Thursday, September 2, 2010

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

GAFCON: Live Blog of Day 1 Press Conference

Sunday, June 22, 2008 • 2:09 pm

Note: Matt is transmitting his live blog to me. I am piecing it together, replacing his shorthand and abbreviations with complete names and terms, as well as correcting typos, then posting it here within minutes of the actual event. If you recall Matt's "live, not Memorex" post from GenCon06, all of the same caveats apply here. - Greg
We are in the press room.

Akinola, Orombi, Nzimbi enter the room and sit at the table

Jensen and Kolini are here.

Cynthia Brust introducing.

Kevin Kallsen: Archbishop Orombi, at the end of the conference, what message do you want Rowasn Williams to hear?

Orombi: I want to think about the conference ending with everything to be put together. I am sure there will be something on the plate for him at the end of this.

National Review: Could someone say whether since there is not sacramental communion, there an effective schism?

Akinola: We want one thing and one thing only - to restore communion and fellowship. It has failed. We are asking this conference to think about this and come up with something we can do. That is what we want.

George Conger: Archbishop Akinola, what would you say to the bishops of California in light of the gay marriage decisions in that state, and the bishops saying that they want to make that work?

Akinola: When there is a crack in the wall error will creep in. If the church had been faithful in its proclamaiton we would not be in this mess. Now we have to deal with this problem. I am not talking about their society. I do not live there. The church is going to be held responsible for the church's own stand and proclamation

Church Times: You mentioned evidence of attempts by Lambeth and TEC to buy off bishops. Could you give us more on that?

Akinola: The fact is this. There are bishops in Africa who have been lured with various attractive offers by certain people from America and England to come to Lambeth. "Oh, bishop, if you come to England, we will provide you with money and fine accommodations; we will provide yo with help with your projects in your diocese. What they do not realize is this: Such attempts to divide our people will not affect our churches. The polity, the constitution, and the canons of our church are clear. Bishops cannot go outside of our common decisions.

Reuters: You mentioned unavoidable realignment. Can you expand on this?

Akinola: Look at the context. Unavoidable realignment in the communion to rescue the communion from where we are. We have in mind a situation in which those who share the same view in some way that those who are together here will figure out how to move forward.

[Unidentified reporter]: Is Rowan Williams guilty of apostasy?

Akinola: I would not say that. He is a brother but we cannot agree on certain ways of doing things.

NYT: Who are the apostates?

Akinola: All those who have given up the faith and doing what we as a church cannot do, who are doing what we as a family of churches cannot do. They are the ones.

[Unidentified reporter]: You wrote to Rowan Williams to assure him of your prayers for a successful outcome of Lambeth. What would that look like?

Jensen: What we are looking for is the renewal of the Anglican Communion. I do not use schsim, but the description of brokenness is a good one. We would like to see renewal so that we can all walk together. When we come together at public meetings we cannot have communion together. It would be a great thing to be able to do this. I am hoping that the Lambeth conference attends to that issue successfully. I do not see how it can do that and I am not confident but on the other hand our absence is helpful because it forces the issue. It is a vote to say that this is enormous. If we had gone I might have thought that it really wasn't all that important. Perhaps our absence will lead to a covenant that will draw us all together in the end.

Gledhill to +Jensen: In The Way, the Truth and the Life, you talked about how worship needs to be adopted to represent the age. How does lay presidency fit into this?

Jensen: This is something that we have talked about in Sydney for 30 years, but we know that there is significant disagreement, so we have held back. I put it at a different level than the issue presented before us today. There is nothing in the bible about who administers communion. There is plenty about sexuality

Catholic News Services: How does this issue affect the relationship between the [Roman] Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion?

Jensen: I do not speak from formal knowledge, but from observation. Whereas there used to be considerable discussion between our two churches and great progress, to my understanding this has been under a considerable cloud. Partly this has to do with WO, but the consecration of a non-celibate homosexual bishop - which is against Catholic, Orthodox, and Anglican teaching - has made for a particularly frigid sense in our relationships.

Lesbian/Gay Christian Movement: Don't you feel the gospel is compromised by bishops who support jailing gay people in their countries?

Akinola: I am not aware of any.

Lesbian/Gay: One woman who has claimed or applied for asylum, she was jailed and raped repeatedly and marched for 2 miles but she may be sent back to a village in Uganda. Your laws say it is against the law and that means that they can be punished. Do you support that?

Akinola: Every society has its own laws. In your society these things are permissible. In ours many things, this one included, are not permissible. We do not have any word for homosexual behavior in our country. To that extent, those who are responsible for these laws want to keep other cultural influences out of the cultures of Africa.

Orombi: There is little influence to stop the legislation of a law the government in cities. The church's job is to preach and proclaim so that when people go against the word of God they may repent. I would be in trouble were I to say I could officiate at a same-sex blessing. I could have my church closed and lose my job.

The Christian faith you taught us told us what the Christian faith is. We cannot go where you want us to go without violating this faith we have received. We believe there is a possibility that God can bring you back when you sin, that you can be transformed. This makes us stand on the word of God. Way back when you go back 1886 young men were murdered because they refused to give themselves to a king sexually. Our communities culturally and where they stand is rock solid on the faith of Christianity. We believe it. We practice it. Now you call us to leave it.

Conger: Friday is the election in Zimbabwe. Last month the central African bishops released a statement. Do you support their call for free elections There have been reports about Dr. Kunoiga wanting to join Uganda and Kenya.

Nzimbi: the Bible says all authority is from God. My word will be that the church of Zimbabwe needs to pray. God will help them to choose the right person who will help them. but if they go according to their tribes they will not have anything. God will help them out of their problems.

Orombi: The bishop of Harare came to see us about this. We said Harare belongs to Central Africa and this matter should be handled by that provic. They should take this matter to that dean and those bishops need to sit down and discuss these problems. There are many challenges. You do not run from challenges. My advice is to go back to central Africa.

Kallsen: The authority of the Anglican Communion lies in the Instruments of Unity, can there be a change without changing these instruments?

Akinola: It is not changing the instruments, it is reforming them so that they work. They need to take a position and stay there. If they can begin to work faithfully, implement taken decisions, then that would be great. This has been said a number of times: Make the instruments perform.

Gledhill:You referred to the ABC's remarks on Sharia. Were you pressured from the Muslims in your country after that? Is this damaging to your situation in Nigeria?

Akinola: The good news is that if the Nigerian church should take the position different from our current position, we should just close our churches now. Our president is a Muslim. I visit him, he visits me. There is no pressure.

[unidentified reporter]: We would like to find out what happened at the border crossing.

Akinola: Like I said in the opening, if we are to make a list of the problems that we face, we will not get to the end of the list. This is one of them. The Lord has removed all of our obstacles one by one. It was from a human perspective humiliating, but the good Lord turned it to our advantage. They ask us to put our bags in the screening machine. They start asking me questions about my family and my education. After three hours I was wondering what is going on. So we get phone calls. They refuse to let me enter, they give me my passport and we left. And it was a good thing. We got here early and we were able to get some very important preparation done. I was carrying a diplomatic passport and this happened to me? But it turned out to be a blessing

Orombi: When our chairman could not meet us in Jordan we took the decision to meet him here.

Akinola: We are bishops and we set boundaries. I've got to insist that we keep the boundaries we set. My own hope is that GAFCON helps us to force the question of boundaries and get answers.

Orombi: We are here to pray, talk, and think about what God is going to give to us.

NYT: I did not hear you condemn the use of torture or rape.

Orombi: I would not believe that a thing is done like that in the public knowledge. Some of those things, we do not know about that.

Jensen: Any violence against any person is wrong. I understand that is Orombi's position as well and Akinola's. I am right in speaking for all of us here. Any such violence within the prisons or in public or private against gay people or anyone else is condemned by us.

[Unidentified reporter]: Archbishop Nzimbi, I heard you asking for a new reformation. Did you mean that?

Nzimbi: Yes, the reformation was about returning to the bible. I meant that. We must retrun to the scriptures.

[end]
51 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

No names being named! Diplomacy is being the forerunner for questions. They want to focus on something that can be done but my questions would be what solution could that be? In 30+ years no solution has manifested itself. Can they come up with one now? My prayers are that they do!

[1] Posted by TLDillon on 06-22-2008 at 01:32 PM • top

Matt, Greg.  Thanks for the transcript, caveats and all. Matt, glad you got there safely.
There are several items worth following up on, but I will await second confirmation from the reporters who asked the questions before jumping in on those.  For now it is useful to have the first read.

[2] Posted by mark harris on 06-22-2008 at 02:19 PM • top

Profoundly disquieting that neither +Akinola nor +Orombi were willing to admit that violence against homosexuals occurs in their countries, never mind condemn it.

Lesbian/Gay Christian Movement: Don’t you feel the gospel is compromised by bishops who support jailing gay people in their countries?

Akinola: I am not aware of any.

Lesbian/Gay: One woman who has claimed or applied for asylum, she was jailed and raped repeatedly and marched for 2 miles but she may be sent back to a village in Uganda. Your laws say it is against the law and that means that they can be punished. Do you support that?

Akinola: Every society has its own laws. In your society these things are permissible. In ours many things, this one included, are not permissible. We do not have any word for homosexual behavior in our country. To that extent, those who are responsible for these laws want to keep other cultural influences out of the cultures of Africa.

...

NYT: I did not hear you condemn the use of torture or rape.

Orombi: I would not believe that a thing is done like that in the public knowledge. Some of those things, we do not know about that.

+Jensen obviously felt the need to jump in and condemn on their behalf since they didn’t seem wiling to do so:

Jensen: Any violence against any person is wrong. I understand that is Orombi’s position as well and Akinola’s. I am right in speaking for all of us here. Any such violence within the prisons or in public or private against gay people or anyone else is condemned by us.

[3] Posted by Mick on 06-22-2008 at 02:57 PM • top

RE: “Profoundly disquieting that neither +Akinola nor +Orombi were willing to admit that violence against homosexuals occurs in their countries, never mind condemn it.”

Not really, since it appears that Akinola and Orombi recognized the “when did you stop beating your wife” nature of the question . . . I wouldn’t have answered it either.

A pity that Jensen felt the need to answer the most obvious version of that question: “I did not hear you condemn the use of torture or rape.”

The response to that is “You did not hear me condemn the use of murder and arson either.” [roll eyes]

[4] Posted by Sarah on 06-22-2008 at 03:01 PM • top

And oh yeh . . . I condemn the use of torture, rape, murder, arson, stealing, perjury, white-collar fraud, carjacking, stagecoach robbing, as well as illegal dumping of industrial waste. 

[roll eyes]

[5] Posted by Sarah on 06-22-2008 at 03:02 PM • top

See, it’s not so hard to do.

[6] Posted by Mick on 06-22-2008 at 03:03 PM • top

Got to it before you asked, Mick . . . ; > )

But why don’t you go ahead and ask me about another sin for me to condemn?

[7] Posted by Sarah on 06-22-2008 at 03:05 PM • top

Way off-topic… I just inadvertantly hit the hyperlink to stop receiving further notifications. How do I undo this, so that I do receive further notifications?

[8] Posted by bluenarrative on 06-22-2008 at 03:07 PM • top

Also these men are well aware of what happened in Zimbabwe. You don’t don’t give press conference opionions that might get someone hurt or killed. We don’t really know what these men and other bishops in Africa live under or with. The cone of silence is for safety. We don’t live under persecution and we do not understand why others do not use Western thought to answer questions. What was he supposed to say?
It is interesting the makeup of the press corps isn’t it? Thought this was by invite only, but then again I am trying to figure out how Bishop O’Neil got an invitation. I am praying for him to have a conversion experience, boy would that set Kate back some for one of her men to find Jesus.
These people are not on a business trip. They are on a pilgrimage to ask God what he wants of them and of the church -Anglican. Everyone forgets this? They have come together in God’s land and in God’s town to take it up with the Master. Don’t forget that when Jesus returns, it is prophesised that to Jerusalem/Mount of Olives He will return. So many are missing the significance here.

[9] Posted by Houseownedbythedog3 on 06-22-2008 at 03:20 PM • top

Here Mick—I’ll go ahead and do it for you.

Father Jake: Don’t you feel the gospel is compromised by white Southern female Episcopal bloggers who support stealing rival Episcopal traditional blogger’s material?

Sarah: Huh?

Matt: “Uh, any stealing of any traditional Episcopal bloggers’ material is wrong.”

Mick: “Profoundly disquieting that Sarah was not willing to admit that white Southern female Episcopal bloggers steal material, never mind condemn it.”

Sarah: “You did not hear me condemn the use of murder and arson either.”

There, Mick.  See how simple that was?  ; > )

[10] Posted by Sarah on 06-22-2008 at 03:26 PM • top

Sarah, I’m very disturbed that you didn’t condemn spiritual violence against the Stand Firm webmaster by the Southern Women’s Anglican Blogger’s Hen Party, or whatever you call that shadowy puppet-regime-within-a-puppet-regime of yours.

[11] Posted by Greg Griffith on 06-22-2008 at 03:32 PM • top

...and litterin’.

[12] Posted by Greg Griffith on 06-22-2008 at 03:36 PM • top

Oh dear. Hit a sore spot have I. :-D

[13] Posted by Mick on 06-22-2008 at 03:37 PM • top

Mick, did you not read THIS PART:

NYT: I did not hear you condemn the use of torture or rape.

Orombi: I would not believe that a thing is done like that in the public knowledge. Some of those things, we do not know about that.

Jensen: Any violence against any person is wrong. I understand that is Orombi’s position as well and Akinola’s. I am right in speaking for all of us here. Any such violence within the prisons or in public or private against gay people or anyone else is condemned by us.

Hopefully, that will clarify things for you.

[14] Posted by HeartAfire on 06-22-2008 at 03:37 PM • top

bluenarrative,

This and may other questions are answered by clicking the light bulb at the top of the page.

[15] Posted by Greg Griffith on 06-22-2008 at 03:38 PM • top

RE: “Hit a sore spot have I” . . .

Well you tried to. 

But I think the silliness has been successfully demonstrated . . . and people don’t laugh when they’re sore.  ; > )

[16] Posted by Sarah on 06-22-2008 at 03:38 PM • top

Greg,
You being “very disturbed” is not good enough.  You’re supposed to be “profoundly disquieted”!

[17] Posted by more martha than mary on 06-22-2008 at 03:39 PM • top

Oh don’t worry. I am very disturbed, profoundly disquieted, appalled, chagrined, and - are you sitting down? - GOBSMACKED.

Matthew… hand me a tissue…

[18] Posted by Greg Griffith on 06-22-2008 at 03:40 PM • top

That’s more like it, Gregory!

[19] Posted by more martha than mary on 06-22-2008 at 03:42 PM • top

RE: “I’m very disturbed that you didn’t condemn spiritual violence against the Stand Firm webmaster by the Southern Women’s Anglican Blogger’s Hen Party, or whatever you call that shadowy puppet-regime-within-a-puppet-regime of yours.”

I am appalled at the misogynistic hate-filled rhetoric of this comment, and indeed it is clear that the institution of a new “webmaster” is urgently needed judging by this shocking screed.

It is the “Southern Anglican Women’s StandFirm Blogger’s Committee” [SAWSBLC] and it is clear that the four Episcopal Therapists that I graciously appointed for Greg’s pastoral care have much, much to offer him in the way of gracious dialogue and conversation, not to mention anti-bigotry lessons.

With Dignity,

Sarah Hey
Chair and Chancellor, Southern Anglican Women’s StandFirm Blogger’s Committee

[20] Posted by Sarah on 06-22-2008 at 03:43 PM • top

more martha than mary, I beg to differ with you.

It is I, The Victim of this hate speech, that should be Profoundly Disquieted, and let me assure you that I am.

Greg does not really have the Sensitivity or the Flower-Like Gentleness and Fragility that is capable of feeling profound disquiet.

[21] Posted by Sarah on 06-22-2008 at 03:46 PM • top

Dear C&C;of SAWSBC,
I was just tryin’ to help Gregory identify with his inner Mick.

[22] Posted by more martha than mary on 06-22-2008 at 03:50 PM • top

the Southern Women’s Anglican Blogger’s Hen Party

Mr Griffith’s remarks were not only misogynistic but anti-chicken as well - implying as they did that an alleged fault in women can be illustrated by a corresponding fault in chickens.  No doubt he eats them, too - with barbecue sauce.

carl

[23] Posted by carl on 06-22-2008 at 04:29 PM • top

<sigh> I was wondering when they would start crawling out of the woodwork.

[24] Posted by sllc on 06-22-2008 at 04:49 PM • top

Mick, Ruth and the NYT hit-squad:

“Those who failed to admit that by the unilateral actions they took, those have torn the fabric of our common life, are grumbling. Pity. Similarly, there those who have failed to come to terms with the reality of the situation but say that they will carry on as they always have. And there are those who do not understand why we do this now. Pray for them.” -Akinola (opening address - GAFCON)

[25] Posted by midwestnorwegian on 06-22-2008 at 04:52 PM • top

There is now a link to the audio of today’s press conference posted at the GAFCON site:
http://www.gafcon.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=59&Itemid=29

[26] Posted by The_Elves on 06-22-2008 at 05:14 PM • top

I did not hear any of you condemn recreational cannibalism or freemasonry.  I am extremely disturbed.

[27] Posted by Newbie Anglican on 06-22-2008 at 06:05 PM • top

Mr Griffith’s remarks were not only misogynistic but anti-chicken as well - implying as they did that an alleged fault in women can be illustrated by a corresponding fault in chickens.  No doubt he eats them, too - with barbecue sauce. 

*sigh*
do you people know NOTHING? We don’t eat chickens with BBQ sauce. We deep fry them and send them to Africa to buy off the bishops.

[28] Posted by David Ould on 06-22-2008 at 06:12 PM • top

Are we to condemn the serving of claret with catfish?  I cannot remember, and now I am so confused.

[29] Posted by Chazaq on 06-22-2008 at 06:16 PM • top

Come on Chazaq.  Always PBR with catfish.

[30] Posted by Old Soldier on 06-22-2008 at 06:26 PM • top

PBR?  I haven’t had a PBR since I had one from a keg at the Beta house in College.  They even make blue ribbon anymore?

I think you can serve claret with catfish, if served with collard greens flavored with that leftover bacon grease from the fridge, red and black pepper, and clear hot sauce.  But, I decry serving claret with it any other way in lieu of PBR.

Seriously, however, the question seems to be on how far does one have to go to decry the taking of the lives of those who engage in sinful behavior.  If Jesus is any example, pretty darn far.  However, the journalists are just doing the same stupid bating they always do.  Good for these bishops for not biting on the unbaited hook.

This reminds me of how the Methodist conference rejected the unbaited hook at their recent convention where they rejected the resolution that said “we disagree over sexuality” and passed the one that said what sexuality should be.

[31] Posted by Brad Drell on 06-22-2008 at 06:41 PM • top

No use reading the NYT if they only publish what was not said.

[32] Posted by Betty See on 06-22-2008 at 06:56 PM • top

Better late than never - Mick dear soul, please when the whole room is laughing at your attempt at an arched brow and a “short-shot arrow lying in the dirt” remark, it is because it was found to silly and inane to a level that provoked humor. Akin to slapstick humor where the antagonist winds up to wallop the protagonist and misses completely. That sort of thing. [comment edited]. Now sit down son, fan yourself a bit and let the heat drain from your face a bit. There’s good lad.

Amazing how culturally inept so many Americans are, believing they have the inside view on other countries based on the lamentable mainstream media or special interest coverage delivered to comfortable suburban homes on a daily basis.

[33] Posted by masternav on 06-22-2008 at 09:49 PM • top

RE: “Are we to condemn the serving of claret with catfish?”

I believe so, Chazaq—and I do condemn it heartily.  Never let it be said that I shirk from condemning ill-bred behavior and acts of pollution which lead to global warming.

However, I believe that we have strayed far afield from the key topic here, which was Greg Griffith’s [“webmaster” of SF] grossly rude, violent, patriarchal comments concerning my own person and my organization of which I am chair and chancellor.

Little as I like to draw attention to myself, nevertheless I must since I serve as a Living Icon of the scorn and prejudice and bigotry heaped upon the heads of so many of us victims.  There are many more . . . of which I believe I stand as the exemplar and primary token.

So let us get back on task, and bring the conversation back round to the appropriate topic, which is me.


Tremblingly and quaveringly,

Sarah

[34] Posted by Sarah on 06-22-2008 at 10:41 PM • top

Chazaq:

Are we to condemn the serving of claret with catfish?  I cannot remember, and now I am so confused.


With catfish, no. TO catfish, yes (it’s a southern thing—you wouldn’t understand).

[35] Posted by The Pilgrim on 06-23-2008 at 01:55 AM • top

A little giddy from staying up too late, are we?

So, the line the liberal press will take is clear.  No surprise:  instead of dealing with trifling scriptural arguments, this conference should be about telling their various governments what to do.  After all, TEC’s leadership is full-time into ADVOCACY, which is of course what Jesus’s message was all about.

I’ll wait to see what comes out of the conference, and ignore the NYT.

[36] Posted by Katherine on 06-23-2008 at 03:26 AM • top

When we come together at public meetings we cannot have communion together. It would be a great thing to be able to do this. I am hoping that the Lambeth conference attends to that issue successfully. I do not see how it can do that…

Indeed.  How can a conference “attend to” certain primates and other bishops’ personal decision (+Akinola says it’s a matter of conscience) not to take Communion in the presence of persons from TEC/ACoC?  Given that both sides are firm in their views, the only way to “attend to” the problem seems to be to throw TEC/ACoC out.  I view remarks like this as disingenuous.

[37] Posted by DavidH on 06-23-2008 at 03:34 AM • top

Not disingenuous, DavidH, but honest.  The Communion is broken.  As these Primates have said, they are not able to receive communion with those who will not comply with the declared Anglican standards.  They are not in communion.  It’s broken.  Either TEC and ACoC are disciplined or the broken communion remains in place.

[38] Posted by Katherine on 06-23-2008 at 03:48 AM • top

I ahve a transcript of the relevant parts of the interview if you would like me to post it?

[39] Posted by Martin Reynolds on 06-23-2008 at 06:45 AM • top

Mick, it saddens me you have not condemned any form of torture used during the Reformation, the Counter-Reformation and the Spanish Inquisition.

Oh, and I’m troubled you haven’t voiced your support for puppies and kittens.

[40] Posted by texex on 06-23-2008 at 08:03 AM • top

The Bishops in Africa take a great risk (for themselves and their churches) when they say they believe homosexuals can be transformed by the Grace of God, whereas Bishops in the United States face no risk but they seem to be so fearful of the Gay Agenda that they do not even acknowledge that homosexuals can be transformed by Grace of God.

[41] Posted by Betty See on 06-23-2008 at 11:39 AM • top

They do still make PBR—I think the South African corporation that bought the Miller brewery now owns the label. It is primarily sold in a very small part of the upper midwest (western Indiana, Illinois (including Chicago) and most of Wisconsin. I have seen it for sale outside of these areas, but the price is always almost double what the stuff goes for in Chicago, so I am assuming that this wider distribution of the product is a function of bottlers and distributors looking to satisfy local tastes, and not a part of Miller’s overall marketing strategy. In the upper midwest, it’s still a bottom-shelf item. I guess people THERE know enough to to pay too much for this awful stuff. Nostalgia—or something similar—has elevated PBR to somewhat higher status beyond this region.

[42] Posted by bluenarrative on 06-23-2008 at 11:51 AM • top

#42, According to their website, PBR is available pretty much everywhere in the US. Last six pack I remember seeing was in a liquor store and looked pretty dusty. It’s probably to beer drinkers what TaB is to the soda consumer, a foul tasting specialty item.

Anyone remember a beer called ‘Red White & Blue’? If PBR is TaB, the RW&B;was Moxie.

I’d rather my church did not require suits.

[43] Posted by Matthew A (formerly mousestalker) on 06-23-2008 at 12:07 PM • top

I rather LIKED Moxie, when it was still available… I miss it… It was a New England specialty item, to be sure. And one needs a certain flinty edge to one’s sensibilities to appreciate it’s complex and diesel-like bouquet. But I find it hard to believe that I am the last person alive on this planet who is sufficiently flinty to appreciate Moxie… RW@B was hideous stuff—even more awful than Falstaff and Grain Belt Beer…

[44] Posted by bluenarrative on 06-23-2008 at 12:21 PM • top

Heh, Moxie is for pikers.  And you can still buy it. Now with spruce gum made by the Androscoggin (sp?) Indians, you not only needed to be sufficiently flinty to be able to chew it, you needed to be sufficiently flush because it required having 10 cents left over from all of your fishing tackle purchases at L.LBean…

[45] Posted by Mrs. Lawrence on 06-23-2008 at 12:30 PM • top

Yikes!!!! PBR!!!! RW&B;!!!!Tab!!!!Moxie!!!! And now SPRUCE GUM too!!!!! No wonder the Revisionists monitoring this site are convinced that we are all a bunch of ineffectual, geriatric, and reactionary DINOSOARS living in the PAST…

True story (NO HYPERBOLE at all): I once, when I was about 8 years old, accidentally, took ONE sip of Tab, thinking it was Coca-Cola. And I could not get the taste out of my mouth for a WEEK! It was awful… If I absolutely had to make a choice today between taking a second sip of Tab or else drinking kerosene, I would immediately opt for the kerosene; if I had to choose between drinking Tab and drinking CHLOROX, then Chlorox would be my choice…

[46] Posted by bluenarrative on 06-23-2008 at 01:13 PM • top

Moxie is available at Shaw’s in New England. I bought one once, as I liked the name.  The flavor, however, was (as bluenarrative noted) more like diesel fuel than any other liquid I have tasted or smelled.

On topic—a fascinating interview.  I will be looking forward to the final statement of the meeting.

[47] Posted by AnglicanXn on 06-23-2008 at 01:38 PM • top

Hoo Boy—do I remember PBR.  It’s one of those ‘60s memories.  My two room mates and I would get a $2.49 6-pack of Bud to get tipsy, then two 99 cent six-packs of PBR to finish the job…

[48] Posted by The Pilgrim on 06-23-2008 at 02:43 PM • top

Even as I write this, I have 2-3 bottles of Moxie in the house.  Goes great with pizza or subs but not a suitable drink for people from away.

[49] Posted by Old Soldier on 06-23-2008 at 03:09 PM • top

Mugabe represents the very face of evil and Archbishops Akinola, Orombi and Kolini know exactly what is going on in Zimbabwe. That is a different issue however, one that doesn’t touch on the crisis in Anglicanism.

Americans are largely ignorant of what is happening in Zimbabwe and Gay/Lesbian reporters focus only on African current events that they can use polemically.

Read the news of Zimbabwe, here, and pray!
http://college-ethics.blogspot.com/2008/06/mugabe-regime-face-of-evil.html
http://college-ethics.blogspot.com/2008/06/international-pressure-on-mugabe.html
http://college-ethics.blogspot.com/2008/06/mugabe-regime-blocks-humanitarian-aid.html
http://college-ethics.blogspot.com/2008/06/mugabe-opponent-pulls-out.html

[50] Posted by Alice Linsley on 06-23-2008 at 04:28 PM • top

bluenarrative, Why do you wish to change the subject of this thread?

[51] Posted by Betty See on 06-23-2008 at 06:40 PM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.