your reign of terror here. |
|
Portable poultry netting sounds like really low tech stun gun sort of stuff, now that I hear about it. Would you wear it around yourself for protection? And it you were walking the dog and there was a fire hydrant, how would that work for you or the hydrant or the dog, for that matter? What we really need are personal force-shields, but I’m thinking the electrified portable poultry netting ain’t gonna cut it, guys! |
|
James Manley #8—I too cringed several times when I saw the video. It’s obvious the guy has never taken a gun safety course or been roundly chewed out for mishandling a weapon. He killed himself several times over. ALWAYS treat a firearm as if it were loaded and could go off. NEVER assume it’s on safety or that the safety will work. ALWAYS point a firearm in a safe direction, even if you “know it’s not loaded.” Those famous last words have killed more people. . . . Maybe this was a nonfunctioning model, but it should have still been treated like the real thing for demonstration purposes. |
|
Glocks are over-rated. It’s a nifty toy, but if you really want a decent handgun get a CZ-75b. |
|
#18, CZ-75b? I don’t know. For Greg, the Israeli Arms Desert Eagle 50Cal.-AE jsut seems more holy. Granted the Desert Eagle in not exactly concealed easily, but those Israeli Arms people really know how to build a reliable item. (The one exception would be the 357 Magnum version, manufactured for the US market, that seems to jam on the last round of the clip). |
|
Dang, reading these comments it’s no wonder those pesky revisionists are trying to move the more orthodox among us out so quickly - it’s before we all come to the next GC packing heat!! & maybe when they come to change the locks on “their” property we can use the portable poultry netting to keep them at bay. |
|
I thought The Rev. Dr. Dickson preferred his Glocks in .40. RevRJ, I would have no reservations about the CZ75. The Ceska Zbrojovka puts out fine and reputable products. (I certainly find that they point more instinctively than the H&K;USP—though your mileage may vary.) Don’t personally own any, though. :( Though my birthday’s coming up eventually, too . . . . |
|
It’s a piddling 9mm, for pete’s sake! The first thing we all need to do is take a step back (metaphorically speaking), take a few deep breaths and then remember the adage
Any pistol round smaller than 10mm (.40 caliber), is only marginally more useful, in a gunfight, than a knife. And .45 caliber is even better than .40 caliber, if the shooter can manage the recoil effectively. Finally, the mention of knives and gunfights brings us to the other adage: “The definition of stupidity is bringing a knife to a gunfight.” Blessings and regards, ———————- ————— |
|
At a recent afternoon at the range, I tried side by side, my old WWII Walther P-38 (9mm), my Glock 22 (.40 cal) & my friend’s Glock GAP (.45 cal). I left the SW .40 at home. Given time, I was most accurate with the Walther, but as MA states above, it is still only a 9mm after all with only an average of 65% take down on the 1st shot. The new Glock 22 came on target more smoothly & after adjusting for my trigger action, was accurate enough to meet most needs and it has an average take down of 85% on the first shot. The GAP was sweet, compact and surprisingly forgiving in the recoil. I’m keeping the Walther for sentimental reasons, as it was a war prize taken by my uncle in the bocage country of Normandy. I’m keeping the Glock 22 as it is now my first choice for carry. I’d buy a GAP .45 given half a chance. The SW .40, is retired. |
|
Martial Artiste: I am all in favor of the .45 ACP cartridge for self defense. I have a Glock 21 (13 in the mag, 1 in the pipe) but my all time favorite (aesthetically at least) is the old GI Colt 1911 model. It is true that you lose some mag capacity with a .45 but you rarely need more than one “hit” with a .45 round. the snarkster |
|
I have a SIG-Mauser M2 in .45: small but sweet. Also it was much less expensive than a 1911*. In the 80s the FBI did some handgun effectiveness tests, the executive summary of whose results was “shoot anything you like that starts with a 4.” A couple of notable naval components of Special Operations commissioned a very tricked out .45 for use by people who were going to USE a pistol, not carry it and hope never to draw. |
|
I just realized someone has sold the Snarkster a lethal weapon. I may rethink my 2nd amendment stand. I mean, it’s like selling a silk rope to the Boston Strangler. Something bad has got to happen. Seriously snark, good to see your moniker in play again. I fired a Thompson .45 that belonged to a man named Blood, That was his name for real. I couldn’t hold it down, ended up spraying some cottonwoods. Useless piece. |
|
[35] snarkster, I had the priviliege of a brief familiarization firing (full auto) of the Thompson in .45ACP in December ‘72, shortly after reporting to my first submarine. It required tremendous effort to keep it on target, as it wanted to “climb” (i.e., pivot about its center of mass in the direction of the front sight). Needless to say, I was among those who got back in line as often as possible, all of us having been invited to do so by the Marine gunnery sergeant who was the rangemaster and instructor, until the allotted ammunition was expended. It was a lovely short range weapon in its era and very useful for “room clearance” if there were only hostiles in the room, because of its relative compactness even with the drum magazine, and because turning the weapon on its side allowed the recoil to “walk” the muzzle across the intended field of fire. Today that mission would probably be better handled by one of the very new bullpup urban assault rifles that use very high velocity ammo. Blessings and regards, |
|
Martial Artiste: An interesting thing about the early production .30 and .45 Thompsons was the fit and finish. They featured high quality bluing, walnut stocks, and extremely tight tolerances. They were almost the equal of many top grade sporting firearms. the snarkster |
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Now that is Sweet.