Welcome to Stand Firm!

John Leo: Orwell Lives

Wednesday, February 6, 2008 • 12:18 pm


From City Journal:

Pressure is increasing on churches and believers to accept dominant secular norms. The pressure includes laws requiring Catholic institutions to provide medical plans offering “morning after” pills to female employees, attempts to force religious hospitals to approve abortions and abortion training, and campus efforts to force Christian evangelical groups to allow sexually active gays into leadership positions.

Jean Bethke Elshtain, a professor of social and political ethics at the University of Chicago Divinity School, calls this establishment pressure “liberal monism.” She means that those who talk the most about diversity and pluralism are often the most willing to mandate that all private and religious institutions conform to one ideological framework. Liberals, she says, are eradicating the differences needed to make tolerance a viable practice. In order to enhance diversity, it is necessary to suppress it.

Do read this all.


9 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

Freedom of religion was one of the primary motivations our nation was founded.  As this freedom is eroded, so will our nation be diminished.

[1] Posted by Jill Woodliff on 02-06-2008 at 12:32 PM • top

I believe that Francis Schaeffer’s definition of the humanist position from the 70’s rings especially true: ‘an exclusivist,closed system which shuts out all contending viewpoints-especially if those views teach anything other than relative values and standards.‘p.112 The Christian Manifesto
Also,Allan Bloom’s words in his introduction of The Closing Of The American Mind seem appropriate here:‘unified only in their relativism and in their allegiance to equality’ and ‘The danger they have been taught to fear from absolutism is not error but intolerance.’ p.25

[2] Posted by paddy on 02-06-2008 at 01:42 PM • top

Orwell reigns in ECUSA/TEC, for sure, as in ‘we have the reins’ and ‘we reign in benign indignity unless our “gospel” is crossed and then we sue for diversity’s sake; amen.’

[3] Posted by dwstroudmd+ on 02-06-2008 at 09:10 PM • top

What happens when religious freedom—religious tolerance—comes into conflict with those who worship sodomy above all else?  I think we know what happens…. http://www.PillarOfSalt.com

[4] Posted by Marty the Baptist on 02-06-2008 at 09:57 PM • top

“In order to enhance diversity, it is necessary to suppress it.”
reminds me greatly of this gem from Vietnam days:
“In order to save the village, we had to destroy it….”

[5] Posted by Nabber on 02-07-2008 at 08:28 AM • top

Funny how this liberal “monism” never seems to apply to Islam:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=512876&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

Rowan Williams, standing firm as a jellyfish!

[6] Posted by st. anonymous on 02-07-2008 at 08:56 AM • top

Liberals can tolerate anything except someone who disagrees with their agenda. So the end of all this liberal “tolerance” will be a conformity to the liberal view point. So much for diversity!

[7] Posted by Allen Lewis on 02-07-2008 at 02:12 PM • top

Oh, I forgot to point out that this is evil in action. Sorry about that. This is just too sad a subject for me and causes me to post prematurely.

[8] Posted by Allen Lewis on 02-07-2008 at 02:13 PM • top

Freedom of religion was one of the primary motivations our nation was founded.  As this freedom is eroded, so will our nation be diminished.

Er, well, if you are going to bring up that, it is only fair to mention that for most immigrants to the English colonies which would become the US, for whome “freedom of religion” was the primary motivation, it was very specifically freedom FROM Anglicanism that they wanted.

Just

[9] Posted by AndrewA on 02-07-2008 at 09:09 PM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.