Saturday, February 4, 2012

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

Oregon Seeking Partnership With Another State For Euthanasia Law

Saturday, September 27, 2008 • 12:23 pm


If you know anyone who lives in the State of Washington, urge them to vote against this attempt to further devalue life

Oregon seems to have found a surefire way to lower health care costs: Tell the patient you’ll pay for drugs that will end her life, but not those that would extend her life.  Here’s how it works:

In May 2008, 64-year-old retired school bus driver Barbara Wagner received bad news from her doctor.  She found out that her cancer, which had been in remission for two years, had returned.  Then, she got some good news.  Her doctor gave her a prescription that would likely slow the cancer’s growth and extend her life.  She was relieved by the news and also by the fact that she had health care coverage through the Oregon Health Plan.

It didn’t take long for her hopes to be dashed. 

Barbara Wagner was notified by letter that the Oregon Health Plan wouldn’t cover her prescription.  But the letter didn’t leave it at that.  It also notified her that, although it wouldn’t cover her prescription, it would cover assisted suicide.

After Wagner’s story appeared in the Eugene Register-Guard, the Oregon Health Plan acknowledged that it routinely sends similar letters to patients who have little chance of surviving more than five years, informing them that the health plan will pay for assisted suicide (euphemistically categorized as “comfort care”), but not for treatment that could help them live for months or years.

Certainly, spending $100 for deadly drugs is cost effective.  And, ever since the Oregon Death with Dignity Act transformed the crime of assisted suicide into a “medical treatment” more than ten years ago, it has been perfectly legal.  Oregon doctors prescribe lethal overdoses of drugs.  Pharmacists dispense them, sometimes with instructions to “take all of this with a light snack and alcohol to cause death.”  Patients die after taking them.

On to Seattle

Now, an Oregon-style law is under consideration in Washington State.  After engineering passage of Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act, assisted-suicide advocacy groups thought other states would rapidly adopt similar laws.  But they were wrong.  Because their attempts to pass Oregon-style laws in more than twenty states failed, the Portland-based Death with Dignity National Center (DDNC), along with Compassion & Choices (the former Hemlock Society), devised a plan in 2005 called “Oregon plus One” to break the logjam. It is based on the premise that, if just one more state follows Oregon’s lead, then other states will fall in line.

The plan was put into effect in early 2006.  In its 2007 annual report, the DDNC noted that it had spent a year “researching and collecting data to determine that state which is most likely to adopt a Death with Dignity law…Through these efforts we have identified Washington as the state.”  (Note that the assisted-suicide group chose Washington.  Washingtonians were not in on the selection.)

After choosing Washington as the target state, the DDNC reported, “[W]e have never had such great odds of success as we have in Washington in 2008.  That is why we will be directing $1.5 million over the next year and a half to the efforts….Our organization is providing leadership, political strategy, and financial resources to this monumental effort.” 

The political campaign was formally announced in late 2007 and, in mid-July 2008, Initiative 1000 (called the “Washington Death with Dignity Act,” a measure virtually identical to Oregon’s law) qualified for the 2008 general election ballot.  Its advocates contend that Oregon’s ten-year experience demonstrates that a Death with Dignity law not only works well, but is actually a benefit to patients.  As proof they point to Oregon’s annual official reports, to the law’s “safeguards,” and to studies in professional journals.

However, their claims are at best misleading.  For example, under Oregon’s law doctors participating in assisted suicide must file reports with the state.  So the only physicians providing data for official annual reports are those who actually prescribe lethal drugs for patients.  First, they help the person commit suicide and, afterwards, they report whether their actions complied with the law.  Then, that information is used to formulate the state’s official annual reports.  However, according to American Medical News, Oregon officials in charge of issuing the reports have conceded that “there’s no way to know if additional deaths went unreported.”  (The official number of reported assisted-suicide deaths in Oregon is 341.)


11 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

Who said that the work of the Thire Reich was ended.  The good work of Mengela and others lives on in the progressive agenda.  First the old and infirmed then the premature and disabled, next those of any age with permanent disabilities will be put out of their “Pain”. Finaly medical cost will go to Zero as anyone with any intelligence will avoid a doctor at all costs.

What a wonderfull country we will then have only the perfect will live.  Wait wasn’t that the Goal of the Master Race?
Lord have Mercy, Christ Have Mercy, Lord have Mercy
For I am a Sinner, thank God I am not of the Master Race

[1] Posted by rlw6 on 09-27-2008 at 12:03 PM • top

Yeah. I saw this last week. It’s amazing how the bad leaven spreads. The rot repels and yet we must promote and encourage right christian witness that is life supporting. I’ve already sent the article to friends so they may have the info what’s going on.

[2] Posted by southernvirginia1 on 09-27-2008 at 12:10 PM • top

This is so incredibly evil, I would appreciate further verification of it.

[3] Posted by Newbie Anglican on 09-27-2008 at 02:25 PM • top

Once death becomes a legitimized treatment, it is almost always more cost-effective to kill than to treat.  Unless of course the patient has:

1.  A large future earning potential relative to the cost of treatment.

2. Good political connections.

Don’t get old and sick.  The combination can be lethal.  It might also be wise to avoid medical conditions the cost of which exceeds your net worth - especially if you can’t work.

But, hey.  TEC has an out to support this.  Doesn’t it say in Scripture “If a man shall not work, neither shall he <s>eat</s> live” ... or something like that?

carl

[4] Posted by carl on 09-27-2008 at 03:21 PM • top

After I posted a link on this to my blog, I saw Newbie’s comment & remembered In The World As We at Present Know It, it is in good form to Check Your Sources. Google has six different heads that begin with “Barbara Wagner” (Oregon, cancer, suicide, Oregon health care, etc.) with many hits) - the story has a good ending.

But sometimes, perhaps, a good ending is not enough…

[5] Posted by Wren King on 09-27-2008 at 03:40 PM • top

I live in the State of Washington ... in the Puget Sound area.  I also lived in Oregon.  We fondly (sort of) refer to this area as the “Great Unchurched.”

Our incumbent governor who is RCC (sort of ... Biden and Pelosi style) is running ads in support of embryonic stem cell research.  (And, no, our bishop has not publicly called her out on this.) The RCC is urging a vote against this initiative.  I have heard several good homilies on this subject.  But who knows? 

Washington is a small state and only two counties have to vote in support of the initiative (King County and Snohomish) and it is a done deal.  It is relatively easy to do here.  Money is pouring in from all over the world in support of this initiative, so I don’t have much hope that it won’t pass.  It is seen a “personal freedom” and how dare anyone try to judge an act of personal freedom .... you know, like abortion?  Unlike abortion, there is not another separate human life involved.  So you tell me, what are the odds?  And in my town, we do not have Episcopalians/Anglicans standing with us. Sadly, because we could use the help.

[6] Posted by interested observer on 09-27-2008 at 03:59 PM • top

Further on comment #5.  Initiative 1000 is the so-called “Death with Dignity” initiative ... otherwise known as “assisted suicide.”  I referred to several pro-life issues in my comment because they are inextricably linked.

[7] Posted by interested observer on 09-27-2008 at 04:09 PM • top

Don’t get old and sick.  The combination can be lethal.

Since there is no way for the next generation to pay for Social Security or Medicare for the Baby Boomers, that would be me, “assisted suicide” could become a real popular choice for them to make for us.  I’m starting an anti-aging program tomorrow in self-defense.  Maybe if I get sick they just won’t think I’m old.

[8] Posted by Edwin on 09-27-2008 at 09:14 PM • top

After Wagner’s story appeared in the Eugene Register-Guard, the Oregon Health Plan acknowledged that it routinely sends similar letters to patients who have little chance of surviving more than five years, informing them that the health plan will pay for assisted suicide (euphemistically categorized as “comfort care”), but not for treatment that could help them live for months or years.

Resolution of the individual case notwithstanding, if OHP now routinely recommends the practice, then the assertion that legalizing assisted suicide would not lead to an implied duty to die has been shown to be false. All those who warned of the slippery slope are now owed an apology for being dubbed prophets of doom.

Catholic and Reformed

[9] Posted by Jeremy Bonner on 09-28-2008 at 06:41 AM • top

Still sickened by this - and other things happening. If anyone wishes to do a word study [one of the chapters where (coincidentally) ‘stand firm in faith’ appears] on delusion & apostasy & the last days, http://www.greekbiblestudy.org/ is an excellent tool. (See 2 Thessalonians 2.)

I have long believed that the loss of Biblical literacy has done much to facilitate where we are now…we can’t rely solely on our priests & bishops, no matter how excellent or otherwise they may be.

Cannot be mere observers of the Truth…not now. We have to be active participants; like the love of Christ: watchful - mindful - active. Able to take every small moment and use it without fanfare or note.

I don’t think it is going to get better…things are happening too fast.

[10] Posted by Wren King on 09-28-2008 at 11:56 AM • top

We should all be alert for more of this.  As more and more states face cash crunches, and more and more of the responsibility for healthcare falls to government entities, they will begin to dig, and what they will find is that some 70% of all healthcare costs are spent in the last 12 months of a person’s life.

Recessions, budget crunches, federal government pulling back on payment to states for Medicaid, pushes for states to expand their health insurance and push for “universal” healthcare, all MUST lead eventually to rationed care, or very high taxes.  Take your pick.

This poor person, who was only 1 birthday away from qualifying for Medicare, may have had a brutal prognosis, but society as a whole needs to decide how heroic we should be in extended her life. 

The real danger in this is, private health insurance companies more and more use Medicare/Medicaid as justification for what they will cover and what they won’t, and how much they will pay docs and hospitals who already know they cannot stay open on Medicare (let alone Medicaid) rates. 

It’s a big deal.  Please pay attention. 

KTF!....mrb

[11] Posted by Mike Bertaut on 09-29-2008 at 10:03 AM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.