Saturday, February 4, 2012

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

The Bishop of Nelson [New Zealand] Writes His Diocese About the Lambeth Conference

Saturday, August 2, 2008 • 5:14 am


[Received via email and posted with permission.]

We are now in the last couple of days of Lambeth and I am feeling deeply sad.
I don’t know why at the moment – everything I came here hoping for looks set to be agreed to:
It is very likely that the Windsor continuation report will be approved – which means that a moratoria on gay bishops will continue etc….
And it seems likely that a covenant process will be endorsed and a draft agreed to.
All this seems good to me and yet I can’t help this overwhelming sadness.
Because I am more convinced than ever that none of this will help us. Those who have stayed away will not agree to it and will continue their ministry in the States. And TEC will continue to bleat that they won’t follow the moratoria while these Africans continue to ignore it.
I believe (at this stage – and there are still two days to go) that this has been the most expensive exercise in futility that I have every been to.
The Indaba groups have been a joke. I can’t believe that no zulu has stood up and taken us to account for our abuse of this process. ‘Indaba’ is supposed to be very similar to the process our Maori use when they go onto a marae to achieve a consensus. We, on the other hand, arrived in our indaba groups only to be divided off into even smaller groups with little tasks to do – little questions to answer.

It feels as though this is a process to divide and conquer
The Bible study groups have been very good in relationship building – I have met some very special people from within TEC and I hope to keep in touch with some of them. But I’m tired of every study being reduced to the buzz-word around here – ‘What does it say in your context. Every second sentence you hear seems to start with that phrase – well, in my context. This is an abuse of the hermeneutical process.
The draft statement that will be released is so full of generalizations it says absolutely nothing. I am deeply dismayed at the spinelessness of the communion.
So what is good.
I have appreciated networking with some pretty amazing people.
I am so full of respect for Bishops Bill Love and Mark Lawrence (from within TEC) who are not afraid to stand up and call sin, sin!
I have the deepest admiration from the Bishops from the Sudan who came to let their voice be heard and have been treated with the most disgusting abuse from a woman Bishop from New York who labeled them ‘wife-beaters!’
I am ready to come home – with little energy for pursuing the covenant – but will do so because this is my church!!!

But I will be actively building relationships with the Global South which looks as if it will expand and grow beyond this Lambeth to include evangelical Bishops from all around the world.
With much love
Richard


6 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

I do not know this Bishop but he seems to have a good grasp on matter except he has bought into the EC’s view that the problem is boundary crossing and while they continue the EC will continue with their GLBT agenda.  Sadly, it is the other way around.  He is drained spiritually and does not believe anything was accomplished that will help the Communion to continue….He is right.

[1] Posted by Creighton+ on 08-02-2008 at 05:40 AM • top

Bishop Nelson, “Because I am more convinced than ever that none of this will help us. Those who have stayed away will not agree to it and will continue their ministry in the States. And TEC will continue to bleat that they won’t follow the moratoria while these Africans continue to ignore it.”

His fundamental error is also the ABCs and TEO/et al -  that the boundary crossing is first and continuing cause of the problem.

The reverse is true. 

The sins of TEC/ACoC/CoE et al have mandated emergency measures and have VOIDED their proprietary authority over anyone.

The ball is in the court of the perpetrators of heresy, apostasy, etc. and there it will remain until they REPENT and produce living lasting proof of it by their actions.

[2] Posted by Theodora on 08-02-2008 at 06:20 AM • top

Hey folks, I’m hoping very much to be able to post an audio interview with this man and I have to say he’s in no way suggesting “equality” in those two actions.

His tone is that of simply stating what is happening, as in “this happens, and that happens.”

One of the things I’ve learned over these past two weeks of interviewing, listening to audio, transcribing, writing, reading, etc, is that tone is very very different and we can often mistake it.  Having the opportunity to converse with this man makes it clear which way he is thinking, even if it may not be quite clear to the readers in this communication.

[3] Posted by Sarah on 08-02-2008 at 06:25 AM • top

If some conservative bishops have used this time to make contact with others, this may not have been the total waste of time it otherwise seems to be.  This good bishop thinks that the Global South movement will be further expanded.  Good.  The sideshows at the fringe” events, and at the marketplace, and apparently all over campus, with the pro-SS activists literally shoving literature and microphones in faces, has made more bishops aware of just how far off the edge these people can be.  This is also good.

[4] Posted by Katherine on 08-02-2008 at 06:28 AM • top

(First, please correct me if I am wrong, but this is from Bishop Richard Ellena, of the Diocese of Nelson, correct?)
I join the bishop in his sadness over what Lambeth has become, but I see here some remarkably positive things:
1) The impression one had of NZ (admittedly, all from TEC sources), prior to reading this, was that it was universally in the TEC camp- Victoria Matthews being seen as the most “conservative” of its bishops. Clearly, the bishops of the province are not so universally liberal as one had been lead to believe.  Hopefully, there are more like Bishop Ellena back home.
2)

I have the deepest admiration from the Bishops from the Sudan who came to let their voice be heard and have been treated with the most disgusting abuse from a woman Bishop from New York who labeled them ‘wife-beaters!’

One is relieved to know that there is at least one bishop at Lambeth, aside those from Africa and Southern Cone, who is intelligent enough to have put two and two together, and recognize publicly that these two things were related.  No doubt many bishops saw this, but it will be quite surprising if we find it makes the cut in the final reflections document. One is also led to speculate that, since TEC HoB is the largest in the Communion, there are more Episcopal bishops guilty of spousal abuse than bishops of any other Communion Church.
3)

I am so full of respect for Bishops Bill Love and Mark Lawrence (from within TEC) who are not afraid to stand up and call sin, sin!

One knew these good bishops would be standing for the Truth, it is gratifying to know that at least some other bishops at Lambeth are listening to them, and recognizing their impact.
Many thanks for this message from Bishop Ellena, and prayers for him and his diocese.
TJ

[5] Posted by tjmcmahon on 08-02-2008 at 06:57 AM • top

Yeah some “moratoria”.

[6] Posted by midwestnorwegian on 08-02-2008 at 08:36 AM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.