Monday, February 13, 2012

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

A Pleasant Drive Part 2

Thursday, July 27, 2006 • 2:32 pm

Lynn has an awful decision to make…


A Pleasant Drive Part 2 (part 1 may be found here)

For the first time since leaving the dealership, Lynn eyes her husband closely. Sweat drips from his face. It’s not hot. His eyes are set firmly on the road but there’s a wildness to them. His hands grip the wheel at 10 and 2 o’clock but his knuckles are white. “Steve what’s going on?”

“Nothing’s going on. We’re having a family drive. Why are you freaking out on me?”

“This is not a family drive. This is insane. You’re not at all yourself.”

“Maybe, Lynn, this really is me. Maybe this has been me all along and you’ve never really taken the time to find out who I really am? Maybe you’ve just been going along with your little picture image of who I am and what our life is together…husband, wife, two kids, one on the way, nice picket fences…all of that crap, when all along I haven’t wanted that. I’ve never wanted that?”

“I don’t care about picket fences Steve. I care about you, I care about my kids, and I care about this family. We can talk about who you are and what you want. We can talk about everything. But it’s hard to have a really deep and lasting conversation while we’re hurtling 130 miles per hour down the highway and you’ve got that completely mad look in your eye. Slow down. Let’s go home. Let’s get the kids in bed and then we can start to have the ‘deep’ conversations.”

“We’re not going anywhere but down this road and we will stop going down this road when I say we’ll stop. For heaven’s sake honey, why on earth would we invest so much money in a car designed to do what we are doing and then not do it?”

“Steve, I’m sure this car can and should do amazing things on the right road. This is not the right road. There is a road in Germany where you can let this car do what she was designed to do. But if you do it here you’ll get killed or arrested.”

“Don’t lecture me about safety. Look, you have your seatbelt on. The kids are strapped in their car-seats. We’re safe. As far as German roads go, you know we’ll never get there. That’s great for Germans, what about us. We’ll always be here. If we don’t do what we’re doing right here right now, we’ll never get to experience it.”

“Steve, you didn’t have to buy this thing. You could have settled for a Taurus.”

“I don’t settle.”

“I know.”

Looking back, Lynn notices the lights.

“Now look what you’ve done. There are at least three patrol cars behind us.”

“I know. They’ve been there for the last five minutes.”

“And you haven’t pulled over?”

“No.”

“Steve, pull over now.”

“Why should I. I’m not doing anything wrong.”

“They already pulled you over once and gave you a ticket this time they’re going to arrest you.”

“Let them try. They don’t have the power. They don’t know who they’re messing with. Without my money our state governor would still be stuffed in his tweedy jackets teaching snot-nosed freshmen how to think their way out of paper bags. I own the guy. One call is all it would take and I’ll have these civil servants washing this car for a living.”

“Don’t count on it. I’m beginning to think your governor is a better man than you give him credit for. Money can’t buy everybody.”

“We’ll see.”

“Yes, we will. In the meantime, if you insist on this you’ll have to do it without me and without the kids. I want you to stop the car and let us go.”

“You want out here? We’re at least 60 miles from home.”

“We’ll make it back one way or the other.”

“I’m afraid I can’t do that. For one, the kids obviously want to stay with me…right Jimmy?”

James, asleep in his car-seat, doesn’t answer but two year old Gwen is wide awake. Steve smiles back at her.

“Hello princess”

“Hi daddy”

“We may drop mommy off. Do you want to drive in the fun car with daddy or go with mommy?”

“This is ridiculous Steve. She’s two.”

“You know that the kids are loving this. You’re all by yourself.”

They drive on. The state patrol cars follow behind but keep their distance. They know there are kids and a pregnant woman in the car and they don’t want the driver to become even more reckless than he already is. 

Listen.” Says Steve, ”I’m not going to pull over. But if you want I’ll get some distance on the cops, slow down and let you out.”

Relief flooded Lynn’s heart, “Thank you Steve. I…”

“But the kids stay with me.”

“What?”

“You heard me. The kids stay with me. I’m not letting them go. You leave me, you leave them.”

Lynn sits back in her seat. She feels as though she’s had the wind knocked out of her. She has an awful decision to make. She can stay with Steve for the sake of the kids in the backseat, not knowing how any of this will end. Perhaps she will eventually be able persuade Steve to slow down or pull over before something horrible happens? Or she can get out of the car now, ensuring the life of the child in her womb, and trusting her other children to the state police.

She sits for a moment, wrestling with herself.

But she doesn’t have much time to decide.

end


53 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

I get your point, Matt.  My story is a bit different as we have attended two Episcopal churches in the Diocese of SC for only the last 4 years, so we don’t have the long history or even years of friends and fellowship others have.  However, we tried many churches in the area and never felt as much at home as we have in the two DofSC Episcopal churches we’ve attended.  Saying that, we realize the vast difference between a DofSC reasserter church and what is going on in the rest of the Episcopal church.  When asked, I tell people I’m Anglican. 

When my husband and I decided to start attending the church closer to home versus the one that brought us to the DofSC, we discussed the problems within the Episcopal church and whether we should give the Methodist churches we tried in the past another chance.  The feeling we have in our local church is so strong, we decided to stay and try to fight for the love and obedience to Christ we feel in our church and this diocese.

[1] Posted by Tami on 07-27-2006 at 02:58 PM • top

Tami,

Not sure how your point is different since I really didn’t make a point with regard to what anyone should do. I merely hoped to get to the heart of the decision. You will chose to stay in the car. A faithful choice. It would also be a faithful choice to step out.

[2] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 07-27-2006 at 03:16 PM • top

Damned if you do and damned if you don’t. In a no win situation, there are no good answers.

Personally, I would say I am leaving, get him to stop the car, then steal the keys when he is not looking and throw them far, far away and wait for the cops to arrive.

But, I think the moral of this story will be that we can’t be throwing stones at each other because of how one deals with a no win situation, which is what we have in TEC these days.

Oh, howse the little guy, btw, Matt? I am looking forward to my second son in September. smile

[3] Posted by Brooks Kelley on 07-27-2006 at 04:43 PM • top

The prophetic Moral is: “we can’t be throwing stones at each other because of how one deals with a no win situation.”  The Question then becomes, “OK, how can we be positive, knowing the risks?”  I will not cite the specifics, read St. Mark as though it were just a book.

[4] Posted by terebinth on 07-27-2006 at 05:32 PM • top

How about you reach over and simply turn the ignition off and let the car coast to a stop.  Then cold cock Steve so that he is dazed until the police get to him.  Take your children and get him some psychiatric help along with bible study and prayer.  Keep him separated from you and the children until he truly repents and recovers.

[5] Posted by Lee Parker on 07-27-2006 at 06:36 PM • top

Matt - I’m sorry, I really wasn’t clear and I now see there are two ways of looking at the loved ones in the “car”.  My first thought was that they represented others who attend the church.  Having very recently changed churches, we know very few people and wouldn’t quite have that feeling of leaving a lot of friends behind to a bad situation.  But thinking about it, the real loved one is Jesus . . . although one can argue that He will go with us wherever we go!

[6] Posted by Tami on 07-27-2006 at 07:02 PM • top

LP: tell us about this “until he truly repents and recovers” part.”  A cold cock punch sounds great in the abstract but history teaches you just end up with blind eyes and no teeth.

[7] Posted by terebinth on 07-27-2006 at 07:06 PM • top

Lee Parker.

I’m not certain that a pregnant woman could cold cock the husband driving the car 130 down the highway.

; > (

I mean—I hate to sound like a fragile flower and all.  But I fear that a woman trying to clock the man over the head while he is driving—unless she knew martial arts or had some brass knuckles handy—would be self defeating.

Matt.  Does the pregnant woman have a pair of brass knuckles?

Is there any way for her to swoon?

Any Southern female would know how to do that.

If she could pull off a good swoon, then perhaps he would be distracted enough to slow down.  It seems to me that he is positively relishing the attention that all of the pursuers and his wife are providing.  Perhaps with no attention for her—since she’s passed out—the joy would depart.

Problem is . . . if she swooned and managed to pull something tricky off, all the other men driving 130 miles an hour down the highway would denounce her for her treachery and deceit.  Many would claim that she had behaved in a terribly unChristian and unloving manner.  They would announce how Absolutely Appalled they all were that she had engaged in closed meetings, strategery, and media announcements.

But I guess that’s another story for another day.

[8] Posted by Sarah on 07-27-2006 at 08:48 PM • top

Is this why St. Paul said it is better for a man not to marry?

[9] Posted by Christoferos on 07-27-2006 at 09:03 PM • top

Mayy,  Thank you.  I really appreciate the fact that in this hot and heavy time when our emotions go up and down like yoyos, you have given us such a wonderful analogy to read: very entertaining but still on track with the message.  We eed it with all these momentous events going on.

cool grin

[10] Posted by Bill C on 07-27-2006 at 09:46 PM • top

ooops!  ...Matt+

tongue rolleye

[11] Posted by Bill C on 07-27-2006 at 09:47 PM • top

Sarah etc. you guys are great.  Maybe just b…. slap him to daze him kinda lack spraying a bear with mace.  I dunno Sarah I’ve been swooned and cold cocked by women and both are pretty effective.

Teribenth on a more serious note.  The analogy I see with ECUSA.  We (ECUSA) have been warned repeatedly much like a spoiled child.  Threats from Rowan++ etc. have not been implemented.  Big mistake in child rearing 101.  A good parent does not spank a child for discipline but may “pop” a child to first get his or her attention.  Then once the attention is gained the treat is implemented.  In this case ECUSA, like a spoiled child has not responded to the discipline.  The consequences are removal from the group until he/she is truly sorry and humbly repents.  Threats without consequences are useless and very damaging to the family.

[12] Posted by Lee Parker on 07-27-2006 at 10:03 PM • top

This being the age of deconstruction I suppose the reader is free to assign his or her own meaning to the story. Here’s the assumption I was working under.

The woman: the body of orthodox believers, the true church within ECUSA.

The children in the back: the large swath of essentially uninformed ECUSAns trusting that all is well, wondering what all the fuss is about, loving the Church but not sure why mommy and daddy are fighting.

Daddy: 815 and the revisionist heirarchy of course.

Unborn Child: orthodox believers within orthodox parishes/diocese

The car: sexuality. It’s a finely engineered thing.

The Road: relations between people of the same sex. There is a limit.

the choice: every orthodox parish has to make it. Stay in the car and fight to save the children in back or leave for the sake of the unborn.

[13] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 07-28-2006 at 02:21 AM • top

oh yes,

the state police #1: the primates (all of them)

the ticket: the WR

the three police cars: the primates, the ACC, the ABC.

[14] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 07-28-2006 at 02:25 AM • top

one more,

the autobahn: Heterosexual marriage

[15] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 07-28-2006 at 03:04 AM • top

Matt: I agree with all your interpretations, except that I thought that the children represented disputed church property.  Steve is telling Lynn, “YOU can go, but with nothing but the clothes on your back.  Everything you’ve created in the past is mine.”  The unborn child is the church’s future - the children already born are its past.  Steve is going to hang onto them, even though it doesn’t benefit anyone, even himself; they need maintenance - eventually, they’ll have to be fed, and that’s going to cut into his wonderful high-speed adventure, but he’s not thinking of it in practical terms, this is all about power.

[16] Posted by Dr. Mabuse on 07-28-2006 at 04:17 AM • top

O.K. then, what if the woman fakes going into labor? Or actually starts going into labor?

What if she reaches into the glove box and finds that the tires are not rated for going about 110mph? Does her husband then argue against the printed word ( The bible )?

Also, at 130mph, when will the fuel run out? After all, if the car is Sexuality, then it can get abused.

Also, using I81, the car is going to hit Syracuse going north in less than an hour, Scranton in about an hour going south, so won’t there be a road block there from another jurisdiction ... Does Syracuse or Scranton become the Government court houses where it gets expensive to settle this TEC debate?

[17] Posted by Brooks Kelley on 07-28-2006 at 05:12 AM • top

Sexuality is a drive so keyed into our core identity, self-concept (driving a beautiful fast car or a clunker) is a powerful machine that must be handled and maintained according to the Manufacturer’s instruction or it will be an instrument of injury or death. 

The joy of driving it can be addictive, an obsession and take over our whole lives and rule us.  Like the people in the auto ads, we will stay up all night looking at the new car parked in our the garages, give it more attention and affection than our family. (the obsession, compulsion, addiction includes homo and hetero sexual behaviors and all kinds of people - statistics show clergy and laypersons, teens are addicted to internet porn and gambling, food, approval, etc.)

Like the machinery in that VERY Fast Automobile (is it a Mercedes, Matt?), the human sexual response is a complex conditioned response; primary, secondary, tertiary conditioning create the emotional and physical responses an individual will have to a particular stimulus.
The conditioning of human beings begins in utero.  Stress hormones from the mother and the mother’s and father’s voices, give the infant clues whether they are loved and wanted, whether it is safe to be born. 

Trauma, (auto accidents) joy, acceptance, (maintenance)rejection, neglect (lack of proper service), actions, choices, attitudes (driving habits), relationships (where the auto is parked) affect the person physically and emotionally, even the chemistry and structure of the brain.

The self-concept, central identity is plastic not fixed and though enormously affected by early conditioning, changes through therapy, both spiritual and psychotherapy, with changes in environment,  relationships, choices, actions.

An automobile can be best restored by a Loving Expert who is familiar with the Manufacturer’s Specifications and the Owners Manual.  The Loving Expert (a priest, psychologist, counselor, Christian friend) knows the Manufacturer, can commend the machine to the Manufacturer and His Restorative Representatives. 

The Loving Experet has experience with, a deep confidence in the abilities and techniques of the Manufacturer and vision of what that auto can be if it were cared for and restored by the Manufacturer.

Restoration is painful, difficult and sometimes lengthy there is a glorious goal and prize at the end.  Most importantly, there is the wonderful Presence of the Manufacturer Who suffers with us and helps us along the Way.

[18] Posted by Theodora on 07-28-2006 at 05:58 AM • top

The car salesman is the devil.

[19] Posted by Milton Finch on 07-28-2006 at 08:10 AM • top

Of course, in the real world, scenarios like this quite often end up in a wreck and it is the passengers who most often suffer and die. Steve would probably be charged with vehicular manslaughter, if he survived.  Hmmmmm….....

the snarkster

[20] Posted by the snarkster on 07-28-2006 at 08:24 AM • top

What if you are running your ‘auto’ on deisel instead of gasoline on which your engine is designed to run, and is not running well (experiencing emotional pain, confusion, etc.) you start looking for a ‘mechanic’.

You look up and down the ‘street’ and see signs that say, ‘Welcome, we REALLY Care for YOU’.  You drive sputtering into the ‘The Compassion Mechanic Business, Inc.’ and the smiling proprietor and his assistants greet you lovingly. 

“Wow, they understand me and they care”, you say.  You’re in distress, so you don’t look too deeply, think about their methods and motives.

They all gather around, comfort you, make you feel good.  They tell you, “Hey, all you need is new tires (labyrinths, prayers to Sophia, etc.).  We have some great tires and a new kind of oil that does wonders.  The Manufacturer always said ‘do this and don’t do this’ but I know better.”

Or, “Your engine is just fine like it is, we care about YOU…WE have read another book by another manufacturer that says ‘practice mindfulness’...‘just enter the fields beyond good and evil’...‘all will be well’  ‘The old Manufacturer’s Manual is too harsh, out of date, not the ONLY WAY.’

Truth is, they don’t do good work, are dishonest, are not really an authorized franchise for the Manufacturer, do follow the Manufacturer’s Specifications.

Mechanics Motives (self-vindication, power, a tangled heap of deep complex spiritual/psychological wounds being covered up) of the (False) Compassion Mechanic Business, Inc. - their motivations of the mechanics never enter your mind. They just make you feel good.  Their waiting room is so pleasant, their parties jolly.  There is a nice family feeling.  We’re all in this together, doing a new thing.  It seems like a taste of heaven.  They use the same names and words as the church of your childhood, but just in a different way.  It’s just so comforting.

Soon, you can say the same things, and sound just like the rest of them.  You believe your car is running fine even though the people down the street are shaking their heads, trying to tell you…you just don’t see the trail of black smoke behind your beautiful automobile, cannot see what the end will be.

[21] Posted by Theodora on 07-28-2006 at 08:43 AM • top

Oops, that is, the Compassion Mechanics *DON’T* follow the Mfg’s Instructions.

[22] Posted by Theodora on 07-28-2006 at 08:46 AM • top

Sarah,

I would imagine the right kind of Southern woman could clock the guy over the head with her laptop.  But would she risk the damage to the hard drive?

[23] Posted by William Witt on 07-28-2006 at 09:13 AM • top

I could never choose to damage my beloved laptop!!  [sob]

[24] Posted by Sarah on 07-28-2006 at 09:19 AM • top

Germany ....... Integrity?

[25] Posted by Bill C on 07-28-2006 at 09:36 AM • top

“Germany ....... Integrity?”

Of course, Dumb Ox, Germany stands for Integrity, just not integrity. And it is “Love”, not “love”. And it is “Sex”, not “sex”.

And “Is”, is not “is” anymore.

We have come a long way from our barbarian past haven’t we? Oh, it feels so good to be modern. rolleyes

[26] Posted by Brooks Kelley on 07-28-2006 at 10:13 AM • top

If the car is sexuality and the autobahn is the proper road for the car, then Germany is NOT integrity.

[27] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 07-28-2006 at 10:19 AM • top

Lee Parker: “...turn off the ignition and let the car coast to a stop”

My idiot brother did that to me once.  Coasting into a curve the steering wheel locked, and we wound up in the ditch.

[28] Posted by Marty the Baptist on 07-28-2006 at 10:35 AM • top

I have an idiot brother, too. He shoved my transmission into reverse while I was tooling along at 50 mph in my old ‘55 Chevy. Who would have thought a 2 speed powerglide transmission would have so many little bitty parts (at least they were little bitty after the accident).

the snarkster

[29] Posted by the snarkster on 07-28-2006 at 10:57 AM • top

Re: Teens and cars, (I don’t think this pertains to our analogy, hope not) but we lived in a rural community when autos were big as ocean liners and had long fins and hoods.  We, my sister and cousins, a few daring friends, thought it was great fun to let someone ride on each fender and fin of the car and go over the bumpy dirt roads as fast as we could to see who could hold on the best.  Thankfully, no casualties before we wised up.

In those days, no one did drugs or drank, it was just silly hijinks and jokes that got us into trouble with our elders.

[30] Posted by Theodora on 07-28-2006 at 11:12 AM • top

Back to the analogy about the Compassion Mechanic Company, Inc.  - they would tell the driver of the auto trailing black smoke, “Don’t worry, *we care*, we have people qualified (AIDS, Hospice workers, Social workers, etc.) to see you to the very end. 

Never mind that these ‘mechanics’ help you to your end, they will make it as sweet and comfortable as possible, until you ‘cross over’ to reap the result of doing life your (or their) way by not loving God with all the body, mind and spirit, not wanting to know or submit to God’s Word and Commandments.  (John 14:23;17:3; IJohn 5:1-21)

“Thy law is truth and truth is Thyself” St Augustine

[31] Posted by Theodora on 07-28-2006 at 11:27 AM • top

FLoridian.

Great interpretation!!

[32] Posted by Chip Johnson, cj on 07-28-2006 at 12:14 PM • top

Matt+, in my case, I was using Integrity to refer to that certain organization that supports what ECUSA is doing. So, in a sense, I do mean that Germany means Integrity, not integrity.

Redefining words are what cults do best and now liberals love to do also. So, these days, Love does not mean love. Sex does not mean sex. And Is does not mean is.

I think that is how they trapped many of us into believing them ( i.e. I know Fr. Anderson was dupped by Bruno into getting his support for being bishop of L.A. because my in-laws who went to St. James told me about it ) and in point of fact it is the technique the husband used as a means to get the car.

So, when he finally gets behind the wheel, then, and only then, when he is in complete control does he say to his wife that she really didn’t know him all along.

Which begs another question, if the husband agrees to stop and let her out, will he? Is he a man of his word. That is the other problem in TEC these days too. A lot of bishops are not keeping their oaths to defend the faith, so why should we believe them on anything now or into the future?

[33] Posted by Brooks Kelley on 07-28-2006 at 07:28 PM • top

When everything is out of our control it is time to pray and then if an opportunity appears act with God’s guidance.

[34] Posted by Betty See on 07-28-2006 at 07:59 PM • top

I’m glad I’m not a sinner like that STEVE Guy (or his gay friends).

So… what if it wound up this way:

Steve takes the “German Engineered Car” to Boston, and as he’s driving through the Big Dig tunnel, his wife screams bloody murder as a 10 ton tunnel section falls on the car, killing her and all inside, and, sadly, the police cars following behind.

By the way - in case you Orthodox Deconstructionists are looking for interpretation, here it is:

The Big Dig = the undermining of faithful Biblical Scholarship

The Tunnel Collapse = The use of tenuous and fear-based theology (like the inerrancy of the Bible) that will eventually cause the collapse of Christianity.

Boston = One city in America where faithful Christians of every sexual orientation can be legally united.

[35] Posted by TheSamaritan on 07-28-2006 at 09:39 PM • top

Steve’s thinking = TheSamaritan’s last comment

[36] Posted by Christoferos on 07-28-2006 at 09:46 PM • top

TheSamaritan, in case you missed the sign on the side of the road ...

“Therefore lay aside all filthiness and overflow of wickedness, and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.” James 1:21

The turn up ahead, it is the twinkling of an eye zone…..Be sure you are ready.

[37] Posted by Brooks Kelley on 07-28-2006 at 10:53 PM • top

You know, there are a LOT of logs that need to be removed from a LOT of eyes.  It seems to me that the “orthodox” position (your terminology) is so obsessed with pointing fingers at the “sin” of other people, they haven’t even taken the time to evaluate or repent of their own sins.  It’s a shame. 

If you want to be faithful, look for the fruits of the spirit.

[38] Posted by TheSamaritan on 07-29-2006 at 08:15 PM • top

Dear Matt,

I think that TheSamaritan is really irritated by your story.

Please keep writing it.  ; > )

[39] Posted by Sarah on 07-29-2006 at 08:44 PM • top

Sarah,

Or, you could just point TheSamaritan to your latest piece, if he/she really wants to know what we think about logs and eyes around here.

[40] Posted by Greg Griffith on 07-29-2006 at 09:00 PM • top

Greg, somehow—it’s just a feeling of course—I suspect that TheSamaritan wouldn’t really like the sins of which the “orthodox” may be under conviction.  I just suspect somehow that he would desire that we become convicted of some things that would, oh, say, fit in with TheSamaritan’s vision for the direction of this church.  ; > )

It’s just that flaming quick mind of mine, you know?  I’m sure that no one else on this blog would ever have figured that out, though.  ; > )

[41] Posted by Sarah on 07-29-2006 at 09:18 PM • top

Wow,we’re Orthodox Deconstructionists.I have to ask though,just WHO is really deconstructing Anglicanism,turning away from the Scripture,the historic Christian theology of marriage,the historic Creeds for a Gnostic Antinomianism.

[42] Posted by paddy on 07-29-2006 at 09:27 PM • top

Also,if Samaritan wants to take his/her variation of the parable to another level(ala big dig),the construction became way over budget ala GC-06 yet was troubled by shoddy construction(ie not dealing with Windsor or Dromantine like it was asked of them)and when Episcopalians tried to progress through it fell down and casualties happened(also reminded me not a little of the images in Isaiah 30:12-14 or Ezekiel 13:10-15).

[43] Posted by paddy on 07-29-2006 at 11:23 PM • top

Did anyone else see the car in this story as representing theology and the power of ideas, rather than sexuality?

[44] Posted by laudlady on 07-30-2006 at 03:07 AM • top

It is all about idolotry.  Nothing is wrong with fine cars, speed, fun, etc.  It is when I will be led by my hormones and do what I want or else.  I am the standard and it is all about me.  I will get my way even if I have to shape my church, religion, god in my image.  I will get to be god.  In training children the first job of the parents is to teach the child that he/she is not the center of the universe.  After all we don’t make very effective gods.  It all ways seems to end up in the ditch, jail, or morgue or hell.

[45] Posted by PROPHET MICAIAH on 07-30-2006 at 08:57 AM • top

These fantasies are getting a little too hostile for me we need to remember that we are called to love our neighbor.
Samaritan, I hope our church does not engage in the self destructive fantasy you describe which destroys everyone in the collapse of the tunnel. 
Sarah Hey, Christians should be charitable and should not enjoy irritating others.
My version may not be as entertaining as Samaritans but here it is:
Steve’s wife, realizing that she and her family may be facing their last moments, stops talking to the unreasonable Steve, and turns her attention to her Faith in God.  She prays for her family and asks for God’s help.
Steve, once he is deprived of the attention of the adversary he so needs, is then thrown to his own resources and has to face the situation he has created. I pray he will hear the Holy Spirit’s call to love his family enough to slow down the car and end the joy ride.

[46] Posted by Betty See on 07-30-2006 at 10:35 PM • top

It’s interesting that so few have taken Lynn’s original choice as I described it and wrestled with that decision. Hers is precisely the sort of decision we all face. There is no beating Steve up or taking the keys from the ignition. Those are indeed fantasies. Perhaps this is a microcosm of a more widespread orthodox imability to deal with the current state of affairs?

[47] Posted by Matt Kennedy on 07-31-2006 at 02:17 AM • top

Matt, I think we aren’t dealing with the original choice maybe because her original choice is one we can relate to or have also made ourselves.

Lynn’s original choice was to trust her husband and let him have his short drive.

After all, he had taken time to buckle the kids in and for all intents and purposes, he looked and acted sane at that moment.

[48] Posted by Brooks Kelley on 07-31-2006 at 05:03 AM • top

The Samaritian: you say “If you want to be faithful, look for the fruits of the spirit.”

The Scripture that says what they are is “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law” (Gal. 5:22,23).

Wise words. I do thank you for reminding us of those fruits.

But, just a few lines before that, Paul says “I say then: Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh.” (Gal. 5:16).

Is that a LOG in your eye? I ask because sexuality is not a fruit of the Spirit. Nor is sin.

I have no objection to a sinner being next to me in church because I am one too. You are right to say that I am a sinner.

However, I do object to an unrepentant sinner leading me in church who does not clearly show the fruits you cite.

Any minister or bishop who does not exercise all the fruits is not fit for command or ministry. And self-control, not seeking the lusts of the flesh, is a crucial part of those gifts.

It seems to me that Bishop Robinson thinks that his self-control is demonstrated by staying with one partner. But, he divorced his wife to be with him. Moreover, his raison d’etre to be in ministry is to show seeking after the pleasures of flesh is o.k. before one seeks after God. That is wrong and prideful.

Further, we orthodox are demanding “faithfulness” which also is a fruit of the Spirit. It means faithfulness first to God, His word, and the Apostolic teaching which has been handed down for nearly 2000 years. Then to our neighbors as ourselves. TEC has reversed these principles which is nothing short of anarchy.

We orthodox are also looking for “peace” as a fruit. It seems to me that the author of the peace that passes understanding would give that peace to his ministers and bishops in greater abundance than His sheep. TEC is sowing the seeds of confusion when they are faithless and lack self-control. And God is not the author of confusion. So, we who are orthodox, have to seek God’s elsewhere.

How we do it is why Matt+ is walking us through this story so we can discern better the path God wants us to take to walk faithfully with Him as we walk our separate ways. Matt+ has indeed been a good shepherd showing the fruits of the spirit.

[49] Posted by Brooks Kelley on 07-31-2006 at 05:52 AM • top

Re: “Sarah Hey, Christians should be charitable and should not enjoy irritating others.”

I disagree with you about the purposes of irritation. 

Sometimes it is indeed charitable to engage in activity that irritates another person.  Sometimes even God does that.  An irritation often functions as a “bur under the saddle” for human beings.

I do believe that Matt’s piece is irritating to some.  And I do believe that is a good thing. 

Matt, re: fantasyland and reasserters . . .

. . . “You’re a cruel man - but fair.”  ; > )

[50] Posted by Sarah on 07-31-2006 at 06:44 AM • top

Betty See - Often an irritant is the very thing we need to open our eyes and actually see.  It is like the pain Sarah describes in her most recent article.  And remember, it is an irritant in the oyster that creates a beautiful pearl.

Matt - I have to agree with Brooks on the original decision.  She just thought they were going along for a brief ride.  Okay, it was slightly outside the norm and probably breaking the rules a little for the kids as far as bedtime but “just a little.”  (Guess that really goes to show what happens when we step just a little outside God’s will for our lives!)  This was a premeditated act on Steve’s part.  Of course, had he revealed his entire plan up front, she and the kids would never had gone with him or at worst they would have been in the next cab.  Bringing Lynn along to me tells me that (1) he needed her signature on the loan (2) he felt he could “keep the peace” by pacifying her and allowing her to think she was part of the decision making process (3) he is so focused on his own wants and feelings that he cannot see – worse still - does not care -  the danger he has placed his family.  Lynn on the other hand by compromising with Steve (ah Balaam knew a thing or two about compromise) is now fully aware that she has placed her entire family in mortal danger.  She makes the same mistake most of us make in thinking that more dialogue will solve the problem and make it right.  They both can’t have their way here.  Either Steve pulls over and let’s them out and continues on his way or Lynn will have to wait for further assistance from the outside while she tries to devise some plan to take the children with her when she exists the car.  If not, she will have no choice but to exit and hope that by doing so she will delay Steve enough so that (1) he realizes how deadly his actions are (won’t happen by the way) (2) the law has anticipated his actions and is ahead of him ready to step in and sweep the little ones to safety at the first chance.  I can only imagine that Lynn has been praying with all her might since Steve started the car.  Of course, I’m sure by this time Lynn has realized that they failed to pray and wait for God’s answer concerning the decision to get the car in the first place!  Oh that way of Balaam is a treacherous slope!

[51] Posted by JackieB on 07-31-2006 at 08:44 AM • top

Sarah Hey,
This story has nothing in it that could possibly be could be considered a source of irritation, but those who are in NEED of obsessing over perceived irritations and hurts seek out irritations in order to distract themselves, and others, from the truth while they merrily disregard Authority and speed down the highway to the destruction of their family. I am not going to play into their hands by providing the irritations they so desire.

[52] Posted by Betty See on 07-31-2006 at 07:53 PM • top

Regarding irritation, depends what the irritation is and how it is being used ...

As it says in Proverbs, “As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another.” ( Proverbs 27:17 )

I think this story is sharpening our tools for the upcoming battles. That is bound to produce some irritation, or at least razor burn. wink

[53] Posted by Brooks Kelley on 07-31-2006 at 08:52 PM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.