"Be on your guard. Stand firm in the faith. Be brave. Be strong.
Be loving in everything you do." - I Corinthians 16:13-14
 

All is Well™ in Alabama

Stand Firm member Ted Sluis of the Diocese of Alabama sends along this post, reflecting on a turbulent summer in his diocese. So far, three parishes have voted to join the Anglican Communion Network, in defiance of Bishop Henry Parsley's warnings not to.



If you're an Episcopalian in the Diocese of Alabama, why join an organization like Stand Firm? After all, in Alabama we have a bishop who has said he is "orthodox", who voted against the false teachings of GC 2003, and has stated several times that "the teachings of this diocese have not changed". Besides, he has pointed out that "New Hampshire is a long way from Alabama".

Maybe it’s time the teachings of the diocese on sexuality did change. Consider the following:

In 1988 ECUSA developed a curriculum entitled "Sexuality: A Divine Gift", which included a recommendation that teenagers view a sexually explicit film (one that was listed in a catalog of pornography films) and review lesbian/gay literature. Some in leadership positions even in "conservative" parishes in this diocese were proponents of this curriculum. Who would have taught them that this type of thing would be acceptable to teach to our children? Contrast this with the common refrain of Song of Solomon (2:7, 3:5, 8:4).

In 1999, Bishop Parsley was the Eucharist celebrant at Integrity's Southeast regional convention held in Birmingham, AL. This is very different from his being the celebrant at a parish that might be sympathetic to Integrity's goals or happen to have a lot of members that are also members of Integrity. In these latter settings he is required to minister to all people in his diocese. Being the celebrant at such an event makes him a direct participant in supporting their efforts to "claim the blessing".

Since 2000 Integrity of Alabama has used Camp McDowell's facilities for their annual retreats. In 2000, Dr. Louie Crew was the retreat leader. In 2004 the Rev. Ed Bacon was the keynote speaker. Rev. Bacon is one of the chief proponents of Integrity's "Claim the Blessing" movement. Don't believe this is in our own diocese? Check out the "Past Events" link on Integrity of Alabama's web site. Bp. Parsley says he can't control who uses what facilities in the whole diocese. Really? He can if he thinks it's important enough. For example, in April 2004 he initially would not allow the Rev. Dr. Ephraim Radner to speak at Ascension in Montgomery in order to educate parishioners on the Network. He allowed it only after Dr. Radner agreed to share the platform with him. Contrast this with Louie Crew participating prominently in the Jonathan Daniels Pilgrimage in Lowndesboro, AL in August 2004 and in Crew’s preaching at Grace Episcopal in Birmingham the Sunday of the pilgrimage. Did Crew have to get the approval of Bishop Parsley before that sermon? Did he have to deliver this sermon in an Episcopal church in the diocese of Alabama only under the condition that he would share the pulpit with Bishop Parsley?

Still trust Bishop Parsley and the Episcopal Diocese of Alabama to give you shelter? From where I’m standing, New Hampshire doesn’t look all that far away.
At General Convention 2000, Bishop Parsley voted for resolution D039, which acknowledged "that while the issues of human sexuality are not yet resolved, there are currently couples in the Body of Christ and in this Church who are living in marriage and others living in life-long committed relationships". The resolution resolved that the church "expects such relationships to be characterized by fidelity, monogamy, mutual affection and respect, careful, honest communication, and the holy love which enables those in such relationships to see in each other the image of God". Happily it did end in acknowledging the Church's teaching on the sanctity of marriage. But the ambiguous wording of the resolution continued the drift toward acceptance of same-sex marriage. And why do we need to formally acknowledge any sin that we all know is going on? What is so different about this one other than some that are victims of it have an agenda to force others to accept it as something other than what it is?

In October 2003, Bp. Parsley stated that he voted for failed GC 2003 resolution B001 upholding the authority of Scripture and historical documents because "he didn't want it used as a sword against him". He made no mention that it was because he really does still believe those things.

Again in October 2003, at the diocesan convocation held at Christ the Redeemer in Montgomery, AL, Bishop Parsley made the following comment: "The question is...If, and it's a big if, we are learning that homosexuality is the natural state of some, is there then a moral way for them to live their life other than enforced celibacy?" Note the similarity between this question and this quote from p.21 of The Rev. George Woodliff's essay "Rediscovering Christian Orthodoxy in Episcopal Anglicanism," [749kb PDF] referring to a "gay gene" article in Time magazine: "this article sets forth the basic revisionist argument - if...then. If science has proven that homosexuality is genetically determined, then we are faced with "new learning" unknown to the writers of the Bible, and it would, therefore, be unjust for the Church to withhold the blessing of committed same sex unions."
Relying on [Bishop Parsley] to resist this tidal wave, especially given the ambiguity exhibited by his actions and statements, is naive at best.

In February 2004, Bp. Parsley stated that while he could not see how scripture and tradition can support the decisions of General Convention 2003, he did say "reason leaves questions". He based this on so-called "scientific" studies touted by National Public Radio, The Wall Street Journal, and Time magazine that purport to have discovered a "gay gene". One can read the details in the Woodliff paper, but the primary studies conducted in 1991 by Michael Bailey and Richard Pillard and in 1993 by Dean Hamer have been convincingly debunked. (The media has not reported Hamer's own comments about finding no gay gene with the same zeal they have reported the studies themselves.) Yet Bishop Parsley entertains questions that "reason" introduces, based on having read these studies or the media's reporting of them. This says one of two things. Either he takes the time to read only the things that support a position he already believes in his heart, or he has read the material debunking the questions reason asks and he has dismissed it. Either way, he has made his position clear.

Again in February 2004, Bishop Parsley helped some of the less enlightened of us understand that "there are those who believe that the authors of the Bible did not anticipate the situation we find ourselves in today". In that helpful explanation he talked about various forms of idolatry, noting that worship of the Bible is a form of idolatry. Indeed. While we don’t worship the Bible, we do worship its Author. (For a hint as to who this might be, see 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and 2 Peter 1:20-21.) If looking for an example of idolatry, it might have been more appropriate to cite the type of thinking that believes Almighty God did not anticipate this situation when he directed his servants to write the words we find in the Bible, or that there is even one person that he does not understand intimately (Matthew 10:30, Luke 12:7). If you’re worshiping a god that can’t know the future or the people he created, you’re worshiping an idol!

Once again in February 2004, Bp. Parsley, while comparing the question of the ordination of women to the question of legitimate expressions of human sexuality, recalled the days when the ordination of women was the big issue. He remembered how resisting it "would have been like resisting a tidal wave". Consider all the steps ECUSA has taken since GC 2003 to bless same-sex unions or marriages or whatever, plus their express authorization for the development of rites for same-sex unions of some sort (e.g. diocese of NC). Does the wave of activity we see look something like the tidal wave he described? Relying on him to resist this tidal wave, especially given the ambiguity exhibited by his actions and statements, is naive at best. (The details of some of that activity are: Washington, D.C. (John Clinton Bradley and Rev. Michael Hopkins performed by Bishop Chane); California (Retired Episcopal Bishop Otis Charles and Felipe Sanchez Paris); Colorado (Rev. Bonnie Spencer and Catherine Anderson, widow of a Colorado Episcopal priest); Dioceses of Utah, Vermont, Nevada and North Carolina have sanctioned same-sex blessings and a church in Indianapolis is seriously considering it.

One more time in February 2004, at the Alabama Diocesan Convention in Montgomery, the keynote speaker was none other than the Rt. Rev. Michael B. Curry, of the Diocese of North Carolina. Yep, the same Bishop Curry that is actively working on a rite to bless same-sex unions.

For the 2004-2005 Sunday school year, the Church of the Nativity in Huntsville, AL has some interesting offerings that go beyond teaching on sexuality. For example, you can "explore mystical ideas and practices from Jewish, Islamic, Buddhist, Hindu, Native American and other traditions and explore how we as Christians can profit from an increased awareness of and familiarity with the shared experience of mystics throughout human history". Or you can attend a Christian Social Action class, the principle resources of which are "the theology of Marcus Borg, the Rev. William Sloan Coffin, Bishop John Spong, Bishop John Robinson and the New Testament:. (Glad they decided to throw the New Testament in there.) I have heard a speaker in "conservative" church who is a former Mormon speak about Mormonism, but it was under the title "Saved from Mormonism". Do you detect even a hint of that sort of presentation when you read the outline of these adult education classes in our own diocese?

And finally, August 2004, less than two weeks ago: Check out this paper (reproduced below) from the Rev. Louie Skipper. When answering the question "what are we blessing when we bless a same-sex relationship", he refers to the Claiming the Blessing movement and says "we are blessing the persons in relationships with one another and the world in which they live. We are blessing the ongoing promise of fidelity and mutuality. We are neither blessing 'orientation' or 'lifestyle,' nor blessing particular sexual behaviors. 'Orientation' and 'lifestyle' are theoretical constructs that cannot possibly be descriptive of any couple's commitment to one another. And every couple works out their own sexual behavior that sustains and enhances their commitment."

So he’s in favor of blessing same-sex unions. And who is Rev. Skipper? At the time his paper was published (May 2003), he was a priest at St. Stephen’s in Birmingham. Now he holds the college campus chaplain position in Montgomery. So he’s on our college campuses representing the Episcopal Diocese of Alabama and counseling our young men and women.

Still trust Bishop Parsley and the Episcopal Diocese of Alabama to give you shelter? From where I’m standing, New Hampshire doesn’t look all that far away.

"Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but our trust is in the name of the Lord our God." Psalm 20:7

- Ted Sluis

(You can join Stand Firm by clicking here)

ONE BEGINNING TO A CONVERSATION ON HUMAN SEXUALITY The Rev. Louie Skipper

I think we are all clear about what we are here to do. But it seems important to declare who we are here to be. We are here to be the Church this morning, to speak and listen in love asking for the guidance of the Spirit and to make known Christ in our midst. As followers of Jesus it is important that none of us take ourselves too seriously. This is not about Dean Turner, this is not about Michael Wyckoff, and this certainly is not about Louie Skipper. It is also important that we do not take these papers too seriously. They are not meant to be exhaustive but rather to serve as a beginning to conversation. If they are useful at your tables to generate discussion, they have served their intent. If not, feel free to discard them entirely. Some of the best poems I know were written in the margins of papers that took themselves too seriously. It is my full intention to sit among you when I am through here and remain quiet for the rest of the day.

I would like to tell you something of my own discovery of Jesus Christ and try to speculate about human sexuality. When I was led to the Episcopal Church nearly thirty years ago, I was challenged to get beyond the literal "black and white" words of scripture so that I might form a more vital relationship with the Living Word. I learned that the Episcopal Church had, at the core of its tradition, a powerful optimism, a passion for love amid cries for justice and truth. Through the Holy Spirit calling us into communion, reason was the gift God had given us to find Christ within others, within ourselves.

I will always be indebted to the Rev. Jim Woodson and Canterbury Chapel for bringing me so much closer to the love of God than I had imagined possible. Suddenly there was room for the entirety of my being, including my mind and imagination. There before us then, and now, was and is Jesus' great commandment: love one another.

So where does a conversation regarding human sexuality begin? Beginning with scripture is problematic for me. I understand the committed and faithful Christian homosexual relationship to be a sacred expression of love. I realize this is not an assumption upon which we all agree, but those who do respect such a relationship will discover no mention of it in either the Hebrew or New Testament. Scripture is silent on this kind of sexual relationship simply because it holds no concept of it. I do. There are wonderful people in this room and in every one of our churches in such relationships.

Secondly, if it is true, and I believe it is, that the Episcopal Church does have an abiding passion for love amid cries for justice and truth, a passion often tempered by time, then tradition itself would have us ask, what justice is there in describing another person in any way other than in the fullness of his or her own humanity?

Thirdly, within our conversation today, where is Jesus Christ?
As I look back to the selective scriptural literalism that was so much of my upbringing in the 1950s in Alabama, I realize much that was taught to me about God was really about the culture of fear, and its subsequent prejudices that thrived around us. Pathology preceded theology. The God I heard about so loudly and for so long, filled with His threats and portents of doom, was an expression of fear in the face of change by an anxious heart.

Far more zealous over hell and its probabilities than in anything heavenly or loving, the God I was taught to believe in was a sociopathic overlord who bullied people for generations and who relished condemnation. Had all sense of loving-kindness been ripped from the belly of the Bible, had all grace been evaporated, it would not have been missed. Again, pathology preceded theology.

So what can I say for a faithful, loving, and committed homosexual relationship with regard to scripture? I find nothing. Regarding homosexuality in general, I hear the familiar threats from my own childhood. Whenever a penalty for homosexual behavior is suggested in scripture, that penalty is death. If, as Galatians 5.3 suggests, should we follow the Law then we are to follow each instance of the Law, who among us, the Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court not-withstanding, would fail to find such a condemnation to be the product of an unstable, dangerous, contemporary mind? Few of us, thanks be to God, are willing to follow scripture so thoroughly or abuse it so rankly.

I offer this to you as a way of showing the difficulty that scripture presents, left to its own devices, for those who believe in Christian homosexual relationships.

Now on to my second question: What justice is there in describing another person in any way other than in the fullness of his or her own humanity? As I attempt to love God and my brother and sister as Jesus has loved me, it is urgent to never settle for less than embracing the full acknowledgment of another person. This seems obvious when speaking of followers of other faiths, of racial identity, of employment status, of social standing, or health. The question before us is why should sexual identity be the means by which we describe anyone?

I believe that I am called through my Baptismal Covenant to my neighbor, as opposed to labels that work to reduce and dehumanize this person. I don't mean to hang out my laundry here, but because of my own childhood, I am a recovering homophobic and recovering racist. For me to cling to a perspective that denies the fullness of personhood can easily become for me a denial of Christ, first within my neighbor, and then, because of that, within myself. The denial of Christ is all that Evil Incarnate ever asks of any of us. This does not mean that I find such an ideal to be easy. It is far easier to enjoy my prejudices, and I will likely be trying to challenge my prejudices for the rest of my life, with God's help.

What possible good could come from denouncing a person for his or her sexual identity? I cannot imagine anyone having a choice when it comes to sexual identity. I say that based upon my understanding of myself. I am hopelessly heterosexual. I have always loved women. I was born that way and I do not see any chance of changing. In fact I will go so far as to say, I do not believe I could change my sexual identity no matter who had that expectation of me. I love my wife and fully expect to remain in a committed relationship with her all my life. So where is the justice in my expecting other people to either change their sexuality or not act upon it in a loving committed relationship?

Does it not seem more reasonable and more loving, more Christian, to expect from homosexual relationships the same ideals I expect from heterosexual relationships: love, fidelity, and mutual respect? Does it not seem more reasonable and more loving, more Christian, to offer the same forgiveness for the human failures of love through grace to homosexual and heterosexual alike?

***

In our conversation today, where is Jesus Christ? He is right here, and, as we have found him in Eucharist I pray that we go on to find him today in the care that we demonstrate for one another, regardless of opinion on this issue. I challenge all of us to protect everyone from verbal abuse, especially those with whom any one of us might disagree.

What I found those many years ago in Canterbury Chapel was nothing short of a new life. Because of Jesus, I was blessed as a child of God through grace. Suddenly I saw all things streaming from Christ's creative love, anything and everything from the stars at night burning into the shapes and figures we make them out to be, the way the ocean seemed to catch its breath as though it were about to sing through its emerald waters, the possibilities of hope, wholeness, and liberation ever present throughout eternal and undeniable love.
Beyond my fear of what I believe to be unlike myself, beyond that which I do not understand, beyond my own pathology, there is Jesus, the living Light of the World. There is Jesus, this mysterious son of Mary and Son of God who constantly takes me beyond the limits of my own acceptance and comprehension, even through death itself. There is Jesus, not words but Living Word, the One who, before time began, set love as the bedrock and cornerstone of the universe.

There is Jesus, telling me to remember that above all else He will be true. There is this holy table that is itself a proclamation that we must be in communion with one another if we are to live into this new possibility offered us by the resurrection. This is a possibility based upon a radical assumption, that I must struggle to love others, including those I believe to be unlike myself, as children of God in their own singular wholeness.

To accept my own salvation, I must see others as they are and love them as myself, just as I must see Christ as he is. There is this holy table where I pledge to bring the full force of my own humanity into a living proclamation of love. There is this holy table telling me to come home, that all is forgiven, challenging me before the God who does not simply ask that I choose him but who would have me remember that he first chose me.

***

What does it mean to be fully included?

There is a document available to you here, Claiming the Blessing, that speaks to this question. I will simply attempt to offer a quick summary. Claiming the Blessing is a partnership of organizations that " has committed itself to obtaining approval at the 2003 General Convention, of a liturgical rite of blessing, celebrating the holy love in faithful relationships between couples for whom marriage is not available, enabling couples in these relationships to see in each other the image of God."

If such a rite were to pass it would be included within The Book of Occasional Services. It also important to note that it is not the expectation of those seeking this rite that it would be used throughout the Church.

"Liberals and conservatives, progressives and traditionalists, must learn to live together in this Church or there will be no Church in which for us to live. But learning to live together must mean 'mutual deference' not moratoriums or some insistence that we all convert to being 'moderates'."

(Their) "second message to the church at large is that (they) are not going anywhere. Gay and lesbian Christians make up a significant portion of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America. (They) will continue to do so after General Convention 2003 no matter what happens. (They) will not attempt to get (their) way by threatening to leave. (They) ask those on all sides of this debate to make this commitment as well." (Claiming the Blessing)

***

Just what are we blessing when we bless a same-sex relationship?

"We are blessing the persons in relationships with one another and the world in which they live. We are blessing the ongoing promise of fidelity and mutuality. We are neither blessing 'orientation' or 'lifestyle,' nor blessing particular sexual behaviors. 'Orientation' and 'lifestyle' are theoretical constructs that cannot possibly be descriptive of any couple's commitment to one another. And every couple works out their own sexual behavior that sustains and enhances their commitment. We don't prescribe that behavior, whether the couple is heterosexual or homosexual, except to say it must be within the context of mutuality and fidelity." (Claiming the Blessing)

***

A hope.

If you have not seen Spike Lee's documentary on the bombing of the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church here in Birmingham, I recommend it. Each time I watch the aged faces of the parents and sisters of those little girls who will always be as they are in our minds, tragically young and beautiful, I come away amazed at the depth of possibility that the Holy Spirit works through us. The sorrow is there because we never get over our grief, rather we become that which our grief makes us. Then a choice is given us by our faith: Will we allow ourselves to become closed, bitter, and dry, unable to keep the covenant and claim the blessing? Like those relatives of random victims, who are the living stones and precious salt of the earth, will we become loving, wise, spiritually powerful, and therefore free, truly free? The choice is ours.

This morning we put Eucharist before all of this, this strange little meal we shared, the Word of God so oddly brought into being and into the claim that we belong to one another to such a degree, that without being in communion, we are captive to a darkness the horror of which we are hardly able to imagine. Look at our silly, hurting, angry world and tell me anywhere else we might go to find a proclamation so simple, so foolish, so glorious.

My family, including my wife Susan and our teenaged children Stephen and Jenna, were the first heterosexual, clerical family to join Integrity-Alabama. No other response made sense when the Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court made an open appeal to violence against lesbian women and gay men. No other response made sense when we thought through the values we prayed our children might have in the fallen world that often seems so determined to do itself in. To those members of Integrity who are here, thank you for welcoming us as you have. I hope other families will consider joining us.

In an old book, Matthew Fox remembers a question once put to Albert Einstein, "What is the most important question you can ask in life?" Einstein answered, "Is the universe a friendly place or not?" Few human beings in our culture live long without knowing, in smaller or greater ways, what it is like to be labeled according to the color of one's skin, a diagnosis of breast cancer, the loss of a job, divorce, addiction... The easiest way to take any of us in is to find a single characteristic and cling to it for all it is worth. Sadly, we live in a culture of violence in which one's sexual identity is the single filter through which Christians are victimized. To not bless same sex unions is, I fear, to curse homosexuals in a dangerous world.

Because we are the church, there is Jesus telling us across 2,000 years of suffering that all is well, for we are his friends. We simply have to lose our lives, our fear and prejudices, to live, that is to thrive in love. To claim the blessing we have to be a blessing.

The Episcopal Church is on the verge of a powerful convergence and demonstration of God's might and love, at least I pray we are. I pray there will be the blessing of a new union between God and God's people in this Church, if not immediately in this diocese. Jesus' words concerning love are urgent if we are not to lose the Church as we know it.

It is extraordinarily important for those who seek the blessing of same sex unions to bear witness to those who are against full inclusion. To do so, those who seek to be blessed must live into the honest conviction and pain of those whose faith depends upon a different understanding of scripture, sexuality, and even salvation. The greatest witness of those who seek to be blessed is to live into your Baptismal Covenant, to seek and serve Christ in all persons, loving your neighbor as yourself.

This is necessary service if those who seek the blessing of same sex unions are to continue to journey toward the fullness of their own humanity, to claim their own salvation as well as the blessing, to practice the discipline required to not become lost in hatred, to continually remain open to God's grace. You have to be a blessing to claim the blessing.

Never forget the Eucharist issues its singular invitation to return to where all of us deeply belong together, to come home to God and to one another. And because, under the best of circumstances, it is a long way from Minneapolis to Birmingham, to lift up your hearts. I pray that you will.

- The Rev. Louie Skipper/St. Stephen's, Birmingham

Posted by Greg Griffith at September 7, 2004 06:27 PM (GMT -6:00)
Comments