Ms Gledhill admirably pressed him on what the nature of the threats were. At first he said he could not talk about them, given counsel he had received from "the security people" that he works with. (Interesting he did not mention the police--why would he not have involved them if there were real threats to his person?). But then he just couldn't help himself, and went on to talk about messages just left on his home phone from British callers that he apparently interprets as threats, suggesting that they were prompted by newspaper articles in Britain about him. He could not pass up the opportunity to again portray himself as victim (and not-so-subtly adding the British press to his growing list of persecutors). Want to bet we'll never hear of any arrests, despite the ease with which such calls can be traced?
It's a good thing that Gene Robinson keeps talking about himself (and talking, and talking, and talking, and talking . . . .). In doing so he makes it ever more apparent that this is a fellow with some serious problems of self-image, a seriously inflated need to be the center of attention, a serious neediness for the affirmation of others, and a seriously weird absorption with himself. Whether this is a result of his choice to move from bisexuality to homosexuality, or his recurring alcoholism, or his genetic predisposition, or his tragically odd upbringing is hardly relevant. Someone with this distorted a personality and outlook has no business being a priest or bishop.

"Around the Web" has moved here, and can also be reached by clicking the globe icon in the top menu.
© 2004-2008 Stand Firm, LLC. All rights reserved.
[52 : 0.5625]
|
The British Police are the people to contact if he feels his life is under threat. They will advise him on whether he should attend given his perception of the risk and on the kind of security measures he needs to take or that they will offer (if any). They will also be good judges of the kind of threat (if any) that he faces. His claims would be more believable if he did the reasonable thing and informed the relevant authorities instead of talking about them to any willing newspaper journalist within two thousand miles. Making threats of violence is a criminal offence in England and the Bishop would be wise, if he really believes he is threatened, to involve the Police at the earliest stage. I look forward to hearing Bishop Robinson speaking about the response from the British Police.
[2] Posted by driver8 on 05-05-2008 at 11:05 PM
|
|
Bishop ROBINSON: I don’t remember a time in my life when God seemed any more present, almost palpably close. Prayer has almost seemed redundant to me because God has seemed so close during all of this. It will surprise both conservatives and liberals how orthodox I am.
[3] Posted by martin4 on 05-05-2008 at 11:29 PM
|
|
.... breaking my non-posting vow .... a truly
[4] Posted by DaveB in VT on 05-06-2008 at 01:19 AM
|
One needs to be careful when selecting the Poster Child for one’s cause. One with the massive and distorted ego of a VGR might have you wincing now and then—and wishing he’d stick to the script. Or maybe this is the script?
[5] Posted by hanks on 05-06-2008 at 02:35 AM
|
|
I know at least one college philosophy professor (who has written not-very-controversial popular level books) who received enough threatening calls that he unlisted his phone number. It sadly does not take much public attention to receive death threats or other threatening communications, although most of those would probably not represent credible dangers. It is apparently something that any public figure of even middling prominence must face and learn to deal with. And the fact that he claims exactly two bits of threatening correspondence during a week of nearly daily news appearances makes it sound like they are the normal background buzz that a controversial person would receive, without there being some vast conspiracy of hate or a specifically conservative homophobic pathology. So in one way I do not doubt that +Robinson has received some threats, although I would be surprised if they generally surpassed the garden variety level. Heck, I’ll bet +Iker and +Duncan have received their fair share of death threats without feeling the need to call foul over them in every public interview. I would bet that a survey of the number and quality of threats received by bishops would have some surprising results.
[6] Posted by K-W on 05-06-2008 at 03:18 AM
|
|
The person is sick… It has behavior that speaks volumes.
[7] Posted by Tom Dennis on 05-06-2008 at 04:45 AM
|
|
1, texex, I fail to see your first point. How does the resurrection undermine the idea that there are things worse than death? I think the resurrection bolsters that idea.
[8] Posted by DavidH on 05-06-2008 at 04:51 AM
|
|
Whenever I read that someone like Robinson has received threats, I am always reminded of one of my favourite NT Wright quotes from this article:
Remember that line next time…
[9] Posted by Derek Smith on 05-06-2008 at 05:06 AM
|
|
I agree—I don’t want VGR silenced, on the contrary I want him to talk as much as possible. I can’t believe even a liberal could listen to his ceaseless maundering without eventually beginning to suspect that this man is no selfless martyr but rather a self-absorbed, self-congratulatory, megalomaniac narcissist. But whether the liberals do or not, the general public will certainly start to get the picture. Look how Rosie O’Donnell fell from grace. Once a highly influential celebrity, thanks to her continuous mouthing off she now looks like a shallow, immature dweeb.
[10] Posted by st. anonymous on 05-06-2008 at 08:36 AM
|
|
In the context of these supposed threats let’s recall the threats faced day by day by Christians in areas where they are a minority. Hardly a week goes by without hearing about attacks on Christian communities by Muslims or Hindus. In this light, Gene appears even more pathetic.
[11] Posted by Nikolaus on 05-06-2008 at 08:43 AM
|
|
Delusional! Utterly delusional! Yes! Keep talking Gene....you are shedding much light on who you really are! I am truly embarrassed for him!
[12] Posted by One Day Closer on 05-06-2008 at 12:16 PM
|
|
My son at age 3, in the middle of a house full of family, plopped face down in the middle of the floor and threw a foot-kicking screaming tantrum. There was no apparent reason for this. My wife calmly asked him why he was so upset. He looked up and said “Cause no one was payn’ no ‘tenshun to me. The parallels are amazing!!!
[13] Posted by RalphM on 05-06-2008 at 12:20 PM
|
|
The truly sad thing about +VGR has more to do with Anglicans of all stripes in that we give him the attention he craves. Even those who purport to be sick of the whole gay bishop thingy feast on his words and actions. “Will no one rid us of the troublesome priest.”
[14] Posted by FrVan on 05-06-2008 at 01:22 PM
|
|
Ms Gledhill admirably pressed him on what the nature of the threats were. The top ten were:
[15] Posted by FrVan on 05-06-2008 at 01:41 PM
|
|
Fr. Van [14], your use of Henry II’s reported line about Thomas Becket will now undoubtedly be cataloged as yet another threat (as we all know what happened to Becket), and further justification for why Gene Robinson simply must have his civil union for protection (although not until just before Lambeth, of course). You are merely encouraging him, and he hardly needs that.
[16] Posted by RomeAnglican on 05-06-2008 at 02:11 PM
|
|
You are correct RomeAnglican, now there are 11 top threats. My apologies (red face here)....
[17] Posted by FrVan on 05-06-2008 at 02:14 PM
|
|
OOOPS! After my post to you there are 12...Golly he was correct, threats against him are mounting...Yikes! That was 13!
[18] Posted by FrVan on 05-06-2008 at 02:15 PM
|
|
Oh dear, I just read this on AOL...Someone is going to feel threatened:"I am the most well-known homosexual in the world.”
[19] Posted by FrVan on 05-06-2008 at 02:37 PM
|
|
#15, Your #6 is more threatening to Bishop Iker I think. Could you imagine the conversation? Like I said I think it would be far more threatening to our bishop.
[20] Posted by martin4 on 05-06-2008 at 04:25 PM
|
|
On NBC Today May, 8, 2008, +VGR again spoke of death threats, particularly associated with Lambeth. That’s part of why he wants a June marriage, so his partner can get benefits if something happens when he goes to hang around Lambeth. The Video is not posted yet on MSNBC but I’m sure it will be soon.
[21] Posted by BrianInDioSpfd on 05-08-2008 at 08:38 AM
|
|
For those of you who would like to see Ruth Gledhill’s interview and make up your own minds, here is the link to the YouTube site: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLDAAvIFR5U&feature=related
[22] Posted by EmilyH on 05-08-2008 at 09:35 AM
|
|
#22.....What and listen to more “Me, me, me me, me, people are threatening me, me, me, me, me, me, I just want to be a simple country bishop, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, I wonder what colors are going to in in June, me, me, me, me, me, me, etc...”
[23] Posted by One Day Closer on 05-08-2008 at 09:49 AM
|
|
When Vivky Gene was elected Bishop, he asked people of the Diocese to donate their grandmother’s gold rings, their wedding rings, their father’s gold watches, in other words, anything gold to make his pectoral cross. I was at the meeting where he showed off said cross. The syncophants fawningly surrounded him as he held it out from his chest. All I could think of was when Jesus was twelve and went to the temple. When his parents chastised him, he said “I must be about my father’s busines”. As I watched one more “look at me Vicky Gene show” I wondered how he could construe extorting gold from parishioners so he would have lots of bling to flash His father’s business? “self serving narcissist is something I’ve called him for years. He’s not even a nice person. BTW when he was interviewing for the job, he said every bishop should have a good therapist. Clearly, he doesn’t have one or he would have made some positive changes in all these years.
[24] Posted by no longer NH Episcopalian on 05-09-2008 at 09:49 AM
|
|
#24 no longer NH Episcopalian,
[25] Posted by One Day Closer on 05-09-2008 at 10:21 AM
|
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.


There are some wonderful Gene comments in the interview.
The Christian life teaches “there are things worse than death.” No. God has conquered death and demonstrated this fact in the resurrection of Christ. But that presupposes one believes in the resurrection.
He also suggests everyone should be at Lambeth not to come to an “agreement” but to learn to “respect” each other. Christian unity is not based on respect for other people - it’s based on belief in Christ and core doctrines (the Nicene Creed for example).