Monday, February 13, 2012

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

Walking Away from Christ: Labyrinths in the Episcopal Church

Thursday, March 13, 2008 • 5:00 am

Modern proponents today often promote the labyrinth as a mix of New-Age spiritualism and vaguely Buddhist meditative practices. Any role it serves in bringing one closer to Christ is considered a side-effect, and not essential either to the experience or the intent.


For years we have chronicled the promotion of paganism by some on the Episcopal left. Among the more notable episodes were the Michigan seminar featuring transgendered pagan priest Raven Kaldera; the ongoing saga of Pennsylavanian Druid/Episcopal priest Bill Melnyk; the selling of a book of “love spells” in the Episcopal Church’s flagship bookstore; and the revelation that Maury Johnston, a prominent Episcopal gay activist and author, led a double life as “Shadwynn” the Wiccan priest.

For years we have also watched the progress of the “labyrinth movement” with no small degree of skepticism, and we also keep a wary eye on “interfaith seminars,” anything having to do with the “divine feminine,” most any event hosted by Grace Cathedral in San Francisco, and anything where one might expect to see sufis, shamans or anyone whose official title includes the word “facilitator.”

In this article in the London Free Press, subtitled “Labyrinths, a form of walking meditation, hold almost magical powers,” we read about The Rev. Lauren Artress, described as an “Episcopal priest and psychotherapist.”

Since the early 1990’s, Artress has championed the labyrinth’s “powers,” and the use of the word “magical” to describe them is perhaps, as we’ll see, not a coincidence.

Artress is Canon for Special Ministries at San Francisco’s Grace Cathedral. Grace Cathedral is the cathedral church of the diocese of California, currently presided over by Bishop Marc Andrus, and formerly presided over by Bishop William Swing. Andrus’ exploits are well-known to Stand Firm readers - he recently rode in the infamous San Francisco gay pride parade, which featured generous amounts of nudity and displays of gay sexual depravity. Andrus, you may recall, berated Archbishop Rowan Williams to his face at the House of Bishops meeting in New Orleans. That’s Bishop Andrus in the nearby photo, taken from the article at Oasis’ web site. Andrus is standing in front of Artress’s labyrinth.

Bishop Swing, in addition to being a vocal supporter of homosexuality in the Episcopal Church, is also the founder of something called the United Religions Initiative. It’s a clever name, because for most westerners - and for almost all Americans - the sound of the word “united” as part of an organization’s name has become so commonplace as to act as a type of salve for an organization’s goals; it’s assumed that it’s there to describe an alliance, or some type of unity, but whatever the details, the western ear hears the word “united” mainly as “good.”

In fact, the United Religions Initiative has as its purpose something that can be described as questionable at best, and decidedly non-Christian at worst. This description of the organization is from the site “Anglicans All”:

The United Religions Initiative (URI), launched in San Francisco in 1995 by former California Bishop William Swing (who retired in 2006), has put down roots in the Global South and many other places around the world, doubling its membership in the last five years.

In its charter, the URI describes itself as “a growing global community dedicated to promoting enduring, daily interfaith cooperation, ending religiously motivated violence and creating cultures of peace, justice and healing for the Earth and all living beings - The URI, in time, aspires to have the visibility and stature of the United Nations.”

The URI hopes to bring together on a regular basis representatives of the major and minor faith systems, including those of the New Age/pagan/occult genre, to help resolve conflicts in the world. However, some of its critics believe the interfaith initiative envisions or could lead to a one-world religion hostile to orthodox Christianity.

In his 1998 book The Coming United Religions, for example, Bishop Swing said that if the First Commandment - “Thou shalt have no other gods but me” - leads billions of adherents of “exclusive religions” (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) to “oppose the godly claims of other exclusive religions, what hope is there for peace among religions?” Swing concluded that “In order for a United Religions to come about and for religions to pursue peace among each other, there will have to be a godly cease-fire, a temporary truce where the absolute exclusive claims of each will be honored but an agreed-upon neutrality will be exercised in terms of proselytizing, condemning, murdering, or dominating. These will not be tolerated in the United Religions zone”

What does a retired bishop’s attempts to undo the divine uniqueness of Christ and create a global alliance with pagans have to do with Lauren Artress and labyrinths?

The Christian Challenge answers this question:

The labyrinth movement has long been intertwined with the URI. Barbara Hartford, a URI staff member in San Francisco, accompanied Artress on her first visit to the Chartres labyrinth in the early 1990s. Artress also acknowledges Sally Ackerly, who has been a URI staffer, as one of those who provided “help in launching the labyrinth.”

Since 1995, labyrinth walks have been common at URI events, including the most recent URI Global Assembly, held in Rio de Janeiro in the summer of 2002 (and attended by, among others, Canada"s Bishop of New Westminster, Michael Ingham, who recently oversaw the first same-sex blessing rite in his diocese).

As promoted by Artress, the labyrinth movement is New Age in form and content. In Walking A Sacred Path, her foundational book on the movement, Artress says, “The labyrinth introduces us to the idea of a wide and gracious path. It redefines the journey to God: from a vertical perspective that goes from earth up to heaven to a horizontal perspective in which we are all walking the path together.”

Artress’ labyrinth project goes hand in glove with the Eastern and pagan religious syncretism promoted by Bishop Swing, Grace Cathedral, and the URI:

Bishop Swing’s Grace Cathedral is the center of the modern-day Labyrinth-walking fad that has spread through New Age workshops, mainline Protestant churches, and Roman Catholic retreat centers and convents. The leader of this movement is Lauren Artress, an Episcopal priest who runs Veriditas - also known as the Labyrinth Project. Artress, Canon for Special Ministries at Grace Cathedral, says that she first encountered the Labyrinth in January 1991, when she decided to “return to a Mystery School seminar with Dr. Jean Houston, an internationally known psychologist, author, and scholar whom I studied with in 1985.” (In the 1990s, Houston was best known to the public as the guru who helped Hillary Clinton contact the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt.)

On Houston’s own web site, she describes her “Mystery School” as:

...a school of human development, a program of cross-cultural, mythic and spiritual studies, dedicated to teaching history, philosophy, the New Physics, psychology, anthropology, myth and the many dimensions of human potential.

Artess’ association with anti-Christian initiatives doesn’t end there. She is a leader in an organization called “White Fire,” which describes itself as “a holy sisterhood that reveals the other face of God, the feminine divine in living, breathing form.” One of Artress’ peers there is a woman who calls herself “Starhawk.” Starhawk offers this bit of wisdom at White Fire:

“Women can be spiritual leaders and religion can be built around female images of beauty. In the pagan world, women rested against rocks and let the sun warm and celebrate their vulvas. We’re the radical edge.”

(Starhawk made a previous appearance at SF in 2006).

Artress and labyrinths are a big hit with Wiccans and other pagans. In the archives of Spelcastor, a Wiccan web site, one commenter writes this:

This past weekend I was at a labyrinth retreat and training led by the Rev Lauren Artress. As a model, she uses the labyrinth laid down in Notre-Dame de Chartres Cathedral in France. We were meeting in Delray Beach.

She explains how walking the labyrinth is a metaphor for life. You spiral in while letting go, ground at the center, and reclaim as you walk out. Lauren is very accepting of all traditions. She is an Episcopal priest at Grace Cathedral in San Francisco.

Her goal is to bring the labyrinth into wider acceptance in main stream America. She is not targeting the folks that get labeled “New Age.” Labyrinths are typically found on church property, schools, parks, and such. When visiting, be respectful of the path of who maintains that labyrinth and do not wear your largest pentacle. We get more tolerance when we offer tolerance.

Artress claims that she takes her inspiration from the labyrinth inlaid centuries ago in the floor of Chartres Cathedral in France, but today the labyrinth is widely used by pagans, especially Wiccans, as a “path to the feminine divine,” among other things. Here are several labyrinths - including a reproduction of the one at Chartres - for sale at “Mystical Convergence,” which specializes in “Wiccan, New Age, Mystical, and Spiritual Items for All Paths.” Wherever Artress’ book Walking a Sacred Path: Rediscovering the Labyrinth as a Spiritual Practice  is found, so are stacks of other overtly pagan and Wiccan books.

Modern proponents today often promote the labyrinth as a mix of New-Age spiritualism and vaguely Buddhist meditative practices. Any role it serves in bringing one closer to Christ is considered a side-effect, and not essential either to the experience or the intent. Indeed, Artress’ views on prayer, as described in this Washington Post editorial, don’t involve Christ at all, and while they refer to Something Bigger, it’s unclear whether she means God as revealed in Holy Scripture:

The question about prayer however, is most daunting. Perhaps I know more about what prayer is not. Prayer is not prayer if it is directed against someone else different than you. It is not prayer if you use it to support your opinion that you are better than someone else. It is not prayer if you condemn a nation, or a people because they worship differently than you do. It is not prayer if you think the god you pray to cares about whether you win a football game. Prayer is not to help your local small self seek revenge, have a cushy life or wish people sharing this planet did not exist.

Prayer is a way to open your heart to Something Greater Than Yourself. It is an effort to quiet the mind, and allow yourself to be nourished by the flow of your breath meeting the Breath that supports the world.

About exactly what effect walking a labyrinth has on a person, Artress has this to say:

I cannot name all that is happening with the labyrinth. However, I know that it is having a profound, yet invisible effect on the transformation of human consciousness both in the individual and the groups of people walking it together. The labyrinth—and Rupert Sheldrake agrees with me on this—is a stabilized morphic field. Some one may enter in grief, and find solace. Another may walk in with a question and find guidance. There is something sacred about the eleven-circuit labyrinth that heals and helps people realize their deepest longing and clearest intentions.

Who is Ruper Sheldrake, whose agreement with Artress pleases her so? Sheldrake is best known for his theory of “morphic resonance,” which, as best I can tell, tries to weave together pseudo-scientific speculation about telepathy and other psychic-type “phenomena” into a way of explaining… uhh… well, read it for yourself. If you can figure it out, drop your explanation into the comments below.

At her own web site, Artress leads off with a quote from Andrew Harvey:

Much of the future of the West depends on whether Christianity can rediscover its mystical core. In this rediscovery, Lauren Artress’s pioneering work using the labyrinth as a tool for self-alignment will be crucial.

And who is Andrew Harvey? He’s a ‘mystic,’ known in those circles as a promoter of the ‘divine feminine,’ as attested to by numerous testimonials on his web site.

Harvey’s mystical wisdom can be yours, but there is a cost and there are some conditions:

Andrew is booking appointments for spiritual direction - via the phone only ­ in 50 minute sessions.

“For me as a believer in the direct connection to the divine, spiritual counseling is about helping people to empower themselves and claim their own truth and divine identity. I am not a guru. I share what I know as a fellow seeker and spiritual friend. Ideally people would sign up for not less than 3 sessions, and no more than 10.”

After booking a session, we need to receive payment prior to the phone call. You will need to call Andrew, we will give you the number once we confirm the appointment. We require 24 hours notice of any cancellation to receive a refund.

Artress offers identical services, also via telephone, also for a fee, and also promoted on her web site. An interesting research exercise would be to get a tally of how many ordained Episcopal priests offer spiritual advice in exchange for cash, and hawk their services on a web site.

And on and on and on it goes. There appears to be virtually no limit to the number of such dots that can be connected among Artress, labyrinths, and new-age “spirituality,” and all it takes it a few minutes on the web to see how deeply intertwined the labyrinth “movement” is with Wiccan and neo-pagan belief and practice. Yet it’s not exactly uncommon to find congregations that generally consider themselves orthodox hosting labyrinths in their parish halls and courtyards. My hope is that this article will prompt people to scrutinize the labyrinth and its origins more closely, to ask the difficult questions about how it contributes to Christian worship, and to consider more carefully whether it has a place in your church.

If we’ve learned anything these last few years, it’s that heresy precedes apostasy, and carelessness and inattention are the doors through which heresy enters. Lift up just one corner of Artress’s labyrinth, and you’ll find all the signs you would ever need to know that this is something which demands your attention, and your vigilance. It will often mean confronting those who have the best intentions but are simply ignorant of what they are promoting. It will sometimes mean confronting those who know exactly what they’re promoting. But these are precisely the kinds of little stone bridges we must defend and, in some cases, take back.


96 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

Greg - thanks for taking the time to do this research.  Re: “It will often mean confronting those who have the best intentions but are simply ignorant of what they are promoting. ”  It is sad that the devil so often takes things that may be good or neutral and corrupts them.  In history and perhaps even today, labyrinths may have been used as a tool for a genuine God-centered spiritual discipline. 

Artress says, “The labyrinth introduces us to the idea of a wide and gracious path. It redefines the journey to God: from a vertical perspective that goes from earth up to heaven to a horizontal perspective in which we are all walking the path together.”

This is so sad.  Trying to redefine away our need to be rightly related to God.
Isaiah 40:25-28

“To whom will you compare me?
    Or who is my equal?” says the Holy One.

26 Lift your eyes and look to the heavens:
    Who created all these?
    He who brings out the starry host one by one,
    and calls them each by name.
    Because of his great power and mighty strength,
    not one of them is missing.

27 Why do you say, O Jacob,
    and complain, O Israel,
    “My way is hidden from the LORD;
    my cause is disregarded by my God”?

28 Do you not know?
    Have you not heard?
    The LORD is the everlasting God,
    the Creator of the ends of the earth.
    He will not grow tired or weary,
    and his understanding no one can fathom.

[1] Posted by Cathy_Lou on 03-13-2008 at 06:19 AM • top

Only by God’s grace!!!!

I confess that reading this article, I understand so much of it through the eyes of one who could easily been sucked in deep, for the logic is so very similar to that I held in the mid to late eighties (note for long term SFIF readers, it also THAT time period in my life as well).

It’s so seductive to attempt to combine religions that we may be all ‘one big happy family.’ Yet, if one reads Gen 34, we can see the worlds main desire is assimilation. I think orthodox Christians expect outright hostile annihilation that we’re blind to annihilation by assimilation, were identity is lost as it’s poured into the whole. Promises that mixing colors will create new and wonderful ones, but ends up a yucky-brownish hue with no hint of the pure white we’re called to be.

Part of the reason it’s so seductive is that it is real and true. When one open oneself to these areas, you’ll find not a make believe world but another real spiritual one. Remember we are warned that Satan often masks himself as an angel of light and we must test the spirits. So a guide like Artress can lead people to experiences that are very real even if not scientifically verifiable from this realm, much like an older high school teacher did teenagers in the eighties. Oddly, no one ever counts the cost, for people who play in those areas tend to have an unusually high amount of trouble or ‘bad luck’ in my experience, much how the Lord brings the grace of consequences to drug addicts in an attempt to awaken people before the lost of their live and soul. One consequence that never seems to go away is once awaken to those areas, they do not sleep, so the vale is thin even as a Christian—so if you’re in a parish that important to spiritual warfare you get a real sense of the Enemy crouching at the door desiring to overtake and see all the foolish moves even godly people make as temptation for those little compromises are sown. So in some ways there is a long term cost for playing on this road (also I can see how a system of rewards would entrap people, for it seems at time to obey Christ has the negative reward attached and only by faith).

Thank you Greg for posting this. This topic will not have much other research on the topic. I’ll report only from my experience that most trapped will not realize it, also think you’re legalistic and impeding them from fully experiencing this spiritual reality that obviously you know nothing about. That one can mix these things, thinking it’s an alloy instead of iron & clay. It amazes me how blind many people are to these spiritual realities, guessing it’s a similar doubt as these “orthodox moderates” have and desire to understand all in a Western “scientific” understanding, but most in the pews will thing you’re crazy if you talk about these things (which Scripture clearly references and I’m going from experiences to Biblical discovery, not the reverse as some may accuse {read first then make-up}).

SUMMARY—Very bad! Remember Commandment One! Thanks Greg for this article.

[2] Posted by Hosea6:6 on 03-13-2008 at 07:12 AM • top

Our God loves names.  The list of His names in Holy Scripture is a very long list, and Something Greater than Yourself is not one of them. 
It seems to me that Reiki is comparable.  You are appealing to a nameless universal force of healing.
Why appeal to the nameless when Christians can appeal to the name that is above all names and at which every knee should bow in heaven, on earth, aand under the earth?
A friend of mine researched Reiki and found that the advanced Reiki masters (2nd and 3rd level) had spirit guides.  Most people who dabble in Reiki are completely unaware of this.
Rev. Artress trained with Dr. Houston, a spiritualist, and she didn’t name Christ Jesus in that interview.
I confess that I have walked on a labyrinth and was unaware of anything adverse happening.  But I’m wiser now.
We see through a glass darkly.  I’ve wondered if we open a gate in labyrinth walking and Reiki that any spirit, not just the Holy Spirit, can enter. It is safest to walk the stations of the cross and pray for healing in the name of Jesus.  Those are gates that only He can enter.

[3] Posted by Jill Woodliff on 03-13-2008 at 07:13 AM • top

The reference to the Cathedral at Chartres suggests, though, that labyrinths have a Christian history prior to the New Age vision of Artress, et al.  (This site says that north African Christians placed one the floor of their church as early as 325 A.D.) I do not know enough to judge the practice and its history in the church.  I really don’t.  Maybe there is something genuinely dangerous about labyrinths.  I would love to hear from someone with genuine knowledge of the history of labyrinths in the church.

Nevertheless, I would be cautious about condemning any and all uses of a practice, just because many pagans do it or some unorthodox Christians (like Canon Artress) do it out of heretical beliefs.  Significant dates on the church calendar (e.g., Christmas and Easter) were a re-appropriation and re-orientation of pagan seasonal festivals.  Why can’t the use of the labyrinth be the same?

[4] Posted by Steve Lake+ on 03-13-2008 at 07:17 AM • top

Steve,

It could… it’s just that in the hands of Artress & Co. - who are responsible for something approaching 100% of the labyrinth activity in the Episcopal Church - it isn’t.

[5] Posted by Greg Griffith on 03-13-2008 at 07:38 AM • top

#4—An action in itself maybe nothing (thinking Paul’s meat sacrificed to idols discussion in 1 Cor. 8) but this seems to be used as a tool for one to give ‘spiritual direction.’ What we need to be weary is when folks begin to make connections of things things and an ideology. Marching a goose step with your arm raised at a 45° angle could have be fun and entertaining before 1933, but now there is a connotation to it (I know blogs try to avoid reference to that Austrian, but objectively was the best master of symbolism and use of group leadership we’ve seen in a long time). We seem to geared to symbolic tools, the Lord uses them but many others tap into this as well for their purposes.

[6] Posted by Hosea6:6 on 03-13-2008 at 07:42 AM • top

Fantastic article, Greg.  Thanks for continuing to expose the rot underneath ECUSA.

I long for the day when some of our “worthy opponents” would join us in outrage over this kind of thing.  Of course, they won’t.

[7] Posted by Phil on 03-13-2008 at 07:48 AM • top

Greg—Change noted. I still say you should submit this to Christianity Today. The research should not be allowed to recess into blog shadows.

[8] Posted by Jim Workman on 03-13-2008 at 07:49 AM • top

I attended the Mississippi parish that was in the forefront of the labyrinth movement in the Diocese of Mississippi. We had a portable labyrinth that we sent out to any parish that requested it and it was set up regularly in the parish hall. We ended up putting a permanent labyrinth outside in our memorial garden. I always thought that it was just plain silly but I figured that a bunch of people walking around in circles, mumbling to themselves, was relatively harmless. I tried it once and all I got out of it was a slight case of dizziness and sore feet. Although there is some evidence of its use in the early church, I have come to believe that labyrinth’s are being used today as a gateway to the new age mysticism that is being promoted so aggressively in TECusaCorp today. It is being used to lead people away from traditional Christianity. I am no longer a member of that parish.

the snarkster

[9] Posted by the snarkster on 03-13-2008 at 08:10 AM • top

We had a portable labyrinth that we sent out to any parish that requested it and it was set up regularly in the parish hall. We ended up putting a permanent labyrinth outside in our memorial garden.

Snarkster:  Thanks for sharing your experience.  This is the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for introducing new things into Episcopal parishes.  Bring something into the church on a temporary or trial basis and then proceed as if it is a fait accompli.  They will ask for feedback and suggestions.  At a later point, they will present about four or five sketches of labyrinth designs and invite folks to participate in a “poll” in a scheme to make members feel like their opinion is valued.  When the “winner” is announced everybody will be relieved that the one truly horrid design wasn’t selected.  This is the way the new prayer book was foisted onto the parishioners.  Most everybody preferred the old prayer book but was grateful that guitar masses weren’t required.

[10] Posted by Piedmont on 03-13-2008 at 09:10 AM • top

I too would like to hear from someone who knows what they are talking about.  I was told that the labyrinth in Christian usage dated to when Islam cut off the routes to Jerusalem and pilgrims could no longer go there.  The labyrinth, which is supposed to be actually incorporated into the floor design in some Middle Age churches, represented the pilgrimage and people walked it to represent their devotion.
People have twisted and misinterpreted many usages to make a point either good or evil.  For example, Holy Communion and other rituals were banished as primitive or barbaric by Christian sects.  Before saying all these extreme negative things about the labyrinth, it would be nice for someone to explore it a little more objectively.  Obviously the idea was around in ancient times (Crete).  But so were ideas like sacrifice, virgin birth, heaven and so on.

[11] Posted by Hope on 03-13-2008 at 09:19 AM • top

Hope,

Greg knows what he’s talking about. That labyrinths were used by Christian pilgrims in the middle ages is fine and good and I promise to remember that next time a mideaval peasant happens by the church looking for the Holy Land. The problem that Greg illustrates so well is that the modern labyrinth movement cloaks itself by appealing to historical Christian pilgrimages but is in reality far far removed from it. The point of the article is to beware.

[12] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 03-13-2008 at 09:35 AM • top

Good grief. OK, I’ll take the “be alert” warning, but sheesh… looking for pagan practices under every rock in the garden?!?

The labyrinth can be a useful tool in contemplative prayer. Got anything against contemplative prayer? Meditation? Of course such practices may be used for ill—much as the sacred consecrated Body of our Eucharist can be used in a shockingly nefarious manner. However...that doesn’t mean I shouldn’t celebrate the Eucharist, does it? And then there’s always Christmas trees, mistletoe, Easter eggs… where will those nasty pagan practices end?!?

[13] Posted by PadreWayne on 03-13-2008 at 09:59 AM • top

Anything this sick church does would get your rubber stamp, wouldn’t it, Wayne?  Or is there some line you have that’s too far?

[14] Posted by Phil on 03-13-2008 at 10:02 AM • top

Padrewayne,

In TEC you don’t need to “look”

[15] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 03-13-2008 at 10:04 AM • top

Greg,
This is a great article. Thank you so much for doing so much good research and laying out the case against the labyrinth.
I do sympathize with the comment [5] Posted by Steve Lake

Nevertheless, I would be cautious about condemning any and all uses of a practice, just because many pagans do it or some unorthodox Christians (like Canon Artress) do it out of heretical beliefs.  Significant dates on the church calendar (e.g., Christmas and Easter) were a re-appropriation and re-orientation of pagan seasonal festivals.  Why can’t the use of the labyrinth be the same?

C. S. Lewis came to realize that Paganism prefigured Christianity and that Christianity fulfilled Paganism. In Christianity, the hints of all Paganism have been fulfilled. (See, for example, Surprised by Joy esp. pages 62-3 and then pg. 235)
I do understand Greg’s point, however, that we are seeing the movement in the opposite direction—Christian churches being used to convert people from Christianity to Paganism via the labyrinth.

[16] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-13-2008 at 10:11 AM • top

I tend to think of the labyrinth as a practical tool, essentially neutral.  It’s all in how it’s used.  And Greg does a great job exposing how it’s being promoted, which in turn will influence how it’s used.  So that is important.  I didn’t read Greg suggesting they are intrinsically evil, or should be banned; but we should exercise caution - “discernment of spirits.”

If the lotus position is a comfortable way for me to get focused for prayer to the Father, there is no harm in it.  If I’m taught to use the lotus position as a way to get spiritually centered on some vague higher self or other, there is opportunity for significant harm.  I think the labyrinth is like that.

The local TEC diocese has had one at their annual convention in recent years.  I just avoid them because I’d feel silly.  wink

[17] Posted by Connecticutian on 03-13-2008 at 10:47 AM • top

Greg,
I just finished reading a book by Frank Viola and George Barna entitled “Pagan Christianity.” And Deju Vu above stated that Lewis believed Christianity fulfilled paganism.
Take a look at this book. A lot of this info is known but scoffed at. But taken all together, it is unsettling.
This is especially true for me, a former Roman Catholic where the pagan influence is overwhelming and was passed on in various ways to the Protestant/Anglo-Catholic/Evangelicals. This truly hits home if you’ve ever walked around Rome.
So Episcopalians calling these people Pagans can be a bit absurd.

[18] Posted by LA Anglican on 03-13-2008 at 11:58 AM • top

I think Screwtape must be doing cartwheels.  Here are a bunch of Christians nipping at one another’s heels over neutral objects.  Evil to him who evil thinks.

[19] Posted by Hope on 03-13-2008 at 12:06 PM • top

RE: “Here are a bunch of Christians nipping at one another’s heels over neutral objects.”

No, Hope.  Greg was quite clear—he disapproves of Artress’s treatment, use, and additions to the labyrinth.

He took a moderate position on the use of the labyrinth—not denouncing it ontologically, but denouncing TEC misuse of and syncretistic accretions to it.  Some denounce labyrinths wholesale, others think they are great—Greg cautions against TEC’s general treatment of the labyrinth.

Artress’s treatment of the labyrinth is certainly not “neutral”.

[20] Posted by Sarah on 03-13-2008 at 12:12 PM • top

“Artress’s treatment of the labyrinth is certainly not “neutral”.”

No, but the danger in this kind of discussion is that ludicrous extremes evolve and appear to be tolerated and supported.  Tacitly or otherwise.  So long as they are in the right camp, so to speak.  Whatever.
Once upon a time, in what seems to now be a galaxy far far away, we were told to look for whatsoever things were lovely…...  Things are bad enough without succumbing to the temptation to exaggerate and distort them.  Even if THEY do.

[21] Posted by Hope on 03-13-2008 at 12:21 PM • top

The first labyrinth I ever walked was at our local Roman Catholic retreat center.  I have also walked the labyrinth at Grace Cathedral in San Francisco.  The other week I visited an Episcopal parish in Delaware that has a designed rock labyrinth built into its front lawn, with electric-light accents.  And I believe the Natty Cat rolls out its labyrinth once a month or so.  We have had them on our men’s retreat, and we are a pretty conservative bunch of guys.
    All of which is to say that it is a vessel that you can do with as you choose.  I have never gotten much out of it.  Because you typically walk it by yourself and in silence, it is a time for reflection, but often I am simply reflecting on the pattern and the turns, how much I have done and how much I have to do.  Other times it is a chance to reflect or pray, but I could take a quiet walk outside and do the same.

[22] Posted by Dick Mitchell on 03-13-2008 at 12:32 PM • top

RE: “Once upon a time, in what seems to now be a galaxy far far away, we were told to look for whatsoever things were lovely…... “

Yes - -and you’ll find those in the labelled “off-topic” posts.  ; > )

RE: “Things are bad enough without succumbing to the temptation to exaggerate and distort them.”

Greg did not distort Artress’s past, and present stances, nor any of the other facts which he laid out methodically and purposefully.  His article was a model of calm, objectively-stated research on Artress and her labyrinth work.

[23] Posted by Sarah on 03-13-2008 at 12:40 PM • top

Hope—I’d completely disagree with you on many levels, first off the route Artress is extremely dangerous. Second is without standing up to things early, then exactly what you are trying to proved is usurped an something once was good is a symbol for something else (an ancient symbol for peace immediately springs to mind). As Christians we have fight one a constant battle in the US where the cross can become a symbol of hate when its usurped when set aflame it becomes one of hate.

Greg has spotlighted the methodology these people are using, taken a benign and even fun thing to gain acceptance while concurrently promoting their believe and value system.  What you are proposing seems to be the same method that overlooking these “little things” and not exaggerating that over the last thirty years has taken Episcopalians down the road to ruin for the last forty years. Between the two, I think Greg many have a better approach for I’ve also experienced where simply overlooking lead us.

[24] Posted by Hosea6:6 on 03-13-2008 at 01:00 PM • top

Okay, I have to add something about the supposed connection with “paganism” as it might have existed in antiquity.  To put it bluntly, there isn’t one.  The paganism of the so-called new age or a movement like wicca has no genealogical connection to ancient religion.  In point of fact, it bears only a passing resemblance to ancient Greek and Roman religion.  These are new religious movements.  They have constructed for themselves a narrative of ancient roots (from all over the globe…) but that is their mythology, not a history lesson.

As for the labyrinth, though there is some appeal to history, I think we have to treat this as a new practice, not as something rooted in ancient tradition.  The geometry of the labyrinth may be ancient but the practice is not.  So I have a hard time classifying this alongside other resonances between Greek or Roman religion and aspects of early Christianity, which have to do with the early development of Christian belief and doctrine.

I also need to say, because I tend toward pedantry, that so-called “Greek” examples of the labyrinth are actually pre-Greek.  The civilization on Crete was Minoan, for a start.  And there isn’t a labyrinth there.  The story of the minotaur is mythic, though the idea of the labyrinth may have been derived from the complex interior layout of the palace at Knossos.  Even in Greek histories, the idea of the labyrinth is attributed to pre-Greek sources (e.g. Pelasgians…a generic name for populations prior to the Greeks).

And again, I concur with others here that the idea that there is some resonance between Christianity and the non-Christian religions of mediterranean antiquity is not a threat to Christian truth.  You need to keep aware, though, that there are writers (even scholars) who do their best to exploit the threat.  It’s also important to keep in mind that there isn’t always good historical evidence for the connections that are made.  Much of the evidence for the cult of Mithras, for instance, is highly fragmentary and was initially synthesized by scholars who saw in its a potential parallel to Christianity.  The cult arose in the east around the same time.  The point being, from the very start, they read the evidence with Christianity in mind.  That process produces a distortion, which in turn suggests a wealth of parallels and apparent borrowings that may or may not be there.

That’s not to say early Christianity didn’t belong to its context.  It certainly did.  I’m saying two things.  One, it isn’t the end of Christian truth.  Two, some of the supposed connections are tenuous at best.

I think the issue with medieval christian labyrinths is that their purpose is unclear.  I’ve heard the pilgrimage explanation before, which makes some sense.  Ultimately, I think we have to treat the current phenomenon as something distinct from its purported history.  And while some part of me wants to see it as neutral, when it comes down to it, I really don’t think it’s something Christians ought to pursue as a practice.  There are plenty of meditative practices that have grown up legitimately in the church.  I see no need to seek guidance elsewhere.

[25] Posted by AnnieV on 03-13-2008 at 02:29 PM • top

shoot, I meant to say there are scholars who do their best to exploit the sense of threat.  I really don’t think there is one.

[26] Posted by AnnieV on 03-13-2008 at 02:30 PM • top

Greg,
In this sentence the words “hand in glove” don’t seem to be linking to the correct website. “Artress’ labyrinth project goes hand in glove with the Eastern and pagan religious syncretism promoted by Bishop Swing, Grace Cathedral, and the URI:”

[27] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-13-2008 at 02:40 PM • top

Greg is taking a moderate position.  Even innocent activities can have spiritually dangerous consequences.  If one researches labyrinths they are common in pagan mythology.  However, they were never innocent.  Generally, in the labyrinth a monster (i.e. minotaur) lays in wait for their victim until the hero comes to vanquish it.  The real issue as Greg has pointed out is that as it is being presented by TEC and taught by Lauren Actress it embraces the New Age practice of god consciousness, which is simply a form of pantheism (pan=all; theism=God, i.e. god is in all thing) as opposed to our Christian Faith in a personal God who is the creator of the universe who is separate and distinct from Creation yet continues to be active in and with His creation (big distinction here).  As one walks the labyrinth they are to open themselves up to this god consciousness and become one with it and informed by it.  The serious question is what god or spirit are we opening ourselves up to?

Yes, one can walk a labyrinth and do so in a Christian way….but not as presented in TEC or as taught by Actress.  What Actress and the TEC have done is embraced spiritual syncretism….the mixing of two or more faiths to form a new religion that is not one or the other.  What you can be sure of is that it is not Christian and it is advisable to warn people of the spiritual dangers in taking part in labyrinth walks.

The more one researches labyrinths one discovers there is nothing Christian about them.  It is time for all of us to be more spiritually discerning. 

Remember…wise as a serpent but harmless as a dove.

[28] Posted by Creighton+ on 03-13-2008 at 02:55 PM • top

I have spelt Lauren Artress’ name wrong…it is Artress and not actress.  This was my mistake and I should have caught it in my previews. No disrespect is intended.

[29] Posted by Creighton+ on 03-13-2008 at 03:01 PM • top

From your link to the <a/ href=http://www.collectivewisdominitiative.org/files_people/Artress_Lauren.htm>Collective Wisdom website</a>, Rev. Lauren Artress says:

Walking the labyrinth is a spiritual exercise. My approach is to offer the labyrinth as a free and save space for personal exploration. There is no right way to walk a labyrinth. Using this guideline, the walker’s inner world becomes transparent to them. Dynamics not ordinarily recognized—-one’s relatioinship to rules, projections of judgment, impatience—- become crystallized into metaphor.

When I once walked the labyrinth with two others, each of us learned something about our internal process. Talking to each other, we found that one of us was overly focussed on what was going on outside the labyrinth, one on how bothersome the other people also walking the labyrinth were and the third had quite a bit of “self talk” about it being too difficult and wanting to give up. Of course, the particular way of thinking was a constant presence in the life of the particular person, and this experience of walking the labyrinth just served to bring the pattern to the forefront.

[30] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-13-2008 at 03:17 PM • top

Yep, nutcases throughout the modern Episcopal church.  Beware of them and their twisted syncretism.  Go it.

But mostly, I’m with #5. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

Nothing unChristian when I walk a labyrinth.  Mental path to Jerusalem and reflections on Christ’s Gospel teachings and miracles.  Focus on the foot of the cross and empty tomb when I get to the center.  Path back to worldly “homeland” with a renewed appreciation for the Lord’s sacrifice, a refreshed sense of Christ’s presence and increased energy to walk even more closely with him in my daily life. 

Even when visiting Grace Cathedral I’ve never met a confused troll or Buddah along the way. Ever. But, of course, I’ve never take the course described above. My loss, NOT. 

Lenten blessings & may your upcoming Holy Week be holy,

[31] Posted by miserable sinner on 03-13-2008 at 03:21 PM • top

[30] MichaelSean,
In every Christian labyrinth there should be a cross embedded in the center. This makes the symbolism clearly about the path to Christ. To neglect to insist on the cross in the center of the labyrinth is a major error.

[32] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-13-2008 at 03:24 PM • top

Deja,

You have to scroll down to the post titled “STRANGE “DIVERSITIES” (Or, The Episcopal Church Welcomes You).” Their permalink doesn’t seem to work very well.

[33] Posted by Greg Griffith on 03-13-2008 at 03:30 PM • top

Padre Wayne:

So as you see it, taking a pagan object—Easter eggs, Christmas trees—and making them Christian is the same as taking a Christian object—the labyrinth—and making it pagan?

[34] Posted by James Manley on 03-13-2008 at 04:08 PM • top

Phil: “Anything this sick church does would get your rubber stamp, wouldn’t it, Wayne?  Or is there some line you have that’s too far?”
a) I do not believe TEC is a “sick” church. In my parish alone there are people of deep Christian faith. And such people can be found in every Episcopal church.
b) What is “sick” is the nitpicking Pharisaic need to undermine anything liturgical that might be new, different, innovative, curious, interesting, thought-provoking by calling it pagan and/or heretical.
c) Of course there are lines of “that’s too far.” Some of it is personal taste (I tend toward Anglo-Catholic [of the Affirming sort] worship), some of it I would consider borderline or outright heretical—or simply bad theology (like too much “praise” music) (NB not all!).

James Manley: As pointed out above, the labyrinth is neither Christian nor pagan—it is a neutral. If someone wants it in their own backyard to worship Isis, well, that is their perogative. I have found the labyrinth useful for contemplative prayer. But I find candles, low-ringing bells, chant, and the Jesus Prayer helpful, as well.

[35] Posted by PadreWayne on 03-13-2008 at 04:20 PM • top

“As pointed out above, the labyrinth is neither Christian nor pagan—it is a neutral.

Padre Wayne,

Is Greg’s article majority about a maze or about Artress & Swing’s use of a maze in their promotion of very questionable to outright pagan belief systems? What is the main focus of Greg’s article?

[36] Posted by Hosea6:6 on 03-13-2008 at 04:35 PM • top

Well said, [38] Hosea6:6,

And Greg titled the piece “Walking Away from Christ: Labyrinths in the Episcopal Church”. If we can be sure a cross is embedded at the center of each labyrinth used by the Episcopal Church, then the labyrinth walk will clearly be a spiritual practice about walking toward Christ.

(Well, OK, some will argue the walk back out would be a walk away from Christ. Actually, I would also recommend not to do the labyrinth in reverse at the end—just treat reaching the cross at the center as the end.)

[37] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-13-2008 at 05:54 PM • top

You are losing me here. All this is a surprise….....why?

WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TEc HERE.

TEc HAS BECOME PATHOLOGICALLY AND THEOLOGICALLY INSANE.

TEc IS DOING EXACTLY WHAT ALL THE NUTCASE GNOSTIC TEXTBOOKS SAY TEc SHOULD BE DOING!

sorry for shouting. the obvious just get a little tedious after quite a long while.

[38] Posted by Dilbertnomore on 03-13-2008 at 06:48 PM • top

Silly comment:  Do labyrinth designers provide a ball of string to the walkers so they don’t get lost?  It conjures up a nightmarish picture of a dozen walker trying to find the center, each with his/her own ball of string! 
End of silly comment. And elves, feel free to delete.  smile

[39] Posted by Bill C on 03-13-2008 at 06:55 PM • top

oops!  Commenatrix, feel free to warn me off!

[40] Posted by Bill C on 03-13-2008 at 06:56 PM • top

Bill C,
In these labyrinths there are no dead ends. There is only one path. It twists and turns but if you just keep walking, you get there. So it can be seen as a metaphor for the need to continually repent and turn back again as we walk our Christian path.

[41] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-13-2008 at 08:09 PM • top

Glad to hear it, Padre Wayne.  Sometimes, I wonder (on boundaries) - not from you, particularly, but from your side of the aisle.

[42] Posted by Phil on 03-13-2008 at 08:56 PM • top

Out with the pew Bibles, in with the labyrinth.

[43] Posted by Irenaeus on 03-13-2008 at 11:19 PM • top

If you had time on your hands and an opportunity to observe lots of Liberal Protestant congregations, you could devise an Apostasy Rating Scale (ARS) and assign points for various indicia of deviation from Christian orthodoxy.

Labyrinths would certainly get points.

[44] Posted by Irenaeus on 03-13-2008 at 11:54 PM • top

re [46] Irenaeus,
but less points if they have a cross embedded in the center.

[45] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-14-2008 at 11:34 AM • top

re [46] Irenaeus,
I just had an idea. I wonder if Greg or Jackie would post it if you created an Apostasy Rating Scale (ARS). I loved your Dictionary last summer.

[46] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-14-2008 at 11:38 AM • top

#48 - it could be color coded:
Yellow alert: fearing man instead of God (ex. Rowan’s sharia fiasco, Hindu communion).

Green alert: lawsuits.

Red alert: denying the necessity and reality of Christ’s sacrifice via liberal theology.

Just about everything else could go under Pink alert.

[47] Posted by SpongJohn SquarePantheist on 03-14-2008 at 11:52 AM • top

Today’s lectionary readings are on spiritual blindness.  The accompanying prayers at Lent & Beyond are here and here.

[48] Posted by Jill Woodliff on 03-15-2008 at 10:33 AM • top

I don’t think anyone’s mentioned the profit motive here. Lauren Artress has helped to turn labyrinths into big business to exploit the gullible. Chartres Replica (Tm) and Labyrinth Company (TM) are among the many trademarks floating around to capitalize on the old tradition. Tucked away in a convent or monastery with limited space for meditation and walking, the labyrinths are fine, sort of like a rosary for the feet. In the hands of pseudo-intellectual and/or opportunistic spiritual advisors, well…

[49] Posted by Anglicat on 03-15-2008 at 08:12 PM • top

Well, it’s just the *thing* one does nowadays.  In the 70’s & 80’s one *made* one’s Cursillo, didn’t one?  And as more and more people did, there were fewer and fewer Episcopalians, weren’t there?  Hmmmmm….
Now there are more and more labyrinths….Probably walked by people who used to get the Cursillo thing….And fewer and fewer Episcopalians.
What next year?  Cow tipping?  Mud wrestling?

[50] Posted by nwlayman on 03-15-2008 at 10:40 PM • top

nwlayman, I am unaware of Cursillo being used for occult purposes and question the analogy with labyrinths.

[51] Posted by Jill Woodliff on 03-16-2008 at 06:36 AM • top

Although there are probably some rare folk to whom both Cursillo and labyrinths would hold great appeal, in general, I would say that very different sorts of folk are attracted to each. I’d even be willing to venture that introverts would tend towards the labyrinths, and extroverts towards Cursillo. I doubt that either could be said to have contributed to TEC’s decline: labyrinths (because they really aren’t all that popular) and Cursillo (because I know too many thorougly dedicated, right-minded, sincere Christians currently holding their parishes together, based in part on what they learned in Cursillo years ago).

[52] Posted by Anglicat on 03-16-2008 at 07:22 AM • top

Tucked away in a convent or monastery with limited space for meditation and walking, the labyrinths are fine, sort of like a rosary for the feet. In the hands of pseudo-intellectual and/or opportunistic spiritual advisors, well…


“There is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so.”  Actually there are things good or bad, but when you are talking about symbols and tools, Shakespeare is right.

[53] Posted by Hope on 03-17-2008 at 08:45 AM • top

Dear Greg,

That was a most helpful article. Thanks.
      Blessings, Ed Hird+
p.s. Here is my article on the Labryinth which I wrote for Anglican Renewal Ministries

Dr Jean Houston & the Labyrinth Fad
  -an article for the May 2,000 AFR Canada magazine
http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/arm08.htm
A ex-new-ager who attends our congregation participated a year ago in
the Labyrinth. Upon walking to the centre of the circle (1), she
immediately sensed a dark spiritual vortex sucking her down.
Fortunately, being a Spirit-filled Christian, she later renounced her
involvement in the Labyrinth and through prayer was cut free from the
bondage that she was sensing.
Being westerners, we often fail to realize that seemingly harmless
‘physical’ techniques can have significant questionable spiritual impact
on our lives.(2) One of the patterns with the dozens of new-age fads
sweeping North America and the West Coast in particular is that they all
pop up out of the blue but claim to have rediscovered an ancient secret
technique that we all need.  Many of them, including the fast-growing
Labyrinth fad (3), even reconstruct a plausible but misleading Christian
history used to persuade well-meaning Christians.  The Labyrinth, as
currently practiced, has very little to do with the Chartres Cathedral
(4), and very much to do with Dr. Jean Houston’s impact on the
new-age-friendly Grace Cathedral in San Francisco.  Dr. Jean Houston is
listed on the Internet as one of the 10 top New Age speakers in North
America (5)  The inside cover of Jean Houston’s 1997 book A Passion for
the Possible describes herself as ‘considered by many to be one of the
world’s greatest teachers…’  Of concern to renewal-oriented Christians
is that Houston teaches her students on the ‘Mystery School’ how to
speak in occult glossolalia.  She encourages her participants to ‘begin
describing your impressions in glossolalia’ and even to ‘…write a poem
in glossolalia.’ (6) This counterfeit phenomenon, of course, does not
discredit the genuine Christian gift of tongues/glossolalia that is
available after renouncing the occult, receiving Jesus as Lord, and
asking for the filling of the Holy Spirit.
As past president of the Association for Humanistic Psychology, Jean
makes use of her doctorate in ‘Philosophy of Religion’(7) to gain access
to areas where most new-agers and occultists can’t go.  For example, as
noted widely in media a few years ago (8), she became a consultant to
Hillary Clinton, helping her to ‘channel’ the spirit of Eleanor
Roosevelt.
The Labyrinth, also called the Dromenon (9), is the official symbol of
Dr. Jean Houston’s new-age ‘Mystery School’ which one pays $3,775 to be
initiated into over a series of 9 weekends.(10) Over 5,000 people so far
have attended the Mystery School over the past 15 years.  Houston
describes her Mystery School students as ‘…the dancers of the
Dromenon…’.(11)  In Houston’s 1996 book The Mythic Life, she credits
H.F. Heard’s novel Dromenon with its ‘psychophysical state of ecstasy
and spiritual awakening’ as the inspiration to adopting the image of the
Dromenon/Labyrinth as the symbol of her work. (12)  Canon Lauren Artress
from Grace Cathedral (13) brought the Labyrinth back to her Cathedral
after experiencing the Labyrinth at Jean Houston’s Mystery School.(14)
Jean Houston wrote in her 1982 book The Possible Human about ‘…the
growth of Dromenon (Labyrinth) communities. (15)
As acknowledged in Labyrinth WEBsites, the Labyrinth is a mandala (16),
which is actually a Hindu occult (17) meditation process (18)brought to
the Western world by the grandfather of the New Age, Dr. Carl Jung. (19)
The Labyrinth has since spread to over 200 cities, and is making a
measurable impact in Canada.  Artress claims that “over a million people
have walked the labyrinth at Grace Cathedral alone…” (20)  Even the
infamous Starhawk, the self-declared practicing witch and colleague of
Matthew Fox, is walking the labyrinth nowadays (21).  One of the stated
purposes of the Labyrinth is to connect us to the mother goddess, of
which the labyrinth is a symbol.  In her 1995 book ‘Walking A Sacred
Path: Rediscovering the Labyrinth as a Spiritual Tool’, Canon Artress
states that “The labyrinth is a large, complex spiral circle which is an
ancient symbol for the divine mother, the God within, the goddess, the
holy in all creation.” (22)  Artress says that “You walk to the center
of the labyrinth and there at the center, you meet the Divine.” (23)
Jean Houston claims that “As we encounter the archetypal world within
us, a partnership is formed whereby we grow as do the gods and goddesses
within us.” (24)  To Jean Houston, it seems that all of life is made up
of polytheistic labyrinths.  In her 1992 book The Hero & the Goddess,
she recommended: ‘Now, taking a favorite god or goddess by the hand, a
Greek one this time, explore the labyrinthian winding of your left
hemisphere…Take the deity by the hand and begin to explore the labyrinth
winding of your right hemisphere, the place of intuition.’ (25)  My
prayer, as Jean Houston’s new-age Labyrinth fad impacts the Church, is
that we may be wise as serpents and harmless as doves.
The Rev. Ed Hird+
Rector, St. Simon’s Anglican Church, North Vancouver, BC
Missioner, Anglican Renewal Ministries of Canada
http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/
(1) One Grace Cathedral Labyrinth advocate said that “Labyrinths predate
Christianity by over a millennium.  The most famous labyrinth from
ancient times was the Cretan one, the supposed lair of the mythological
Minotaur, which Theseus slew with the aid of Ariadne and her spool of
thread. rituals…”  Peter Corbett, “Pathfinders: Walking medieval
labyrinths in a modern world,”
http://www.gracecathedral.org/enrichment/features/fea_19981120_txt.shtml, p. 2
It was at the centre of the Labyrinth that the Minotaur did his
devouring of unsuspecting humans.

To read the rest of the footnotes, click on http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/arm08.htm

[54] Posted by edhird on 03-17-2008 at 10:57 AM • top

If you had time on your hands and an opportunity to observe lots of Liberal Protestant congregations, you could devise an Apostasy Rating Scale (ARS) and assign points for various indicia of deviation from Christian orthodoxy.

Labyrinths would certainly get points.

The only concern people should have is the distinction between proper and improper use of Labyrinths.  This tradition has Christian roots that reach back to medieval times.  Many cathedrals throughout Europe have Labyrinths built into their floors.  It is misuse that should be criticized not the practice itself.  Sadly, the West has lost almost any contact with mysticism and Christianity has suffered for it. (I am of course referring to the great Christian Mystics and not mysticism as in occult practice)

[55] Posted by Brian from T19 on 03-17-2008 at 11:46 AM • top

“This tradition has Christian roots that reach back to medieval times.  Many cathedrals throughout Europe have Labyrinths built into their floors.  It is misuse that should be criticized not the practice itself.”

Unfortunately this line of thinking falters because there is no written tradition about how Labryinths may have functioned in the middle ages. Nada.

Because of this, the medievial church labyrinths exist as ‘empty crab shells’ into which any new-age practice can crawl into, and redefine itself as ‘ancient christian practice.’ Post-modern theology is very good at sound-bite ‘re-creation’ of alleged ancient christian practices.
                Ed Hird+

[56] Posted by edhird on 03-17-2008 at 12:02 PM • top

Well, I do agree with Brian from T19 that the labyrinth became so popular because of a lack of spirituality in the churches. The emphasis on the social gospel leaves a void.

[57] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-17-2008 at 04:00 PM • top

[56], [58] edhird,
I am wondering what you make of the C. S. Lewis novel Till We Have Faces?

[58] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-17-2008 at 05:53 PM • top

56], [58] edhird,
I am wondering what you make of the C. S. Lewis novel Till We Have Faces? [60] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-17-2008 at 05:53 PM

Dear Deja Vu,

I love CS Lewis’ writings, and have written a number of articles on CS Lewis. Feel free to check them out at http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/cr9202.htm
C.S. LEWIS: LOVER OF NATURE
Perhaps one of the most famous and versatile 20th century English writers has been the Oxford, and then Cambridge, scholar: C.S. Lewis(...)

http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/nsnews007.htm
Friends on a Quest
- an article for the NSN ‘Spiritually Speaking’ column
  By Rev. Ed Hird
Anthony Hopkins portrayed CS (Jack) Lewis, the author of the hugely popular Narnia Tales, in the thoughtful movie ‘Shadowlands’. Since Lewis’ death in 1963, sales of his books have risen to over 2 million a year. For much of his life, Lewis, the son of a solicitor and of an Anglican clergyman’s daughter, was a convinced atheist(...)

http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/nsnews021.html
Always Winter and Never Christmas
-an article for the North Shore News ‘Spiritually Speaking’ column

http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/cr0601.html
Aslan on the Move
an article for the Deep Cove Crier

http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/nsnews022.html
I’m On Aslan’s Side
-an article for the North Shore News ‘Spiritually Speaking’ column

          Ed Hird+
          http://www.battleforthesoulofcanada.blogspot.com

[59] Posted by edhird on 03-17-2008 at 06:45 PM • top

edhird,
I am wondering particularly about what you make of Lewis’ novel Till We Have Faces   because of the Pagan elements.
I, as noted previously on this thread, understand Lewis in Surprised by Joy   to perceive Paganism as a foreshadowing of Christianity. And so I understand Till We Have Faces   in this way. Did you get a chance to read through the comments on this thread? Have you read Till We Have Faces ?

[60] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-17-2008 at 08:34 PM • top

edhird,
I am wondering particularly about what you make of Lewis’ novel Till We Have Faces because of the Pagan elements.
I, as noted previously on this thread, understand Lewis in Surprised by Joy to perceive Paganism as a foreshadowing of Christianity. And so I understand Till We Have Faces in this way. Did you get a chance to read through the comments on this thread? Have you read Till We Have Faces ?

[62] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-17-2008 at 08:34 PM

My wife tells me that I have read ‘Till We have Faces’.  It is not my strong suit, as it would have been a long while ago. I have no problem with “Paganism as a foreshadowing of Christianity”, but also believe that we are not to serve two masters. Sometimes renunciation is key in moving forward.  Sometimes cultural practices can be transformed.  If you read my article about the rebirth of the labyrinth, it was done in the heart of the new-age movement and cleverly packaged to a naive waiting church.  Why not rediscover authentic christian practices that are an undisputed part of our Anglican heritage? This really is what Lent is (and should be) about.

            Blessings, Ed Hird+
p.s. I commend to you an article to that effect which I wrote for the Toronto Prayer Book Society. http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/arm06.htm
THE PRAYER BOOK: YESTERDAY, TODAY AND TOMORROW
Three addresses given at St. Paul’s Church, Bloor Street, Toronto, on May 1, 1999 at a special event organized by
the Prayer Book Society of Canada, Toronto Branch, in celebration of the 450th anniversary of the Book of Common Prayer
by
The Revd. Dr. Robert Crouse, retired Professor of Classics at King’s College, Halifax;
The Revd. Ed Hird, rector of St. Simon’s Church, North Vancouver;
The Revd. Dr. James Packer, Professor of Systematic Theology at Regent College, Vancouver
“FILLED WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF HIS WILL”  (Col. 1:1-14)
The Revd. Ed Hird

[61] Posted by edhird on 03-17-2008 at 11:19 PM • top

I am thrilled with this thread. I have a few parishioners who went from wanting an outside Stations of the Cross in our parish garden to wanting to put in a Labyrinth. I walk and talk in circles enough on my own, and certainly don’t need a Labyrinth to accomplish such. If you will give me permission I’d like to copy your work Greg and pass it around. I love Fr. Matt’s response in #13, what a hoot. I have five puppy labradors at my house, and I’ve decided to name one Labyrinth (“Laby” for short).

[62] Posted by FrVan on 03-20-2008 at 09:55 AM • top

FrVan:  From the name one can’t tell whether “Labyrinth” is male or female.  I suppose that since the dog is Episcopalian that’s unimportant, eh? smile

[63] Posted by Piedmont on 03-20-2008 at 10:39 AM • top

We prefer the titles: Gaybrador, Bi-dogged, or trans-canine… smile

[64] Posted by FrVan on 03-20-2008 at 10:58 AM • top

Thanks, Greg, for the wonderful article about the labyrinth.  We have been called religious “fundamentalists,” “radicals,” “regressives,” and just pain stupid and lunatic for years for speaking out against these things.  Glad to have you join us among the lunatic fringe. 
St. George’s Church in Germantown, TN came apart at the seems, rolled over and died only a year or two after installing one of these counfounded things in their church yard in the mid-90’s.  Labryinth lovers beware.  God will not be mocked.
Have a blessed Holy Week and Easter.
The Revs Ruth and John Urban

[65] Posted by 2cor520 on 03-20-2008 at 02:02 PM • top

Fr. Van,

Feel free to pass this article around. Please use <a href=“http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/print/10769/”>this link<a> to print your copies.

[66] Posted by Greg Griffith on 03-20-2008 at 02:06 PM • top

Thank you for the link, and for the article. I think I will make copies and enclose it in our newsletter (I want every Church in the diocese to have a copy). I think this is splendid! Have a blessed close to Holy week, and a joyous Eastertide…

[67] Posted by FrVan on 03-20-2008 at 02:15 PM • top

Some thoughts:

I read a book some time ago by, I think Artress, on the labryinth, sicne I was curious about the Christian practice of it, and it concerned the Labyrinth in a church San Francisco, and not once did she mention God the Father or Jesus, and only a vague reference to ‘the spirit’ (lower case).  So if the “Labyrinth” movement is Christian, why the omission?  Sometimes you can tell more about something by what is left out or not said, as when is included or specifically stated.

2) as a poster stated, we have meditative walks in the church, such as the Stations of the Cross and the rosary, so why do we need another exercise of doubtful origin? I would also like to point out that some who are praising the Labyrinth are the same who deride the stations or the rosary as being “too Catholic”.  Yet they point to Catholic cathedrals for the validity of the Labyrinth.  Very curious.

3) wasn’t the Labyrinth in Chartre Cathedral covered over for centuries?  Doesn’t that perhaps speak that it was tried and then discarded?  So why, just because it was in a cathedral, do we think it was a good thing? It may have been found wanting.

4) for some the word ‘spirituality’ equals ‘Christian’, yet there are many forms of spirituality in this world (and the other) that have nothing to do with the God of Christianity, but rather with the ‘other’ spiritual powers and dominions.  But to point this out is not cool.  And much of this, such as the Enneagram or tarot cards or astrology, which are definately occultic in origin, are accepted just because a bishop, priest or nun espouses it.  Jesus warned against false teachers, and told us to be on our guard. Yet it seems some are willing to run here and there after every new thing that is presented as an old thing.

5) I don’t think Lewis was proposing accepting every thing from Paganism be accepted because it is fulfilled in Christ.  My reading is that he beleived that there were shadows of the Truth presented in myths and rituals and fables, and that the SUBSTANCE of these shadows had their origin in the Truth of Christianity.  Not that they were good in and of themselves, but rather that they pointed, in the same way as a signpost, to the truth and to the right path.

Peace to all, in Christ!

Jim Elliott <><

[68] Posted by libraryjim on 03-22-2008 at 03:49 PM • top

Jim Elliott:
“...And much of this, such as the Enneagram or tarot cards or astrology, which are definately occultic in origin, are accepted just because a bishop, priest or nun espouses it…”

Your comments about the Enneagram are a good example of the need for the spiritual gift of discernment in our post-modern ‘soundbite culture’ where many things disguise themselves as allegedly ancient Christian practice’.

        In Christ, Ed Hird+
p.s. Here is an article I wrote on the Enneagram that may interest you. Just click on http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/arm04.htm
Extract: “Gurdjieff and the Enigmatic Enneagram”
The following article emerged out of a footnote to a larger investigation into the relationship between Dr. Carl Jung, neo-gnosticism, and the MBTI.
 
Who is George Gurdjieff, and why is he having such a massive indirect impact on our churches today?  Why in particular are ‘post-charismatic’ Roman Catholics, especially well-meaning nuns, becoming caught up in his questionable practices?(1)  The Rev. Dr. Robert Innes, Lecturer in Systematic Theology at St. John’s College: Durham, England, tells us that the man credited with bringing the Enneagram to the West is George Gurdjieff, a Greek-Armenian from what is now the Republic of Georgia.  While still a teen, Gurdjieff became immersed in occultic practices such as astrology, mental telepathy, spiritism, table turning, fortune telling and demon possession.  Gurdjieff claimed that while he was in Afghanistan in 1897, he visited a monastery of the esoteric Sarmouni sect where he learned their mystical Sufi dancing, psychic powers and the Enneagram.(2)
The massive popularity of the Enneagram in Christian circles, the 2nd most popular personality test after the MBTI (3), makes it well worth assessing what we are actually opening ourselves to.  Advocates like Barbara Metz and John Burchill describe the Enneagram as “a sleeping giant, awakened in our times…”(4)...”

[69] Posted by edhird on 03-22-2008 at 04:40 PM • top

To All,
Greetings! Just a reminder that these practices are very pagan in origin.  The Labyrinths that are used today are the same as they were when created in anciet Greek culture and mythology. [The Minotaur being at the center of the Greek Labyrinths]  These are full of the devilish occult.  And they have no place in any Christian church in the body of Christ, no matter which denomination it is.
+Stonewall

[70] Posted by BishopOfSaintJames on 03-26-2008 at 11:32 PM • top

Hey Greg,
I love you dearly, and disagree with you wholeheartedly on this one.  Yes, I know that non-Christians and Christy-ans (a word I just made up for the pseudo-Christians cluttering the Christian left) enjoy the labrynth, but it has a good respectable orthodox Christian pedigree.  It is a tool, no more sinister or intrinsically pagan than a telephone.

[71] Posted by Tim Jones on 03-27-2008 at 03:02 AM • top

Well, I disagree about the labyrinth too, but having been subjected to the Enneagram a few years back, I have to say I found it about as convincing as those check-the-answer quizzes in the Ladies’ magazines on weighty subjects like “Does your man turn you on” or “Are you a dynamite Mom.”  Pure crap, in my humble opinion.
Churches should not be promoting such dreck.

[72] Posted by Hope on 03-27-2008 at 05:06 AM • top

the labrynth, but it has a good respectable orthodox Christian pedigree…” Tim Jones, 73

Dear Tim,

As there is no written history to the Labyrinth and its alleged Christian pedigree, could you please let us know what you mean by the concept “a good respectable orthodox Christian pedigree…” in this context?

        Ed Hird+

p.s. If you have not yet read about the Dr Jean Houston connection in the Labryinth fad, I would value your thoughts on her impact.
Dr Jean Houston & the Labyrinth Fad
-an article for the May 2,000 AFR Canada magazine
http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/arm08.htm

[73] Posted by edhird on 03-27-2008 at 09:54 AM • top

Hi Ed,
Well, first of all, I fully acknowledge that labrynths of various kinds predate Christianity, and have been found in very many cultures across the world.  I reject the suggestion though that because something did not originate in Christianity, or has been used by someone with non Christian beliefs, then it must be rejected and boycotted by Christians.  I might just as well say that because I once saw a pagan eating carrots while praying to a donkey-goddess, I will never again eat carrots.

There are a number of European medieval cathedrals, mostly French, that incorporate labrynth designs in their floors.  Many other cathedrals, like the Minster here in York, have patterned flagging in the nave.  I acknowledge that there is scant medieval writing about them, so the normal historian’s art needs to be used - looking at what people did (build labrynths in cathedrals at great expense) and wonder why they did it.  Given that the medieval period was an age in which much was made of pilgrimages, it is not an outrageous suggestion that the use of labrynths by Christians was perhaps related to the importance of pilgrimage.  Also, the period in which the labrynths were constructed was a period in which the dangers of heresy and paganism were taken very seriously indeed.  It is unlikely that the persecutors of heresy and witchcraft would knowingly have incorporated something dreadfully inappropriate into their cathedral.
I find walking the labrynth a good part of my prayer discipline, especially while I am on retreat.  I can well believe that new age nut cases imagine all kinds of wierd stuff while using the same labrynths.  I also imagine that the very same internet that I use to access Stand Firm, which I value greatly, might be used by others to access pornography or witchcraft!

I thank God for the time I have spent using labrynths.

[74] Posted by Tim Jones on 03-27-2008 at 11:40 AM • top

I acknowledge that there is scant medieval writing about them…Given that the medieval period was an age in which much was made of pilgrimages, it is not an outrageous suggestion that the use of labrynths by Christians was perhaps related to the importance of pilgrimage. Tim Jones

Dear Tim,
You mention scant medieval writing about the Labyrinth. I have been told that there is none, not scant. Please inform me as to any documented evidence about the scant medieval writing. I would love to look at the texts.

The speculation about pilgrimage is just that. There is no documentation as to its possible use in Chartre, etc.

If I am wrong, please let me know with documentation.

      Ed Hird+

[75] Posted by edhird on 03-27-2008 at 02:00 PM • top

Hi Ed,

I’m quite happy to accept your assertion that there is no medieval documentation regarding the purpose and uses of cathedral labrynths or village labrynths.  The speculation about pilgrimage is just that - that is part and parcel of the historian’s craft - educated, informed speculation concerning the gaps in hard historical evidence.
Let us then, for the sake of argument, assume that the medieval cathedral labrynths, and the various English turf labrynths, have nothing to do with pilgrimages (which I happily admit is perfectly possible).  How might we then explain the time, effort and cost expended by medieval Christians in building them?  Or is it your argument that they were built by people of another belief system, right under the noses of the Christian authorities?
I’ve walked the labrynth at Grace cathedral in San Francisco a few times.  Often it was clear that some of the other people using the labrynth were either not Christian or were Christian in the most tangental sense, with little notion that their “Christianity” necessitated submission to Jesus Christ as Lord.  Their presence in no way diminished my Christian use of the labrynth.  I am quite sure that in medieval times, faithful Christian people walked the labrynths of the cathedrals, the evidence for which is that they are there.

[76] Posted by Tim Jones on 03-27-2008 at 03:11 PM • top

Has anyone read what the Chartres diocesan website says about the labyrinthe? You can read it here:

http://www.diocesechartres.com/cathedrale/

According to diocesan site, the medieval labyrinthes were called “Chemins de Jerusalem” - or “path to Jerusalem” which tends to suggest they may have been regarded as a way to have a pilgrimage experience. And that the person walking it would walk out toward the chancel (I think? “choeur”), toward the East and the light.

The fact that there are labyrinthes in several medieval cathedrals (some extant, some not) would indicate, to me at least, that they had a Christian purpose there. This takes nothing away from what Greg has written above about how labyrinthes are being used and marketed by the people he has written about and their sudden appearance in Episcopal churches near you. And me.

[77] Posted by oscewicee on 03-27-2008 at 03:21 PM • top

[72] BishopOfTheBadlands asserts that “The Labyrinths that are used today are the same as they were when created in ancient Greek culture and mythology.” This is false.

The labyrinths I am most familiar with from Greek culture and mythology are multicursal—there are wrong choices and the possibility of getting lost in the dead ends of a maze.

The Christian labyrinths are unicursal—there is only one path and while there are many twists and turns, if one keeps walking the path, one will reach the center.

[78] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-27-2008 at 03:22 PM • top

Also, please note that a unicural labyrinth with a cross in the center was also carved into many medieval baptismal fonts.

[79] Posted by Deja Vu on 03-27-2008 at 03:26 PM • top

My disagreement with Greg is his assertion that if a labrynth is on Episcopal property then it is there for non or sub- Christian use.  I helped build a labrynth at the Gray Center in Mississippi a couple of summers ago.  It was built carefully and prayerfully, blessed and commissioned for use by the bishop.  It was built as part of a forty day retreat in which we studied the scriptures daily, prayed together constantly, and sought practical ways to serve our neighbors.  Its construction was based on the remarkable labrynth used by the sisters at the St. Scholastica (RC) monastery for women in Fort Smith, Arkansas.
Yes, labrynths, like spoons and rocking chairs, can be used by non Christians, or pseudo Christians, but that in no way diminishes their good, helpful use by faithful orthodox Christians.

[80] Posted by Tim Jones on 03-27-2008 at 03:33 PM • top

I have to admit, though, Tim, that I find it troubling to see the same emblem/structure being used by those without Christian intent. A table or a spoon is not a church. Would you be comfortable if pagans came to conduct pagan services in your church? I know there is no way of regulating the use of a labyrinth or the mind of the person using it - but I’m not sure I see the value of helping to make one available for non-Christian use. If that makes any kind of sense to you. I am not sure how we can be confident we have recovered a Christian devotion if no one knows what the devotion was.  That the medieval church had labyrinths is unquestionable. How they used them and why seems to be completely open to debate.

[81] Posted by oscewicee on 03-27-2008 at 03:46 PM • top

Looking for documentation from a time when most people couldn’t write isn’t logical.  There was a whole discipline of mnemonics back then; people learned to use their memory to pass on things like the way to build cathedrals, and much of the crafts and lore of the time. People had libraries in their heads.  Among other reasons was the lack of paper or other writing materials within the economic reach of an ordinary person.

[82] Posted by Hope on 03-27-2008 at 05:41 PM • top

This is what happens when you hit the bong a little too hard for a little too long.  What laughable mumbo-jumbo.

[83] Posted by Jeffersonian on 03-27-2008 at 06:05 PM • top

Hope, it’s true that illiteracy was high - but the very people who *were* literate would have been those gathered around the cathedrals. We even have records of Abbot Suger, don’t we?

[84] Posted by oscewicee on 03-27-2008 at 06:12 PM • top

Hi oscewicee,
I would object firmly to non- or anti- or sub- Christian services being held in the church.  The presence of a labrynth in the church should not be seen as an invitation to pagan ritual.  There are all kinds of things in churches that pagans might choose to use to their own anti Christian ends, but that shouldn’t prevent their Christian use and symbolism.

[85] Posted by Tim Jones on 03-28-2008 at 03:01 AM • top

And I return to my previous point concerning medieval Christian usage - what possible reason can we imagine to explain the presence in medieval cathedrals of labrynths, if not for orthodox Christian use?

[86] Posted by Tim Jones on 03-28-2008 at 03:04 AM • top

“...And I return to my previous point concerning medieval Christian usage - what possible reason can we imagine to explain the presence in medieval cathedrals of labrynths, if not for orthodox Christian use?

[88] Posted by Tim Jones on 03-28-2008 at 03:04 AM

Tim,
A person can imagine any possible reason for labryinths in some medieval cathedrals, but the fact remains that even with the presence of well-educated medieval monks and priests, there are no literary records that describe the reason and alleged usage of the medieval labyrinths. Perhaps, and just perhaps, the labryinth may have been merely a work of art, like other works of art on Cathedral floors, walls and ceilings. Perhaps it was never intended to be walked or turned into a religious practice.

You may find it interesting, Tim, to retrace the ‘bread crumb’ trail of who first introduced you to walking the Labryinth and/or built the Labryinths you walk on. I suspect that you would find Lauren Artress and Dr Jean Houston in your direct lineage.

The Dr Jean Houston labryinth revival has taken an ‘empty crab shell’ and inserted into it a clever new-age ideology and practice, with a strong emphasis on the worship of the mother goddess and on Centering Prayer. Centering Prayer is really a vaguely christianized Hindu Mantra Yoga popularized by Basil Pennington and Thomas Keating as (once again) an alleged ‘ancient Christian practice’, waiting to be rediscovered by post-moderns.

I commend to you a couple of articles on the web critiquing the Centering Prayer movement which has strong overlapping connections with both the Labryinth and Enneagram movements.  http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/1997/9711fea1.asp
The Dangers of Centering Prayer by John Dreher
http://www.catholicculture.org/library/view.cfm?id=6337
A Closer Look at Centering Prayer

Sincerely, Ed Hird+
Author, Battle for the Soul of Canada
http://www.battleforthesoulofcanada.blogspot.com

[87] Posted by edhird on 03-28-2008 at 09:21 AM • top

Our friends here in Northern Virginia at Columbia Baptist use a labyrinth as part of their Holy Week preparations.  Here is their 2006 brocure -
http://filemanager.silaspartners.com/dox/columbiabc/Lenten-brochure_06.pdf
If you can find anything but biblical orthodoxy among these fine folks, I’ll be more than surprised.

Peace on your own journey to Jerusalem,

[88] Posted by miserable sinner on 04-08-2008 at 04:39 PM • top

[90] miserable sinner,
Thank you so much for posting the link to this brochure. I especially like the way it explains the difference between a maze and a unicural labyrinth. And I like this:

Get in touch with His pain and yours as you walk this journey toward the cross of Christ.

I do think we need to make sure the labyrinths are understood to be the path toward the cross of Christ. The confusion can come from statements like this:

At its most basic level the labyrinth is a metaphor for the journey to the center of your deepest self and back out into the world with a broader understanding of who you are.

I would love to see Matt+ work on this a little, but I will venture here that at our deepest level we do find the image of Christ within us, grime encrusted perhaps, but at the center.
As well as careful language, one to make sure Christ and the cross stay at the center of the labyrinth experience is to make sure that a cross is embedded in the center of the labyrinth itself.

[89] Posted by Deja Vu on 04-08-2008 at 04:59 PM • top

Maybe this will seem arrogant, but I’ve always been blessed with a complete indifference to any religion besides Christianity. So, no labyrinth for me, thank you, Jesus!

[90] Posted by helpmelord on 04-14-2008 at 11:01 PM • top

#50

What next year?  Cow tipping?  Mud wrestling?

Hey, let’s not dis cow tipping, now. I mean, what’s wrong with a little transcendental pasture-walking at three in the morning? Just don’t mix cow-tipping with mud wrestling. Too odoriferous.
The Rabbit.

[91] Posted by Br_er Rabbit on 04-15-2008 at 02:04 AM • top

Dear StandFirm friends in Christ,

I have just returned from Crete where I have been working on the book ‘Restoring Health in the 21st Century’, the Titus sequel to my Timothy devotional commentary ‘Battle for the Soul of Canada’. Crete was the centre of the Minoan civilization (ca. 2600–1400 BC), the oldest form of Greek and hence European civilization. There are over 2,000 scholars and archeologists on Crete. Last week in Crete, I was able to visit the birthplace of the Labyrinth movement, the Cretan palace of Knossos.

The emphasis in the actual written documentation about Labyrinth usage was not how to enter the labyrinth but how to escape the labyrinth:

The labryinth story starts with King Minos, the legendary founder of the Cretan Minoan civilization. Minos rejected a beautiful bull offered him by a Greek deity, so the greek deity had Minos’ wife have physical intimacy with another bull, giving birth to a troublesome son, the Minotaur, half bull/half human. To contain this difficult ‘teenager’, Daedalus built the labryinth, which essentially functioned as a prison for King Minos’ awkward child.

You all understand how hungry ‘teens’ can be. So King Minos demanded six young Athenian men and six young Athenian women to be sacrificed at the Labryinth where they would be eaten by his son.

Hans George Wunderlich, The Secret of Crete, Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.,  New York, NY, 1974 p. 44
“Theseus had come to Crete with a shipment of hostages.  He won the love of Princess Ariadne who helped him escape from the labyrinth after he killed the Minotaur.  It was she who gave him the thread that he fastened to the entrance of the perplexing structure so that later he could grope his way along it back to the light.”

Barry Unsworth, Crete, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, 2004 p. 48 We also visited the second largest city in Crete, Chania: “Then there is (in Chania)‘inevitably a Minos Street, named after the legendary King of Crete, who had the labyrinth of Knossos constructed as a home for the monstrous Minotaur, unnatural offspring of the union of his queen with a bull.  The Minotaur, who, as the name suggests, was half royal prince, half bull, fed on human flesh. From Athens there came an annual tribute of youths and maidens to be sacrificed to him.  Close by is Ikarus Street, named for was the son of the great artificer Daedalus, who built the labyrinth.  Father and son were kept imprisoned in this same labyrinth by King Minos.  Daedalus made wings for them both out of wax and feathers (but the son flew too close to the sun and the wax melted). (Myths of Crete)

Barry Unsworth, Crete, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, 2004   p. 116 (The origin of the term Labyrinth) “Labyrs in Lydian means ‘double-headed ax’ which was an object of cult worship among the Minoans.  So labyrinthos might mean ‘the place of the sacred ax’. p. 135 “The snake was a principal object of worship among the Minoans, for whom it represented eternity, immortality and reincarnation.”

p. 182 NP “Goddesses, as the productive deities, were considered the most important (in Crete.) In art they are portrayed in their various aspects as the Queen of Wild Beasts, Kourotrophos (Nursing Mother of Youths), Mother and Daughter, the Goddess of the Serpents, and the Goddess of the Doves. P. 183 “...the important part played by the worship of the bull, suggests that the bull symbolized the male creative force and that the bull was worshipped in this form.”

I saw and took a picture of an actual historic ‘Labyrs/Double-Edged Ax’ at the National Museum of Crete’. It is interesting to reconstruct what a double-edged ax (Labrys) has to do with a labyrinth that devours the young. It is also interesting how the current Dr Jean Houston-inspired Labryinth movement is so closely connected with the modern mother-god/dess revival movement.

When even Baptists start walking contemporary labryinths, I shake my head. Perhaps they could let us know where they got it from. I suspect that their labyrinth usage could be traced back to ultra-liberal San Francisco Bishop Swing’s Grace Cathedral and their Canon Lauren Artress, who admits getting it from the famous new-age leader Dr. Jean Houston.

“Our friends here in Northern Virginia at Columbia Baptist use a labyrinth as part of their Holy Week preparations.  Here is their 2006 brocure -
http://filemanager.silaspartners.com/dox/columbiabc/Lenten-brochure_06.pdf
If you can find anything but biblical orthodoxy among these fine folks, I’ll be more than surprised.
Peace on your own journey to Jerusalem,
[88] Posted by miserable sinner on 04-08-2008 at 05:39 PM”

        Sincerely, Ed Hird+
author of ‘Dr Jean Houston & the Labyrinth Fad’
  -an article for the May 2,000 AFR Canada magazine
http://www3.telus.net/st_simons/arm08.htm

          Blessings, Ed Hird+

[92] Posted by edhird on 04-15-2008 at 06:19 AM • top

My morphic field is more stable than YOUR morphic field!
Hah!
Love and hugs to all….
Rdr. James Morgan

[93] Posted by rdrjames on 01-27-2009 at 03:38 PM • top

“Andrus, you may recall, berated Archbishop Rowan Williams to his face at the House of Bishops meeting in New Orleans. “

This is very confusing. Did you read the article you are quoting? In no sense do I see that anyone is berating anyone here…

[94] Posted by ExWitch on 01-27-2009 at 10:28 PM • top

I am interested in the opinions of any who have researched Artress, Houston, Veraditis, The Labyrinth Project, the International Transpersonal Association and the Transpersonal Institute. Check out the home page of the International Transpersonal Association and read their book list. You may learn that Labyrinths are good because they are not Christian - not my words. They have to be set up on the yin and the yang. They represent a vagina. They may be helpful to your spirituality but not to mine.

[95] Posted by Pb on 10-01-2009 at 11:51 AM • top

I just had the thought that it is time for Charles Ledbetter to be re-discovered by the Episcopalians! He was an Australian Anglican bishop who around the turn of the last century got involved with Theosophy. He wrote several books, one famous in its time called ‘The Science of the Sacraments’. It is popularly referred to as the ‘Bubble Book’, since Ledbetter postulates that during the Eucharist a series of psychic domes or bowls forms over the church. He even has numerous illustrations to show how this takes place. If this concept is combined with the labyrinth’s morphic field, perhaps a psychic snake would result, to the awe and astonishment of all who viewed it (on the astral plane, of course!)
Point is, none of this is remotely Christian, and the Church has had to battle the dark force many times. One thing the Devil hates is to be laughed at!
Rdr. James

[96] Posted by rdrjames on 10-01-2009 at 01:50 PM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.