I just have one thing to say to Matt Lauer:

All he wants is to be a SIMPLE! COUNTRY! BISHOP!!!!

"Around the Web" has moved here, and can also be reached by clicking the globe icon in the top menu.
© 2004-2008 Stand Firm, LLC. All rights reserved.
[52 : 1.0138]

|
’only a 100 churches out of 8000’ - there’s that tiny minority argument again. Hey, if it’s such a small group why even worry? They’re just a blip . . . an afterthought. I’m sure that’s exactly how TEC bishops feel about the parishes in Overland Park, KS and Plano, TX and Newport Beach, CA and Savannah, GA and Vero Beach, FL. “They’re just an insignificant little parish of no significance. They’re an abberation, move along now, nothing to see here.” All is Well™ ... Can’t have it both ways Gene (and KJS)
[2] Posted by anglicanhopeful on 05-08-2008 at 10:59 AM
|
|
Such incredible delusion. God have mercy on him and lead him to the truth.
[3] Posted by masternav on 05-08-2008 at 11:01 AM
|
|
“I go home today to the people of New Hampshire.” Wow, big news! Will he know how to find his office? Will they recognize him? Is the world tour over? What an incredible ego!
[4] Posted by hanks on 05-08-2008 at 11:11 AM
|
|
Has anyone every taken a look at the ASA for the “100 churches of 8000” so that the real size is taken into account? Does that number include the SJ diocese? How about FW, Texas?
[5] Posted by Nospin on 05-08-2008 at 11:11 AM
|
|
So what if it is 100? That number will grow and is growing. And I beleve that our Lord weeps over every church lost just like He does over just one sheep! He would leave the 8000 to go and get the 100! 1 sheep....100 churches....in God’s eyes they both are a tragedy! In the case of the churches it is the 8000 or 7900 that He is really weeping over that are lost in TEC space! As far as the world tour being over....only for a few months then he’s out and about again....Honeymoon & Lambeth!
[6] Posted by One Day Closer on 05-08-2008 at 11:17 AM
|
|
As usual, his numbers are a little off. There are not 8000 congregations, but 7500 at most. In 1920 there were 7500, so we have lost over 1000 since that time. I’m surprised that he even mentioned re-interpreting the Bible as I didn’t think he had one.
[7] Posted by Dallas Priest on 05-08-2008 at 11:35 AM
|
|
I meant to say in 1920 there were 8500 congregations.
[8] Posted by Dallas Priest on 05-08-2008 at 11:35 AM
|
|
Yeah, and if you want to talk about numbers, there are many more like myself who remain in TEC (for the time being), speak out when we can, but would never be included in the numbers VGR is talking about. THAT number, though I don’t know what it would be, would probably be a lot more than the number of those 100 parishes mentioned. I can say that even people who voted for VGR at GC--one in my parish--are now admitting that their vote hurt the church and caused a number of people to leave. This from a person who upon returning from GC03 defended her vote by saying to me, “It’s nobody’s business what I do in my bedroom!”
[9] Posted by DavidSh on 05-08-2008 at 11:37 AM
|
|
Robinson is to be pitied for the truth is far from him. All he knows is spin and lies - about his sex, his identity, his actions, his place in God’s kingdom. He is lying to God, to himself. He is in denial about the eventual outcome of his choices. He not at rest or peace.
[10] Posted by Floridian on 05-08-2008 at 11:39 AM
|
|
In a related story: Bishop Gene Robinson, Episcopal Bishop of New Hampshire, has signed a multi-year deal with They Work, Inc., a nationally known maker of bullet-proof vests, to develop a special clerical line of vests. “I’m just a country Bishop,” said Robinson, “But I’m getting threats all the time. Yesterday a dog growled at me as I crossed the street, so you can never be too careful. You must always keep your guard up.” Bishop Robinson says he has no idea what’s been causing the rise in anti-clerical threats since 2003, but says he is happy to work with TW, Ink. “Of course I will have something to say about it in my next book,” he said. The ‘Gene Collection’ will initially offer three options: a vest in “Simple Country Bishop Rose” for Bishops, one in “We’re Doing A New Thing Black” for parish priests, and a made-to-order “Color of Sunrise” for special church occasions, such as depositions. More color options are being considered, including an all-weather fabric for serving outside, which currently code-named ‘Lambeth.’ Each vest will come with a detachable fragment-resistant clerical collar, and will be able to attach the standard US military IBV groin and shoulder protection. As an option on the Bishop’s vest, the groin protection may be attached to the rear in order to cover their posteriors. This will be known as the ‘Beers attachment,’ and will come in especially handy when explaining what happened at House of Bishops meetings.
[11] Posted by cliffg on 05-08-2008 at 11:53 AM
|
|
I imagine that Hitler and all the villeins of the world were convinced that the world was wrong, and that 100 people in camps/dead/fearful/dismayed were of no consequence ...one day they all had to face their consequences and vicky will have to also.
[12] Posted by ewart-touzot on 05-08-2008 at 12:01 PM
|
|
Bishop Robinson, the alcoholic, divorced, bi-sexual, country bishop of New Hampshire is the icon of the Loon Left. Let him talk and write to his heart’s desire. He will soon drive people to AMiA, CANA, Uganda, Kenya, and others IN DROVES!! -Jim+
[13] Posted by FrJim on 05-08-2008 at 12:03 PM
|
|
really when I think he has gone as far astray as is possible I am again surprised
[14] Posted by ewart-touzot on 05-08-2008 at 12:03 PM
|
|
Oh wait...VGR already IS driving people there in droves. -Jim+
[15] Posted by FrJim on 05-08-2008 at 12:05 PM
|
|
Pitiful for all of the above reasons but particularly for the re-interpretaton of the Bible bit. Nothing can be more plain spoken than the issue of homosexuality in scripture. On the subject of numbers it is not so much that 100-200 have left but the number of spin-offs from the original group. For example, the Virginia Congregations separated with 11 parishes; now there are 21 in the Anglican District of Virginia. I had read that there are only 7000 churches left in TEC. Out of those how many are really viable? What number will have to be abandoned and sold within the next ten years? I predict a whole bunch.
[16] Posted by Petra on 05-08-2008 at 12:10 PM
|
|
The poor man needs to spend less time worrying about his bullet-proof vest and more time worrying about his theology - which is already shot though with holes.
[17] Posted by cliffg on 05-08-2008 at 12:20 PM
|
|
I’m sorry to inform you Gregg, but you have mistyped the name of this article. Instead of “+VGR on the Today Show,” it should have read “Today on the +VGR show.”
[19] Posted by FrVan on 05-08-2008 at 12:33 PM
|
|
#18
Piedmont, MSNBC may have something here, especially if you place the emphasis on “His.”
[20] Posted by FrVan on 05-08-2008 at 12:38 PM
|
|
The MSNBC article begins:
I wonder if he realizes that this is more than spin, and he really has invited a death threat. It’s spelled out in Romans 6:23—both the threat and the answer to it.
[21] Posted by hanks on 05-08-2008 at 12:39 PM
|
|
There are slightly more than 7600 Episcopal congregations if you count those “overseas”. TEC counted 7,095 in 2006, down from 7,155 in 2005. If I remember correctly, there were 7200 domestic parishes in 2003 when +Robinson was consecrated.
[22] Posted by John316 on 05-08-2008 at 12:40 PM
|
|
He will not be pleased with a bullet proof vest, it will make him look fat in his wedding dress. Now, maybe a bullet proof corset…
[23] Posted by FrVan on 05-08-2008 at 12:40 PM
|
|
Thanks for the link to the article. I hadn’t seen the full title of his book before : The Eye of the Storm: Swept to the Center by God .
[24] Posted by In Newark on 05-08-2008 at 12:50 PM
|
|
Volcanoes
[25] Posted by Paula Loughlin on 05-08-2008 at 12:56 PM
|
Gene really should shepardize his arguments.
[26] Posted by Piedmont on 05-08-2008 at 01:12 PM
|
|
Greg, I think CJ is becoming prophetic...first Today Show.....how long will it be before Vicki Gene makes his appearance on Meet the Press with Tim Russert.
[27] Posted by Gayle on 05-08-2008 at 01:15 PM
|
|
#25
[29] Posted by evan miller on 05-08-2008 at 01:26 PM
|
|
[30] Posted by Justin Martyr on 05-08-2008 at 01:38 PM
|
Living the Life (2009) (Remake) Kata (Vicky Gene Robinson) has served his first five years as a simple country bishop beleving that, although he has an amazing ministry, the only thing that lies in his future is a broken heart, the symbol of his New Hampshire Street Gang. He and his lifelong friend Ana (Mark Andrew) are two of the toughest members of their gang, fearing nothing but someone else getting attention. Church-jacking, fights, depositions, and running from the cops are a daily routine as the guys fight to protect their diocesan territory and their reputation. Performing as “Outrageous Chaos” in local dance contests provides their only relief, but each night they must return home to the sad reality of their lives - an abysmally low level of page views for their personal web page and home cam.
[32] Posted by tired on 05-08-2008 at 01:44 PM
|
|
The percentage of Episcopal churches that are unhappy is the same percentage that the Gay community is of the population as a whole. Why is one favored and the other not favored within the Episcopal church?
[33] Posted by ctowles on 05-08-2008 at 01:57 PM
|
|
Sometimes the whole purpose of your life is to be an example for others, and, I have to agree that VGR is just such an exemplar! There is no finer WHINER anywhere. Whether the June bride to be is a whiner or merely a whine is a matter for some eternal concern. Too bad they didn’t give him a go on how Kevlar and Bride’s dresses are the coolest thing this season!!!
[35] Posted by dwstroudmd on 05-08-2008 at 02:34 PM
|
|
Bishop, would you please give us the names of the world recognized theologians you mention? Just who are “they”.
[36] Posted by Dee in Iowa on 05-08-2008 at 02:37 PM
|
Is it just me or does this man just want stir up trouble and create division? I mean he knows that what he is doing is against God Word and teachng regardless if he admits it or not, and yet he will go forward anyway and push the proverbial envelope. He’s just not satisfied unless he is creating discontent and division....gee reminds me of another biblical figure....from the darkside!
[37] Posted by One Day Closer on 05-08-2008 at 02:47 PM
|
|
Greg,
[38] Posted by Keith Bramlett on 05-08-2008 at 02:52 PM
|
|
The left secular media has given VGR a soap box to sell his personal epistle that will further divide the communion with the presiding bishop’s approval. VGR you need to read the blogs here and repent or perish.
[39] Posted by Tom Dennis on 05-08-2008 at 02:54 PM
|
|
If the whole visualization of vickie Gene and his new husband kissing at the end of the ceremony and their evening together in the privacy of their honeymoon swuite at the local hotel doesn’t make you cringe, you have a stronger stomach than I.
[40] Posted by DJ on 05-08-2008 at 03:02 PM
|
|
I thought “Vickie Gene” was unacceptable usage around here?
[41] Posted by oscewicee on 05-08-2008 at 03:07 PM
|
|
DJ #40,
[42] Posted by One Day Closer on 05-08-2008 at 03:09 PM
|
|
I hear that top of the list on Macy’s registry of wedding gifts are a stunning set of frilly kevlar nighties.
[43] Posted by Bill C on 05-08-2008 at 03:12 PM
|
|
People haven’t stopped going to the Episcopal church for fear of being told of the things they can’t do. People have stopped going to the Episcopal church because of the things they’re being told they can do.
[44] Posted by DJ on 05-08-2008 at 03:14 PM
|
|
Thanks to #2 for The Episcopal Church’s Fast Facts. I noticed that St. Martin’s, Houston, showed about 8,000 members and about 2,000 ASA or only 25% ASA of their membership. Does anyone know if that is the average percentage showing up on Sundays or does that reflect ballooned, outdated membership roles as is the situation in many Episcopal Churches?
[45] Posted by Petra on 05-08-2008 at 03:55 PM
|
|
Episcopal Church Database - 1996 - 2006
[46] Posted by DJ on 05-08-2008 at 04:03 PM
|
|
Too bad they didn’t put him on that “fourth hour” of the show with Kathie Lee…
[47] Posted by bigjimintx on 05-08-2008 at 04:36 PM
|
|
Petra,
[48] Posted by tjmcmahon on 05-08-2008 at 05:03 PM
|
|
Some observations on this interview. First, Matt really served up a succession of softball questions. No doubt the mainstream media is sympathetic to Gene and helps his cause. Second, Gene comes across as quite reasonable in the interview. Picture someone who is essentially secular and not at all well versed in the Bible and church tradition of the past two millenia. To them, Gene is going to seem quite rational and they will probably think that those “conservative” Anglicans are picking on a nice man. I have to give the “loon left” props for their skillful manipulation of the agenda and language here, ably abetted by the mainstream media. The orthodox really need to figure out a way to redefine these issues and get a good public relations campaign going. Last observation - I think that some orthodox Anglicans need to get together and provide physical security for Gene during the Lambeth confab. If he is going to be outside the security arrangement for the conference and making himself available to talk to anyone, I really think he needs security. From a selfish point of view, the last thing he needs to do is be made a martyr. From a Christian point of view, it would be a good thing to protect him from the nut cases out there and show that we of the vast right wing conservative conspiracy love the sinner.
[49] Posted by Daniel on 05-08-2008 at 05:12 PM
|
|
"I’m surprised that he even mentioned re-interpreting the Bible"… I find it actually good that he did. At least now Christendom knows where both he and TEC stand. Corruption, anyone?
[50] Posted by Geek in Dallas on 05-08-2008 at 05:13 PM
|
|
"I’m surprised that he even mentioned re-interpreting the Bible"…
No, no, you misunderstood him. What he actually said was, “re-interpreting my Babble...” Glad I could clear that up for you...
[51] Posted by FrVan on 05-08-2008 at 05:20 PM
|
|
The sign of evil times when a person can speak such lies before the world and be honored (at least in his own mind). I’m glad I left ministry in ECUSA on the day he was consecrated. A small gesture really, but hugely important for my soul’s health. Even dwelling on him darkens the mind.
[52] Posted by Alice Linsley on 05-08-2008 at 05:42 PM
|
|
2006 - 7,095 domestic parishes and missions
[53] Posted by martin4 on 05-08-2008 at 06:33 PM
|
|
Daniel, #49, I agree that Lauer threw him whiffle balls. A good person to interview him, in depth, with people from ACI present, would be Margaret Warner of PBS. She is one of the best reporters on national television. Giving Robinson a grand stand in the NBC format will off course make him look good. NBC promotes the brave new world of homosexuality pretty unabasedly; what is needed is a more serious forum on the national news, with a credible interviewer, and people who can respond to his vacuous propoganda. Has he reported the death threats to any authorities? If not, reporters should not let him get away with talking about them as though they were clearly true.
[54] Posted by Seen-Too-Much on 05-08-2008 at 07:50 PM
|
|
Daniel is right: I was a lot less perturbed by Bp. Robinson than I was by the absence of any kind of a rigorous interview. We know that the media is largely secular, and therefore more likely to serve up uncritical formats for unorthodox Christians. (The part of the interview that bothered me most was a non sequitir; Matt Lauer prefaced a statement about orthodox bishops not taking communion with Bp Robinson with a “Get this...,” As if to say: you just can’t believe what these looney conservatives are doing now.... Fact is, formats on secular television are not likely to cover this accurately, with any depth or insight. And we have to be prepared for that. For that reason, I ask my brothers and sisters here: please, let’s keep our comments about Bp Robinson to Scripture, theology, formularies & facts. I like red meat like the next person, but our objections are based upon the abandonment of Scripture in modern life, not this man and his sins. I pray he will find the truth and repent. And I pray we will help make whole the remnant, the people of God. Thanks for listening.
[55] Posted by old believers on 05-08-2008 at 08:12 PM
|
|
This morning, I ran across some tract about Iraqi and Palestinian Christians prostletizing among radical Islamists. Those guys are risking it all for their faith. VGR has about as much chance falling under the Underground in London as he does of someone actually doing him violence. How dare he suggest that he is “putting his life on the line” by going to Lambeth. Sheesh.
[56] Posted by jamesk on 05-08-2008 at 08:46 PM
|
|
People ought to write to Lauer and ask him to interview some of the clergy who have been victims of the “reign of terror,” brought on by Robinson and his handler, Schori.
[57] Posted by DJ on 05-08-2008 at 08:53 PM
|
|
Well, I just picked up the SF news, and I’ve found out what I’ve been missing by not watching broadcast commercial news–our illustrious bishop of New Hampshire. Neither Mr. Lauer nor Mr. Robinson come off very well. They both seemed to be very uncomfortable screaming at one another. And of course, I now know way too much about the bishop protecting his wife or husband and daughter with that bullet-proof vest and the security problems he’ll have in England. Perhaps he shouldn’t travel to England, ya think? Bizarro news item of narcissism. You’d think NBC could come up with at least more entertaining exclusive interviews. I can understand why +VGR wants free publicity for his book.
[58] Posted by southernvirginia1 on 05-08-2008 at 09:28 PM
|
|
VGR needed the bullet proof vest when he ran from his airplane as it landed in Bosnia under sniper fire.
[59] Posted by JHGraves on 05-08-2008 at 10:18 PM
|
|
I just now watched the interview. Robinson answered each question so fast and so pat, he never even paused for a second to consider the question. It seemed really strongly scripted in advance. Am I just embarrassingly naive? Are all interviews on these kind of shows like that?
[60] Posted by CarolynP on 05-08-2008 at 10:34 PM
|
|
It’s interesting to note that VGR reiterates the party line about how it’s such a “tiny minority” of parishes and/or individuals who are leaving TEC, that they are so insignificant. Yet over at Jake’s place, Jake has put out an APB on Bp Cavalcanti. Anyone who spots him is ordered to notifiy the proper authorities immediately. I also find it fascinating that the people who are currently running TEC were once the people who shouted and carried banners on college campuses that said “Question Authority” and who burned their draft cards. Now they seem to be saying, “okay, you can stop questioning authority now and blindly obey ours, now that WE are calling the shots.” This undying loyalty to TEC coming from people who once laughed at such things is astonishing.
[61] Posted by DaveW on 05-09-2008 at 12:14 AM
|
|
I watched the interview on NBC yesterday. Some thoughts:
[62] Posted by Petra on 05-09-2008 at 08:40 AM
|
|
Seen-Too-Much [54], Exactly right. Let’s all remember that just a week or so ago, Robinson backed out of a forum on the issue of ex-gays, at which he was to share the dais with Al Mohler. Like the rest of the Integrity crowd, he’s no more interested in real “dialogue” or “the listening process” than the man in the moon. CarolynP [60], Almost all interviews like this work by having a little back-and-forth between the subject and the interviewer ahead of time. The subject usually gets to request that a few topics and questions be brought up. If it’s a “friendly” situation, then those are lobbed in there as softballs. I’ve seen - and done - interviews that are in fact “friendly,” where the topics the subject wants to address are brought up in a “hostile” manner by the interviewer, but the subject knows how he’ll handle them in such a way as to appear to turn a defeat into a victory. Not all interviewers do this, obviously, but it’s a common method used in a lot of these morning shows and other similar “fluff” formats.
[63] Posted by Greg Griffith on 05-09-2008 at 08:52 AM
|
|
Keith [38], The “simple country bishop” line is one VGR himself trotted out a couple of months ago, the poor dear.
[64] Posted by Greg Griffith on 05-09-2008 at 09:02 AM
|
|
martin4,
CarolynP [60],
[65] Posted by John316 on 05-09-2008 at 10:46 AM
|
|
The interview begins with Laurer’s claim they same “in these same chairs” 5 years ago. Never mind the Today Show set was remodeled last year. It goes down hill from there…
[66] Posted by texex on 05-09-2008 at 12:12 PM
|
|
65, to that that the Anglican Catholic Churcch, the Anglican Provice of Christ the King, the Anglican Province of America etc… TEC has been bleeding for a long time.
[67] Posted by AndrewA on 05-09-2008 at 12:26 PM
|
|
NEW YORK (LifeSiteNews) - The head of the Episcopal Church in the United States, Bishop Jefferts Schori, shocked listeners of a BBC Interview when she announced that Gene Robinson - the controversial Episcopalian bishop who was consecrated bishop despite his being an openly practicing homosexual - is not the only homosexual and partnered bishop in the Anglican Church. “[Robinson] is certainly not alone in being a gay bishop,” Schori said in response to a question from her interviewer. “He is certainly not alone in being a gay partnered bishop. He is alone in being the only gay partnered bishop who’s open about that status.” The interviewer then asked Schori whether she meant that Robinson was not the only gay, partnered bishop in the Episcopalian Church. She responded, “Within our own church and within the Anglican Communion as a whole.” See, its ok, its not really a change...he is just being open about...all is well
[69] Posted by Conoscenzo on 05-09-2008 at 06:28 PM
|
|
I saw his mouth moving, but all I heard was “blah blah blah me blah blah blah me"…
[70] Posted by B. Hunter on 05-09-2008 at 06:37 PM
|
|
Well, I think it’s an outrage the way we have treated VGR. All the poor man ever asked of us was that we “just let him be the bishop of New Hampshire”—and what have we done? Dragged him kicking and screaming before microphones and cameras, forced him to give interviews, compelled him to write a book about himself and go on tour to promote it when all he wanted was to stay at home. And now we’re making him go all the way to Lambeth against his will! There’s no end to our cruel demands on his time. I say give him what he asked for: let him just be a bishop! LEAVE VGR ALONE!!!!!!!!!
[71] Posted by st. anonymous on 05-09-2008 at 06:42 PM
|
|
Bishop Robinson, if by chance you read the postings in this forum, please don’t be discouraged. People in here and at other sites have called you nasty names. They say vile and unkind things about you. They accuse you of being a sexual pervert a confused bi-sexual and an alcoholic. They mock your upcoming nuptuals saying that the event is disgusting and perverted. Plus they accuse you of wrecking the Episcopal Church. Just for the record sir, most of us here believe all those accusations and comments to be fairly accurate.
[72] Posted by DJ on 05-09-2008 at 07:17 PM
|
|
+Robinson is doing is a huge favor. How else could we get the news out about the direction TEC is going for free? There are many who just don’t know what is going on ... but they will soon enough come June. Then more churches/people will leave. I am sure not how much TEC can afford all these lawsuits either at the 815 level or the diocese level. Time will tell soon enough.
[73] Posted by martin4 on 05-09-2008 at 09:09 PM
|
|
I’m in a compare and contrast mood tonight...compare Robinson’s self-focused speil with the Rector of Trinity Vero Beach’s letter posted on SFIF: http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/12348/ and Robin Eames’ shocking falsehoods at babyblueonline.com. BIG contrast.
[74] Posted by Floridian on 05-09-2008 at 09:39 PM
|
|
To measure the tiny effect the New Thing Revelation in the US, click on any state here: http://www.shelterinthestorm.org/
[75] Posted by Floridian on 05-09-2008 at 09:50 PM
|
|
Dear Matt Lauer,
[76] Posted by Intercessor on 05-10-2008 at 01:19 AM
|
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Saw it! Wanted to puke! Had to run to the bathroom and pray really hard for his soul! To say on National TV that the bible needs to be re-interpreted and to imply that for 2000+ years it has been wrongly interpreted is just too much for one set of ears to take!! OMGosh! Lord heal him of his arrogance and heresy! Then to say that new threats are being hurled on him because of the Lambeth Conference....what hooey! I mean...like it’s all about him and no one else! This man’s arrogance is bigger that Bill Gates Mansion and continues to grow! I need to go to church kneel at the alter and get on my face and pray for this man and his followers and supporters!