"Be on your guard. Stand firm in the faith. Be brave. Be strong.
Be loving in everything you do." - I Corinthians 16:13-14
 

Covenant and Communion*

The Windsor Report of the Lambeth Commission is proposing that the churches of the Anglican Communion enter into a “covenant” with one another, requiring that each church place the interests of the communion ahead of their own. As members of the Body of Christ, we already share in communion with Christ and with one another.

COVENANT AND COMMUNION
Entering into covenant with our brothers and sisters in the Anglican Communion is part of what it means to be in communion with them. Covenant is part of our Biblical history and story. So, what is the meaning of covenant? What is the biblical history and nature of covenant?
The word covenant is used close to 300 times in Scripture. The cutting “carat,” of a covenant, “beriyith,” has its roots in a time even before the foundation of the world. An eternal covenant for the redemption of the world existed even before the foundation of the world. “For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight....In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of God’s grace that he lavished on us with all wisdom and understanding. And he made known to us the mystery of his will according to his good pleasure which he purposed in Christ, to be put into effect when the times will have reached their fulfillment—to bring all things in heaven and on earth together under one head, even Christ.” Eph. 1:4, 7-10. “For you know that it was not with perishable things such as silver or gold that you were redeemed from the empty way of life handed down to you from your forefathers, but with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or defect. He was chosen before the creation of the world, but was revealed in these last times for your sake.” 1 Pet. 1:18-20. “All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast—all whose names have not been written in the book of life belonging to the Lamb that was slain from the creation of the world.” Rev. 1:8. “And yet his work has been finished since the creation of the world.” Heb. 4:3b. See also Matt. 13:34-35.
The cutting of a covenant has traditionally been a very serious undertaking. One who broke covenant with a covenant partner was subject to being cut off from the community or communion of the faithful. We recall the initial covenant Abraham made with God. It required the taking of animals, and cutting them in half. God passed between them in the form of a flaming torch and smoking firepot. Gen. 15:17. Circumcision was the sign of the covenant between God and Abraham. “Any uncircumcised male, who has not been circumcised in the flesh, will be cut off from his people, he has broken my covenant.” Gen. 17:14. Carat or cut-off is the same Hebrew word used in the cutting or making of a covenant. Breach of the covenant led not only to one being “cut-off” from community, but it is written in Jeremiah that, “The men who have violated my covenant and have not fulfilled the terms of the covenant they made before me, I will treat like the calf they cut in two, and then walked between its pieces. The leaders of Judah and Jerusalem, the court officials, the priests and all the people of the land who walked between the pieces of the calf, I will hand over to their enemies who seek their lives.” Jer. 34:18-20.
In the covenant between Jacob and Laban, Laban called upon the Lord to “keep watch” as a witness between them even when they were apart to see that Jacob would not mistreat Laban’s daughters. Jonathan called upon the Lord to deal either with himself or with David, through David’s enemies, if either should break covenant with the other. 1 Sam. 20:13-17. Moses called upon heaven and earth as witnesses to the keeping of the covenant between the Israelites and God as they entered the Promised Land. “See I set before you today life and prosperity, death and destruction. For I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commands, decrees and laws; then you will live and increase, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land your are entering to possess....This day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses.” Deut. 30:15, 19.
Covenant making included a number of exchanges. Robes and belts were sometimes exchanged signifying the taking on of the identity, character or strength of the covenant partner. Weapons were exchanged signifying the taking on of the enemies of the covenant partner. 1 Sam. 18:3-4. Our safety and well-being is bound up in the safety and well-being of our covenant partner. Josh. 9-10:15.
Covenant making often involves a covenant meal. The seventy elders took part in a covenant meal with Moses. Ex. 24:7-11. Isaac and Abimelech shared a covenant meal. Gen. 26:28-30. Of course, The Last Supper is a covenant meal between Jesus and His disciples, a covenant meal in which Jesus has instructed us to partake in remembrance of Him as a sign of the New Covenant we have in Him. Matt. 26:26-28. As we do so, we renew our covenant, and remain in Him as He is in us. If we do not do so, we have no life in us. John 6:47-58.
In a blood covenant, which is what we have with Jesus Christ, there is shedding of blood and the drinking or partaking of the blood of the covenant partner, such that his DNA becomes part of our DNA. He dwells within us and we dwell in Him. The shedding of blood to cover human sin began with the killing of animals to clothe Adam and Eve in the Garden. A foreshadowing of the enmity between man and Satan began with the judgment upon the snake in Gen. 3:15: “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” Thereafter, when it appears to God that all the earth is full of corruption, a covenant is made with the one who is righteous, that is Noah, “But I will establish my covenant with you, and you will enter the ark—you and your sons and your wife and yours sons’ wives with you.” Gen. 6:18. God entered into covenants with Abraham and with Moses. The response of the people to Moses’ reading of the Book of the Covenant was that “We will do everything the Lord has said; we will obey.” Ex. 24:3. “Moses then took the blood, sprinkled it on the people and said, ‘This is the blood of the covenant that the Lord has made with you in accordance with all these words.’” Ex. 24:8.
In other words, the Israelites agreed to keep the law, but they could not do so. Therefore, the Lord promised a new covenant with the House of Israel, “It will not be like the covenant which I made with their forefathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt….This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time, declares the Lord. “I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people.” Jer. 31:31-33. The covenant God made with God’s people is an eternal covenant. Ps. 105:8-10.
The prophet Malachi refers to a special covenant which the Lord made with the tribe of Levi for the priesthood. “My covenant was with him, a covenant of life and peace…For the lips of a priest ought to preserve knowledge and from his mouth men should seek instruction—because he is the messenger of the Lord Almighty. But you have turned from the way and by your teaching have caused many to stumble; you have violated the covenant with Levi, says the Lord Almighty. So I have caused you to be despised and humiliated before all the people, because you have not followed my ways but have shown partiality in matters of the law.” Mal. 2:5-12.
Being in covenant with Jesus Christ is a matter of discipleship. And, moreover, discipleship is a matter of salvation. Just as living into our covenant role as a disciple is to assure our salvation, so also to neglect our covenant role as a disciple is to condemn ourselves to eternal destruction. Like the historic covenants of scripture, a covenant relationship with Jesus Christ is a relationship unto death. We commit to live our lives as one with our covenant partner. It is like the marriage relationship in that we are no longer two but one. Jesus reminds us that being His disciple, His follower, requires that one offer one’s complete self and hold back nothing in the covenant relationship. Jesus’ blood has been shed for the forgiveness of our sins, and we are to put Him before our fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, spouses, children, all of our possessions and even our own lives. Lk. 14:26, 33. If we refuse to give up all for Jesus Christ, not only are we not worthy of discipleship, but we will not enter the kingdom of heaven. Mt. 10:37-39; Mk. 8:34-38; 10:23; Lk.14:33. This is where discipleship becomes a matter of salvation.
What does covenant have to do with communion? Covenant and communion are closely connected. Covenant with Jesus Christ is part and parcel with our role as His disciples. We no longer live for ourselves, but for Christ who is in us. Covenant with Christ includes covenant with His body, the Church. Our communion with Christ extends to other parts of the body of Christ in communion with Him. “Have we not all one Father? Did not one God create us? Why do we profane the covenant of our fathers by breaking faith with one another?” Mal. 2:13.
Our ability to keep our covenant comes from the strength we are given by grace through faith in Jesus Christ. When we are weak, then Christ, our covenant partner, is strong. A major difference between the Old Covenant and the New Covenant is that we have the Spirit of Christ within us to enable us through the power of the Spirit to keep our covenant.
It would appear that what we are being asked to do as churches of the Anglican Communion is to formalize and reaffirm a relationship of communion and covenant that already exists in spiritual terms if we take seriously our covenant relationship with Jesus Christ, and the fact that we, as Christians are one body in Christ. To say that such a relationship already exists is not to say that such a covenant is unnecessary, because it is clear that we have different understandings of the meaning of our communion and our existing covenant.

*There is nothing original about the collection of these verses except perhaps the order in which they are presented, and their application to the Anglican Communion. Much of the content is credited to Kay Arthur and her Precept upon Precept, study of “Covenant,” (2002).

Posted by Sandra DePriest at October 19, 2004 09:59 AM (GMT -6:00)
Comments

I thank God that He called you to study covenant prior to the release of The Windsor Report, and I thank you for your obedience. It seems that the concept of eternity is implicit to the understanding the concept of covenant. We Americans are such a distracted people, we frequently lose sight of eternity.

# Posted by: Jill Woodliff at October 19, 2004 06:09 PM

Covenant is a very incarnational concept. Look at the corporeal words used in this brief description: body, member, head, blood, flesh, pieces, minds, hearts, mouth, lips, circumcision, lamb, calf, men, animals, complete self.
I'm no theologian, but I've a feeling the neo-gnostics aren't going to like the idea of covenant.

# Posted by: Jill Woodliff at October 19, 2004 07:52 PM

Covenant flies in the face of universalism as well--names not written in the book of life, cut off from community, cut in two, life and death, not enter kingdom of heaven.

# Posted by: Jill Woodliff at October 19, 2004 09:52 PM

Sorry I'm making so many comments, but I keep finding nuggets as I sift through the concept of covenant. If my husband were doing this, it would be far more cohesive. The tabernacle of Israel had one entrance, the front gate. There was no way to get from the front gate to the Holy of Holies without blood sacrifice. Jesus is our blood sacrifice. Through Him, we have access to the Father (Eph 2:18). Does the concept of covenant challenge open communion as well? I'm over my head here.

# Posted by: Jill Woodliff at October 19, 2004 11:18 PM

Just to tag Jill's comment on covenant and communion - some would say that the baptismal covenant, the public and sacramental acceptance of Christ, is inexticably bound to the sacramental witness and gift of the Eucharist; both being public proclamations of the Gospel. Therefore if one is going to partake of Christ's public sacrifice and gift for us in the Eucharist, what we call the "new covenant," then is there not a public sacrafice and gift incumbent upon us as well? I see the covenant of baptism and the new covenant of the Eucharist existing in a reciprocal relationship; it is very difficult for one to exist without the other. By partaking of the body and the blood, saying the great Amen together at the end of the Eucharistic Prayer, simply being present at the service, are we not affirming all those aspects of the faith presented at Baptism?

Cordially,

Alston Johnson

# Posted by: Alston Johnson at October 20, 2004 04:36 AM

Jill, Alston et al,

My thoughts run much along the same lines as Alstons. Through our Baptism and through our sharing in the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, we are already covenanted to one another and to Christ. We already exist in a covenant situation. That's principally why I object so strongly to breaking communion by schism. The bishops of the Global South claimed a break--way too extreme a move,imo, given the sacredness of covenant. What we need to work out in the coming weeks and months is how do we know when the covenant is truly broken? And then what do we do?

One hint might be here: When the Hebrews continued to break their side of the covenant ("I will be your God, and you shall be my people,") God in his steadfast amazing love sent Jesus Christ as a "new covenant" that couldn't be broken, except one deny Christ and not have faith and trust in his salvation.

# Posted by: Barbara+ at October 20, 2004 01:07 PM

Alston, Barbara, et al, doesn't the linkage of baptism and Eucharist also challenge the concept of open communion?

# Posted by: Jill Woodliff at October 20, 2004 02:24 PM

Jill,

I definately challenges the idea of "open communion," where the unbaptised are welcome to receive given they profess faith in Christ and the sanctity of the Eucharist. I think "open communion," which refers to sharing our communion with other baptised members of the Christian faith isn't so clear.

# Posted by: Barbara+ at October 20, 2004 02:39 PM

Dear Barbara, Alston, Jill, I would say that we are inextricably bound to each other through the very beginning and act of creation. No matter how far apart the people of earth have pulled. That binding becomes more enfleshed when we accept being in covenant (OT) with God as creator, and then again even more with Jesus Christ, incarnated and redeemer. The sharing of the Eucharist is a faithful witness (hopefully) to our understanding of being in communion and in covenant. I can refuse to be in covenant and communion, I'm not sure I can break it. And yet, a schism has opened between us as peoples.

I'm still torn about "open communion." I understand all the good reasoning behind understanding and being baptized to receive communion. What I struggle with is that Jesus never required folks to do the ceremony before sitting down and eating with him. He invited them in - let them have the opportunity to know him a little first. Do I want to see people baptized and in an authentic relationship with a living, risen Savior - certainly - I just continue to struggle with the "exclusive" message it gives people to say you cannot receive at the table of Christ without first doing > > > >. thanks for all your thoughts on these things. Mary

# Posted by: Mary Berry at October 25, 2004 04:12 PM

Mary,

In part you write, "I'm still torn about "open communion." I understand all the good reasoning behind understanding and being baptized to receive communion. What I struggle with is that Jesus never required folks to do the ceremony before sitting down and eating with him. He invited them in - let them have the opportunity to know him a little first. Do I want to see people baptized and in an authentic relationship with a living, risen Savior - certainly - I just continue to struggle with the "exclusive" message it gives people to say you cannot receive at the table of Christ without first doing."

Mary, I agree wholeheartedly. I realize that by totally opening communion, we are in a sense risking diluting the Communion, yet at the same time, it seems so exclusionary--something Jesus notably didn't do. So like so many, I keep a totally open communion--no one is asked for their baptismal "credentials." What I keep finding are people who've been hurt by the Church in some ways--who come to feel welcome and healing again to an "open" and "liberal" communion table. It's so often when people tell me they don't believe in God, or in "institutionalized religion" by the grace of God I can agree with them, I don't believe in the "god" they describe either--a wrathful, vengeful exclusionary god waiting for good people to slip up so he can smash them for an infraction of the "rules," and a church which promotes the same. But theologically, of course, there's always more than that and we have a responsibility to teach and guide people into the forms of the faith.

I hope you will keep posting as your time allows.

# Posted by: Barbara at October 25, 2004 07:57 PM