Welcome to Stand Firm!

Communion Laity and Clergy of Colorado Release a Letter to Bishop O’Neill

Thursday, June 28, 2007 • 6:58 am


[received via email]

Dear Bishop O’Neill,
The purpose of this letter is to once again share with you the current mind of the Communion Laity and Clergy of Colorado (CLC).  The CLC met on March 24, 2007 to discuss recent developments in the Anglican Communion; the proposed Anglican Covenant, the Primates Communiqué, and recent House of Bishops Resolutions in response to that Communiqué.  We reviewed your Pastoral Letter in response to the House of Bishops Resolutions, and noted that you fully support the actions taken there.  We also understand from that same letter that you are fully committed to the life and ministry of the Anglican Communion.  Unfortunately, the contradictions in these two positions are painfully obvious to all.
We know you have asked the Diocesan Task Force “to find some ways to maintain the essential unity of the body by identifying practical means by which different groups can hold and exercise their convictions with integrity without needing either to act out or to split off completely and to identify some way in which the two polarizing elements of the diocese can continue to work together.”  While the goal of the Task Force is noble, we do not see any solution to the dilemma facing either group, short of a miracle.  The dilemma is not based on issues of sexuality.  Rather, the primary source of our differences is two interpretations of scripture and of the Gospel itself.
CLC stands committed to the Primates’ Communiqué and to whatever Primate endorsed alternate national pastoral scheme may be developed—with or without the cooperation of the House of Bishops.  Further, we are committed to work cooperatively with you through any practical matters if such a scheme is determined in a manner that reflects a Christian witness.
As the CLC goes forward, we are taking several actions:
·      The CLC as an organization is in conversation with the Anglican Communion Network about affiliate membership as a body, and will work cooperatively with the ACN.  Each parish will continue in their own individual discernment regarding ACN membership.
·      We are writing letters of support to the Primates, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the Network/Camp Allen/Windsor Bishops.  We will continue to provide prayers and encouragement to these orthodox leaders, and we will offer to work with them in any way we can.
·      Each CLC parish will provide education regarding these letters to their members so that everyone is able to make an informed decision on choosing to go with any developing alternate national pastoral scheme.  Everyone will be given an opportunity to sign his or her name in support of the Network/Camp Allen /Windsor Bishops’ letter.
·      We will provide a statement of our position to the Diocesan Task Force as they requested through our CLC representative to that group, the Rev. John Wengrovius.
We have sought throughout these past three plus years to work together with you with honesty and transparency. We appreciate your joining with us on a number of occasions and the time you have spent meeting with CLC representatives. The Episcopal Church is walking away from the call of the Primates, The Windsor Report, and the Archbishop of Canterbury, and from Communion.  By continuing to support the House of Bishops rejection of the Primates’ requests of the pastoral scheme, you too are poised to “walk apart” from Communion.

We ask you to reconsider your position, knowing that you gravely risk causing our beloved Episcopal Church to “walk apart” from the vast majority of the Anglican Communion in a formal way.  We desire to remain faithful to the Gospel in its fullness, and to live within the polity and rich heritage of the Anglican Communion. Yet if the Episcopal Church does not hear the seriousness of the pleas made by the Instruments of Unity and provide for the request of Windsor and the Primates, it will have shown it prefers its own way over the expressed clear requests of this church’s councils, is willing to break relationship with our Sisters and Brothers, and is willing to throw the Anglican Communion’s gift of catholicity to the side.

Our prayers are ever with you, for our diocese, and for the Communion: that we might abide in truth, and be one, even as the Father and the Son are one.
Faithfully in Christ,
The Communion Laity and Clergy Steering Committee:
The Rev. Theron Walker, CLC Clergy Co-Chair
Debra Tenney, CLC Laity Co-Chair
The Rev. Jim Paul, Northern Region Representative
The Rev. Scott Campbell, Southern Region Representative
The Rev. David Henderson, Mountain Region Representative
The Rev. Charles Larry Day, Western Region Representative
The Rev. Stace Tafoya, Central Region Representative
The Rev. Dr. Ephraim Radner
The Rev. Andrew Kline
The Rev. Martin Pearsall
Jane Henninger
Ray Howard
Dr. Robert McLean
Verlene White


29 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

Well, it appears to me that the good people and clergy of Colorado are extending a hand to Bp. O’Neil that he may not extend back. Well done clergy and laity of Colorado! I hope that Bp. O’Neil re-thinks his decisions re-steps his actions. I give his clergy and laity applause for at the most they are trying to work with him, not something we conservative orthodox have had reciprocated back to us.

[1] Posted by TLDillon on 06-28-2007 at 08:15 AM • top

Loud standing ovation from this tiny node of the blogosphere.  cool smile

[2] Posted by Truth Unites... and Divides on 06-28-2007 at 08:36 AM • top

Courageous.  Perhaps fool hardy. O’Neil can hardly be expected to not retaliate given his record. Clergy signing this thing are at risk, make no mistake. He will spend a lot of Diocesan money and effort to punish such insubordination. Hope you all have paid your taxes, have audited your checking accounts, have no discretionary funds….You know what I mean?

[3] Posted by teddy mak on 06-28-2007 at 10:55 AM • top

Finally, a light in a dark room.

[4] Posted by FrankV on 06-28-2007 at 10:58 AM • top

I think we will see more “papering of the file” as the endgame draws near.

[5] Posted by chips on 06-28-2007 at 11:03 AM • top

The churches that compose the CLC represent approximately 7,600 members out of the 32,000 members of the Diocese of Colorado.  While the Diocese of Colorado has stagnated the last five years, the 16 Episcopal Churches in the CLC have shown significant growth. 

KJS and her legal team will soon find themselves managing a bunch of empty buildings.

[6] Posted by TraditionalOne on 06-28-2007 at 12:10 PM • top

Note: Signed by Verlene White

Jacob Loves you Verlene!!!

Yours in Christ,
jacob

[7] Posted by Jacobsladder on 06-28-2007 at 12:15 PM • top

Sasha,

I did not mean to imply that KJS and the rest of the leaders of our church cared about what happened to either the majority of the members of TEC or the church buidings that have been lovingly and generously maintained over the decade.

They refuse to change course even though our membership has declined by 15%.  I am sorry that there is not a recall mechanism within our canons and constitution.  If the average parishioner had their say, KJS and her ilk would be out on the street with their bags packed.

[8] Posted by TraditionalOne on 06-28-2007 at 05:53 PM • top

“If the average parishioner had their say, KJS and her ilk would be out on the street with their bags packed.” That is an interestiing quote. My mom who is a left-leaning middle of the roader, after seeing Bill Moyer’s interview of KJS described her as “incredibly shallow”, and asked, “And how long are we going to have this woman in charge???”

[9] Posted by rob-roy on 06-29-2007 at 03:25 AM • top

Sasha, I thought your post was spot on, except perhaps your opening line:

I’m strongly convinced that KJS and her subordinate lawyers

I am becoming increasingly convinced that it is the other way around, the PB is becoming subordinate to the lawyers.

[10] Posted by tjmcmahon on 06-29-2007 at 05:26 AM • top

To what extent is the view of a congregation co-terminus with its clergy?  My experience as a “pew sitter” is that the teaching function of the clergy can often be the filtered through his or her bias.  But I also note that a particular congregation may be chosen by a congregant based on his or her prejudices and whether or not the clergy share them.  In Colorado Springs, it’s hard to find a liberal, poltical or religious.  Grace St. Stephen’s provides free rent to the far right John Jay Indtitute, a quasi educational organization preparing post college grads for careers in law, politics and religion.  In the northeast where it’s as blue as blue can be, the Coloradans are aghast at what they see as the gay agenda proclaimed as gospel from the pulpit. Some of these churches may be hosting meeting of Integrity.  But does anybody ever ask who is educating these folks?  I’ve heard a lot here on this blog about Tanzania, but what about the hermeneutics project?  I’ve heard nothing about that?  I am for keeping people at the table, not for either the reasserters or reappraisers delivering their message, propaganda?, in sound bytes.  Maybe we should call these “teachers” what they are.  The reconfirmers; the commuicators and iterators of their own bias?

[11] Posted by EmilyH on 06-29-2007 at 06:56 AM • top

EmilyH, I don’t want to take the thread off-track, but I’m curious about your characterization of the John Jay Institute as “far right.”  As one with a limited personal connection to that program, I’d be interested in dialoguing with you about it off-thread, if you’re willing.  You can e-mail me via the StandFirm site by clicking my name in the “Logged-in members” list at the bottom of the page.

[12] Posted by Jeff in VA on 06-29-2007 at 07:10 AM • top

EmilyH, I hope that all the laity teach themselves rigorously, since both right and left clergy have failed so miserably in informing us.  But of course, if reasserting clergy teach well I am all for it.

And if a reasserting layperson is under a revisionist priest, then I’m all for such laypeople gathering together in small groups to teach themselves.

There are parishes now that have off-campus information and education groups for laity, led by laity.  I think that’s great.

So naturally, since you and I don’t share the same foundational worldviews, I pretty much disagree with your above comment. 

Just putting it on the record.

Also, just so you know . . . I don’t know a thing about the John Jay Institute—not a bloomin’ thing . . . and I also don’t support or oppose Grace Church Anglican [I support the truth being revealed, whatever that is, probably in the secular courts].  But when you say that the JJ Institute is “far right” I immediately realized that it was merely somewhat right of center.

Why?  Because I’ve learned that reappraisers and I simply don’t share the same definitions of words.  Pretty much any word you use, I reinterpret automatically.

Just, again, making sure this is on the record.

Cheerio!

[13] Posted by Sarah on 06-29-2007 at 07:13 AM • top

I am for keeping people at the table, not for either the reasserters or reappraisers delivering their message (propaganda?), in sound bites.

I am for allowing people to leave the table AFTER they’ve heard enough of the substantive essence of the various messages being delivered and coming to their own prayerful convictions without being forced to sit at the table forever.

[14] Posted by Truth Unites... and Divides on 06-29-2007 at 07:26 AM • top

Here’s just an idea.  Maybe the reasserters could ask reappraisers to read just three books (other than the bible which is a given) that they feel are seminal to their understanding of their faith.  Maybe the reasserters could ask the reappraisers to do likewise.  Maybe we could promise to read them with an open mind and the promise to read them with the greatest of good will, trying to put asside our bias if just for the moment.  What would be your suggestions.  My brother the pretty hard core Presbyterian pastor has me reading NT Wright.  I’ve also been stuggling with 8 different variations of “substitution” theory of atonement.  The works not to be read all the better to formulate an opposing argument, but you care about the other guy and you want to know where he comes from.  What 3 would the reasserters recommend?  Why would you recommend them?

[15] Posted by EmilyH on 06-29-2007 at 09:51 AM • top

EmilyH,
From one Orthodox Conservative Christian to you…here are my recommendations…..

1. Bible RSV

2. Bible ESV

3. Bible KJV

Why?

Because these no matter the transltions is the Living Word, our

Basic
Instructions
Before
Leaving
Earth

[16] Posted by TLDillon on 06-29-2007 at 09:59 AM • top

Oops! Not enough coffee this am….th rest of my post above:

“I know you said other than the Bible but I feel it neccessary to grasp the Basics before moving on into something that might not be able to be understood with out first having the Basic Instructions that will help to shed Light! smile

[17] Posted by TLDillon on 06-29-2007 at 10:04 AM • top

Emily H,thanks for asking.
My own recomendations would be
Ring Of Truth and Your God Is Too Small by Fr. J.B. Phillips
Fundamentalism and the Word Of God by Rev Dr J.I. Packer
Called And Committed(American Printing)Discipleship(English Printing)
by Fr David Watson

[18] Posted by paddy c on 06-29-2007 at 10:19 AM • top

Yeah! What’s this John Jay right wing thing?  I have attended all the John Jay seminars and read their charter and goals and perceive them to be as American as apple pie.  The real old fashioned American apple pie.  If that’s right wing (perjorative) then I’m here waving the flag.
I suppose that during Sunday service when we praise God from whom all blessings flow etc and then immediately after sing the second stanza from “America” - Our Fathers’ God to thee, author of liberty, to thee we sing…..  I suppose that’s a bit too right wingy too. Humbug!

[19] Posted by FrankV on 06-29-2007 at 04:09 PM • top

RE: “If that’s right wing . . . “

Yep—for progressives like EmilyH, it’s right wing.

Which makes me realize it’s just moderately conservative in reality.

[20] Posted by Sarah on 06-29-2007 at 04:19 PM • top

By the way Sarah, I am about half through your book and find your writing style delightful.  You are truly inspired.

[21] Posted by FrankV on 06-29-2007 at 04:37 PM • top

Thank you very much for the kind words, FrankV!

I hope it will be helpful to whatever little stone bridge for which you are fighting!  ; > )

[22] Posted by Sarah on 06-29-2007 at 04:53 PM • top

Emily H.,

o Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis
o The Cost of Discipleship by Dietrich Bonhoeffer
o Total Truth by Nancy Pearcey

Pax in Christ alone.

[23] Posted by Truth Unites... and Divides on 06-29-2007 at 04:54 PM • top

OK Emily, the book question is a fair one.  Here are my nominations:
The Visionary Christian   CS Lewis
The Imitation of Christ (De Imitatione Christi) Thomas a Kempis
1928 Book of Common Prayer

As to why- Visionary Christian is an overview of many of Lewis’s writings on Christianity- everything from Mere Christian to Screwtape and even a bit of Narnia, as I recall.  Readable in small bits and very instructive without making you think you are reading about religion. Kempis’ work is one of the great classics of Catholic Christianity, profound, moving and meditative all at the same time- available in any number of translations if you don’t read Latin, (it might be wise to check your source, like Bible translations, some versions may be more true to the original).  The ‘28 BCP is what many of us “stodgy old folks” grew up with.  Some differences are subtle, and some not so subtle.  If you look over the liturgy and the lectionary in the ‘28 BCP you may come to understand why the new and remodeled TEC is not a good fit for those who were in the church prior to 1979.  And to cap off your study, compare the catechism and confirmation of the 1928 BCP with that in the 1979 (ordination too).  You will see that we (pre ‘79 piskies) have indeed taken different vows- some of us intend to keep them.

Now, fair is fair.  What 3 books would you have us read, Emily?

[24] Posted by tjmcmahon on 06-29-2007 at 05:27 PM • top

I am expecting to pick up Mere Christianity and the Bonhoeffer today.  My rector will be lending me his copies.  I’ve read Thomas A Kempis but I am so glad someone mentioned an early writing.  I’ve thought about my own “list” of things that affected me…seminal to my faith experience and I first thought of those whose spiritual journies resonatec most with me…The author of The Cloud of Unknowing, John of the Cross’ Dark Night of the Soul, even Ellie Wiezel’s Night.  Dante’s Divine Comedy, and the more lived, faith through practice, vs. intellect of The Spiritual Exercises of Ignatius Loyola, the “conversion” journey of the soul and the “geography” of prayer, hospitality and obedience lived out in the Rule of St. Benedict. 

I am going on vacation next week and promise to take the Lewis and Bonhoeffer with me.. Also reading Ahab’s Wife.

[25] Posted by EmilyH on 06-30-2007 at 08:16 AM • top

For those interested, many of the classic books on Christianity are available online courtesy of Calvin College.
http://www.ccel.org/
You can search by author or title.  Don’t let the “Calvin” fool you.  For us Anglo Catholic types, it contains everything from Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologica (under T for Thomas not A for Aquinas) and under “Newmann” you will find all 91 tracts (including those written by others) and some of his other writings.

[26] Posted by tjmcmahon on 06-30-2007 at 08:41 AM • top

Sorry for the grammar, or lack thereof, in my previous post.  red face

[27] Posted by tjmcmahon on 06-30-2007 at 08:43 AM • top

Of Newman, I have read only The Idea of a University.  Of Lewis I’ve read only all of Narnia, Out of the Silent Planet, Perelandra, That Hideous Strength, The Great Divorce and the Screwtape Letters.  So I look forwarc to Mere Christianity.  On some of the other suggestions, I am interested but I live quite a way from a major city, no Harvard Coop or Powels in the area.  So I have to check out what my fellow pew sitters might have

On something more current that I found really helpful, both Karen Armstrong’s A History of God and The Battle for God.  Battle is on the origin and understanding of fundamentalism in the three great monotheistic traditions.  I’ve been trying to get through The Great Transformation but found it really slow going. I got it as a Christmas gift, but it is really slow going and I am not quite sure I didn’t prefer the year I got a new iron.

[28] Posted by EmilyH on 06-30-2007 at 08:59 AM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.