Thursday, September 2, 2010

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

Former Vatican Ambassador Says No to Prestigious Notre Dame Award…and to President Obama

Monday, April 27, 2009 • 12:53 pm


From here:
April 27, 2009
The Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C.
President
University of Notre Dame

Dear Father Jenkins,

When you informed me in December 2008 that I had been selected to receive Notre Dame's Laetare Medal, I was profoundly moved. I treasure the memory of receiving an honorary degree from Notre Dame in 1996, and I have always felt honored that the commencement speech I gave that year was included in the anthology of Notre Dame's most memorable commencement speeches. So I immediately began working on an acceptance speech that I hoped would be worthy of the occasion, of the honor of the medal, and of your students and faculty.

Last month, when you called to tell me that the commencement speech was to be given by President Obama, I mentioned to you that I would have to rewrite my speech. Over the ensuing weeks, the task that once seemed so delightful has been complicated by a number of factors.

First, as a longtime consultant to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, I could not help but be dismayed by the news that Notre Dame also planned to award the president an honorary degree. This, as you must know, was in disregard of the U.S. bishops' express request of 2004 that Catholic institutions "should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles" and that such persons "should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions." That request, which in no way seeks to control or interfere with an institution's freedom to invite and engage in serious debate with whomever it wishes, seems to me so reasonable that I am at a loss to understand why a Catholic university should disrespect it.

Then I learned that "talking points" issued by Notre Dame in response to widespread criticism of its decision included two statements implying that my acceptance speech would somehow balance the event:

* "President Obama won't be doing all the talking. Mary Ann Glendon, the former U.S. ambassador to the Vatican, will be speaking as the recipient of the Laetare Medal."

* "We think having the president come to Notre Dame, see our graduates, meet our leaders, and hear a talk from Mary Ann Glendon is a good thing for the president and for the causes we care about."

A commencement, however, is supposed to be a joyous day for the graduates and their families. It is not the right place, nor is a brief acceptance speech the right vehicle, for engagement with the very serious problems raised by Notre Dame's decision - in disregard of the settled position of the U.S. bishops - to honor a prominent and uncompromising opponent of the Church's position on issues involving fundamental principles of justice.

Finally, with recent news reports that other Catholic schools are similarly choosing to disregard the bishops' guidelines, I am concerned that Notre Dame's example could have an unfortunate ripple effect.

It is with great sadness, therefore, that I have concluded that I cannot accept the Laetare Medal or participate in the May 17 graduation ceremony.

In order to avoid the inevitable speculation about the reasons for my decision, I will release this letter to the press, but I do not plan to make any further comment on the matter at this time.

Yours Very Truly,

Mary Ann Glendon

Mary Ann Glendon is Learned Hand Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. A member of the editorial and advisory board of First Things, she served as the U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican from 2007 to 2009.

33 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

Bravo, Prof. Gendon!  A gutsy decision, and expressed very tactfully too, as befits a former ambassador.

This is exactly the sort of courageous setting of clear, healthy boundaries that needs to happen on a large scale.  It’s not words, but ACTIONS that count.  Alas, that’s something ++Rowan Williams doesn’t seem to understand.

David Handy+

[1] Posted by New Reformation Advocate on 04-27-2009 at 01:07 PM • top

Well said and well done!

[2] Posted by Harry Edmon on 04-27-2009 at 01:08 PM • top

Well done, madam.

[3] Posted by evan miller on 04-27-2009 at 01:11 PM • top

Bravo!

[4] Posted by Positive Phototaxis on 04-27-2009 at 01:15 PM • top

A principalled stand - how refreshing!  A real breath of fresh air in an otherwise pretty stale and smelly episode!

Bravo and God Bless You, Professor Glendon.

[5] Posted by Ol' Bob on 04-27-2009 at 01:30 PM • top

This is beautiful.  Her integrity is far more valuable than any award the University could give.

[6] Posted by Fine Young Calvinist on 04-27-2009 at 01:31 PM • top

Bravo! A women who values her morals and soul far better than appeasing the masses! Shame on Notre Dame and the other schools that are following their poor, poor, poor example!

[7] Posted by TLDillon on 04-27-2009 at 02:21 PM • top

Wow! Replete with all the ambassadorial tact and directness at hand - well done! Would that all leaders of like stripe would take a stand as firm and uncompromising.

[8] Posted by masternav on 04-27-2009 at 03:05 PM • top

Wowzer wowzer wowzer.

That stings.

What a wonderful response—woo hoo!!!!  We need more people like this to step up and make public statements and put actions to their statements, such that it enters the news media.

[9] Posted by Sarah on 04-27-2009 at 04:04 PM • top

She has exhibited genuine, not pseudo integrity.

[10] Posted by Bob Maxwell+ on 04-27-2009 at 04:21 PM • top

A letter like that sends chills through me.  But it shouldn’t because leaders should always take principled stands.  What a fine letter.

[11] Posted by Bill C on 04-27-2009 at 04:53 PM • top

Chills too, I read it at the petition site and was touched and proud of her integrity and very glad she refused to be used to justify Jenkins’ disobedience and dishonor to Christ, to the Church and his spiritual leaders.

The Cardinal Newman Society is asking for signatures and people send the request to others on their eLists: http://www.notredamescandal.com
So far, they have 336,521 signatures.

[12] Posted by Theodora on 04-27-2009 at 05:18 PM • top

Bravo, Ambassador Glendon! Such integrity is its own reward!

[13] Posted by helpmelord on 04-27-2009 at 05:52 PM • top

I am so glad to hear this.  Even the bishop in whose diocese Notre Dame is, who has said he will not attend although he attends ND graduation every year,  said he encouraged Glendon to accept the reward.  So I thought for sure that she would,  but I really wished she wouldn’t.  I think this makes the point clear in a way which can’t be ignored.
Susan Peterson

[14] Posted by eulogos on 04-27-2009 at 07:08 PM • top

I guess if the Pope cannot correct Pelosi, how is Glendon going to deal with Obama?
It is the Bishops jobs.  Why haven’t more of the Catholic Bishops taken a stand?

[15] Posted by Theodora on 04-27-2009 at 07:13 PM • top

Father Jenkins, in his eagerness to have Obama the pro-abort speak, is turning the Medal into a mathom.  Regifting is now elevated beyond hobbits and fruitcake.  How splendiferously honours fall from Notre Dame…like the rain…and on the just and unjust, too.  Perhaps I missed it but did President Bush speak at Notre Dame after each election?  Perhaps I wasn’t paying attention.

[16] Posted by dwstroudmd on 04-27-2009 at 07:37 PM • top

I hope she has solid tenure at Harvard….

[17] Posted by vu82 on 04-27-2009 at 07:56 PM • top

#16, I think Bush gave the commencement address at Notre Dame following his first election.  I don’t recall his being given an honorary degree, though; perhaps someone knows.

I’ve read that Notre Dame is now searching for someone else to receive the award Glendon is declining.  It would be appropriate for all potential recipients to decline to help bail out the school.

[18] Posted by Katherine on 04-27-2009 at 10:44 PM • top

A very good analysis with historical information is here:

http://www.ncregister.com/daily/glendon_declines_nd_honor/

[19] Posted by robroy on 04-28-2009 at 02:45 AM • top

Notre Dame is not the only one, however.  Another rebellion underway: “New Orleans Archbishop to Boycott Xavier U. Commencement Honoring Pro-Abort Catholic.”
http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2009/04/archbishop_hughes_to_boycott_x.html

[20] Posted by Floridian on 04-28-2009 at 06:10 AM • top

As the old song says, ‘We’ve only just begun…”

Secretary of State Clinton Admits Obama will Work to Dismantle Abortion Laws around the World
http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/?p=9906

[21] Posted by Floridian on 04-28-2009 at 10:08 AM • top

What she says here is more than she could have ever said in person…what an excellent person to model

[22] Posted by ewart-touzot on 04-28-2009 at 10:36 AM • top

Somebody needs to remind this ego-maniac that he is the president of the USA not the WORLD! The world did not blindly vote for him like the US citizens did!

[23] Posted by TLDillon on 04-28-2009 at 10:42 AM • top

#22 - I assume you mean Amb. Glendon, not the Sec of State mentioned in #21…..

what diametrically opposed points of view.  3 cheers for Ms. Glendon.  Prayers for Sec’y Clinton.

[24] Posted by maineiac on 04-28-2009 at 11:00 AM • top

ditto TLdillon

[25] Posted by ewart-touzot on 04-28-2009 at 11:54 AM • top

My hope is that, as President Jenkins makes his offer of the Laetare Medal to other Catholics, that they, too, will follow Ambassodor Glendon’s splendid lead in saying NO to NOtre Dame. Like TEc, the administratin of Notre Dame has sold its soul. +David Zubik, RC Bishop of Pittsburgh, put it well when he said Our Lady must be embarrassed by this.

[26] Posted by mike458 on 04-28-2009 at 12:12 PM • top

Thank God for Ambassador Glendon and other brave Christians who will stand up for their faith. I agree,mike458, that it would be great if whoever ND tries to offer the medal to also refuses it.

[27] Posted by Nellie on 04-29-2009 at 09:57 PM • top

Don’t miss two blessings:
1. This awesome Notre Dame pro-life testimony at First Things:
http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/?p=1402

2.  Sign the petition at the Cardinal Newman Society website:  http://www.notredamescandal.com
There are now 349,653 signatures on the petition.

[28] Posted by Theodora on 05-01-2009 at 09:54 AM • top

An update on the Notre Dame scandal…
Pro-Life students have selected a real hero, Fr. Frank Pravone, founder of Priests for Life, as the Commencement speaker at their Obama-free Graduation Ceremony.
http://www.lifenews.com/state4129.html

[29] Posted by Floridian on 05-12-2009 at 09:43 AM • top

Mary Ann Glendon makes me so proud to be a Catholic!!  What an unselfish move she has made!  Pelosi should take notice of what it takes to be a good Catholic woman and act accordingly herself!

[30] Posted by mollykat on 05-13-2009 at 05:30 PM • top

THE PLOT THICKENS -
“Notre Dame President Sits on Board of Directors of Pro-Abortion, Pro-Contraception Organization”
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09051309.html

Of course, we knew something like this would come to the surface.  There is more than idealogy connecting pro-abortion people like Jenkins to Obama to Planned Parenthood.  There is a spiritual connection as well.
That is why someone like Jenkins has no place in leadership in Christ’s Church or an institution bearing His Name, much less the name of the woman who bore Him at greatest personal cost.
Cleanse your temples, Lord.  Amen

[31] Posted by Theodora on 05-14-2009 at 08:51 AM • top

Hmmm. He is also a Roman Catholic priest, so he is subject to discipline from many angles. We shall see how Rome handles this.

[32] Posted by Ralph on 05-14-2009 at 09:03 AM • top

Rome’s way would be to wait until all the fuss has died down….which could be years in their way of thinking,  and then,  some quiet words in the right ears, and Jenkin’s decides to retire early…    I would be surprised at anything soon and public.  Pleased, but surprised.
Susan Peterson

[33] Posted by eulogos on 05-17-2009 at 10:30 AM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.