Welcome to Stand Firm!

House Of Bishops Statement On Lambeth Conference

Wednesday, March 12, 2008 • 3:52 pm


As published in Episcopal Life

The House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church
Meeting at the Camp Allen Conference Center, Navasota, Texas
March 12, 2008

Give to your Church, O God,
a bold vision and a daring charity,
a refreshed wisdom and a courteous understanding,
that the eternal message of your Son
may be acclaimed as the good news of the age;
through him who makes all things new,
even Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. (1)

We, the House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church, approaching the forthcoming Lambeth Conference, are mindful of the hurt that is being experienced by so many in our own Episcopal Church, in other Provinces of our global communion, and in the world around us. While the focus of this hurt seems centered on issues of human sexuality, beneath it we believe there is a feeling of marginalization by people of differing points of view. Entering into Holy Week, our response is to name this hurt and to claim our hope that is in Christ.

As the Lambeth Conference approaches, we believe we have an enormous opportunity, in the midst of struggle, to be proud of our heritage, and to use this particular time in a holy way by affirming our rich diversity. The health of such diversity is that we are dealing openly with issues that affect the entire global community. Thus, even as we acknowledge the pain felt by many, we also affirm its holiness as we seek to be faithful to our Lord Jesus Christ.

Even though we did not all support the consecration of the Bishop of New Hampshire, we acknowledge that he is a canonically elected and consecrated bishop in this church. We regret that he alone among bishops ministering within the territorial boundaries of their dioceses and provinces, did not receive an invitation to attend the Lambeth Conference.

We appeal to the faithful of the Episcopal Church and the faithful in the wider, global Anglican family, to focus and celebrate our unity in the comprehensiveness of diversity. In union with Christian tradition through the centuries, we are willing to face challenges that precipitate struggle as a means towards reconciliation.

During our meeting we have been praying for a “daring charity and courteous understanding.” With this intent and guided by the Holy Spirit, we go to the Lambeth Conference spiritually united and praying that God will sanctify our struggles and unify us for Christ’s mission to a hurting world.

(1) This Franciscan-inspired prayer was offered by our chaplains during this meeting of the House of Bishops.


27 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

“During our meeting we have been praying for a “daring charity and courteous understanding.” With this intent and guided by the Holy Spirit, we…”

depose two godly bishops.

[1] Posted by Jerry C. on 03-12-2008 at 03:58 PM • top

We have seen the House of Bozos in their true colors today.

[2] Posted by Pageantmaster [Free Archbishop Cranmer] on 03-12-2008 at 04:01 PM • top

I apologize, but I am cross-posting this with T19.

Lord, have mercy.

This disgrace of a House, after working hard to rip the 500-year-old Anglican Communion apart, has the gall to moan that Gene Robinson, alone among their number, didn’t receive a Lambeth invitation?  They’re partly right: many more of them shouldn’t be going, either.

And yet, these frauds have stood by, without saying a damn thing, while Jack Spong slurs our Faith?  While Gaia masses and clown masses go on?  While the sacrament of our Lord’s Body and Blood is profaned across this province?  While some of their own members get before microphones and lie to everybody’s face about whether gay “marriages” are sanctioned in ECUSA?  While Vince Warner laughs it up over a Muslim “priest” in his diocese?  While Charles Bennison gets away with his antics in Pennsylvania until Schori needs a convenient scapegoat to balance out today’s actions?  While they spit on a Godly man, like William Cox, who has dedicated his life to the church they cavalierly blaspheme?  While their Presiding Bishop denies the divinity of our Lord, God and Savior?

And among those issuing this statement are the “Windsor Bishop” frauds?

To paraphrase Joseph Welch, Let us not assassinate this church further, bishops.  You have done enough.  Have you no sense of decency?  For God’s sake, have you no shame?

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me, a sinner.

[3] Posted by Phil on 03-12-2008 at 04:01 PM • top

While the focus of this hurt seems centered on issues of human sexuality, beneath it we believe there is a feeling of marginalization by people of differing points of view.

It’s not about ‘hurt.’  It’s not about ‘pain.’  This simply trivializes the conflict and reduces all opposition to an irrational response triggered by the pain of seeing their presuppositions questioned and defeated.  The level of patronization in such a statement is beyond offensive.  This conflict is about competing ideas of Truth.  It remains whether there is pain or not.  And it cannot be resolved by the application of some spiritual analgesic.

carl

[4] Posted by carl on 03-12-2008 at 04:14 PM • top

“We appeal to the faithful of the Episcopal Church and the faithful in the wider, global Anglican family, to focus and celebrate our unity in the comprehensiveness of diversity. In union with Christian tradition through the centuries, we are willing to face challenges that precipitate struggle as a means towards reconciliation.”

Time for the Episcopal drinking game, as we live into the tension, minding our pluriform truths, that lactating cows will moove us towards a diversity of reconciliation, as we are herded into the Anglican mainstream. Always mindful of the udder, and how by now brown cow being face to face with udders we can together reduce the me thane and the threat of global warming.

Its easy and fun to play the Episcopal drinking game! Just string together meaningless phrases in any random order and you too can sound like an Episcopal Bishop!

“our response is to name this hurt and to claim our hope that is in Christ.”

New game! Name this hurt! Fun for the whole family!

Idiots.

[5] Posted by BillS on 03-12-2008 at 04:16 PM • top

What a crock of Bovine Flatulence Excretement.

the snarkster

[6] Posted by the snarkster on 03-12-2008 at 04:20 PM • top

Let’s not get too bent out of shape, surely there will be a ‘Camp Allen/Windsor Bishop’ minority report.  I bet they are working on it right now.

[7] Posted by Jerry C. on 03-12-2008 at 04:46 PM • top

I am waiting eagerly for the minority report from the stalwart and courageous Communion Partner bishops.

[8] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 03-12-2008 at 04:58 PM • top

#7 It is too late for minority reports that come after the fact.  The HoB has done what it set out to do and there was little opposition to the proceedings.  A concurrent report may have been a glimmer of hope, but a group of bishops having to parse words to veil their complicity is useless.

[9] Posted by frreed on 03-12-2008 at 05:07 PM • top

#9. Precisely

[10] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 03-12-2008 at 05:10 PM • top

With the above HOB statement on Lambeth, we see the last shovel of dirt here thrown on the Windsor Report, the Windsor Process, the ersatz Windsor Bishops, Dar es, Dromantine, practically any orthodox solution…

The darkest of days so far.  Getting close to time to stick a fork in TEC.

[11] Posted by Athanasius Returns on 03-12-2008 at 05:11 PM • top

I am waiting eagerly for the minority report from the stalwart and courageous Communion Partner bishops.

  Heck, I would have settled for some audible “no” votes.

As I said a couple weeks ago, this is the only chance they will have to prove their mettle.  The usual half-dozen pastoral letters trying to spin this are not going to cut it. 

We regret that he alone among bishops ministering within the territorial boundaries of their dioceses and provinces, did not receive an invitation to attend the Lambeth Conference.

There is one statement that I completely agree with.  I can name at least 50 others who should not have received an invitation.

TJ

[12] Posted by tjmcmahon on 03-12-2008 at 05:17 PM • top

I am afraid the spirit that is guiding the HOB (House of Boneheads) is not the Holy one.
AP+

[13] Posted by Anglican Paplist on 03-12-2008 at 05:30 PM • top

It’s striking to me how inconsequential this HoB meeting feels.  The Left has largely achieved its objectives, and within few years will have expunged the remaining malcontents from its midst.  Tectonic forces have begun to reshape the global Communion, and will not be stopped.  The locus of events has departed to other locations, and what the bishops of TEC do or don’t do just doesn’t seem significant anymore.  The irony will come home to them when the absence of conflict with conservatives dries up all interest in TEC by the MSM.  Then KJS will discover the hard reality that her secular allies really don’t care spit about her opinions.

carl

[14] Posted by carl on 03-12-2008 at 05:33 PM • top

A commentator on an English blog put it well:

There was no need for a lot of this mess, if LibTEC had learned from the example of the CofE: Acts of Synod for legitimate dissenters, satisfactory protection and flying Bishops etc.

But LibTEC is demonstrating the meaning of Liberal “Tolerance”. It includes everyone… if they are liberal .

[15] Posted by Pageantmaster [Free Archbishop Cranmer] on 03-12-2008 at 05:36 PM • top

Getting close to time to stick a fork in TEC.

You’ll need a jack-hammer to drive the fork through the charcoal crust by this point.

[16] Posted by James Manley on 03-12-2008 at 06:01 PM • top

The quote was: “we believe there is a feeling of marginalization by people of differing points of view.”  Uh Duh!  What kind of Peter Pan world do these people live in?  There are and always will be people of differing views that should not only be “marginalized,” they should be jailed.  TEC wants to be all inclusive but do they really understand what they’re saying.  Once the floodgates are opened to all those of “differing views,”  does TEC really know whose waiting on the otherside.  Will they then include the pedophiles, the folks into beastiality, the Man/Boy association and the rest of that bunch?  Because if they don’t, they’re not only not be inclusive, they’ll be discriminating against them.  Are we margainilizing people, YOU DAMN RIGHT WE ARE ! 

Our faith is under attack and those of “differing views” should thank God eveynight that they live in the 21st century.  If they had tried to push this stuff down the throats of Christians during the first reformation, they, along with the clergy that supported them would have prayed that marginalization would be their worst punishment.

There is no turning back.  We MUST separate ourselves from TEC cult.  They are dragging good Christians through the sick mud they want to call a cultural norm.  If anything should be marginalized, it should be TEC.

[17] Posted by The Templar on 03-12-2008 at 06:31 PM • top

to be proud of our heritage, and to use this particular time in a holy way by affirming our rich diversity.

It seems to me that the bishops are more united in their American exceptionalism than in anything else.

How many orthodox bishops were present?  Were there any “No” votes on this blather?  I would imagine that the most stalwart orthodox bishops had a much better use for their time than to come.

[18] Posted by AnglicanXn on 03-12-2008 at 06:37 PM • top

Some American bishops - those who supported the consecration of Bishop Robinson and those who permit same-sex blessings - had an opportunity to decline their invitations to Lambeth and thereby open the way for other bishops to attend. They could have even offered to pay the other bishops’ way. But they declined. Pity.

[19] Posted by TomRightmyer on 03-12-2008 at 08:05 PM • top

12, according to the Episcopal Life story, there were audible no votes.  More importantly, what there weren’t were any votes on the record.  Every HoB vote ought to be roll call.  Full disclosure.

[20] Posted by DavidH on 03-12-2008 at 08:26 PM • top

It’s this sort of methane and CO2 production that will doom the ECUSA/TEC/GCC if it doesn’t get the planet first.

Thou shalt not lie/bear false witness.  OOPS!  God didn’t mean that for bishops of the ECUSA/TEC/GCC, obviously.  They have perfected the technique.

[21] Posted by dwstroudmd+ on 03-12-2008 at 09:17 PM • top

...and in other news, this open letter to all parishes in TEC

The House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church
Meeting at the Camp Allen Conference Center, Navasota, Texas
March 12, 2008

Dear Remaining Orthodox of TEC,

You have been PWNED!  Oh, and… Your base are belong to US!  Thanks for the memories, oh, and the properties, and the Prayer Book, and the theology, and 815, and the episcopate, and the endowments…

Your Brothers and Sisters in Compromise and Confusion
(including the formerly vaunted Windsor Bishops)

[22] Posted by Athanasius Returns on 03-13-2008 at 02:23 AM • top

In union with Christian tradition through the centuries, we . . .

I think those are called parasites.

[23] Posted by Newbie Anglican on 03-13-2008 at 06:25 AM • top

“...the Bishop of New Hampshire, we acknowledge that he is a canonically elected and consecrated bishop in this church…”

How come this statement has no mention of the outcast bishop of San Jaoquin?  Or the retired bishop of (Maryland?)?  Or that they are sorry they did not quite get to the business of casting out the Bishop of Pittsburgh?  (all three of whom are, of course, canonically elected and consecrated bishops of this church) Why is there no mention of the thousand people who left TEC last week?

[24] Posted by tjmcmahon on 03-13-2008 at 07:26 AM • top

“to focus and celebrate our unity in the comprehensiveness of diversity”

THE PURPOSE OF THE CHURCH

[25] Posted by rreed on 03-13-2008 at 07:54 AM • top

  During our meeting we have been praying for a “daring charity and courteous understanding.” 

Guess they did not get that prayer answered.  If you have any doubt, ask Bishops Cox and Schofield.  Daring charity????

If +Mark Lawrence attended, he’s got to be wondering why he bothered to go through the agony and disrespect leading up to his consecration.

[26] Posted by hanks on 03-13-2008 at 07:59 AM • top

During our meeting we have been praying for a “daring charity and courteous understanding.”

Translated:  we double-dog dare y’all to call our faux convivial meeting as possessing a spirit of true charity and, Listen, our understanding is courteous and don’t you forget that, OK…OK…got that…good

[27] Posted by Athanasius Returns on 03-13-2008 at 02:05 PM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.