Thursday, September 2, 2010

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

University of Michigan: How to be Gay

Tuesday, January 8, 2008 • 7:43 am


What fresh hell is this?
Section 002 — How to be Gay: Male Homosexuality and Initiation.

Credits: (3; 2 in the half-term).

Instructor(s): David M Halperin ((JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address))

Course Description:

Just because you happen to be a gay man doesn't mean that you don't have to learn how to become one. Gay men do some of that learning on their own, but often we learn how to be gay from others, either because we look to them for instruction or because they simply tell us what they think we need to know, whether we ask for their advice or not.

This course will examine the general topic of the role that initiation plays in the formation of gay male identity. We will approach it from three angles: (1) as a sub-cultural practice — subtle, complex, and difficult to theorize — which a small but significant body of work in queer studies has begun to explore; (2) as a theme in gay male writing; and (3) as a class project, since the course itself will constitute an experiment in the very process of initiation that it hopes to understand.

In particular, we will examine a number of cultural artifacts and activities that seem to play a prominent role in learning how to be gay: Hollywood movies, grand opera, Broadway musicals, and other works of classical and popular music, as well as camp, diva-worship, drag, muscle culture, taste, style, and political activism. Are there a number of classically 'gay' works such that, despite changing tastes and generations, all gay men, of whatever class, race, or ethnicity, need to know them, in order to be gay? What is there about gay identity that explains the gay appropriation of these works? What do we learn about gay male identity by asking not who gay men are but what it is that gay men do or like? One aim of exploring these questions is to approach gay identity from the perspective of social practices and cultural identifications rather than from the perspective of gay sexuality itself. What can such an approach tell us about the sentimental, affective, or subjective dimensions of gay identity, including gay sexuality, that an exclusive focus on gay sexuality cannot?

At the core of gay experience there is not only identification but disidentification. Almost as soon as I learn how to be gay, or perhaps even before, I also learn how not to be gay. I say to myself, 'Well, I may be gay, but at least I'm not like that!' Rather than attempting to promote one version of gay identity at the expense of others, this course will investigate the stakes in gay identifications and disidentifications, seeking ultimately to create the basis for a wider acceptance of the plurality of ways in which people determine how to be gay.

Additional note. This course is not a basic introduction to gay male culture, but an exploration of certain issues arising from it. It assumes some background knowledge. Students wishing to inform themselves about gay men and gay culture in a preliminary way should enroll in an introductory course in lesbian/gay studies.

36 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

Who can tell me with a straight (sorry!) face that this will not end up being a <strike>meat market</strike> social networking opportunity for these curious students??

Hot Rod Anglican blog

[1] Posted by Anglican Beach Party on 01-08-2008 at 08:03 AM • top

And wait ... if they’re born that way ... shouldn’t they already know these things??

[2] Posted by Anglican Beach Party on 01-08-2008 at 08:04 AM • top

Greg, this quite unbelievable item fits right in with the new focus of this once academically respected university.  Makes me wonder how I’d react if I were considering a job applicant and saw this on his transcript.

Remember when the <a href= “http://media.www.michigandaily.com/media/storage/paper851/news/2007/09/17/CampusLife/Lgbt-Affairs.Office.Considers.Name.Change-2972089.shtml”>
U of Michigan LGBT Affairs Office </a> was looking for a new name just a few months ago?  Never did learn the result of their search.  Perhaps Instructor Halperin could enlighten us.

[3] Posted by hanks on 01-08-2008 at 08:20 AM • top

This course has been around for a few years.  In my household, saying “He’s a graduate of the University of Michigan” is descriptive without exposing the younger children to the real meaning.

[4] Posted by slanehill on 01-08-2008 at 08:20 AM • top

Would it be a sin for me to laugh out loud at this?

[5] Posted by Paul B on 01-08-2008 at 08:22 AM • top

Anglican Beach Party,  you beat me to it.

[6] Posted by GB on 01-08-2008 at 08:32 AM • top

Is it April 1 already???

[7] Posted by Marty the Baptist on 01-08-2008 at 08:36 AM • top

When 1970’s Saturday Night Live skits become real life. Absolutely unbelieavable…..
Makes you wonder what the graduate program would be like.

[8] Posted by birminghamer on 01-08-2008 at 08:49 AM • top

Exploring life at the bottom of the septic tank….

[9] Posted by AnglicanXn on 01-08-2008 at 08:51 AM • top

Here’s a course I’d rather take:

Just because you happen to be an Anglican doesn’t mean that you don’t have to learn how to become one.  Anglicans do some of that learning on their own, but often we learn how to be Anglican from others, either because we look to them for instruction or because they simply tell us what they think we need to know, whether we ask for their advice or not (LOL).

This course will examine the general topic of the role that initiation plays in the formation of Anglican identity. We will approach it from three angles: (1) as a sub-cultural practice—subtle, complex, and difficult to theorize—which a small but significant body of work in pan-Anglican studies has begun to explore; (2) as a theme in Anglican writing; and (3) as a class project, since the course itself will constitute an experiment in the very process of initiation that it hopes to understand.

The evolution of worship style as an individual attempts to Live Into™ Anglicanism will be considered.

[10] Posted by Anglican Beach Party on 01-08-2008 at 08:53 AM • top

Exploring life at the bottom of the septic tank….

That’s really unhelpful.  I’d expect that sort of comment [reference to another blog deleted], but am surprised to see it here.

Yes, homosexual practice is sinful and yes it is but one issue that is tearing our church apart, but for God’s sake show a little love and compassion.  Our enemies may not, but we ought to at least shew forth the love of Christ in all circumstances.

Michael Daley

[11] Posted by Michael Daley on 01-08-2008 at 09:02 AM • top

Dear Heavenly Father,
We all have distorted images of who You are.  May we all, the instructors of this course, the students, and the observers of this course, grow into the mind of Christ that we may gain a perfect knowledge of You.  Amen.

[12] Posted by Jill Woodliff on 01-08-2008 at 09:18 AM • top

It assumes some background knowledge.

You don’t say…

[13] Posted by Roll Tide Roll on 01-08-2008 at 09:23 AM • top

No hope for a “How to be Anglican” course in this country. Remember the little blue books one could find at each parish, “What is An Episcopalian”? I suspect the pages now are blank and the reader just pencils in whatever feels good. I remain puzzled these days at what could be included in “confirmation classes”. Do they just hand out buttons saying “Anything Goes!”?

[14] Posted by stevenanderson on 01-08-2008 at 09:47 AM • top

Similar indoctrination has been going on for decades in ‘Womens Studies” departments, and we all know about the close alliance between gay and feminist activists, so why is anyone surprised at this?

I’d like to take that Anglican Studies class too.

Cheers,

Phil Hobbs

[15] Posted by CryptoCatholic on 01-08-2008 at 09:48 AM • top

...and (3) as a class project, since the course itself will constitute an experiment in the very process of initiation that it hopes to understand.

They will gain hands-on experience, not just lip-service and screwin’ around with the articles.

I wonder how the course will be graded? I can see valid reasons for questions: “Does this count?”  “Do we need to know this for the test?” “Can I get extra credit if I ....?”

[16] Posted by Dr. N. on 01-08-2008 at 09:55 AM • top

Well, I took a similar course (only not for gays, which is something nobody had thought about at that time) 25 years ago at the U of Michigan and we basically sat around and BS’d for 45 minutes three times a week and everybody got an A.  The mere fact that the subject of the BS has changed is not really all that big a change.

[17] Posted by Catholic Mom on 01-08-2008 at 10:08 AM • top

“Yes, homosexual practice is sinful and yes it is but one issue that is tearing our church apart, but for God’s sake show a little love and compassion.  Our enemies may not, but we ought to at least shew forth the love of Christ in all circumstances. “

Michael, I don’t think this thread is hateful or lacking in compassion. It is one thing to be afflicted by sin, as we all are. It is another to revel in it, as this course encourages. To quote Oscar Wilde (yes, I appreciate the irony involved) and Chrissy Hynde:  “We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.”  And some of us are looking down, contemplating the sewer.  I doubt that this Wildean quote will make Mr. Halpern’s course.  Perhaps Wilde’s last words will have a better chance:  “Either those curtains go, or I do.”

[18] Posted by Kevin Babb on 01-08-2008 at 10:23 AM • top

If this were truly an academic course, it could be useful as a way for the Church to engage The Listening Process™ and learn how to really minister the transforming love of Christ to people who have Learned these behaviors.

Not much academic rigor suggested by the course description, though; sounds like “Catholic Mom” pegged it.

[19] Posted by Connecticutian on 01-08-2008 at 10:47 AM • top

Hmmm.  It IS a subculture and as such should be studied.  Doesn’t sound like a how-to class, really, as much as putting the subculture under the microscope.  The title of the class is unfortunate.  Not very academic.

[20] Posted by GoodMissMurphy on 01-08-2008 at 11:19 AM • top

GoodMissMurphy wrote:

Doesn’t sound like a how-to class, really ...

It does to me!  At least, this part does:

as a class project, since the course itself will constitute an experiment in the very process of initiation that it hopes to understand.

That sound to me as if part of the class is to initiate participants into the gay lifestyle.

[21] Posted by Anglican Beach Party on 01-08-2008 at 12:02 PM • top

Michael, I don’t think this thread is hateful or lacking in compassion. It is one thing to be afflicted by sin, as we all are. It is another to revel in it, as this course encourages.

Erm…I don’t recall calling the thread hateful.

Anyway, I was referring to a comment made by AnglicanXn, not the entire thread.

MGD

[22] Posted by Michael Daley on 01-08-2008 at 12:36 PM • top

For something you’re supposedly born with there certainly is a lot of lifestyle to study.

I would be curious to see if Billy Budd is on the reading list.

[23] Posted by texex on 01-08-2008 at 12:47 PM • top

Does the class include any field trips to Episcopal churches in the Diocese of Michigan?

[24] Posted by Piedmont on 01-08-2008 at 01:07 PM • top
[25] Posted by Matthew A (formerly mousestalker) on 01-08-2008 at 01:23 PM • top

Michael, I did not mean for my comment to be hateful—which does not mean it could not be taken that way—but if homosexual practice is sinful, and if the “gay lifestyle” includes things like pride parades or even some of the stuff that shows up on sitcoms—then to think of a course on the “gay lifestyle”—a course that assumes the gay lifestyle not only exists but that it is a good thing that it exists—is like thinking of diving into a river of sludge.  How can anyone one contemplate someone being drawn more fully into a pathway to death and not be repulsed?

[26] Posted by AnglicanXn on 01-08-2008 at 02:12 PM • top

Just another example of the increasingly wacky, liberal, anti-traditional family, secular humanism that is so firmly entrenched in collegiate academia. Shocking? No. Dangerous? Yes. Can’t the University of Michigan come up with a more substantive and useful course than this nonsense? Good grief….....

[27] Posted by irishanglican on 01-08-2008 at 02:50 PM • top

What a waste of good tuition $...

[28] Posted by B. Hunter on 01-08-2008 at 03:57 PM • top

Darn.  I may need to change my e-mail address!

[29] Posted by drjoan on 01-08-2008 at 05:27 PM • top

In school I also remember the out of country students taking classes in their native language to get easy credits and meet girls who they could tutor. This is the same.

[30] Posted by DaveB in VT on 01-08-2008 at 06:15 PM • top

All that talk about an initiation makes me nerrrrvous.  I think I’d skip this course ...

[31] Posted by RoyIII on 01-08-2008 at 06:28 PM • top

Some of you act soooooooo surprised! You need to touch your inner “identity” - try the course at UMass.

[32] Posted by Festivus on 01-08-2008 at 07:03 PM • top

On the transcript this will show up as:

ENGLISH 317. Literature and Culture.

So parents, employers and graduate schools will not know what the work and topic was for the particular section.

[33] Posted by Deja Vu on 01-08-2008 at 07:26 PM • top

An activity in search of a proclivity.
A proclivity in search of an orientation. 
An orientation in search of a culture. 
A culture in search of a science. 
A science in search of a theology. 
A theology in search of a righteousness. 
A righteousness in search of a justification.
A justification applied to an activity.

[34] Posted by Moot on 01-08-2008 at 07:43 PM • top

Final Exam in Core Philosophy Course from U of M, circa 1980 (in it’s entirety):

“Why?”

Answer key:
1)  ‘Why not?’
2)  ‘Because’

Nope, I’m not kidding.

[35] Posted by Moot on 01-08-2008 at 07:48 PM • top

Courses like this make me glad to be a graduate of Hillsdale College. I have a good friend who is a product of U of M’s English department - trying to debate with him is like beating my head against a wall.

[36] Posted by tmrichter on 01-11-2008 at 01:04 AM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.