Thursday, February 9, 2012

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

DioCNY: “Financial Realities” Forcing “Staff Reorganization”

Thursday, October 16, 2008 • 10:04 am


Judging by this memo from Bishop Gladstone “Skip” Adams, it looks like All is Well™ in Central New York:

In the development of the proposed 2009 Diocesan Budget, it became clear that the financial realities of today’s economy are creating challenges for our congregations in terms of assessment and investment revenue.

Translation: Parishes aren’t sending us as much jack as they used to.

Increased energy costs place additional pressures on already stretched budgets. these challenges obviously impact the financial resources available on the diocesan level for staff, programming and ministry.

The mission of the Diocesan Staff is to provide resources to commissions, committees and congregations so they can minister faithfully in their own communities. This will remain our commitment, however, an anticipated reduction in 2009 revenues has required me to make some difficult and painful decisions.

Translation: Well, not difficult or painful for me, you understand. As your bishop, I certainly can’t be expected to take a pay cut, now can I?

No, there is NO OTHER WAY AROUND IT!

What? Drop property lawsuits and get settlement money that would more than pay for these people’s salaries? Bite your tongue!

No no no… the only solution is that people who have served the diocese faithfully will have to “reorganize.”

Bishop Skip goes on to announce that the positions of Property and Benefits Administrator, Interim Director of the Diocesan Formation Program, and the Canon for Youth and Family Ministries will be eliminated.

He concludes by explaining:

We are living in uncertain times that can be frightening, if we allow it.

In fact, nothing could be further from the truth, bishop. Two things, at least, are certain:

One is that the average Sunday attendance for your diocese is on a steady decline and shows no signs of improving (a 14% drop over the last decade).

The other is that the worst of the crisis is behind you! Yessiree, you’re about to turn the corner onto easy street!


21 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

“Canon for Youth and Family Ministries”

Do they even have enough “Youth and Family” left in the diocese to justify the posistion?

[1] Posted by AndrewA on 10-16-2008 at 09:41 AM • top

Silly AndrewA… you know Episcopalians are better educated and have fewer children. We have no need for “Youth and Family Ministries.”

[2] Posted by Greg Griffith on 10-16-2008 at 09:49 AM • top

Keep looking for Diocese’s and parishes to use the recession as the main reason for money problems.  This is convenient cover to mask the deeper problems.

[3] Posted by Looking for Leaders on 10-16-2008 at 09:56 AM • top

Tis always better to blame the current issues surrounding society than admit that your New Thing Theology isn’t working out and you are bleeding out finances and people that no longer are there for you for your dioceses!

[4] Posted by TLDillon on 10-16-2008 at 10:05 AM • top

Well, obviously useless positions, now those building which we’ll never regain members to occupy (new families might want a youth program, which wisely is being cut) and not dispose of in a down real estate market, those we must spend millions to feed hungry lawyers, else they might be seen on the street with signs such as “will sue for food.”

[5] Posted by Hosea6:6 on 10-16-2008 at 10:07 AM • top

So many of the “commissions and committees” are really just adult play groups, that their elimination might give the participants time for real work, like preaching the gospel.

[6] Posted by Long Gone Anglo Catholic on 10-16-2008 at 10:08 AM • top

DioCNY: “Financial Realities” Forcing “Staff Reorganization

Kinda like “reorganizing” the deck chairs on the Titanic, don’t ya think?

the snarkster™

[7] Posted by the snarkster on 10-16-2008 at 10:39 AM • top

Why aren’t they reducing salaries, like that Dean in Seattle (I think it was Seattle?) who makes 200 thousand per year? Selling the PB’s 5th Ave. penthouse, and disposing of non diocesan related property investments? Didn’t the PB evict a bunch of nuns from a church building to create some high faluting “retreat” space for female priests and bishops? Sell that. The PB and other high flyers should gut their budgets, no more travel expenses, reduce their standards of living to a more humble level.

[8] Posted by mari on 10-16-2008 at 10:49 AM • top

Is that ‘Easy Street’ or the “Boulevard of Broken Dreams?”

[9] Posted by rkreed on 10-16-2008 at 11:22 AM • top

I wonder how many Roman Catholic dioceses have commissions and committees such as TEC has?

[10] Posted by Cennydd on 10-16-2008 at 11:46 AM • top

#8   Mari, what you say makes a lot of sense.  To that, I would add this:  Consolidate outlying parishes and missions.  The Adirondack Mission in the Diocese of Central New York is a good example of that.  Three churches in northern Oneida County and southern Lewis County did that….but even so, they’re still having financial problems.

Outlying parishes and missions have been forced to do this for years, and it’s especially true for those “summertime” churches where the ASA figures fall off dramatically after Labor Day.  Unfortunately for dioceses such this one, that’s going to happen a lot more often if finances continue to nosedive due to falling attendance….and it will spread to larger communities as long as bishops like Adams remain in power.

[11] Posted by Cennydd on 10-16-2008 at 12:02 PM • top

I like to call all these groups and committees the “Pardiggle” groups.  Mrs. Pardiggle is character in Dickens’ novels.  You can google if not familiar.  The resemblance to all the busybody do-gooder groups in TEC is quite hilarious.

[12] Posted by Looking for Leaders on 10-16-2008 at 12:04 PM • top

It is very frustrating to read this.  As Greg rightly points out, if they settled their lawsuits they could probably save some staff.

Reminds me of Pharaoh.

[13] Posted by DietofWorms on 10-16-2008 at 12:08 PM • top

Helllllllllooooooooooooo.  Less membership equals less giving. Duh!

[14] Posted by The Templar on 10-16-2008 at 01:05 PM • top

Finally was able to bring up the stat sheets. 

There are actually four dioceses that grew: Alaska and East Carolina each by 2%, and (drumroll, please!) South Carolina, w/ that new whacko bishop who hasn’t had the taste to follow along w/ TEC’s tripe, was up 6%, and Tennessee, up 7%.  So 101 shrank.  I’ll leave the math to you all.

If this were a business w/ 105 branches - say an outfit like “Curves” that depends on memberships? - and they all were losing an average of 11% per year, wdn’t there be some heads rolling somewhere?  At least franchises folding or combining, as someone mentioned above, merge small missions.  (Does distance from those who might attend matter, when the cost of gas is what it is?)  Lots of red ink on books. 

V sad.

[15] Posted by maineiac on 10-16-2008 at 02:39 PM • top

Maineiac,
East Carolina’s +2% may be phantom growth.  They still have people on their books who left two years ago, largely because Bishop Daniel will not grant letters of transfer to anyone moving to a non-TEC congregation. 
I dare say he’s not the only one cooking the books to perpetuate the myth that All is Well.

[16] Posted by Invicta on 10-16-2008 at 03:13 PM • top

According to a comment on MCJ, some orthodox dioceses are not growing either, but losing members dramatically:  “Springfield and Quincy are the most shocking: their ASA and/or membership have dropped something like 25% over the past few years.”

[17] Posted by Floridian on 10-16-2008 at 05:21 PM • top

One of the reasons that conservative dioceses are shrinking is the national church and its focus.  I’ve heard from several former members here in Dallas and their story is very similiar.  They know we have a faithful bishop and are members of a faithful congregation, but they can’t abide what the national church office is doing and can’t understand why it won’t discipline the wayward bishops (such as +Spong, +Righter, +Bruno, +etc.)

YBIC,
Phil Snyder

[18] Posted by Philip Snyder on 10-16-2008 at 08:03 PM • top

I’m in the diocese of Dallas, too.  I was consumed by all the national church business 3 or 4 years ago, but the vicious politics (nothing is nastier than a church fight), slow pace of events, seemingly endless droning about doctrine and how one faction or the other ain’t doin’ it right,  and general polarization in the websites has pretty much turned me off.  I am content to worship in my parish,and just follow Bishop Stanton’s Godly leadership.  He may be the most trustworthy religious figure outside of Billy Graham and the Pope that I know.  I am particularly tired of carping over property by both sides.  I had a pastor once, Richard Ellis of Reunion Church in Dallas, who refused to build church buildings.  He still holds services in rented public facilities.  He always said he was in the sheep business, not the barn business.  We have had no telling how many screwballs on the national scene in the Episcopal Church over the years - there just seem to be a lot more of them lately.  I’m not going to let them distract me from following Christ.

[19] Posted by RoyIII on 10-16-2008 at 08:29 PM • top

Last winter in South Dakota we had more snow than many could remember.  One of my neighbors has had a “Stop Global Warming” sign in her front yard for about 2 years now.  I laughed all winter long, as the sign got buried by snow and she had to keep pulling it up higher and higher.  At the height of winter it was planted on top of a 5 foot deep snow bank.

Thank you Presiding Heretic Schlamori for switching to sporks.  It seems to be doing the trick.

[20] Posted by midwestnorwegian on 10-17-2008 at 07:50 AM • top

whoops - sorry…wrong thread :-(  Firefox failed me again.

[21] Posted by midwestnorwegian on 10-17-2008 at 07:51 AM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.