Thursday, February 9, 2012

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

Anglican Mainstream Statement on the Outcome of the Primates’ Meeting at Dar es Salaam

Saturday, February 24, 2007 • 6:38 am


Anglican Mainstream Statement on the Outcome of the Primates’ Meeting at Dar es Salaam
(via email)
in February 2007

We thank God for this unanimous Communique.

We agree with Archbishop Orombi’s assessment that this Primates’ meeting has not solved the current crisis in the Anglican Communion but has ‘clarified the steps needed for trust to be restored, healing to take place, and for our full bonds of affection to once again flourish’.

We welcome, in particular,

· the clear teaching on issues of marriage and sexuality [paragraph 11], based on Holy Scripture and set out in Lambeth 1:10.

· the clear evaluation that ECUSA/TEC has departed from that clear standard of teaching [paragraph 17] and that the General Convention’s response to the Windsor Report was inadequate.

· the clear conclusion that ECUSA/TEC’s relationships with the Communion have yet to be mended [paragraph 24].

· that the need for urgency is recognised (paragraphs 31-33 and Key Recommendations) and that a clear deadline for a satisfactory response from the Episcopal Church has been set.

· the clear commitment of the Archbishops from the Global South to stand by their promise not to abandon orthodox congregations in TEC/ECUSA until there is truly a safe and Biblically faithful ecclesial entity in America .

· the appeal for TEC to ‘suspend all actions in law’ with regard to property disputes.

We note that

·  the Communion remains broken and divided and the Communique does not solve the current crisis but sets out the first steps which have still to be taken to achieve reconciliation.

· the Episcopal Church has been asked for reassurances. The response requested from the Episcopal Church needs to be expressed in clear and unambiguous language.

· other Churches are similarly placed (paragraph 36) as Archbishop Hutchinson has made clear.

We are concerned that

· the area of reassurance sought from the Episcopal Church should not be interpreted too narrowly. The stated beliefs of the Presiding Bishop regarding Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord, radical liturgical revision that affects belief in God as Father, Son and Holy Spirit, other related resolutions at General Convention such as support for gay marriage and the actions of the Episcopal Church mean that the focus should not be placed too narrowly on precise words, but on the spirit and actions that those words represent. 

· there are references in the Communique to ‘consensus’ and ‘majority’. Christian faith and practice are rooted in biblical teaching and the Church’s understanding, since its earliest days, of this biblical teaching. ‘Consensus’ and ‘majority’ describe modes of agreement. They cannot be definitive terms for expressing the faith once delivered to the saints, nor for expressing the mind of the Anglican Communion and its commitment to that faith.

· the process to date has been marked by delays and prevarication.  Although a deadline for the Episcopal Church’s response has been set, the process for assessing that response is not stated and the consequences if it is judged to have fallen short of what is required are not clearly specified.

· in all dioceses arrangements should continue to be made for ministry to homosexual persons, including their care and support, that is scripturally based and pastorally sensitive.  To this end Anglican Mainstream is sponsoring with others a two-day conference later this year to contribute to the Listening Process.

We pledge

· continued support for biblically orthodox, faithful Anglican congregations, clergy and dioceses in North America (both within and outside TEC), Brazil, New Zealand, South Africa and the British Isles, who continue to face irregular action by bishops, for example in ordaining active homosexual persons, failing to exercise proper discipline and, in some cases, harassing orthodox churches and ministry.

· to pray for all the Archbishops as they lead the Communion and exercise their calling to pastor and lead Christ’s flock, as we seek to fulfil the Great Commission to proclaim His Gospel and build His Kingdom.

· to pray particularly for Archbishop Rowan Williams in his immensely difficult tasks in leadership of a Communion whose fabric has been torn at the deepest level.


Dr Philip Giddings, Convenor
Canon Dr Chris Sugden, Executive Secretary
For Anglican Mainstream


5 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

The revisionists are shell-shocked, and solidly against a special convention; probably because they are accustomed to having years to influence the votes.  Even with a packed House, they seem unsure since they don’t know how to read the PB.  You can bet they are not wasting time in organizing, and we shouldn’t either.

[1] Posted by Texican on 02-24-2007 at 07:24 AM • top

HALLELUJAH and AMEN!

[2] Posted by DonaldH on 02-24-2007 at 07:26 AM • top

Could someone explain what is meant by:

“· the area of reassurance sought from the Episcopal Church should not be interpreted too narrowly. The stated beliefs of the Presiding Bishop regarding Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord, radical liturgical revision that affects belief in God as Father, Son and Holy Spirit, other related resolutions at General Convention such as support for gay marriage and the actions of the Episcopal Church mean that the focus should not be placed too narrowly on precise words, but on the spirit and actions that those words represent.”

Thanx
Grannie Gloria

[3] Posted by Grandmother on 02-24-2007 at 07:43 AM • top

Grannie Gloria,

I don’t know that I can fully answer your question but here are my takes on some of it.  I believe the Presiding Bishop is on record as saying that Jesus Christ is not the only way to God, not the exclusive redeemer and saviour of the world; in TEC other names are falsely used to refer to the Trinity and to God (a well-known one is “Sophia” which theologically inept people claim to draw from biblical wisdom literature); given that TEC frequently says one thing while doing something else, Anglican Mainstream is asking the Primates to monitor all subversive resolutions such as the one cited, as well as subsequent actions, regardless of what TEC says it will do.  So, for example, any bishop who agreed to stop same sex blessings, would need to be monitored.  If one were alleged in that bishop’s diocese, what would that bishop do to enforce the prohibition he or she pledged?  What would the Primates do if that bishop did not enforce his/her promised ban on same sex blessings?

The piece by Anglican Mainstream is excellent.  I hope the Primates duly consider it.

[4] Posted by Seen-Too-Much on 02-24-2007 at 08:53 AM • top

Of course Seen, there were just a few too many words, and I couldn’t seem to work my way out of them. LOL

Now I understand, actions speak much louder than “words”.
Many thanks

Blessings,
Grannie Gloria

[5] Posted by Grandmother on 02-24-2007 at 09:15 AM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.