Welcome to Stand Firm!

Press Release From St. Francis On The Hill About Separation From TEC

Saturday, November 1, 2008 • 10:05 am


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

ST. FRANCIS ON THE HILL SEPARATES FROM THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND DIOCESE, EL PASO, TX – (October 27, 2008) –

The vestry of St. Francis on the Hill Episcopal Church, following a vote this week by members of its congregation, has separated from the Episcopal Diocese of the Rio Grande and The Episcopal Church of the USA.

The action to officially separate from The Episcopal Church in the United States (TEC) comes in the wake of over four years of discussions and meetings between St. Francis’s church and The Episcopal Church, as well as with the TEC’s governing body for this Episcopal Church region, the Episcopal Diocese of the Rio Grande.  A number of other former Episcopal USA Churches in the U.S. have left the TEC in the past year, including the former St. Clement Episcopal Church in El Paso.

Ron Munden, a St. Francis vestry member who has been involved in the talks since they began, said the separation was mandated by the congregation and ratified by the vestry, “To preserve what the people of St. Francis feel is not only our constitutional freedom but our legal right to worship as true Christians, following the basic tenets and canons on which the original Episcopal Church of the USA was founded, in a church property that we own.” 

The Episcopal Church has been in turmoil for a number of years, with what many Episcopalians see as a deviation from the Bible and changes of policies and church laws to fit current cultural moods, rather than holding fast to strong scriptural beliefs.  The TEC in the U.S. is part of the worldwide Anglican Communion, which remains at odds with the TEC for a number of those changes and other differences.  The rift came to a head in 2003, when the Episcopal Church of the USA consecrated an openly gay bishop and sanctioned same-sex marriages.

“Unfortunately, today in our Church,” said Munden, “many Episcopalians believe that the Church’s leadership has wavered from the core values of Christ’s teachings, creating confusion and division among parishes, dioceses, and the Church hierarchy itself.”  Munden added, “Many of the churches within the TEC hung on throughout 2008, thinking that the Church would change, or at least allow them to practice their faith in the traditional Anglican manner, which we believe is founded on scripture.  It is apparent that is not going to happen, and The Episcopal Church in the USA has firmly stated they are doing what they think is right—they are not changing.  As a result, some churches and even whole dioceses are leaving.  For us at St. Francis, we feel we cannot worship and pray in an environment that deviates from traditional church teachings, so we have broken away.”

The Rev. Dr. Felix Orji, Rector of St. Francis on the Hill, explained that his church has been concerned for some time that the Episcopal Church has strayed from such core doctrines as, “The uniqueness of Christ as God and the only Savior of the World, the authority and primacy of Scripture, and the death of Jesus Christ as the only path to salvation.”  Fr, Orji also said, “What we have seen over the past three years is a concerted, planned effort by the TEC to ‘go someplace’ that is not in line with our thinking here.  The Episcopal Church is in serious transition, and frankly, we believe that no matter how the TEC tries to explain it away, their beliefs today are vastly opposed to long-accepted teachings of the Bible.”  Father Orji noted that the controversies surrounding the changes taking place in The Episcopal Church have caused a major decline in church membership.  In 1965, the Episcopal Church in the U.S. had 3.5 million members.  Today, that’s down to 2.4 million.  “We even know of a number of dioceses that are leaving the TEC.  What I have feared for some time is becoming a reality,” Fr. Orji said. “The Episcopal Church as we once knew it has changed so drastically to appeal to modern social and cultural trends that it is now unacceptable to many of its core membership.”  He added, “If they are striving to become a popular church for today’s trends and culture, they may very well achieve that.  But it will be a much smaller church.  The Episcopal Church of the USA today has little resemblance remaining to the foundations of the original Episcopal Church in the Anglican Communion.”

St. Francis on the Hill church leaders say The Episcopal Church of the USA and the Rio Grande Diocese may try to claim a right on the St. Francis church and property.  “We have the title and deed to our property,” said Munden.  Since the Episcopal Church passed a Canon, or church law, in the 1970’s that said all Episcopal churches’ properties were to be held in trust by the Diocese for the U.S. Episcopal Church, St. Francis on the Hill has denied this claim in official notices to the TEC.  “As early as 2004, we let it be known that our by-laws clearly outlined how and why we owned our own property,” said Munden.  “We built this church with money from our parishioners – not one dime came from the Episcopal Church or from the Diocese.  This church and grounds belong to St. Francis on the Hill, and The Episcopal Church clearly knows of our unique situation here and our position on this matter.” 

Fr. Orji said that his congregation has a great sense of relief now that the transition away from the Episcopal Church has taken place.  “This has been a long ordeal,” said the minister.  “After years of debate, communications to and from the Church and Diocese, and waiting, this controversy is finally over.  The membership has elected to follow a path they believe in, and the fact that we have taken those positive steps is comforting to us all.  I think collectively, as an independent Church, we are more peaceful.”  Fr. Orji added that the fight may not be over for the Episcopal Church, but it is for his congregation. “We made our choice.  We are a church that will now worship and carry on our ministries without encumbrance.  The TEC may not view it that way, but we hope they do. It is time for all of us to get away from politics that don’t belong in our church and back to the real meaning of Christianity and Christ’s teachings.”


12 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

People really need to stop using the “2.4 million” figure.  Even using TEC’s own math, that figure is more than 6 years old.  In the US, there are just over 2.1 million using their figures (which show the total membership decline to be only a few thousand more than the decline in ASA- presumably because Christmas was not on a Sunday last year).  In real life, under 730,000 go to TEC churches on any given Sunday.

[1] Posted by tjmcmahon on 11-01-2008 at 09:45 AM • top

Does anyone know who St. Francis will be affiliating with?

[2] Posted by fatherlee on 11-01-2008 at 09:56 AM • top

When was this congregation founded?

[3] Posted by AnglicanXn on 11-01-2008 at 10:01 AM • top

Given, the rector, Felix Orji is Nigerian born, I would wager to guess they would be affiliating with CANA

[4] Posted by David Wilson on 11-01-2008 at 10:17 AM • top

Good for them…and slowly but surely these claims to property are going to find themselves clearly ruling in favor of the local congregation giving more impetus for congregations to free themselves of a failing brand.

If TEC had an ounce of gospel tendency they would want to pray these congregations on their way into the new province for the sake of the conversion of souls…spending money on Christian witness instead of lawyers.

[5] Posted by Caleb on 11-01-2008 at 11:39 AM • top

“If TEC had an ounce of gospel tendency ...”. Actually Caleb, they do.
Its just “another gospel” (2 Cor. 11:4).

[6] Posted by GSP98 on 11-01-2008 at 12:39 PM • top

What I find so objectionable to TEC’s erroneous claims to property ownership is the fact that in NONE of the proceedings leading to the purported adoption of the Dennis Canon in 1973 were individual parishes given the opportunity to register an objection to its adoption….either BEFORE the General Convention or AFTER it.  I do not recall my former parish ever having had the chance to register our approval or disapproval of that canon.  As far as I’M concerned, it was a “slam-bang, we DID it….it’s a done deal, now LIVE WITH IT” thing on the part of General Convention, and in NO case did our delegates to the diocesan convention ever tell us pew-sitters what was about to happen!

[7] Posted by Cennydd on 11-01-2008 at 01:48 PM • top

Dennis canon = “Its ours cause we say its ours!”

“I think collectively, as an independent Church, we are more peaceful.”

  He’s right. I’ve heard many who have separated from TEC say similar things. There is a palpable peace in separating from TEC. Its a blessing.

[8] Posted by Gordy on 11-01-2008 at 03:42 PM • top

In every parish of which I have been a member the biggest underminer of effective ministry and growth has been the Episcopal diocese & bishop…it makes sense that a parish would do better in eveyway without them.

It is also true that these folks get elected because they are relatively weak links and don’t threaten any of the clergy…so they do not add a lot to the spiritual aspirations of the diocese either…and so here again, better off without them.

[9] Posted by Caleb on 11-01-2008 at 04:26 PM • top

And too…bishops are symbols, not enforcers, of the faith once delivered…so out of the way is the best place for them.

This is called a low doctrine of the episcopate…

[10] Posted by Caleb on 11-01-2008 at 04:27 PM • top

Does anyone know how many parishes or diocese have separated from TEC since 2006?

[11] Posted by The Templar on 11-01-2008 at 10:58 PM • top

fatherlee,

The largest Anglican presence in town is the Church of St. Clement (formerly the pro-cathedral of the Episcopal Diocese of the Rio Grande).  Unless my info is out of date, they disaffiliated from TEC but did not affiliate with any other jurisdiction.

Don’t know whether St. Francis on the Hill will follow that lead, but it’s out there.

[12] Posted by Jeff in VA on 11-02-2008 at 07:55 PM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.