Welcome to Stand Firm!

What Is Going On In Hiawathaland?

Monday, December 1, 2008 • 10:03 am


Remember the Diocese of Northern Michigan?  The one that closed their chapter of the ECW?  It seems they are also looking for a bishop.  Or more accurately, a Bishop/Ministry Developer.  Unless I missed something, you don’t have to be ordained to be elected to this position.  Take a look and see what you think

1. What is “discernment”?
The Episcopal Ministry Discernment Team (EMDT) is using a discernment process to identify people to fill the roles of Bishop/Ministry Developer and the regional membership
of the Episcopal Ministry Support Team. This discernment embodies much more than Webster’s definition which reads: to detect with the eyes: distinguish: discriminate: to come to know or recognize mentally. For the people of this diocese, discernment also implies intent to consider all aspects of an individual’s being (or presence) looking at external and internal characteristics on an intimate level, much as one would use when looking for a mate or lifelong partner. We are not just hiring someone. We are looking for someone with whom we can establish, nurture, and sustain a true and intimate relationship; someone who we can care deeply about and someone who will care deeply about the people of this diocese; someone who will embrace the vision of mutual ministry which we currently hold, and continue to build the vision, in equal partnership and with mutual accountability.

2. Who was/is eligible for discernment as Bishop/Ministry Developer?
The basic requirements for a person to be considered are:
The person must be an adult baptized member of Christ’s church. In addition, the individual cannot be ordained and consecrated Bishop until s/he has attained 32 years of age. (Ref: Article II, Sec.2of the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention.) The individual must also be less than 72 years old. (Ref: Article II, Sec. 9 of the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention).
The individual should possess the generally desirable characteristics and skills as published in the diocesan profile.
The individual must have been discerned by someone else who knows the individual well, has become familiar with the generally desirable characteristics we are seeking, and has prayerfully considered if that person would be a “good fit” for the role of Bishop/Ministry Developer.

3. Has this ever been done before? Is it historical?
Yes, it is actually historical. All ministry in the early church was corporate or shared among the people. Early origins of the Episcopacy were collegial. ”An ‘overseer’ (episkopos in Greek) was chosen as needed from among a group of presbyters who formed a sort of council. Even then this function was more fluid than fixed.” (Urban Holmes, 1978)

The Diocese of South Carolina recently presented one person for election at their Special Convention. He was elected Diocesan Bishop at that Special Convention.
The Presiding Bishop Speaks About “Effective” Ministry

“Ministry grows out of the Body of Christ. We may not agree on the language to use in talking about that ministry-we hear terms like total ministry, mutual ministry, and ministry of all the baptized, it has to recognize the connectedness of that Body, and express that awareness in collaboration….A baptismal ecclesiology begins in the belief that every member of this church is gifted for, and called to, ministry. It asserts that no ministry is more important than another, but that all are equally valued expressions of members of the Body of Christ.” (Katharine Jefferts Schori, A Wing and a Prayer, 2007)

It appears the committee plans to submit only one candidate for the election using South Carolina’s special convention where +Mark Lawrence was the only name submitted as a precedent.  Here and here are two updates sent out to the parishioners. 

Is this the future of an organization that makes General Convention its ultimate authority rather than Scripture? 

Hat tip:  TJ


29 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

just rearranging deck chairs…

[1] Posted by rreed on 12-01-2008 at 10:01 AM • top

This is like saying “If we move the couches over here to give a different view maybe those who sit in them will get a better idea of how we see things!”
Maybe they too are seeking “Change” as many Americans have been and are now touting is happening!

[2] Posted by TLDillon on 12-01-2008 at 10:25 AM • top

Jackie,

I must protest the misuse of the term “Hiawathaland.”  Northern Michigan, like the rest of the continental US, was once Indian/Native American/First Peoples territory.  But Hiawatha seems to point to a more specific location, far from the shores of the Upper Peninsula.

I clicked on the new thread name, expecting to hear something from either Fr. Tim Fountain in Sioux Falls, SD, or maybe Anglicat in Minnesota.  Properly speaking, I believe that Hiawatha story is set in SW Minnesota.

But maybe by Hiawathaland, you were suggesting that the Diocese of Northern Michigan is now living in fantasyland, in their own make-believe world, where wrong is right and where diocesan bishops don’t have to be ordained.  And I’d have to agree with that cyncial assessment.  TJ’s diocese appears to win the grand prize for being the looniest of the leftist dioceses in the country.

David Handy+

[3] Posted by New Reformation Advocate on 12-01-2008 at 10:36 AM • top

The article’s title comes from their newsletter.

[4] Posted by JackieB on 12-01-2008 at 10:44 AM • top

O, then it must be okay.

[5] Posted by dwstroudmd+ on 12-01-2008 at 10:54 AM • top

Jackie usually has her “i’s” dotted and her “t’s” crossed.

[6] Posted by terrafirma on 12-01-2008 at 10:57 AM • top

The Hiawatha National Forest is also found in Northern Michigan.

[7] Posted by JackieB on 12-01-2008 at 11:13 AM • top

David+, you have your geography wrong for the Iroquois.

[8] Posted by oscewicee on 12-01-2008 at 11:19 AM • top

I read through the full link and I am quite baffled. What the——are they thinking?  Ordination appears to be optional, even seminary training too.  Of course that may fit the TEO model.  But to use South Carolina as an example?  Towards the end there is a comment that “traditionally” anyone could throw their hat in the ring and they call it “self-selection.”  I suppose that may explain how KJS got to be a bishop.  They also threw in some psycho-drool about “reflectors” and “companions.”  Seriously, what is going on?

[9] Posted by Nikolaus on 12-01-2008 at 11:36 AM • top

Dat der’s “Yupperland” if antin’, eh?

[10] Posted by Moot on 12-01-2008 at 11:43 AM • top

OK, OK, I withdraw my complaint.  It appears that several places in the country lay claim to the Hiawatha legend.  I didn’t know about the Hiawatha National Forest in Northern Michigan.

David Handy+

[11] Posted by New Reformation Advocate on 12-01-2008 at 11:46 AM • top

I agree, Nikolaus.  Those were my thoughts exactly - although I think I did temper it with a My Word! 

Anyone who has been baptized (which is an improvement considering this bishop) can wear the mitre it seems.  Of course, some of the theology coming from our mitre wearing individuals leads one to wonder if this trend started years ago.

[12] Posted by JackieB on 12-01-2008 at 11:59 AM • top

Sounds a lot like the arguements made to advocate Lay Presidency.  Once you let the toothpaste out of the tube - - -

Oh well - it really dosen’t matter much.

[13] Posted by star-ace on 12-01-2008 at 12:29 PM • top

Jackie, did you see anything in these documents saying clearly that Northern Michigan looks to South Carolina for precedent? I searched the documents in vain for any such suggestion, but I may have missed it.
I’m doubtful of it for two reasons:
1. The dominant theologies in Northern Michigan and South Carolina are profoundly different. That Northern Michigan would cite South Carolina as precedent for anything would be miraculous.
2. South Carolina did not use this process in the first place. Instead, this happened:
—South Carolina’s search committee prepared a slate of candidates, from which Mark Lawrence was elected on the first ballot.
—The Presiding Bishop ruled against his approval by standing committees, based on some flawed last-minute ballots.
—South Carolina then re-elected Bishop Lawrence on acclamation, reinforcing its discernment that God indeed had called it to elect Bishop Lawrence.
—Bishops and standing committees responded more punctually and precisely, and we may now call Bishop Lawrence by his rightful title.

[14] Posted by Douglas LeBlanc on 12-01-2008 at 12:34 PM • top

TEC = Titanic
Diocese of Northern Michigan = Edmund Fitzgerald.

[15] Posted by Nasty, Brutish & Short on 12-01-2008 at 12:49 PM • top

@ # 15 Ho, ho.

Perhaps Gordon Lightfoot could write a sad ballad about the D. of N. Michigan.

[16] Posted by rkreed on 12-01-2008 at 01:41 PM • top

Yes Doug!  She copied it in the excerpt above.  It is straight out of their newsletter. 

The Diocese of South Carolina recently presented one person for election at their Special Convention. He was elected Diocesan Bishop at that Special Convention.

[17] Posted by Nikolaus on 12-01-2008 at 01:45 PM • top

D’oh! Thanks, Nikolaus, and please forgive me, Jackie, for my too-quick skimming of your post.

[18] Posted by Douglas LeBlanc on 12-01-2008 at 01:56 PM • top

Doug,
They are using Mark Lawrence’s election as precedent for submitting only one candidate to the electing convention.  Would that they were using the good bishop Lawrence as a model for that candidate.

[19] Posted by tjmcmahon on 12-01-2008 at 02:04 PM • top

Did they mention to the good people of Northern Michigan WHY there was only one candidate in South Carolina?  What?  No?  Well, I’m not surprised.

[20] Posted by Nasty, Brutish & Short on 12-01-2008 at 03:19 PM • top

Anti-clericalism, and just that.
It has been the “motor” since the Reformation.
There’s not such a thing as “reformed catholicism”.

[21] Posted by Antonio on 12-01-2008 at 06:05 PM • top

Umm, both the “Gitchegumee” and the “Falls of Minnehaha” are in EASTERN Minnesota, thank you very much.

[22] Posted by jamesk on 12-01-2008 at 06:09 PM • top

The diocese can save all that money on travel expenses for the bishop candidates by only having one!

Chris Johnson had a funny thread about a coke bottle running for bishop, I believe. That sort of inspired me to propose the following.

I think that Frostbite Falls is pretty close to the upper Pennisula. There is a 6 foot moose with a little flying squirrel friend who might work for free. Being an animated character can be looked at as a real advantage. (Well, there might be some trademark issues.) But I see real potential.

[23] Posted by robroy on 12-01-2008 at 06:35 PM • top

The diocese can save all that money on travel expenses for the bishop candidates by only having one!

Rumor has it they will be looking close to home.  Note the “discernment” process was limited to nomination of those known personally to <strike>the powers that be</strike> someone in the diocese.

There is a 6 foot moose with a little flying squirrel friend who might work for free.

Fearless Leader spends quite enough time in this diocese already, thank you.  You keep the Moose and Squirrel in Minnesota, where the moose would still be a big improvement over the current holder of the see.

[24] Posted by tjmcmahon on 12-01-2008 at 06:51 PM • top

Let’s not forget that the folks who designed and are leading the bishop discernment process gave us this:

Affirmations

Because each and every one of us is an only begotten child of God; because we, as the church, are invited by God to see all of creation as having life only insofar as it is in God; because everything, without exception, is the living presence, or incarnation, of God; as the Diocese of Northern Michigan,

We affirm Christ present in every human being and reject any attempt to restructure The Episcopal Church’s polity in a manner contrary to the principles of the baptismal covenant;

We affirm the full dignity and autonomy and interdependence of every Church in the Anglican Communion and reject any attempt of the Primates to assume an authority they do not have nor have ever possessed;

We affirm the sacramental gift of all persons, their Christ-ness, especially those who are gay and lesbian, and reject any moratorium on the blessing of same-sex unions and consents of gay bishops, as it would compromise their basic dignity.

Welcome, all, to the new, improved Episcopal/Ministry Developer Church of the General Convention.

[25] Posted by tjmcmahon on 12-01-2008 at 06:59 PM • top

I think that you all have misread the point. They are not saying they do not want an ordained priest as a candidate, they are merely saying that the TEC canons require that the candidate be at least 32 years old and less than 72 years old to be eligible to be considered to be ordained and consecrated a bishop.

[26] Posted by David |däˈvēd| on 12-02-2008 at 03:34 AM • top

26 - The canons also require that the candidate be in prebyterial orders. (III.11.4(a)) 

Of course if the PB and the majority of those who happen to be a HOB meeting decide differently, the canons could be interpreted to say that the “Bishop-elect thinks about “having been duly ordered Deacon and Priest.”

YBIC,
Phil Snyder

[27] Posted by Philip Snyder on 12-02-2008 at 07:06 AM • top

27-
I’ve been told by a member of the “Discernment Team” that there was one lay application, but that candidate has not made the “final four” (from which they will present the “chosen one” to the convention- I should note that even some of the diocesan progressives do have a sense of humor).

If they choose a deacon, I am sure they will fall back on Thomas Becket as precedent.  However, note that there is some time allowed between the convention and the scheduled consecration, although I think this has to do more with GC than with a window for ordination.

[28] Posted by tjmcmahon on 12-02-2008 at 09:17 AM • top

It is all real simple,when the church has no message,besides stale left wing talking points and new age,psycho-babble, they go outta business. Maybe,um, Northern Michigan could like invite,that Jesus dude they told to go away, to come back. Then maybe something good would happen for them.

[29] Posted by Anglo-Catholic-Jihadi on 12-02-2008 at 09:33 AM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.