Comments are closed.
© 2004-2010 Stand Firm, LLC.
All rights reserved.
[63 : 1.2440]
Welcome to Stand Firm!
Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info
|
Muslim Episcopal Priest |
|
This has to be in the top ten |
|
Easily the Report of the Communion Sub-Group issued to the Primates at Dar es Salaam and brokered by Rowan Williams, which attempted to get “on the table” that ECUSA really had complied with the Windsor Report’s three requests, and thankfully not accepted by the Primates. |
|
Sarah’s post at SF “Bishop Andrus—How Could You? [Content Warning]” |
|
I hate to say this, because I pray for the man daily, but the most outrageous story of 2007 was really a non-story. The primates of the Communion, in council, issued a communique directing the establishment of a Pastoral Council. The Archbishop of Canterbury reneged on his responsibility to name the members of the council and in so doing, gave the Episcopal HoB the power to veto decisionsof the primates of the Communion, just as he had previously allowed them to veto Lambeth 1.10 within the boundaries of their jurisdiction. By demonstrating to the world that the tail can indeed wag the dog, he has threatened the very existance of the Communion itself. |
|
South Carolina bishop election declared “null and void”—first time in 70 years: Followed closely by the list of dioceses which did not consent to the consecration of Bishop Lawrence: |
|
Oops, I misread the opening remarks before posting. What I posted is a tragedy. For parody and farce, I think bp. Andrus parade appearance would be a tie with the announcement that we will have a June bride among the HoB. The second I find especially shocking- a clergyman being married in a civil ceremony- what is this church coming to? |
|
Former Iranian President Khatami allowed to use the Washington National Cathedral pulpit to publicize his version of “world peace”: |
|
McGreevy goes to GTS, wants to become Episcopal priest: http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/2914/ |
|
KJS appealing to the “ancient customs of the church” to Archbishop Akinola: |
|
Bishop Andrus in the rear seat of an open convertible participating in the gay pride parade in San Francisco. (This became the “bottom of the pit” story for me when I clicked on the link later offered on SFIF to gay pride day and then realized what really goes on…..shall we say, after the parade is over. Sometimes, it is better to heed the warning and remain naive.) |
|
South Carolina election voided due to “canonical deficiencies” in responses |
|
The early invitations to Lambeth from the ABC: |
|
The abject failure of the Panel of Reference: The Episcopal Diocese of Minnesota inviting a convicted child sex offender to serve as retreat leader at its retreat house: The HOB’s rejection of the Dar communique, including the lengthy and “feeling our oats” histrionic “statement” which I expect will be read for a long long time to come as pretty representative of early 21st century ECUSA: Bishop of Maryland stamps foot at Archbishop of Ghana, says can’t come to his party: Kenneth Kearon caught doing what we all already knew he was doing—conspiring and scheming with a favorite ally, Louie Crew: |
|
The complete capitulation and folding of the group formerly known as the Windsor Bishops at the New Orleans HOB meeting, in which they issued no minority report and almost to a man failed to vote nay to the awful HOB response to Dar: Bishop Bruno’s Brass-Faced Blandishments to reporters, helpfully captured on video for all the Anglican world to see: |
|
Ahhhhh! There are just too many way too outrageous stories. Way too many. When did we cross the “no publicity is bad publicity” line? It really is one outrage after another. For my part, a bishop in the “licentiousness parade”, as Matt called it is the most outrageous. I’d love to hijack diocesan convention, like when we’re being left-hooked to death with global warming, and get that horrible clip up front and center for all to see. As if “we” are the problem. That may be the most outrageous thing of all, i.e., that “we” are the problem. (Ahab v. Elijah all over again). As I said, there are just too many stories. I have to go hurl now. |
|
—The farcical attempts at the “secret” gay communion service, including another attempt at a “Bruno Beguilement” . . . http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/8008/ —The letter of “encouragement” that KJS wrote Bishop Schofield: —The Diocese of Atlanta invites everyone to gay pride parade: —Suprise, surprise, surprise, the discovery that the diocese of Virginia violated the canons in their bishop election—and nothing was done about it: |
|
Many have already mentioned the Anne Holmes Redding (Muslim priest) story which first broke in the diocese of Olympia diocesan paper. Don’t think anyone has mentioned another absolutely shocking diocesan newspaper story. Remember Northern Michigan’s so-called “response to the Primates” and it’s declaration that we ALL are Christ? We seek and serve Christ in all persons because all persons are the living Christ. Each and every human being, as a human being, is knit together in God’s Spirit, and thus an anointed one – Christ. |
|
Ah, I forgot about one aspect of the Anne Holmes Redding story. Jim Naughton’s blatant attempt to get the whole thing swept under the rug. |
|
Well, my idea to supplement Sarah’s is from Susan Russell’s October Archive and the link is for the whole month,
The event was a “Blessing of Union and Holy Eucharist” to be held at |
I concur…simply a command performance! Intercessor |
|
“Abortion as a Moral Choice” by Rev. Anne Fowler. |
|
Ok, one more from me. I wasn’t sure initially whether this was in 2007, but I checked, and yes, it was in January. KJS’ interview with the Arkansas Democrat Gazette and her on the record denial of John 14:6
|
|
+Spence Niagara assenting to SSB’s. Now why is this especially bad? So…......... In the intervening three years, the Global South made it clear that this type of thing was a potential communion-breaking issue, and General Synod 2007 voted down the motion approving SSBs. One might think that the outcome of +Ralph’s discernment process would be fairly clear: there is no consensus approving SSBs. So you would expect that +Ralph would again withhold consent when Niagara Synod voted for a resolution approving SSBs. But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO…. +Spence gave his approval, citing as the deciding factor the just-made decisions of Ottawa Synod and Montreal Synod saying that their resolutions had forced the issue. See, I don’t think Ralph Spence is a liar. As far as I can tell, +Ralph is a (basically) honest person and good Christian. The problem is that he sees no need to be consistent in his statements. The pro-homosexual lobby, deeply embedded in Niagara’s Hamilton Cathedral and bureaucracy, operates under the principle: “What’s mine is mine; what’s yours is negotiable.” So it is impossible for orthodox to stay there in honesty and truth, because, aside from the issues we lose, today’s defeat of SSBs (in GS), or disapproval of Moloch worship, or disapproval of liturgical pole-dancing, is never final. If a liberal resolution is defeted by 50 votes today, that is not a decision on the issue, but the beginning of a campaign to turn 25 people around or otherwise gather support for the same resolution 3 years down the round. The orthodox are like the soldiers fighting the invading soldiers on the beach. You fight hard, fire eveything you’ve got, and find that not only are they still coming, but paratroopers have landed behind your lines and are mowing you down as you retreat. We then wait for orders telling us to regroup ourselves from headquarters, get no such reply, and find while retreating that headquarters was abandoned long agoo. No punchline; that’s it. |
|
Gerald Ford’s priest using his homily at the Natty Cat to bring up the Late Unpleasantness, and telling us (what he said) was the dead man’s opinions on said Unpleasantness. Also: Has any one else noticed that the list of Outrageous Episcopal Stories of 2007 is now twice as long as the list of Encouraging ones? |
|
Good Lord! Did all this really happen in 2007? This is like a hyperbolic mathematical function. Within a couple of years at this rate there will not be enough blog-space in the universe to report all the Outrages…...life as we know it may come to an end. Is this the strategy for TEC domination? To hog all available blog space? |
|
No one has mentioned the Buddhist monks erecting mandelas in the sanctuary of Trinity Cathedral, Sacramento: http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/8199 or the astrology workshop in Seattle http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/8120 or the Trans-sexual, Trans-spiritual Retreat in Oak Ridge N.J: http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/8289 I guess there are too many other things to discuss…. |
|
Wow! Where to start. I love the stories about the Bishop of Pennsylvania and his druid priest and priestess, his bankrupting of the diocese, his refusal to resign, the setting up of a shadow standing committee, I guess this all occured in 2007 in Episcopalian time. The beat goes on. |
|
Much worse than Ann Holmes Reddings bizarre declaration that she is “both Christian and Muslim” was the response by her Bishop, Vincent Warner, gushing about how excited he was about “the interfaith possibilities” of such an unholy merger; about what a woman of integrity Ann was (apparently, it takes a lot of integrity to violate the Oath of Conformity taken at your’ ordination, made before your church, your bishop, and God), and what a “natural bridge builder” Ann was. The “bridge builder” remark was, no doubt, made in reference to her lovely statement: “To walk into Al-Islam and be reminded that there are more people of color in the world than white people, that in itself is a relief,” she said. Hey, with bridge builders like Ann….. |
|
How can you pick a winner out of this plethora of farce and outrage? I keep coming back to Andrus riding in the SF Gay Pride parade and Bruno telling his bald-faced lies about SSBs. And that got me thinking about the ABC, with a straight face, telling the world in NOLA that September 30 was not a deadline. But the targets are so big and so many. Feel like a kid in a candy shop. |
|
Most ridiculous story—The largest parish is Tucson, AZ avoiding the word ‘Lord’ because of its connotations of power. |
|
Sooooooooooooooo many from which to choose. But some shine brigher than others - let’s see there’s Episcopalians are smarter than Catholics Okay technically that one was the end of 2006 but really it deserves a highlight. Then there’s the gay indoctrination gag by the School Board. Oh my. Such awful memories does bring on indigestion. |
|
“Are they ashamed of their loathsome conduct? |
|
“Abortion as a Moral Choice” by the Rev. Anne Fowler.
If TEC could ordain such a candidate for “HOLY orders” in 1985/86, it is no wonder we are where we are in 2007. |
|
As far as I can tell, NOBODY has topped #50 yet… I cannot count the number of times that I have been told by people who are, more or less, on the orthodox side of things, that I should NOT refer to the PB as a “heretic” or as a “sub-christian gnostic.” When this thread finally ends, would it be possible for somebody to edit a compilation of all of the outrages cited, minus the (at times very incisive and humorous) commentary? Just a simple list of outrages—maybe in chronological order, since there is no way we can ever organize them into a hierarchy of hideous things going on in TEC—along with notes regarding sources, etc. ? In my opinion, this catalogue of spiritual atrocities SHOULD be sent to MANY people—both inside and outside of the Anglican fold—to document SOME of the things that are going on. |
|
re:#42
As I now live in said diocese, I was thinking of including this (I frequently comment on it here and on other sites). However, at the top of the page Greg specifically asked for Anglican and Episcopal stories. I think we can all agree that whatever the diocese of Northern Michigan is, it is not either Anglican or Episcopalian, since the “affirmations” amount to outright denials of the creeds. Of course, I suppose that would eliminate a good 50-70 dioceses at this point, so maybe we need to be lenient on the point. |
|
DaveB in Vt, The “Clown Eucharist” is old news—I first encountered this bizarre and patently offensive sub-christian rite way back in the late 80’s. I was on a retreat being held in a monastery and the priest running the event (a very nice guy, by the way, and somebody who was not completely devoid of any Christian sensibilities, though he was seriously impaired spiritually by too much time spent in the Diocese of New York under the episcopal oversight of Paul Moore), assisted by two other priests, decided to SURPRISE us with this awful thing… I think that almost everybody apart from the “celebrants” was appalled. Many of us fled the chapel, feeling defiled and horrified… Yet, apparently, this thing (the “Clown Eucharist”) just won’t go away… Lord, have mercy on ALL of us. |
|
This is almost completely OT but I thought it would provide some nice levity here, in the midst of some very sad stories. About 15 years ago ou r youth group at our Episcopal Church at the time put on a lovely, innocuous dinner theatre and the play was suitable and about faith. The priest, a lovely man, had gotten a wholesale deal on the final course of the Chinese-themed dinner: fortune cookies. Problem was, he did not know they were X-rated fortunes. Completely obscene. Mine advised me to do some very interesting things to the person to my left. This still brings a laugh to our family suppers when we remember the event. |
|
I got two. I have kept thinking about things to add and I find that people (mostly Sarah Hey, dawgon’it) have already mentioned them. Father Armstrong getting a pie thrown at him: Ephraim Radner’s treatment at the HoB meeting in March and the betrayal at the last minute by Katherine Greib (who apparently had been plotting the betrayal for some time with 815). Katherine Jefferts Schori correcting Rowan Williams grammar with her infamous “[sic]” (Couldn’t find the link. Perhaps Sarah can. Then she can get credit for this one, too.) “Two Gay Episcopal Priests Joined In Ceremony Officiated by Two Episcopal Priests” |
|
Jane, since Sarah is getting most of the credit here, I’d like it known that I was first with the ABC’s claim that September 30th was not a deadline (see #70). Seriously, here are two links (thanks to Baby Blue) on You Tube. In the first (starting at about the 1:00 minute point) he talks about Dar es Salaam not having set an “ultimatum.” In the second (starting at about the 4:40 minute point) he answers a question from the NY Times reporter relevant to the “deadline” of September 30. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEy1qIpd1ws By the way, Greg, I thought bluenarrative (#83) had a great idea about putting all these horrors together in a comprehensive list. So what are you doing New Years’ Eve? |
|
That TEC and its representatives sued individual vestry members of churches in Virginia and Colorado…and then in Colorado the Episcopal Bishop wrote an extortion letter to vestry members trying to turn them from their principled theological stance…oh, see how they love one another…could TEC any more diminish its witness? |
|
Hanks, what a great video! Did that look like a smirk as she said “at the foot of the cross”? |
|
No. 7 is correct; the absolute worst event, IMHO, was the ABC’s duplicitous and dishonest use of the duplicitous and dishonest “report” of the Subgroup of the JSC of the ACC, just in advance of the Primates’ meeting in Dar es Salaam. That dishonest “report”- finding that TEC had substantially complied with Windsor - is proof positive, if any additional proof were needed, that the ABC and his minions will never discipline the TEC – never, never. The ABC will continue to yammer on at Lambeth 2008 and beyond, while the orthodox of the TEC slowly melt away. The ABC’s participation in the preparation and use of that patently dishonest “report” shows, beyond doubt, that the ABC is also dishonest and will stoop to any level to save the Communion. I know that I am bitter about the ABC’s dishonesty, but I had naively hoped, against hope, that as ABC he would do something at Dar and thereafter. |
|
[comment deleted—please do not use the blog to tout stories for which revisionists have their own blogs] An additional note added to this deletion: Grace, this is your one warning. No further warnings will be given you on this or any other thread. Your statement that you wanted to discuss an alternate story—and then announcing you were leaving for several days—is somewhat obvious, don’t you think? We’re on a no-warning, immediate ban policy regarding this issue, as we have clearly and repeatedly explained the policy, and as revisionists have repeatedly and deliberately violated this policy by using our blog-space to attempt to promote whatever various humdrum stories they are touting. We have made an exception for you, and offered this warning and explanation—all of which, you already know. And so your deliberate violation of commenter policy is disappointing. If you have further questions, please feel free to privately email a blogger. |
Comments are closed.
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
<ahref=“http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003751274_redding17m.html>Muslim Christian Priest</a>