Thursday, February 9, 2012

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

American Anglican Council Statement on the Primates’ 2007 Communiqué

Saturday, February 24, 2007 • 10:01 am


American Anglican Council Statement on the Primates’ 2007 Communiqué

The American Anglican Council (AAC) expressed this week its gratitude for the work of the Anglican primates during their meeting in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, held Feb. 14-19, 2007, and applauded the strong stance taken in their final communiqué as well as the progress made on developing an Anglican Covenant.

“This is the most important decision taken by the global Anglican Communion since the last Lambeth Resolutions were issued in 1998,” said the Rev. Canon David C. Anderson, AAC president and CEO. “The clock is now running on The Episcopal Church, and it is running fast.”

The primates’ communiqué, issued later than expected on Monday, Feb. 19 due to last-minute deliberations, issues an ultimatum to The Episcopal Church (TEC) in the United States with regard to its stances on human sexuality. In particular, the church is given seven months (until Sept. 30, 2007) to convey its definitive position on the blessing of same-sex unions and the elevation to episcopal orders of a candidate living in a same-sex relationship.

“The meeting in Dar es Salaam moved TEC firmly into the penalty box, which they will not emerge from without a true, 180-degree turn from the behavior and theology that has become the norm in many parts of the U.S. church over the past several decades,” Canon Anderson said. “Fudging the issues is no longer possible because the primates are ‘on to’ TEC and understand that they have been saying one thing and doing another.

“Before this meeting, many primates could not fathom that the bishops and presiding bishop would play fast and loose with their words in order to deceive the primates or avoid sending a clear message,” Canon Anderson continued. “Now, a clear message is demanded, and if it is not given, the church will suffer the long-threatened consequence of losing full membership in the worldwide Anglican family.”

The AAC was especially pleased with portions of the communiqué which gave special recognition to the unique positions of the Convocation of Anglicans in North America (CANA) and the Anglican Mission in America (AMiA); under the primates’ recommendations, these groups, led by American-based bishops, will be allowed to continue operating separately from TEC, and are recognized as legitimate parts of the Anglican Communion. In addition, the AAC applauded the communiqué’s demand for a stop to all litigation within TEC, and urged TEC both nationally and at the diocesan level to take this admonition seriously.

“The communiqué is a workable document, despite some difficult areas,” Canon Anderson said. “The proposal for a pastoral council and primatial vicar, for example, contains some rough spots that will be of particular concern for congregations linked to overseas dioceses that are not part of AMiA or CANA. Nevertheless, the document is strong overall, especially for its reaffirmation of Communion-wide teaching on sexuality and the concrete nature of its recommendations for the U.S. church.”

Canon Anderson also expressed support for the developments made on the Anglican Covenant and believes that once it is refined and finalized over the next several years, it will serve as an important unifying factor for the Anglican Communion.

In a related development, the AAC also announced this week its formation of a Communiqué Compliance Office, which will monitor TEC’s acts of compliance and non-compliance with respect to the primates’ requirements throughout the period leading up to the Sept. 30 deadline.

“As a non-ecclesial body, the AAC is in a unique position to function as a watchdog on TEC’s compliance with the demands of the Dar es Salaam communiqué,” Canon Anderson explained. “Over the coming months, the newly created office will continuously gather information from around the United States and provide monthly accountings to the primates so that there is no doubt where TEC stands when the clock runs out.”

The AAC asks that anyone with pertinent information on TEC compliance to the communiqué’s demands send that information to the AAC, preferably by email to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address), or by snail mail to:

Communiqué Compliance Office
American Anglican Council
2296 Henderson Mill Road, NE
Suite 406
Atlanta, GA 30345-2739


8 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

“The Communiqué Compliance Office?” Is this a joke? If not, upon whose presumptuous authority has this bureaucratically official-sounding “office” been founded? Reminds the historian in me of 1939-45 Germany. We can outfit special investigators to encourage family members to report each other’s subversive behaviors to the CCO—what fun! (What pathology.) If this is not a joke, does anyone really think that the reappraisers’ behaviors are going to be sub rosa?

[1] Posted by kb9gzg on 02-24-2007 at 03:47 PM • top

I answered my question by going to the AAC’s website. “The Communiqué Compliance Office” is not a joke. It has, in fact, been established by the AAC. IMHO, the AAC is becoming bizarre. It may be time for them to take a mood stabilizer and a vacation.

[2] Posted by kb9gzg on 02-24-2007 at 04:07 PM • top

I agree.  Establishment of a Communique Compliance Office by the AAC is bizarre at best, and poor timing in any case.  If they felt the need to do this sort of thing, it would have been best to do it sub rosa, and call it the Monitoring Office.  This is not helpful, especially as the middle-of-the-road bishops are ascertaining which way the wind is blowing.

[3] Posted by recusant on 02-24-2007 at 04:30 PM • top

kb9gzg said,

“The Communiqué Compliance Office?” Is this a joke? If not, upon whose presumptuous authority has this bureaucratically official-sounding “office” been founded?

Presumably, the AAC felt someone needed to do it. Absent its founding by the primates of the AC, perhaps AAC felt it would be a handy service to provide to the primates, at least until 30th September next.

Praise God that someone is doing it.

[4] Posted by H. Potter (aka Martial Artist) on 02-24-2007 at 05:56 PM • top

I would assume this would be on the “authority” of the President of the American Anglican Council, (definitely NOT in ECUSA)and his board of directors.
The AAC has led the “fight” for years, attempting to get ECUSA to “come back” from the brink.

Its their organization, so I would assume they can pretty much do what they think is best.

If not them, then who will monitor the situation and the attempts at “spinning”??
Grannie gloria

[5] Posted by Grandmother on 02-24-2007 at 06:33 PM • top

+Duncan, in his video briefing for his diocese, says that the primates’ Pastoral Council is the body that will provide monitoring. The AAC’s efforts in this regard reminds me, as a friend of mine has put it, of the role played by “Dwight” in the comedy “Office,” and those who played at being (i.e., being without portfolio) high school “hall monitors.”

[6] Posted by kb9gzg on 02-25-2007 at 05:05 PM • top

Well,  Fr. Anderson was talking about between now and September 30,
As of now, there is NO pastoral council, so its pretty difficult to monitor anything.

I’m sure the AAC will be more than happy to turn the job over to the proper “authorities”.. 
Grannie Gloria

[7] Posted by Grandmother on 02-25-2007 at 05:49 PM • top

I’m glad someone is monitoring compliance - a bit strange that it’s AAC but ECUSA isnt going to do it.  BTW - is there any kind of tally on all the Bishop’s statements that have come out yet?

[8] Posted by this_day on 02-25-2007 at 05:54 PM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.